Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A history of instructional design and technology: Part I: A history of instructional media

  • Development
  • Published:
Educational Technology Research and Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This is the first of a two-part article that will discuss the history of the field of instructional design and technology in the United States. A definition of the field is provided and the major features of the definition are identified. A rational for using instructional design and technology as the label for the field is also presented. Events in the history of instructional media, from the early 1900s to the present day, are described. The birth of school museums, the visual and audiovisual instruction movements, the use of media during World War II, and the interest in instructional television, computers, and the Internet are among the topics discussed. The article concludes with a summarization of the effects media have had on instructional practices, and a prediction regarding the effect computers, the Internet, and other digital media will have on such practices over the next decade.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, C. (1962). Technology in American education: 1650–1900 (Report No. OE-34018). Washington, DC: Office of Education, U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, R.E., & Ronnkvist, A. (1999).The presence of computers in American schools: Teaching, learning and computing: 1998 national survey (Report #2). Irvine, CA: Center for Research on Information Technology and Organizations. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 430 548).

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, R.C., & Hansen, D.N. (1966). Computer-assisted instruction in initial reading: The Stanford project.Reading Research Quarterly, 2, 5–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bassi, L.J., & Van Buren, M.E. (1999). Sharpening the leading edge.Training and Development, 53(1), 23–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, H.J. (1998). Running to catch a moving train: Schools and information technologies.Theory into Practice, 37(1), 20–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berlo, D.K. (1963). “You are in the people business.”Audiovisual Instruction, 8, 372–381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blakely, R.J. (1979).To serve the public interest: Educational broadcasting in the United States. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnegie Commission on Educational Television (1967).Public television: A program for action. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, C.R., & Greenhill, L.P. (1956).Instructional film research reports: Vol. 2 (Technical Report No. 269-7-61). Port Washington, NY: U.S. Navy Special Devices Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, S. (2000, August 18). Army bombshell rocks distance education.The Chronicle of Higher Education, 46,

  • Center for Social Organization of Schools (1983). School uses of microcomputers: Reports from a national survey (Issue no. 1). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University, Center for Social Organization of Schools.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, R.E. (1983). Reconsidering research on learning from media.Review of Educational Research, 53, 445–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, R.E. (1994). Media will never influence learning.Educational Technology Research and Development, 42(2), 21–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Commission on Instructional Technology (1970).To improve learning: An evaluation of instructional technology (Vol. 1), New York: Rowker.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuban, L. (1986).Teachers and machines: The classroom use of technology since 1920. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dale, E. (1946).Audio-visual methods in teaching (1st ed.) New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dale, E. (1953), What does it mean to communicate?AV Communication Review, 1, 3–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ely, D.P. (Ed.) (1963). The changing role of the audiovisual process in education: A definition and glossary of related terms.AV Communication Review,11(1).

  • Ely, D.P. (1970). Toward a philosophy of instructional technology.British Journal of Educational Technology, 1(2), 81–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finn, J.D. (1954). Direction in AV communication research.AV Communication Review, 2, 83–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finn, J.D. (1972). The emerging technology of education In R.J. McBeath (Ed.),Extending education through technology: Selected writings by James D. Finn. Washington, DC: Association for Educational Communications and Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, G.N. (1970).Classroom television: New frontiers in ITV, New York: Hastings House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gumpert, G. (1967). Closed-circuit television in training and education. In A.E. Koenig & R.B. Hill (Eds.),The farther vision: Educational television today, Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkridge, D. (1999). Cost-effective support for university students via the Web?Association for Learning Technology Journal, 6(3), 24–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinich, R. (1970) Technology and the management of instruction (Association for Educational Communication and Technology Monograph No. 4), Washington, DC: Association for Educational Communications and Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinich, R., Molenda, M., Russell, J.D. & Smaldino (1999).Instructional media and technologies for learning (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hezel, R.T. (1980). Public broadcasting: Can it teach?Journal of Communication, 30, 173–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoban, C.F., Sr., Hoban, C.F., Jr., & Zissman, S.B. (1937).Visualizing the curriculum. New York: Dryden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Industry Report 1999 (1999).Training,36(10), 37–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozma, R.B. (1991). Learning with media.Review of Educational Research, 61(2), 179–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kozma, R.B. (1994). Will media influence learning: Reframing the debate.Educational Technology Research and Development, 42(2), 7–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levie, W.H., & Dickie, K.E. (1973). The analysis and application of media. In R.M.W. Travers (Ed.)Second handbook of research on teaching. Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, B.N., & Pask, G. (1965). The theory and practice of adaptive teaching systems. In R. Glaser (Ed.),Teaching machines and programmed learning II: Data and directions. Washington, DC: National Education Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, L., Snow, K., Farris, E., Levin, D. & Greene, B. (1999).Distance education at postsecondary institutions: 1997–98 (NCES 2000-013), Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lumsdaine, A.A. (Ed.) (1961).Student response in programmed instruction. Washington, DC: National Academy of Science-National Research Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lumsdaine, A.A. (1963). Instruments and media of instruction. In N.L. Gage (Ed.),Handbook of research on teaching. Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lumsdaine, A.A. (1964). Educational technology, programmed learning, and instructional science. In E.R. Hilgard (Ed.),Theories of learning and instruction: The sixty-third year book of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part 1. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, M. A., & Lumsdaine, A. A. (1958).Learning from films. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCluskey, F.D. (1981). DVI, DAVI, AECT: A long view. In J.W. Brown & S.N. Brown (Eds.),Educational media yearbook: 1981, Littleton, CO: Libraries Unlimited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meierhenry, W.C. (1980). Instructional theory: From behaviorism to humanism to synergism.Instructional Innovator, 25(1), 16–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, M.G. (1989, April). Three modes of interaction. InIssues in instructional interactivity. Forum conducted at the meeting of the National University Continuing Education Association, Salt Lake City, UT.

