Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of restored freshwater inflow on macrofauna and meiofauna in upper Rincon Bayou, Texas, USA

  • Published:
Estuaries Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Construction of two dams in 1958 and 1982 reduced freshwater inflow events to Rincon Bayou, part of the Nueces Delta near Corpus Christi, Texas, USA. Inflow reduction led to a reverse estuary, where low-salinity water flooded the delta on incoming tides and higher salinities were found near the Nueces River. Hypersaline conditions caused by high evaporation rates and low water levels were common during summer in the upper reaches. In October 1995, an overflow diversion channel was created by lowering the bank of the Nueces River to restore inflow events into Rincon Bayou, which is the main stem creek that runs through the center of the Delta. Hypersaline conditions occurred four times from mid-1994 to mid-1997 and only once after mid-1997. Lower, rather than higher, salinity conditions were found after August 1997 in the upper reaches. Benthic faunal recovery was monitored by changes in macrofauna and meiofauna communities. Macrofauna responded to inflow events with increased abundances, biomass, and diversity but decreased during hypersaline conditions. Meiofauna abundance also increased with increasing inflow. Benthic characteristics were different in Rincon Bayou than in a reference site, upstream from introduced inflow. As inflow events have increased due to the diversion, the opportunities for positive responses to increased flow have increased. Although the oveflow channel was filled in at the end of the demonstration project in fall 2000, the City of Corpus Christi reopened the channel in fall 2001 because the ecological benefits were credited toward the state-mandated minimum flow requirement for the Nueces Estuary.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Asquith, W. H., J. G. Mosier, andP. W. Bush. 1997. Status, trends and changes in freshwater inflows to bay systems in the Corpus Christi Bay National Estuary Program Area. Publication CCBNEP-17. Texas natural Resource Conservation Commission, Austin, Texas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banse, K. andS. Mosher. 1980. Adult body mass and annual production/biomass relationships of field populations.Ecological Monographs 50:355–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, S. S. 1980. Meiofauna-macrofauna interactions in a high salt marsh habitat.Ecological Monographs 50:487–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bureau of Reclamation. 2000. Chapter 3: Hydrography.In Concluding Report: Rincon Bayou Demonstration Project. Volume II: Findings. U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation. Austin, Texas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, K. R. andR. N. Gorley. 2001. PRIMER v5: User Manual/tutorial. Primer-E, Plymouth, U.K.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, K. R. andR. M. Warwick. 2001. Change in Marine Communities: An Approach to Statistical Analysis and Interpretation, 2nd edition. Primer-E, Plymouth, U.K.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comín, F. A., J. A. Romero, O. Hernandez, andM. Menéndez. 2001. Restoration of wetlands from abandoned rice fields for nutrient removal, biological community and landscape diversity.Restoration Ecology 9:201–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coull, B. C. andS. S. Bell. 1979. Perspectives of marine meiofaunal ecology, p. 189–216.In R. J. Livingston (eds.), Ecological Processes in Coastal and marine Systems. Plenum Publishing Corp., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coull, B. C. andM. A. Palmer. 1984. Field experimentation in meiofaunal ecology.Hydrobiologia 118:1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Day, Jr.,J. W., C. A. S. Hall, W. M. Kemp, andA. Yáñez-Arancibia. 1989. Estuarine Ecology. Wiley-Interscience Publications, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deegan, L. A., J. W. Day, Jr.,J. G. Gosselink, A. Yáñez-Arancibia, G. S. Chávez, andP. Sánchez-Gil. 1986. Relationships among physical characteristics, vegetation distribution and fisheries yield in Gulf of Mexico estuaries, p. 83–100.In D. A. Wolfe (ed.), Estuarine Variability. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finney, C. M. 1979. Salinity stress in harpacticoid copepods.Estuaries 2:132–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fry, B. 1981. Natural stable carbon isotope tag traces Texas shrimp migrations.Fisheries Bulletin 79:337–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glenn, E. P., C. Lee, R. Felger, andS. Zengel. 1996. Effects of water management on the wetlands of the Colorado River Delta, Mexico.Conservation Biology 10:1175–1186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, R. H. 1979. Sampling Design and Statistical Methods for Environmental Biologists. