Skip to main content
Log in

Finite difference heat-transfer modeling for continuous casting

  • Published:
Metallurgical Transactions B Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A number of solution strategies for heat-flow models of continuous casting processes are developed and compared for interfacing with optimization algorithms. These two-dimensional (2-D) slice models include nonlinear thermodynamic and transport properties. As a result of the compari-son, a number of modifications are applied to enhance the accuracy of the simulation as well as the efficiency of the solution. Here, we found that by applying the Kirchhoff transformation to the heat-flow equations and by iterative adjustment of temperature-dependent properties, fewer calculations are required per time-step and larger time-steps can be taken. Consequently, this leads to approximately a twentyfold reduction in computation time when using 2-D slice models to determine three-dimensional, steady-state temperature fields. As a result, a complex, 2-D heat-flow model for a cast strand can be solved in 2 to 5 minutes on a Micro VAX II and is thus suitable for incorporation into a systematic optimization procedure and for process simu-lation in real time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J.K. Brimacombe, I.V. Samarasekera, and J.E. Lait:Continuous Casting, Vol. 2, Heat Flow, Solidification and Crack Formation, Book Crafter Inc., Chelsea, MI, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. Grill, K. Sorimachi, and J.K. Brimacombe:Metall. Trans, B, 1976, vol. 7B, pp. 177–89.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. A.W.D. Hills:J. Iron Steel Inst., Jan. 1965, p. 18.

  4. I.V. Samarasekera and J.K. Brimacombe:Can. Metall. Q., 1979, vol. 18, p. 251.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. K.E. Blazek:Iron Steelmaker, 1987, vol. 14 (9), p. 49.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. E.A. Mizikar:Iron Steel Eng., June 1970, p. 53.

  7. H. Muller and R. Jeschar:Arch. Eisenhuttenwes., 1973, vol. 44, p. 589.

    Google Scholar 

  8. J.K. Brimacombe:Can. Metall. Q., 1976, p. 163.

  9. E.A. Mizikar:Trans. TMS-AIME, Nov. 1967, p. 1747.

  10. G. Comini, S. Del Guidice, R.W. Lewis, and O.C. Zienkiewicz:Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., 1974, p. 613.

  11. J.P. Gabathuler and F. Weinberg:Metall. Trans. B, 1983, vol. 14B, pp. 733–41.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Y.S. Touloukian:Thermophysical Properties of High Tempera- ture Solid Materials, Vol. 3, Ferrous Alloys, MacMillan Com-pany, New York, NY, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  13. J. Nauman: Allegheny Ludlum Corporation, Brackenridge, PA, personal communication, 1987.

  14. A. Perkins and W.R. Irving:2nd Process Technology Confer- ence, ISS-AIME, Warrendale, PA, 1981, p. 187.

    Google Scholar 

  15. B. Lally: Ph.D. Dissertation, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  16. H.S. Carslaw and J.C. Jaeger:Conduction of Heat in Solids, University Press, Oxford, 1947.

    Google Scholar 

  17. J. Nauman: Allegheny Ludlum Corporation, Brackenridge, PA, personal communication, 1986.

  18. G.D. Smith:Numerical Solution of Partial Differential Equa- tions: Finite Difference Methods, Clarendon Press, New York, NY, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  19. H.L. Stone:SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 1968, vol. 5 (3), p. 530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

H. HENEIN, formerly with Carnegie Mellon University.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lally, B., Biegler, L. & Henein, H. Finite difference heat-transfer modeling for continuous casting. Metall Trans B 21, 761–770 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02654255

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02654255

Keywords

Navigation