Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Population issues and social indicators of well-being

  • Published:
Population and Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Relating demographers' measures of various population characteristics (size, growth/decline, density, age/sex structures, migration, et cetera) to measures of well-being recently developed within the social indicators movement promises to provide new knowledge about the linkage of population and well-being that can enhance decision making about important population issues.

A conceptual schema is presented that suggests specific relationships to examine at various levels of aggregation, that helps to classify research already done in this area, and that helps to identify "holes" in the knowledge base.

Some special methodological features of research in this area suggest considerable time and care will be required to produce dependable new knowledge. These include: (a) the inherent multilevel nature of the relationships (involving properties of individuals and collectivities); (b) the slow rate at which population characteristics change; (c) the absence of much good well-being data from the past; and (d) the limited nature of the collectivities for which population data are available.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andrews, F. M. Social indicators of perceived life quality.Social Indicators Research 1974,1 279–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, F.M. Subjective social indicators, objective social indicators, and social accounting systems. In: Juster, F.T. and Land, K. C. (eds.),Social accounting systems: Essays on the state of the art. Academic Press, New York, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, F. M. and McKennell, A. C. Measures of self-reported well-being: Their affective, cognitive, and other components.Social Indicators Research 1980,8 127–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, F. M., and Withey, S. B. Developing measures of perceived life quality: Results from several national surveys.Social Indicators Research 1974,1 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, F. M. and Withey, S.B.Social indicators of well-being: Americans' perceptions of life quality. New York: Plenum, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, F. et al.The value of children: A cross-national study. Honolulu: East-West Population Institute, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, T., Blishen, B., and Murray, M. Physical status and perceived health quality. Working papers on the quality of life in Canada. Downsview, Ontario: York University, Institute for Behavioural Research, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bahr, H.M., Chadwick, B.A., and Thomas, D. (eds.).Population, resources, and the future: Non-Malthusian perspectives. Provo, Ut.: Brigham Young University Press, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldassare, M.Residential crowding in urban America. Berkeley, Ca.: University of California Press, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldassare, M. The effects of household density on subgroups.American Sociological Review 1981,46 110–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baum, A. and Epstein, Y. M. (eds.).Human response to crowding. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booth, A. and Edwards, J. N. Crowding and family relations.American Sociological Review 1976,41 308–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, L.R.The 29th day: Accommodating human needs and numbers to earth's resources. New York: Worldwatch Institute, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell, J.C. Mass education as a determinant of the timing of fertility decline.Population and development review 1980,6 225–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, A.A. (ed.).Social, economic, and health aspects of low fertility Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, A., Converse, P.E., and Rodgers, W.L.The quality of American life: Perceptions, evaluations, and satisfactions. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easterlin, R. A. Relative economic status and the American fertility swing. In: Sheldon, E. B. (ed.),Social structure, family life styles, and economic behavior. Philadelphia: Lippincott, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easterlin, R. A.Birth and fortune. New York: Basic Books, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Espenshade, T.J. Estimating the costs of children and some results from urban United States.Social Indicators Research 1974,1(3), 359–381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Espenshade, T. J. The value and cost of children.Population bulletin 1977,32(1), 1–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, G. W. Behavioral and psychological consequences of crowding in humans.Journal of applied social psychology 1979,9(1), 27–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freedman, J.Crowding and behavior: The psychology of high density living. San Francisco: Freeman, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilmartin, K. J., Rossi, R. J., Lutomski, L. S., and Reed, D. F. B.Social indicators: An annotated bibliography of current literature. New York: Garland, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glassman, M. B., and Ross, J. A. Two determinants of fertility decline: A test of competing models.Studies in family planning 1978,9(7), 193–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gove, W. R., Hughes, M., and Galle, O.R. Overcrowding in the home: An empirical investigation of its possible pathological consequences.American Sociological Review 1979,44 59–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurkaynak. M. R., and Lecompte, W. A (eds.)Human consequences of crowding. New York: Plenum, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, L.W. The value of children to parents and the decrease in family size.Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 1975,119 430–438.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede G. Motivation, leadership, and organization: Do American theories apply abroad?Organizational dynamics, 1980 (Summer), 42–63.

  • Holm, C. F. Social security and fertility: An international perspective.Demography 1975,12(4), 629–644. (Response: Kelly, W. R. et al.Demography, 1976,13(4), 581–586. Reply: Holm, C. F.Demography, 1976,13(4), 587–589.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, G.Population growth and educational planning in developing nations. New York: Irvington, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Land, K. C. On the definition of social indicators.American sociologist 1971,6 322–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, B. C.The quality of life in the United States, 1970. Kansas City, Mo.; Midwest Research Institute, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, B.C.Quality of life in U.S. metropolitan areas, 1970. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, R., and Faulkenberry, G. D. Aspirations, achievements, and life satisfactions.Social indicators research 1978,5 133–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKennell, A. C. Cognition and affect in perceptions of well-being.Social indicators research 1978,5 389–426.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKennell, A. C., and Andrews, F. M. Models of cognition and affect in perceptions of well-being.Social indicators research 1980,8 257–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meadows, D.H. et al.The limits to growth. New York: Universe Books, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mesarovic, M. and Pestel, E.Mankind at the turning point. New York: Dutton, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mosley, W. H. (ed.).Nutrition and human reproduction. New York: Plenum, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD).Measuring social well-being. Paris: OECD, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawhill, I. V. The role of social indicators and social reporting in public expenditure decisions. In:The analysis and evaluation of public expenditures: The PBB system, Volume I. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheldon, E. B., and Freeman, H. E. Notes on social indicators: Promises and potential.Policy sciences 1970,1 97–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, J. L.The ultimate resource. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stokols, D. On the distinction between density and crowding: Some implications for further research.Psychological Review 1972,79 275–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabah, L. World population trends: A stocktaking.Population and development review 1980,6 355–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornton, A. Relationship between fertility and income, relative income, and subjective well-being. In: Simon, J. L. (ed.),Research in population economics, Volume I, 1978.

  • United States Department of Health, Education and Welfare.Toward a social report. Washington, D. C.: U. S. Government Printing Office, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Department of Health, Education and Welfare (National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Center for Population Research).A review of actual and expected consequences of family size. Washington, D.C.: U. S. Government Printing Office (Publication #76-779), 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verbrugge, L. M. and Taylor, R. B. Consequences of population density and size.Urban Affairs Quarterly 1980,16 135–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasserman, I. M., and Chua, L. A. Objective and subjective social indicators of the quality of life in American SMSA's: A reeanalysis.Social Indicators Research 1980,8 365–381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Worchel, S. Reducing crowding without increasing space: Some applications of an attributional theory of crowding.Journal of population 1978,1(3),216–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zajonc, R. B. Family configuration and intelligence.Science 1976,192 227–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zajonc, R. B., Markus, H., and Markus, G. B. The birth order puzzle.Journal of personality and social psychology 1979,37(8), 1325–1341.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The University of Michigan, USA

    Frank M. Andrews

Authors
  1. Frank M. Andrews
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

This article is a revised version of a paper presented to the 1981 Annual Meeting of the Population Association of America. Gillian Foo, Anne Lee, Alison Mclntosh, Willard Rodgers, and Arland Thornton made helpful commments on earlier versions of this paper. Frank M. Andrews is affiliated with the Center for Population Planning and the Institute for Social Research at The Univeristy of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109. Requests for reprints should be directed to Dr. Andrews.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Andrews, F.M. Population issues and social indicators of well-being. Popul Environ 6, 210–230 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01363887

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01363887

Keywords

Search

Navigation