Skip to main content
Log in

Designing and using open-ended software to promote conceptual change

  • Published:
Journal of Science Education and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We describe a recent project that explored the use of interactive computer software for teaching Einstein's special theory of relativity to secondary school studients. Our approach couples results from recent cognitive science research with modern techniques for using computers to help students visualize and experiment with otherwise inaccessible phenomena. One the products of this research is RelLab, a computer-based exploratory tool for constructing “gedanken,” or thought experiments involving physical systems in relative motion. We will describe our efforts in designing and testing this software for affecting change in students' concepts of space and time. Relativity is ideally suited for such a study because understanding it requires a radical reconceptualization of these quantities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Angotti, J. A. P., Caldas, I., Delizoicov, D., Rudinger, E., and Pernambuco, M. (1978). Teaching relativity with a different philosophy.American Journal of Physics 46:1258–1262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barowy, W. (1992). Using open-architecture relativity software for interviewing pairs of students. AAPT summer meeting, Orono, Maine.

  • Barowy, W. (1993) Simulations for modern physics, in the symposium: New and emerging roles for science simulation. NARST annual meeting, Atlanta, Georgia.

  • Barowys, W., and Horwitz, P. (1992). From galiean to special relativitiy: A pilot conceptual study of high school students. AAPT summer meeting, Orono, Maine.

  • Chi, M. (1992). Self explanations improve learning. InPsychological and Educational Foundation on Technology-Based Learning Environments. NATO Advance Study Institute, Orthodox Academy, Greece.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chi, M., Feltovich, P., and Glaser, R. (1981). Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices.Cognitive Science 5:121–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clement, J. (1982). Student preconceptions in introductory mechanics.American Journal of Physics 50:66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clement, J. (1992). Dealing with misconceptions in mechanics. Invited talk presented at the winter meeting of the American Association of Physics Teachers, Orlando, Florida.

  • Collins, A., and Brown, J. S. (1988). The computer as a tool for leaming through reflection. In Mandl, H., and Lesgold, A. (Eds.),Learning Issues for Intelligent Tutoring Systems. Springer, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, A., and Gentner, D. (1987). How people construct mental models. In Holland, D., and Quinn, N. (Eds.),Cultural Models in Thought and Language Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 243–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, A., and Stevens, A. (1991). A cognitive theory of inquiry teaching. In Reigeluth, C. M. (Ed.),Instructional Design Theories and Models: An Overview. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, 1983, pp. 247–278. Reprinted in Goodyear, P. (Ed.),Teaching Knowledge and Intelligent Tutoring. Ablex, Norwood, New Jersey, pp. 203–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, A., Hawkins, J., and Frederiksen, J. R. (1990). Technology-based performance assessment. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association meeting.

  • Collins, A., Hawkins, J., and Frederiksen, J. R. (1993). Three different views of students: The role of technology in assessing student performance.Journal of the Learning Sciences (in press).

  • DiSessa, A. (1983). Phenomenology and the evolution of intuition. In Gentner, D. and Stevens, A. (Eds.),Mental Models. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, New Jersey, pp. 15–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Einstein, A. (1954).Ideas and Opinions. Crown Publication Group, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feynman, R. P., Vernon, F. L., and Hellwarth, R. W. (1957). Geometrical representation for the Schroedinger equation for solving maser problems.Journal of Applied Physics 28: 49–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galileo, G. (1938). Discourses and mathematical demonstrations concerning two new sciences pertaining to mechanics and local motion.

  • Gunstone, R. (1992). Constructivism and metacognition: Theoretical issues and classroom studies. In Duit, R., Goldberg, F., and Niedderer, H. (Eds.),Research in Physics Learning: Theoretical Issues and Empirical Studies. pp.129–140.

  • Harel, I. (Ed.). (1990),Constructionist Learning, MIT Media Lab, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harel, I., and Papert, S. (1990). Software design as a learning environment. In Harel, I. (Ed.),Constructionist Learning. MIT Media Labs, Cambridge Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatano, G. (1993). Sharing cognition through collective comprehension activity. In Resnick, L., Levine, J., and Teasley, S. (Eds.),Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition (in press).

