Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The influence of discussion groups in a case-based learning environment

  • Development
  • Published:
Educational Technology Research and Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The common practice of using discussion groups during case-based learning makes the role of discussion important in these learning environments. However, little empirical research has been done to investigate the influence of discussion on performance and motivation in case-based learning. The purpose of this article is to present the results of a study conducted to examine the role of discussion groups in a case-based environment. College students completed two cases either individually or in small discussion groups. Measures included two case analyses, an attitude survey, time on task, and document analysis. Results revealed significant performance and time differences between instructional methods on the first case, but not on the second case. In addition, results indicated significant differences in student attitudes between treatments. Overall, participants who worked in groups liked their method significantly better than those who worked alone, felt they learned more working in a group than they would have working alone, and expressed a preference for working in a group if they had to do the class over again. Implications for implementing case-based learning and future research are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albanese, M.A., & Mitchell, S. (1993). Problem-based learning: A review of literature on its outcomes and implementation issue.Academic Medicine, 68(1), 52–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aranda, E.K., Aranda, L., & Conlon, K. (1998).Teams: Structure, process, culture and politics. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Astin, A.W. (1992).What matters most in college: Four critical years revisited. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aulls, M.W. (1998). Contributions of classroom discourse to what content students learn during curriculum enactment.Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(1), 56–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brookfield, S.D., & Preskill, S. (1999),Discussion as a way of teaching. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruffee, K.A. (1995). Sharing our toys: Cooperative learning versus collaborative learning.Change, 27(19), 12–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, J.A., & Schodt, D.W. (1995). Beyond the lecture: Case teaching and the learning of economic theory.Journal of Economic Education, 26(1), 17–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, J.R., & Narasimhan, R. (1996). A comparison of North American and European future purchasing trends.International Journal of Purchasing, and Materials Management, 32(2), 12–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, K. (1989), Using cases to frame mentor-novice conversation about teaching.Theory into Practice, 27, 214–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavalier, J.C., Klein, J.D., & Cavalier, F.J. (1995). Effects of cooperative learning on performance, attitude, and group behaviors in a technical team environment.Educational Technology Research and Development, 43(3), 61–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, C.R. (1987).Teaching and the case method. Boston: Harvard Business School.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, C.R., Garvin, D.A., & Sweet, A. (1991).Education for judgment: The artistry of discussion leadership. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cliff, W.H., & Wright, A.W. (1996). Directed case study method for teaching human anatomy and physiology.Advances in Physiology Education, 15(1), S19-S28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, J.L., & Mueck, R. (1992). Student involvement in learning. In A. Goodsell, M. Maher, & V. Tinto (Eds.),Collaborative learning: A sourcebook for higher education. University Park, PA: National Center on Postsecondary Teaching, Learning, and Assessment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, J.L., Robinson, P.R., & McKinney, M. (1994). Cooperative learning in the classroom. In D.F. Halpern and Associates,Changing college classrooms: New teaching and learning strategies for an increasingly complex world. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross, K.P., & Steadman, M.H. (1996).Classroom research: Implementing the scholarship of teaching. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doriswami, M., & Towl, A.R. (1963).ASCI Case Collection. AISA Publishing House.

