Abstract
We describe a recent project that explored the use of interactive computer software for teaching Einstein's special theory of relativity to secondary school studients. Our approach couples results from recent cognitive science research with modern techniques for using computers to help students visualize and experiment with otherwise inaccessible phenomena. One the products of this research is RelLab, a computer-based exploratory tool for constructing “gedanken,” or thought experiments involving physical systems in relative motion. We will describe our efforts in designing and testing this software for affecting change in students' concepts of space and time. Relativity is ideally suited for such a study because understanding it requires a radical reconceptualization of these quantities.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Angotti, J. A. P., Caldas, I., Delizoicov, D., Rudinger, E., and Pernambuco, M. (1978). Teaching relativity with a different philosophy.American Journal of Physics 46:1258–1262.
Barowy, W. (1992). Using open-architecture relativity software for interviewing pairs of students. AAPT summer meeting, Orono, Maine.
Barowy, W. (1993) Simulations for modern physics, in the symposium: New and emerging roles for science simulation. NARST annual meeting, Atlanta, Georgia.
Barowys, W., and Horwitz, P. (1992). From galiean to special relativitiy: A pilot conceptual study of high school students. AAPT summer meeting, Orono, Maine.
Chi, M. (1992). Self explanations improve learning. InPsychological and Educational Foundation on Technology-Based Learning Environments. NATO Advance Study Institute, Orthodox Academy, Greece.
Chi, M., Feltovich, P., and Glaser, R. (1981). Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices.Cognitive Science 5:121–152.
Clement, J. (1982). Student preconceptions in introductory mechanics.American Journal of Physics 50:66.
Clement, J. (1992). Dealing with misconceptions in mechanics. Invited talk presented at the winter meeting of the American Association of Physics Teachers, Orlando, Florida.
Collins, A., and Brown, J. S. (1988). The computer as a tool for leaming through reflection. In Mandl, H., and Lesgold, A. (Eds.),Learning Issues for Intelligent Tutoring Systems. Springer, New York.
Collins, A., and Gentner, D. (1987). How people construct mental models. In Holland, D., and Quinn, N. (Eds.),Cultural Models in Thought and Language Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 243–265.
Collins, A., and Stevens, A. (1991). A cognitive theory of inquiry teaching. In Reigeluth, C. M. (Ed.),Instructional Design Theories and Models: An Overview. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, 1983, pp. 247–278. Reprinted in Goodyear, P. (Ed.),Teaching Knowledge and Intelligent Tutoring. Ablex, Norwood, New Jersey, pp. 203–230.
Collins, A., Hawkins, J., and Frederiksen, J. R. (1990). Technology-based performance assessment. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association meeting.
Collins, A., Hawkins, J., and Frederiksen, J. R. (1993). Three different views of students: The role of technology in assessing student performance.Journal of the Learning Sciences (in press).
DiSessa, A. (1983). Phenomenology and the evolution of intuition. In Gentner, D. and Stevens, A. (Eds.),Mental Models. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, New Jersey, pp. 15–34.
Einstein, A. (1954).Ideas and Opinions. Crown Publication Group, New York.
Feynman, R. P., Vernon, F. L., and Hellwarth, R. W. (1957). Geometrical representation for the Schroedinger equation for solving maser problems.Journal of Applied Physics 28: 49–52.
Galileo, G. (1938). Discourses and mathematical demonstrations concerning two new sciences pertaining to mechanics and local motion.
Gunstone, R. (1992). Constructivism and metacognition: Theoretical issues and classroom studies. In Duit, R., Goldberg, F., and Niedderer, H. (Eds.),Research in Physics Learning: Theoretical Issues and Empirical Studies. pp.129–140.
Harel, I. (Ed.). (1990),Constructionist Learning, MIT Media Lab, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Harel, I., and Papert, S. (1990). Software design as a learning environment. In Harel, I. (Ed.),Constructionist Learning. MIT Media Labs, Cambridge Massachusetts.
Hatano, G. (1993). Sharing cognition through collective comprehension activity. In Resnick, L., Levine, J., and Teasley, S. (Eds.),Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition (in press).
Hewson, P. W. (1981). A conceptual change approach to learning science.European Journal of Science Education 3: 383–396.
