Skip to main content
Log in

Don’t kill the messenger! Whistle-blowing in America — A review with recommendations

  • Published:
Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Whistle-blowing in America business and industry has increased as interest in ethical business behavior and the cost of unethical behavior have grown. Whistle-blowing plays the important role of helping to fill the gaps in the regulatory system that is designed to check the abuse of organizational power. However, the practice of whistle-blowing is controversial and whistle-blowers often pay a high price for their actions. Firms can engage in a number of actions to encourage whistle-blowing. Creating a climate that encourages employees to report organizational wrong doing and that protects the whistle-blower is critical. To create such a climate the organization must build trust and cooperation by educating employees in the benefits of ethical and legal behavior.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aram, J., & Salipante, P. (1981). An evaluation of organizational due process in the resolution of employee/employer conflict.Academy of Management Review, 6, 197–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aron, M. (1992). Whistle-blowers, insubordination, and employee rights of free speech.Labor Law Journal, 43, 211–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, T. (1992). Overview of state whistle-blower protection statutes.Labor Law Journal, 43, 440–448.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, T., Cochran, D., & Taylor, G. (1990).The Relationship Between Internal Dissent Policies and Employee Whistle-blowing: An Exploratory Study, paper presented at the 50th annual meeting of the Academy of Management, San Francisco.

  • Boyle, R. (1990). A review of whistle-blower protections and suggestions for change.Labor Law Journal, 41, 821–830.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brief, A., & Motowidle, S. (1986). Prosocial organizational behaviors.Academy of Management Review, 11(4), 710–725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callahan, E., & Collins, J. (1992). Employee attitudes toward whistle-blowing: Management and public policy implications.Journal of Business Ethics, 11, 938–948.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connick v. Myers, 461, U.S. 138 (1983).

  • Dozier, J., & Miceli, M. (1985). Potential predictors of whistle-blowing: A prosocial behavior perspective.Academy of Management Review, 10(4), 823–836.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dworkin, T., & Callahan, E. (1991). Internal whistle-blowing: Protecting the interests of the employee, the organization and society.American Business Law Journal, 29, 267–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Egler, T. (1992). Retaliating against the whistle-blower.Risk Management, August, 24–32.

  • Festinger, L. (1957).A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, J. (1993).A Diagnostic Approach to Organizational Behavior, 4th ed. Boston, MA: Allyn, & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, J. (1986). Principled organizational dissent: A theoretical essay.Research in Organizational Behavior, 8, 1–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberger, D., Miceli, M., & Cohen, D. (1987). Oppositionists and group norms: The reciprocal influence of whistle-blowers and co-workers.Journal of Business Ethics, 6(7), 527–542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hacker, A. (1978). Loyalty and the whistle-blower.Across the Board, 15(4–9), 67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollander, E. (1958). Conformity, status, and idiosyncracy credits.Psychological Review, 65(2), 117–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keenan, J., & McLain, D. (1992). Whistle-blowing: A conceptualization and model. Wall, J., & Jauch, L. (Eds.),Academy of Management Proceedings, 348–352.

  • Keenan, J. (1990). First-level managers and whistle-blowing: An exploratory study of individual and organizational influences, Working paper, School of Business-Management Institute, University of Wisconsin, Madison.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L. (1984). Stage and sequence: The cognitive-development approach to socialization. In Goslin, D. A. (Ed.),Handbook of Socialization Theory and Research, 347–480. Chicago: Rand-McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolarska, L., & Aldrich, H. (1980). Exit, voice, and silence: Consumers and managers responses to organizational decline.Organizational Studies, 1(1), 41–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacNamara, D. (1991). The Victimization of whistle-blowers in the public and private sectors. In Kelly, R. J., & MacNamara, D. E. J. (Eds.),Perspectives in Deviance, Degradation, and Denigration. Anderson Publishing.

  • Miceli, M., & Near, J. (1988). Individual and situational correlates of whistle-blowing.Personnel Psychology, 41(2), 267–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miceli, M., & Near, J. (1984). The relationships among beliefs, organizational position, and whistle-blowing status: A discriminate analysis.Academy of Management Journal, 27, 687–705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miceli, M., Near, J., & Schwenk, C. (1991). Who blows the whistle and why?Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 45(1), 113–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miceli, M., & Near, J. (1992).Blowing the Whistle. New York: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miceli, M., & Near, J. (1985). Characteristics of organizational climate and perceived wrongdoing associated with whistle-blowing.Personnel Psychology, No. 3.

  • Miceli, M., & Near, J. (1994). Whistle-blowing: Reaping the benefits.Academy of Management Executive, 8(3), 65–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, R. (1993).Honesty in the Workplace, 50–58. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Near, J., & Miceli, M. (1987). Whistle-blowers in organizations: Dissidents or reformers? In Staw, B., & Cummings, L. (Eds.),Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 9, 321–368. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Near, J., & Miceli, M. (1985). Organizational dissidence: The case of whistle-blowing.Journal of Business Ethics, 4, 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parliman, G. (1987). Protecting the whistle-blower.Personnel Administrator, July, 26.

  • Perrucci, R., Anderson, R., Schendel, D., & Trachtman, L. (1980). Whistle-blowing: Professionals resistance to organizational authority.Social Problems, 28, 149–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, J. (1993). The consequences of speaking out: Processes of hostility and issue resolution involving federal whistle-blowers.Academy of Management Proceedings, 311–315.

  • Petty, R., & Cacioppo, J. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion.Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 123–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pottmyer, A. (1987). Fruits of blowing the whistle,Utah Holiday, 16(10), 30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Randall, D., & Gibson, A. (1991). Ethical decision making in the medical profession,Journal of Business Ethics, 10, 111–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rongine, N. (1985). Toward a coherent legal response to the public policy dilemma posed by whistle-blowing.American Business Law Journal, Summer, 283.

  • Simon, H. (1975).Administrative Behavior (Second Edition). New York: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, A. (1992). The whistle-blower: Patriot or bounty hunter?Across the Board, November, 18–22.

  • Staw, B., Sandelands, L., & Dutton, J. (1981). Threat rigidity effects in organizational behavior: A multilevel analysis.Administrative Science Quarterly, 26, 501–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Victor, B., Trevino, L., & Shapiro, D. (1993). Peer reporting of unethical behavior: The influence of justice expectations and social context factors.Journal of Business Ethics, 12, 253–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zald, M., & Berger, M. (1978). Social movements in organizations: Coup d’ etat, insurgency, and mass movements.American Journal of Sociology, 83, 823–861.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Paul, R.J., Townsend, J.B. Don’t kill the messenger! Whistle-blowing in America — A review with recommendations. Employ Respons Rights J 9, 149–161 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02622256

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02622256

Key words

Navigation