Abstract
This paper presents a nonspatial operationalization of the Krumhansl (1978, 1982) distancedensity model of similarity. This model assumes that the similarity between two objectsi andj is a function of both the interpoint distance betweeni andj and the density of other stimulus points in the regions surroundingi andj. We review this conceptual model and associated empirical evidence for such a specification. A nonspatial, tree-fitting methodology is described which is sufficiently flexible to fit a number of competing hypotheses of similarity formation. A sequential, unconstrained minimization algorithm is technically presented together with various program options. Three applications are provided which demonstrate the flexibility of the methodology. Finally, extensions to spatial models, three-way analyses, and hybrid models are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Appelman, I. B., & Mayzner, M. S (1982). Application of geometric models to letter recognition: Distance and density, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 111, 60–100.
Bass, F. M., Pessemier, E. A., & Lehman, D. R. (1972). An experimental study of the relationships between attitudes, brand preference, and choice. Behavioral Science, 17, 532–541.
Birnbaum, M. H. (1974). Using contextural effects to derive psychological scales. Perception and Psychophysics, 15, 89–96.
Carroll, J. D. (1976). Spatial, nonspatial, and hybrid models for scaling. Psychometrika, 41, 439–463.
Carroll, J. D. & Arabie, P. (1980). Multidimensional scaling. Annual Review of Psychology, 31, 607–649.
Carroll, J. D., & Chang, J. J. (1973). A method for fitting a class of hierachical tree structure models to dissimilarities data, and iits application to some body parts data of Miller's. Proceedings of the 81st Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, 8, 1097–1098.
iCarroll, J. D., Clark, L. A., & DeSarbo, W. S. (1984). The representation of three-way proximity data by single and multiple tree structure models. Journal of Classification, 1, 25–74.
Carroll, J. D., & Pruzansky, S. (1975, August). Fitting of hierarchical tree structure (HTS) models, mixtures of HTS models, and hybrid models, via mathematical programming and alternating least squares. Paper presented at U.s.-Japan Seminar of Multidimensional Scaliing, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, California.
Carroll, J. D., & Pruzansky, S. (1980). Discrete and hybrid scaling models. In E. D. Lantermann & H. Feger (eds.), Similarity and choice (pp. 48–69). Bern: Hans Huber.
Chandler, J. P. (1969). STEPIT—Finds local minima of a smooth function of several parameters, Behavioral Sciences, 14, 81–82.
Corter, J E. (1987). Similarity, confusability and the density hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 116, 238–249.
Corter, J. E. (1988). Testing the density hypothesis: Reply to Krumhansl. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 105–106.
Cunningham, J. P. (1978). Free trees and bidirectional trees as a representation of psychological distance. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 17, 165–188.
Currim, I. S. (1982). Predictive testing of consumer choice models not subject to independence of irrelevant alternatives. Journal of Marketing Research, 19, 208–222.
Debreu, G. E. (1960). Review of R. D. Luce, Individual choice behavior: A theoretical analysis. American Economic Review, 50, 186–188.
DeSarbo, W. S. (1982). GENNCLUS: New models for general nonhierarchical clustering analysis. Psychometrika, 47, 449–475.
De Soete, G., De Sarbo, W. S., Furnas, G. W., & Carroll, J. D. (1984). The estimation of ultrametric and path length trees from rectangular proximity data. Psychometrika, 49, 289–310.
Fiacco, A. V., & McCormick, C. P. (1968). Nonlinear programming: Sequential unconstrained minimization techniques. New York: Wiley.
Gower, J. (1977). The analysis of asymmetric data and orthogonality. In J. P. Barra et al. (Eds.). Recent developments in statistics (pp. 1-9–1-123). New York: North Holland.
Green, P. E., & Tull, D. S. (1978). Research for marketing decisions (4th ed). Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall.
Gregg, V. (1976). Word frequency, recognition and recall. In J. Brown (ed.), Recall and Recognition 183–216). New York: Wiley.
Hartigan, J. A. (1967). Representation of similarity matrices by trees. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 62, 1140–1158.
Huber, J., Payne, J., & Puto, C. (1982). Adding asymmetrically dominated alternatives: Violations of regularity and the similarity hypothesis. Journal of Consumer Research, 9, 90–98.