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, M. O. 1973. Diversity and evenness: A unifying notation and its consequences.Ecology 54:427–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jassby, A. D., W. J. Kimmerer, S. G. Monismith, C. Armor, J. E. Cloern, T. M. Powell, J. R. Schubel, andT. J. Vendlinski. 1995. Isohaline position as a habitat indicator for estuarine populations.Ecological Applications 5:272–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalke, R. D. andP. A. Montagna. 1991. The effect of freshwater inflow on macrobenthos in the Lavaca River Delta and upper Lavaca Bay, Texas.Contributions in Marine Science 32:49–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Longley, W. L. (ed.). 1994. Freshwater Inflows to Texas Bays and Estuaries: Ecological Relationships and Methods for Determination of Needs. Texas Water Development Board and Texas Parks and Wildlife Department, Austin, Texas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ludwig, J. A. andJ. F. Reynolds. 1988. Statistical Ecology. John Wiley and Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mannino, A. andP. A. Montagna. 1997. Small scale spatial variation of macrobenthic community structure.Estuaries 20:159–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moffett, A. W. 1970. The Shrimp Fishery in Texas. Texas Parks and Wildlife Department, Austin, Texas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montagna, P. A. 1995. Rates of meiofaunal microbivory: A review.Vie et Milieu 45:1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montagna, P. A., G. F. Blanchard, andA. Dinet. 1995. Effect of production and biomass of intertidal microphytobenthos on meiofaunal grazing rates.Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 185:149–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montagna, P. A. andR. D. Kalke. 1992. The effect of freshwater inflow on meiofaunal and macrofaunal populations in the Guadalupe and Nueces estuaries, Texas.Estuaries 15:307–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montagna, P. A. andW. B. Yoon. 1991. The effect of freshwater inflow on meiofaunal consumption of sediment bacteria and microphytobenthos in San Antonio Bay, Texas, USA.Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 33:529–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nixon, S. A., C. A. Oviatt, J. Frithsen, andB. Sullivan. 1986. Nutrients and the productivity of estuarine and coastal marine ecosystems.Journal of the Limnological Society of South Africa 12:43–71.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Riera, P., P. A. Montagna, R. D. Kalke, andP. Richard. 2000. Utilization of estuarine organic matter during growth and migration by juvenile brown shrimpPenaeus aztecus in a South Texas estuary.Marine Ecology Progress Series 199:205–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritter, M. C. 1999. Benthic succession in a Texas estuary: The influence of hypoxia, salinity, fluctuations, and disturbance frequency. Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Marine Science, University of Texas at Austin, Port Aransas, Texas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritter, M. C. andP. A. Montagna. 1999. Seasonal hypoxia and models of benthic response in a Texas bay.Estuaries 22:7–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute, Inc. 1991. SAS/STAT7 User's Guide, Version 6, 4th edition, Volume 2. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina.

    Google Scholar 

  • SigmaPlot. 2000. SigmaPlot 2000 Programming Guide. SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, L. E., J. C. Schmidt, T. J. Ayers, andB. T. Brown. 1995. Flow regulation, geomorphology, and Colorado River marsh development in the Grand Canyon, Arizona.Ecological Applications 5:1025–1039.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walters, C., L. Gunderson, andC. S. Holling. 1992. Experimental policies for water management in the Everglades.Ecological Applications 2:189–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, G. H. 1985. Marsh enhancement by freshwater diversion.Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management 111:1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, G. H. andN. E. Armstrong. 1997. Ambient water, sediment, and tissue quality of the Corpus Christi Bay National Estuary Program Area, present status and historical trends. Publication CCBNEP-23. Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission, Austin, Texas.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul A. Montagna.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Montagna, P.A., Kalke, R.D. & Ritter, C. Effect of restored freshwater inflow on macrofauna and meiofauna in upper Rincon Bayou, Texas, USA. Estuaries 25, 1436–1447 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02692237

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02692237

Keywords

Navigation