Skip to main content
Log in

The croatian scientific elite and its socio-professional roots

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

No matter how strong the intellectual and other psychological predispositions for top scientific achievement and/or a successful scientific career, neither the processes of a general and scientific socialisation nor the socio-cultural or socio-professional environment can be avoided or neglected. Empirical support for the thesis on the impact of the social environment on the formation and the influence of the scientific elite of a country is supported by three analysed research studies: on distinguished Croatian scientists (1995), on the population of Croatian scientists (1990) and on Croatian scientific emigrants (1986).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes and references

  1. H. A. Zuckerman (1977),Scientific Elite. Laureates in the United States, The Free Press/Collier Macmillan Publishers, New York/London.

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. Roe (1961), The psychology of the scientist,Science, 134, 456–459.

    Google Scholar 

  3. M. J. Mahoney (1979), Psychology of the scientist: An evaluative review,Social Studies of Science, 9(3), 349–375.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. C. Berry (1981), The Nobel scientists and the origins of scientific achievement,The British Journal of Sociology, 32(3) 381–391.

    Google Scholar 

  5. J. Ph. Rushton, H. G. Murray, S. V. Paunonen (1987), Personality characteristics associated with high research productivity, in:Scientific Excellence. Origins and Assessment,Jackson,D. N. andJ.Ph. Rushton (Eds), Sage, Newbury Park-Beverly Hills-London-New Delhi, pp 129–148.

    Google Scholar 

  6. H. R. Silver (1983), Scientific achievement and the concept of risk,The British Journal of Sociology, 34(1), 39–43.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. F. Cancian (1980), Risk and uncertainty in agricultural decision making, in:Agricultural Decision Making: Anthropological Contributions to Rural Development,P. Barlett (Ed.), Academic Press, New York, pp 161–176.

    Google Scholar 

  8. It is known that 48 elite apprentices served apprenticeship with 71 master laureates. Enrico Fermi, for example, educated 6 American Nobel prize winners, Bohr 4, and Thomson and Rutheford worked together with 17 future laureates of different nationalities (Zuckerman 1977 100/101).

  9. B. Golub (1988), Odliv mozgova:Socijalni profil istrazivaca-migranata (Brain-drain: A Social Profile of Researcher Migrants). Institut za drustvena istrazivanja Sveucilista u Zagrebu, Zagreb.

    Google Scholar 

  10. B. Golub (1990), Potencijalni egzodus istrazivaca u inozemstvo (Potential exodus of researchers to other countries), in:Pripic, K., Golub, B.,Znanstvena produktivnost i potencijalni egzodus istrazivaca Hrvatske (Scientific Productivity and Potential Exodus of Researchers of Croatia), Institut za drustvena istrazivanja Sveucilista u Zagrebu, Zagreb, pp 63–103.

    Google Scholar 

  11. B. Golub (1996), Croatian scientists' drain and its roots,International Migration, 34(4), 609–625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. F. Maletic, F. (ur.) (1993),Tko je tko u Hrvatskoj. Who is who in Croatia, Golden Marketing, Zagreb.

    Google Scholar 

  13. K. Prpic (1987),Marginalne groupe u znanosti (Marginal Groups in Science). Institut za drustvena istrazivanja Sveucilista u Zagrebu, Zagreb.

    Google Scholar 

  14. K. Kumar (1985), Role parity in international social science collaborative research: Research roles of U.S. researchers and their collaborators.Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilisation, 7(1), 7–32.

    Google Scholar 

  15. J. Fortney (1972), Immigrant professionals. A brief historical survey,International Migration Review, 6, 50–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Nacionalni znanstvenoistrazivacki program (The National Scientific and Research Programme). Ministarstvo znanosti i tehnologije (Ministry of Science and Technology), Zagreb, 1996.

  17. K. Prpic (1996), Produktivnost istaknutih znanstvenika: znanstvena vrsnost i sociokognitivni kontekst (Productivity of eminent scientists: Scientific quality and socio-cognitive context).Revija za sociologiju, 27(1–2) 37–52.

    Google Scholar 

  18. K. Prpic (1996a), Characteristics and determinants of eminent scientists productivity,Scientometrics, 36(2) 185–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Golub, B. The croatian scientific elite and its socio-professional roots. Scientometrics 43, 207–229 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02458408

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02458408

Keywords

Navigation