  • Morgan, J.E. (1932). Introduction. In B.H. Darrow,Radio: The assistant teacher. Columbus, OH: R.H. Adams.

    Google Scholar 

  • Office of Technology Assessment (1995).Teachers & technology: making the connection, Washington, DC: Office of Technology Assessment

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, J.R., & Bass, V. B. (1982). The application of performance technology in the military: 1960–1980.Performance and Instruction, 21(6), 32–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pagliaro, L.A. (1983). The history and development of CAI: 1926–1981, an overview.Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 29(1), 75–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papert, S. (1984). New theories for new learnings.School Psychology Review, 13(4), 422–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pask, G. (1960). Electronic keyboard teaching machines. In A.A. Lumsdaine & R. Glaser (Eds.),Teaching machines and programmed learning: A source book. Washington, DC: National Education Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiser, R.A. (1987). Instructional technology: A history. In R.M. Gagné (Ed.), Instructional technology: Foundations. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiser, R.A. (in press). What field did you say you were in? Defining and naming our field. In R.A. Reiser & J.V. Dempsey (Eds.),Trends and issues in instructional design and technology. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.

  • Reiser, R.A., & Dempsey, J.V. (in press).Trends and issues in instructional design and technology. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.

  • Reiser, R.A., & Ely, D.P. (1997). The field of educational technology as reflected through its definitions.Educational Technology Research and Development, 45(3), 63–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reiser, R.A., & Gagné, R.M. (1983).Selecting media for instruction, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossett, A., & Donello, J.F. (1999)Knowledge management for training professionals (Online). Available: http://defcon.sdsu.edu/3/objects/km/ (2000, November 3).

  • Saettler, P. (1968).A history of instructional technology. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saettler, P. (1990).The evolution of American educational technology, Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schramm, W. (1977).Big media, little media. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seels, B.B., & Richey, R.C. (1994).Instructional technology: The definition and domains of the field, Washington, DC: Association for Educational Communications and Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shannon, C.E., & Weaver, W. (1949).The mathematical theory of communication, Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silber, K.H. (1981). Some implications of the history of educational technology: We’re all in this together. In J.W. Brown & S.N. Brown (Eds.),Educational media yearbook: 1981, Littleton, CO, Libraries Unlimited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, G.H., & Stevens, E.F. (1995).Designing electronic performance support tools. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stolorow, L.M., & Davis, D. (1965). Teaching machines and computer-assisted systems. In R. Glaser (Ed.),Teaching machines and programmed learning, II: Data and directions, Washington, DC: National Education Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suppes, P., & Macken, E. (1978). The historical path from research and development to operational use of CAI.Educational Technology, 18(4), 9–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, B.J. (1967). The development of instructional television. In A.E. Koenig & R.B. Hill (Eds.),The farther vision: Educational television today. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, R.W. (1975). Have educational reforms since 1950 created quality education?Viewpoints, 51(2), 35–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Visual Education. (1908). Meadville, PA: Keystone View Co.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Instructional Systems program at Florida State University, Florida, USA

    Robert A. Reiser (professor)

Authors
  1. Robert A. Reiser
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Portions of this article are from a chapter that will appear inTrends and Issues in Instructional Design and Technology (Reiser & Dempsey, in press). Some segments of the article previously appeared in a book chapter by Reiser (1987).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Reiser, R.A. A history of instructional design and technology: Part I: A history of instructional media. ETR&D 49, 53–64 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504506

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504506

Keywords

Search

Navigation