Skip to main content
Log in

Nonlinear programming and nonsmooth optimization by successive linear programming

  • Published:
Mathematical Programming Submit manuscript

Abstract

Methods are considered for solving nonlinear programming problems using an exactl 1 penalty function. LP-like subproblems incorporating a trust region constraint are solved successively both to estimate the active set and to provide a foundation for proving global convergence. In one particular method, second order information is represented by approximating the reduced Hessian matrix, and Coleman-Conn steps are taken. A criterion for accepting these steps is given which enables the superlinear convergence properties of the Coleman-Conn method to be retained whilst preserving global convergence and avoiding the Maratos effect. The methods generalize to solve a wide range of composite nonsmooth optimization problems and the theory is presented in this general setting. A range of numerical experiments on small test problems is described.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • R.H. Byrd, “On the convergence of constrained optimization methods with accurate Hessian information on a subspace,” Dept. of Computer Science, Report CU-CS-270–84. Univ. of Colorado at Boulder (1984).

  • R.H. Byrd and R.B. Schnabel “Continuity of the null space basis and constrained optimization,” Dept. of Computer Science, Report CU-CS-272–84, Univ. of Colorado at Boulder (1984).

  • T.F. Coleman and A.R. Conn, “Nonlinear programming via an exact penalty function: Asymptotic analysis,”Mathematical Programming 24 (1982a) 123–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • T.F. Coleman and A.R. Conn, “Nonlinear programming via an exact penalty function: Global analysis,”Mathematical Programming 24 (1982b) 137–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Fletcher,Practical Methods of Optimization 2 (1981);Constrained Optimization (Wiley, Chichester, 1981). (References to this volume are also contained in Fletcher (1987) which follows.)

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Fletcher,Practical Methods of Optimization, 2nd Edition (Wiley, Chichester, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  • C.B. Gurwitz, “Sequential quadratic programming methods based on approximating a projected Hessian matrix,” Comp. Sci. Dept. Report #219, Courant Institute of Mathematical Science (1986).

  • J. Nocedal and M.L. Overton, “Projected Hessian updating algorithms for nonlinearly constrained optimization,”SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis 22 (1985) 821–850.

    Google Scholar 

  • M.R. Osborne,Finite Algorithms in Optimization and Data Analysis (Wiley, Chichester, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  • M.J.D. Powell, “A fast algorithm for nonlinearly constrained optimization calculations,” G.A. Watson, ed.,Numerical Analysis, Dundee 1977, Lecture Notes in Mathematics 630 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Sainz de la Maza, “Nonlinear programming algorithms based onl 1 linear programming and reduced Hessian approximations,” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Mathematical Science, University of Dundee (1987).

  • R.S. Womersley, “Local properties of algorithms for minimizing nonsmooth composite functions,”Mathematical Programming 32 (1984) 69–89.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fletcher, R., de la Maza, E.S. Nonlinear programming and nonsmooth optimization by successive linear programming. Mathematical Programming 43, 235–256 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01582292

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01582292

Key words

Navigation