Hewson, P. W. (1982). A case study of conceptual change in special relativity: The influence of prior knowledge in learning.European Journal of Science Education 4: 61–78.
Hewson, P. W. (1989b). The conditions of conceptual change in the classroom.International Journal of Science Education 11: 541–553.
Hewson, P. W., and Hewson, M. G. (1989). Analysis and use of a task for identifying conceptions of teaching science.Journal of Education for Teaching, 15, 191–209.
Horwitz, P. (1992a). Relative motion from Galileo to Einstein. Invited talk presented at the winter meeting of the American Association of Physics Teachers, Orlando, Florida.
Horwitz, P. (1992b). RelLab: A “gedanken experiment construction kit” for teaching relativity. Invited talk presented at the summer meeting of the American Association of Physics Teachers, Orono, Maine.
Horwitz, P. (1993). Using software and cognitive science to teach relativity. IFIP Open Conference, Gmunden, Austria, June 7–11, 1993.
Horwitz, P., Taylor, E. F., and Barowy, W. (1993). Teaching relativity using a computer.Computers in Physics (in press).
Kuhn, T. S. (1977).The Essnntial Tension. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Lakatos, I. (1976).Proofs and Refutations: The Logic of Mathematical Discovery. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
Miller, A. (1984).Imagery and Scientific Thought: Creating Twentieth Century Physics. Birkhauser, Nederlands.
Newman, D., Goldman, S. V., Brienne, D., Jackson, I., and Magzamen, S. (1989). Computer mediation of collaborative science investigations.Journal of Educational Computing Research 5(2): 151–166.
Norman, D. (1988).The Psychology of Everyday Things. Basic Books, New York.
Olenick, R. P., Apostol, T. M., and Goodstein, D. L. (1985). The mechanical universe. A series of videotapes sponsored by the Annenberg Foundation and the Corporation for Public Broadcasting.
Richards, J., Barowy, W., and Levin, D. (1992). Computer simulations in the science classroom.Journal of Science Education and Technology 1: 67–79.
Rochelle, J. (1992). Learning by collaborating: Convergent conceptual change.Journal of the Learning Sciences 2(3): 235–276.
Saltiel, E., and Malgrange, J. L. (1980). “Spontaneous” ways of reasoning in elementary kinematics.European Journal of Physics 1: 73–80.
Sastry, G. P. (1987).American Journal of Physics 55: 943–946.
Schwedes, H., and Schmidt, D. (1992). Conceptual change and theoretical comments. In Duit, R., Goldberg, F., and Niedderer, H. (Eds.),Research in Physics Learning: Theoretical Issues and Empirical Studies. pp. 188–203.
Solomon, J. (1992). Images of physics: How students are influenced by social aspects of science. In Duit, R., Goldberg, F., and Niedderer, H. (Eds.),Research in Physics Learning: Theoretical Issues and Empirical Studies. pp. 141–153.
Taylor, E. F. (1992a). Experiencing relativistic effects: StarPilot. Invited talk presented at the winter meeting of the American Association of Physics Teachers, Orlando, Florida.
Taylor, E. F. (1992b). Leading students beyond reference frames.Plenary lecture, proceedings of the International Conferences on Physics Education Teaching about Reference Frames: from Copernicus to Einstein, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Torun Poland, August 1991.
Taylor, E. F., and Wheeler, J. A. (1992).Spacetime Physics. Freeman, New York.
Tognazzini, B. (1986). Usability testing in the real world. In Mills, C. B.,et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of CHI'86, pp. 212–215.
Villani, A., and Pacca, J. L. A. (1987). Students spontaneous ideas about the speed of light.International Journal of Science Education 9: 55–66.
White, B. Y. (1993). ThinkerTools: Conceptual change and science education.Cognition and Instruction 10: 1–100.
White, R., and Gunstone, R. (1989). Metalearning and conceptual change.International Journal of Science Education 11: 577–586.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Advanced Physics from an Elementary Viewpoint, NSF grant MDR-9016417.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Horwitz, P., Barowy, B. Designing and using open-ended software to promote conceptual change. J Sci Educ Technol 3, 161–185 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01575178
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01575178