  • Hewson, P. W. (1981). A conceptual change approach to learning science.European Journal of Science Education 3: 383–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewson, P. W. (1982). A case study of conceptual change in special relativity: The influence of prior knowledge in learning.European Journal of Science Education 4: 61–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewson, P. W. (1989b). The conditions of conceptual change in the classroom.International Journal of Science Education 11: 541–553.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewson, P. W., and Hewson, M. G. (1989). Analysis and use of a task for identifying conceptions of teaching science.Journal of Education for Teaching, 15, 191–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horwitz, P. (1992a). Relative motion from Galileo to Einstein. Invited talk presented at the winter meeting of the American Association of Physics Teachers, Orlando, Florida.

  • Horwitz, P. (1992b). RelLab: A “gedanken experiment construction kit” for teaching relativity. Invited talk presented at the summer meeting of the American Association of Physics Teachers, Orono, Maine.

  • Horwitz, P. (1993). Using software and cognitive science to teach relativity. IFIP Open Conference, Gmunden, Austria, June 7–11, 1993.

  • Horwitz, P., Taylor, E. F., and Barowy, W. (1993). Teaching relativity using a computer.Computers in Physics (in press).

  • Kuhn, T. S. (1977).The Essnntial Tension. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakatos, I. (1976).Proofs and Refutations: The Logic of Mathematical Discovery. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, A. (1984).Imagery and Scientific Thought: Creating Twentieth Century Physics. Birkhauser, Nederlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, D., Goldman, S. V., Brienne, D., Jackson, I., and Magzamen, S. (1989). Computer mediation of collaborative science investigations.Journal of Educational Computing Research 5(2): 151–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, D. (1988).The Psychology of Everyday Things. Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olenick, R. P., Apostol, T. M., and Goodstein, D. L. (1985). The mechanical universe. A series of videotapes sponsored by the Annenberg Foundation and the Corporation for Public Broadcasting.

  • Richards, J., Barowy, W., and Levin, D. (1992). Computer simulations in the science classroom.Journal of Science Education and Technology 1: 67–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rochelle, J. (1992). Learning by collaborating: Convergent conceptual change.Journal of the Learning Sciences 2(3): 235–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saltiel, E., and Malgrange, J. L. (1980). “Spontaneous” ways of reasoning in elementary kinematics.European Journal of Physics 1: 73–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sastry, G. P. (1987).American Journal of Physics 55: 943–946.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwedes, H., and Schmidt, D. (1992). Conceptual change and theoretical comments. In Duit, R., Goldberg, F., and Niedderer, H. (Eds.),Research in Physics Learning: Theoretical Issues and Empirical Studies. pp. 188–203.

  • Solomon, J. (1992). Images of physics: How students are influenced by social aspects of science. In Duit, R., Goldberg, F., and Niedderer, H. (Eds.),Research in Physics Learning: Theoretical Issues and Empirical Studies. pp. 141–153.

  • Taylor, E. F. (1992a). Experiencing relativistic effects: StarPilot. Invited talk presented at the winter meeting of the American Association of Physics Teachers, Orlando, Florida.

  • Taylor, E. F. (1992b). Leading students beyond reference frames.Plenary lecture, proceedings of the International Conferences on Physics Education Teaching about Reference Frames: from Copernicus to Einstein, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Torun Poland, August 1991.

  • Taylor, E. F., and Wheeler, J. A. (1992).Spacetime Physics. Freeman, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tognazzini, B. (1986). Usability testing in the real world. In Mills, C. B.,et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of CHI'86, pp. 212–215.

  • Villani, A., and Pacca, J. L. A. (1987). Students spontaneous ideas about the speed of light.International Journal of Science Education 9: 55–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, B. Y. (1993). ThinkerTools: Conceptual change and science education.Cognition and Instruction 10: 1–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, R., and Gunstone, R. (1989). Metalearning and conceptual change.International Journal of Science Education 11: 577–586.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Advanced Physics from an Elementary Viewpoint, NSF grant MDR-9016417.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Horwitz, P., Barowy, B. Designing and using open-ended software to promote conceptual change. J Sci Educ Technol 3, 161–185 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01575178

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01575178

Key Words

Navigation