  • Droge, C., & Spreng, R. (1996). Enhancing involvement and skills with a student-led method of case analysis.Journal of Marketing Education, 18(3), 25–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erskine, J.A., Leenders, M.R., & Mauffette-Leenders, L.A. (1981).Teaching with cases (1st ed.). London, Ontario, Canada: Ivey Publishing, Richard Ivey School of Business, The University of Western Ontario.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erskine, J.A., Leenders, M.R., & Mauffette-Leenders, L.A. (1998).Teaching with cases (2nd ed.). London, Ontario, Canada: Ivey Publishing, Richard Ivey School of Business, The University of Western Ontario.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ertmer, P.A., & Quinn, J. (1999).The ID casebook: Case studies in instructional design. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ertmer, P.A., & Russell, J.D. (1995) Using case studies to enhance instructional design.Educational Technology, 35(4), 23–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Florio-Ruane, S., & Clark, C.M. (1990). Using case studies to enrich field experiences.Teacher Education Quarterly, 17, 17–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, S.A., & Stepien, W.J. (1996). Content acquisition in problem-based learning: depth versus breadth in American Studies.Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 19(3), 257–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, S.A., Stepien, W.J., & Rosenthal, H. (1992). The effects of problem-based learning on problem solving.Gifted Child Quarterly, 36(4), 195–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graf, D. (1991). A model for instructional design case materials.Educational Technology Research and Development.39(2), 81–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gragg, C.I. (1954). Because wisdom can't be told. In M.P. McNair (Ed.),The case method in the Harvard Business School (p. 6). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, G.E., & Parkey, F.W. (1989).Case studies for teacher decision-making. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffith, P.L., & Laframboise, K. (1997). The structures and patterns of case method talk: what our students taught us.Action in Teacher Education, 18(4), 10–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haynes, P.J., & Helms, M.M. (1993). Increasing participation in case method courses.Journal of Management Education, 17(1), 114–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herreid, C.F. (1994). Case studies in science education.Journal of College Science Teaching, 23, 221–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn, E.M., Collier, W.G., Oxford, J.A., Bond, C.F., Jr., & Dansereau, D.F. (1998). Individual differences in dyadic cooperative learning.Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(1), 153–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D.W., & Johnson, R.T. (1989).Cooperation and competition: Theory and research. Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D.W., Maruyama, G., Johnson, R.T., Nelson, D., & Skon, L. (1981). Effect of cooperative competitive and individualistic goal structures in achievement: A meta analysis.Psychological Bulletin, 89, 47–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, A., Staffieri, A., & Adelgais, A. (1998). Mutual peer tutoring: Effects of structuring tutorial interaction to scaffold peer learning.Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(1), 134–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kinzie, M.B., Hrabe, M.E., & Larsen, V.A. (1998). An instructional design case event: Exploring issues in professional practice.Educational Technology Research and Development, 46(1), 53–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, J.D., & Doran, M.S. (1999). Implementing individual and small group learning structures with a computer simulation.Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(1), 97–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleinfeld, J. (1990). The special virtues of case method in preparing teachers for minority schools.Teacher Education Quarterly, 17, 43–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knechel, W.R., (1992). Using the case method in accounting instruction.Issues in Accounting Education, 7(2), 205–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kowalski, T.J., Weaver, R.A., & Henson, K.T. (1990).Case studies on teaching, New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, P.R. (1953). The preparation of case material. In K.P. Andrews (Ed.),The case method of teaching human relations and administration (p. 215) Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leenders, M.R., Fearon, H.E., & Flynn, A.E. (1997).Purchasing and supply management. Chicago: Richard D. Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, B.B. (1995). Using the case method in teacher education: The role of discussion and experience in teachers thinking about cases.Teaching and Teacher Education, 11(1), 63–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matejka, J.K., & Cosse, T.J. (1981).The business case method: An introduction, Richmond: Robert F. Dame.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mauffette-Leenders, L.A., Erskine, J.A., & Leenders, M.R. (1997).Learning with cases. London, Ontario, Canada: Case and Publication Services, Richard Ivey School of Business, The University of Western Ontario.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNair, M.P., & Hersum, A.C. (1954).The case method at the Harvard Business School. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merseth, K.K. (1991) The early history of case-based instruction.Journal of Teacher Education, 42(4), 243–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Natasi, R.K., & Clements, D.H. (1991). Research on cooperative learning: Implications for practice.Psychology Review.

  • Nii, L.J., & Chin, A. (1996). Comparative trial of problem-based learning versus didactic lectures on clerkship performance.American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 80, 162–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palinscar, A.S., & Brown, A.L. (1989). Classroom dialogues and promoting self-regulated comprehension. In J. Brophy (Ed.),Advances in research on teaching, 1, 35–71. New York: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, V. (1991).The use of cases in considering methods for motivating students. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Washington, D.C.

  • Shulman, J. (Ed.). (1992).Case method in teacher education. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siciliano, J., & McAleer, G.M. (1997). Increasing student participation in case discussions: Using the MICA method in strategic management courses.Journal of Management Education, 21(2), 209–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slavin, R.E. (1983). When does cooperative learning increase student achievement?Psychological Bulletin, 94, 429–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slavin, R.E. (1989). Cooperative learning and student achievement. In R.E. Slavin (Ed.), School and classroom organization (pp. 129–156). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slavin, R.E. (1990).Cooperative learning: Theory, research, and practice Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Specht, L.B., & Sandlin, P.K. (1991, June). The differential effects of experiential learning activities and traditional lecture classes in accounting.Simulation and Gaming, 22, 196–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stolovitch, H.D., & Yapi, A. (1997). Use of case study method to increase near and far transfer of learning.Performance Improvement Quarterly, 10(2), 64–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tillman, B.A. (1995). Reflections on case method teaching.Action in Teacher Education 17(1), 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welty, W. (1989, July/August). Discussion method teaching: How to make it work.Change, 41–49.

  • White, H.B., III. (1996). Addressing content in problem-based courses: The learning issue matrix.Biochemical Education, 24(1), 41–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkerson, L., & Feletti, G. (1989). Problem-based learning: One approach to increasing student participation. In A.F. Lucas (Ed.), The department chairperson's role in enhancing college teaching.New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 37, 51–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, J., & Dubrow, H. (1991). Encouraging independent thinking. In C.R. Christensen, D.A. Garvin, & A. Sweet (Eds.).Education for judgment (pp. 249–261). Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, A.J., Giunipero, L.C., & Henthorne, T.L. (1994). The cross-functional imperative: The case of marketing and purchasing.International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 30(3), 29–33.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Arizona State University, Arizona, USA

    Anna E. Flynn & James D. Klein (Professor Editor of the Development section of ETR&D)

Authors
  1. Anna E. Flynn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. James D. Klein
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Anna E. Flynn is Vice President and NAPM Associate Professor with the National Association of Purchasing Management.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Flynn, A.E., Klein, J.D. The influence of discussion groups in a case-based learning environment. ETR&D 49, 71–86 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504916

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504916

Keywords

Search

Navigation