Jardine, C. J. Jardine, N., & Sibson, R. (1967). The structure and construction of taxonomic hierarchies. Mathematical Biosciences, 1, 173–179.
Johnson, S. C. (1976). Hierarchical clustering schemes. Psychometrika, 32, 241–254.
Krumhansl, C. L. (1978). Concerning the applicability of geometric models to similarity data: The interrelationship between similarity and spatial density. Psychological Review, 85, 445–463.
Krumhansl, C. L. (1982). Density versus feature weights as predictors of visual identification: Comment on Appelman and Mayzner. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 111, 101–108.
Krumhansl, C. L. (1988). Testing the densith hypothesis: Comment on Corter. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 101–104.
Kruskal, J. B. (1964a). Multidimensional scaling by optimizing goodness of fit to a nonmetric hypothesis. Psychometrika, 29, 1–27.
Kruskal, J. B. (1964b). Nonmetric multidimensional scaling: A numerical method. Psychometrika, 29, 115–129.
Kruskal, J. B. & Wish, M. (1978). Multidimensional Scaling. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Mervis, C. B., & Rosch, E. (1981. Categorization of natural objects. In M. R. Rozenzweig & W. Porter (Eds.), Annual Review of Psychology (Vol. 32, pp. 89–115). Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews.
Murphy, G. L., & Smith, E. E. (1982). Basic-level superiority in picture categorization. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 21, 1–20.
Parducci, A. (1965). Category judgment: A range-frequency model. Psychological Review, 72, 407–418.
Pruzansky, S., Tversky, A., & Carroll, J. D. (1982). Spatial versus tree representations of proximity data. Psychometrika, 47, 3–24.
Rao, S. S. (1984). Optimization: Theory and applications (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.
Rao, V. R., Sabavala, D. J., & Langfeld, P. A. (1977).Alternative measures for partitioning analysis based on brand switching data. Unpublished manuscript, Cornell University.
Rosch, E., Mervis, C. B., Gray, W. D., Johnson, D. M., & Boyes-Braem, P. (1976). Basic objects in natural categories. Cognitive Psychology, 8, 382–439.
Rosenberg, S., & Kim, M. P. (1975). The method of sorting as a data-gathering procedure in multivariate research. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 10, 489–502.
Rothkopf, E. Z. (1975). A measure of stimulus similarity and errors insome parired-associated learning tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53, 94–101.
Saito, T. (1986). Multidimensional scaling to explore complex aspects in dissimilarity judgment. Behaviormetrika, 20, 35–62.
Sattath, S. & Tversky, A. (1977). Additive similarity trees. Psychometrika, 42, 319–345.
Shepard, R. N. (1962a). The analysis of proximities: Multidimensional scaling with an unknown distance function. Part I. Psychometrika, 27, 125–140.
Shepard, R. N. (1962b). The analysis of proximities: Multidimensional scaling with an unknown distance function. Part II. Psychometrika, 27, 219–246.
Shepard, R. N. (1963). Analysis of proximities as a technique for the study of information processing in man. Human Factors, 5, 33–48.
Sjöberg, L. A. (1972). A cognitive theory of similarity. Goteborg Psychological Reprots, 2, 10–30.
Torgerson, W. S. (1958). Theory and methods of scaling. New York: Wiley.
Tulving, E. (1974). Cue dependent forgetting. American Scientist, 62, 74–82.
Tversky, A. (1977). Features of similarity. Psychological Review, 84, 327–352.
Tversky, B., & Hemenway, K.. (1984). Objects, parts, and categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 169–193.
Tversky, A., & Russo, J. E. (1969). Substitutability and similarity in binary choices. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 6, 1–12.
Watkins, M. J. (1979). Engrams as cuegrams and forgetting as cue overload: A cuing approach to the structure of memory. In C. R. Puff (Ed.), Memory organization and structure (pp. 347–372). New York: Academic Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The authors wish to thank three anonymous reviewers and the editor for their insightful comments on a previous draft of this manuscript.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
DeSarbo, W.S., Manrai, A.K. & Burke, R.R. A nonspatial methodology for the analysis of two-way proximity data incorporating the distance-density hypothesis. Psychometrika 55, 229–253 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02295285
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02295285