Skip to main content
Log in

Biomonitors of stream quality in agricultural areas: Fish versus invertebrates

  • Research
  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although the utility of using either fish or benthic invertebrates as biomonitors of stream quality has been clearly shown, there is little comparative information on the usefulness of the groups in any particular situation. We compared fish to invertebrate assemblages in their ability to reflect habitat quality of sediment-impacted streams in agricultural regions of northeast Missouri, USA. Habitat quality was measured by a combination of substrate composition, riparian type, buffer strip width, and land use. Invertebrates were more sensitive to habitat differences when structural measurements, species diversity and ordination, were used. Incorporating ecological measurements, by using the Index of Biological Integrity, increased the information obtained from the fish assemblage. The differential response of the two groups was attributed to the more direct impact of sediments on invertebrate life requisites; the impact of sedimentation on fish is considered more indirect and complex, affecting feeding and reproductive mechanisms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature cited

  • Balon, E. K. 1975. Reproductive guilds of fishes: a proposal and definition.Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada 32:821–864.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brusven, M. A., and K. V. Prather. 1974. Influence of stream sediments on distribution of macrobenthos.Journal of the Entomological Society of British Columbia 71:25–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, J. R. 1970. A biological approach to water quality management.Water Pollution Control 4:415–422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chutter, F. M. 1969. The effects of silt and sand on the invertebrate fauna of streams and rivers.Hydrobiologia 34:57–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cordone, A. J., and D. W. Kelley. 1961. The influences of inorganic sediment on the aquatic life of streams.California Fish and Game 47:189–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Culp, J. M., and R. W. Davies. 1980. Reciprocal averaging and polar ordination as techniques for analyzing lotic macroinvertebrate communities.Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 37:1358–1364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, K. W., and G. H. Lauff. 1969. The influence of substrate particle size on the microdistribution of stream benthos.Hydrobiologia 34:145–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farnworth, E. G., M. G. Nichols, C. N. Vann, L. G. Wolfson, R. W. Bosserman, P. R. Hendrix, F. B. Golley, and J. L. Cooley. 1979. Impacts of sediment and nutrients on biota in surface waters of the United States. EPA-600/3-79-105. Environmental Research Laboratory, Athens, Georgia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fausch, K. D., J. R. Karr, and P. R. Yant. 1984. Regional application of an index of biotic integrity based on stream fish communities.Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 113:39–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenneman, N. M. 1983. Physiography of eastern United States. McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frost, S., M. T. L. Chiv, and M. P. Thomas. 1976. Seasonal changes of invertebrate populations in the polluted River Medlock.Environmental Pollution 11:223–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauch, H. G., Jr. 1982. Multivariate analysis in community ecology. Cambridge University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauch, H. G., Jr. and R. H. Whittaker. 1972. Comparison of ordination techniques.Ecology 53:865–875.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, C. R. 1980. Zoogeographic factors in relation to biological monitoring of fish. Pages 309–356in C. H. Hocutt and J. R. Stauffer, Jr. (eds.), Biological monitoring of fish. Lexington Books, D. C. Heath and- Company, Lexington, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, R. 1979. Sampling design and statistical methods for environmental biologists. John Wiley and Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hellawell, J. 1977. Biological surveillance and water quality monitoring. Pages 69–88in J. S. Alabaster (ed.), Biological monitoring of inland fisheries. Applied Science, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendricks, M. L., C. H. Hocutt, and J. R. Stauffer, Jr. 1980. Monitoring of fish in lotic habitats. Pages 205–231in C. H. Hocutt and J. R. Stauffer, Jr. (eds.), Biological monitoring of fish. Lexington Books, D. C. Heath and Company, Lexington, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, M. O. 1972. Reciprocal averaging: an eigenvector method of ordination.Journal of Ecology 61:237–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, M. O. 1979.Decorana: a Fortran program for detrended correspondence analysis and reciprocal averaging. Section of Ecology and Systematics, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hockensmith, R. D., and J. G. Steele. 1962. Soil erosion: the work of uncontrolled water. US Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, Agriculture Information Bulletin 260. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hocutt, C. H. 1981. Fish as indicators of biological integrity.Fisheries (Bethesda) 6(6):28–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hocutt, C. H., and J. R. Stauffer, Jr. (eds.). 1980. Biological monitoring of fish. Lexington Books, D. C. Heath and Company, Lexington, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karr, J. R. 1981. Assessment of biotic integrity using fish communities.Fisheries (Bethesda) 6(6):21–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karr, J. R., and I. J. Schlosser. 1978. Water resources and the land-water interface.Science 201:229–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keenleyside, M. H. A. 1979. Diversity and adaptation in fish behavior.In Zoophysiology, vol. 11. Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamberti, G. D., and V. H. Resh. 1978. Substrate relationships, spatial distribution patterns, and sampling variability in a stream caddisfly population.Environmental Entomology 8:561–567.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langlois, T. H. 1941. Two processes operating for the reduction in abundance or elimination of fish species from certain types of water areas.Transactions of the North American Wildlife Conference 6:189–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muncy, R. J., G. J. Atchinson, R. V. Bulkley, B. W. Menzel, L. G. Perry, and R. C. Summerfelt. 1979. Effects of suspended solids and sediment on reproduction and early life of warmwater fishes: a review. EPA-600/3-79-0. Corvallis Environmental Research Laboratory, Corvallis, Oregon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nuttall, P. M., and E. D. Bielby. 1973. The effects of China clay on stream invertebrates.Environmental Pollution 5:77–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, J. A., R. C. Ward, and J. C. Loftis. 1984. Survey of state water quality monitoring programs.Environmental Management 8:21–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pflieger, W. L. 1975. The fishes of Missouri. Missouri Department of Conservation, Jefferson City, Missouri.

    Google Scholar 

  • Platts, W. S., W. F. Megahan, and G. W. Minshall. 1983. Methods for evaluating stream, riparian, and biotic conditions. General Technical Report INT-138. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Ogden, Utah.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollard, J. E., and W. L. Kinney. 1979. Assessment of macroinvertebrate monitoring techniques in an energy development area: a test of the efficiency of these macroinvertebrate sampling methods in the White River. EPA 600/7-79-163.

  • Rabeni, C. F., and G. W. Minshall. 1977. Factors affecting microdistribution of stream benthic insects.Oikos 29:33–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabeni, C. F., and K. E. Gibbs. 1980. Ordination of deep river invertebrate communities in relation to environmental variables.Hydrobiologia 74:67–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rafferty, M. D., R. H. Gorlach, and D. J. Hrebec. 1970. Atlas of Missouri. Aux-Arc Research Associates, Springfield, Missouri.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reice, S. R. 1980. The role of substrate in benthic macroinvertebrate microdistribution and litter decomposition in a woodland stream.Ecology 61:580–590.

    Google Scholar 

  • Resh, V. H., D. M. Rosenberg, and J. W. Feminella. 1985. The processing of benthic samples: responses to one 1983 NABS questionnaire.Bulletin of the North American Benthological Society 2:5–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, P. W. 1971. Illinois streams: a classification based on their fish and an analysis of factors responsible for disappearance of native species. Biological Notes no. 76. Illinois Natural History Survey, Urbana, Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Starrett, W. C. 1950. Food relationships of the minnows of the Des Moines River, Iowa.Ecology 31:215–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strahler, A. N. 1957. Quantitative analysis of watershed geomorphology.Transactions of the American Geophysical Union 38:913–920.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilhm, J. L., and T. C. Dorris. 1968. Biological parameters for water quality criteria.BioScience 18:477–481.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yount, B. 1983. Missouri farm facts. Missouri Crop and Livestock Reporting Service, Missouri Department of Agriculture. Jefferson City, Missouri.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The Unit is sponsored by the US Fish and Wildlife Service, the Missouri Department of Conservation and the University of Missouri.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Berkman, H.E., Rabeni, C.F. & Boyle, T.P. Biomonitors of stream quality in agricultural areas: Fish versus invertebrates. Environmental Management 10, 413–419 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01867267

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01867267

Key words

Navigation