Skip to main content
Log in

Application of optimisation techniques in groundwater quantity and quality management

  • Published:
Sadhana Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents the state-of-the-art on application of optimisation techniques in groundwater quality and quantity management. In order to solve optimisation-based groundwater management models, researchers have used various mathematical programming techniques such as linear programming (LP), nonlinear programming (NLP), mixed-integer programming (MIP), optimal control theory-based mathematical programming, differential dynamic programming (DDP), stochastic programming (SP), combinatorial optimisation (CO), and multiple objective programming for multipurpose management. Studies reported in the literature on the application of these methods are reviewed in this paper.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aarts E, Korst J 1989Simulated annealing and boltzmann machines (New York: John Wiley)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Aguado E, Remson I 1974 Groundwater hydraulics in aquifer management.J. Hydraul. Div., Am. Soc. Civ. Eng. HY1-100: 103–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Aguado E, Remson I 1980 Groundwater management with fixed charges.J. Water Resour. Planning Manage. Div., Am. Soc. Civ. Eng. WR2-106: 375–382

    Google Scholar 

  • Aguado E, Remson I, Pikul M F, Thomas W A 1974 Optimal pumping for aquifer dewatering.J. Hydraul. Div., Am. Soc. Civ. Eng. HY7-100: 860–877

    Google Scholar 

  • Aguado E, Sitar N, Remson I 1977 Sensitivity analysis in aquifer studies.Water Resour. Res. 13: 733–737

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahlfeld D P, Heidari M 1994 Applications of optimal hydraulic control to groundwater systems.J. Water Resour. Planning Manage. Div., Am. Soc. Civ. Eng. 120: 350–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alley W M, Aguado E, Remson I 1976 Aquifer management under transient and steady-state conditions.Water Resour. Bull. 12: 963–972

    Google Scholar 

  • Andricevic R 1990 A real-time approach to management and monitoring of groundwater hydraulics.Water Resour. Res. 26: 2747–2755

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andricevic R, Kitanidis P K 1990 Optimisation of the pumping schedule in aquifer remediation under uncertainty.Water Resour. Res. 26: 875–885

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aronofsky J S, Williams A C 1962 The use of linear programming and mathematical models in underground oil production.Manage. Sci. 8: 374–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atwood D F, Gorelick S M 1985 Hydraulic gradient control for groundwater contaminant removal.J. Hydrol. 76: 85–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bear J 1979Hydraulics of groundwater (New York: Mc-Graw Hill)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogardi J J, Das Gupta A, Jiang H Z 1991 Search beam method, a promising way to define non-dominated solution in multiobjective groundwater development.Int. J. Water Resour. Dev. 7: 247–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burt O R 1967 Temporal allocation of groundwater.Water Resour. Res. 3: 45–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Casola W H, Narayanan R, Duffy C, Bishop A B 1986 Optimal control model for groundwater management.J. Water Resour. Planning Manage., Div. Am. Soc. Civ. Eng. 112: 183–197

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang L C, Shoemaker C A, Liu P L F 1992 Optimal time-varying pumping rates for groundwater remediation: application of a constrained optimal control algorithm.Water Resour. Res. 28: 3157–3173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohon J L, Marks D H 1975 A review and evaluation of multiobjective programming techniques.Water Resour. Res. 11: 208–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Colarullo S J, Heidari M, Maddock T III 1984 Identification of an optimal groundwater strategy in a contaminated aquifer.Water Resour. Bull. 20: 747–760

    Google Scholar 

  • Culver T B, Shoemaker C A 1992 Dynamic optimal control for groundwater remediation with flexible management periods.Water Resour. Res. 28: 629–641

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Culver T B, Shoemaker C A 1993 Optimal control for groundwater remediation by differential dynamic programming with quasi-Newton approximations.Water Resour. Res. 29: 823–831

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Datta B, Dhiman S D 1996 Chance constrained optimal monitoring network design for pollutants in groundwater.J. Water Resour. Planning Manage. Div., Am. Soc. Civ. Eng. 122: 180–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Datta B, Peralta R C 1986 Interactive computer graphics-based multiobjective decision-making for regional groundwater management.Agric. Water Manage. 11: 91–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das A, Datta B 1999a Development of multiobjective management models for coastal aquifers.J. Water Res. Planning Manage., Am. Soc. Civ. Eng. 125: 76–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das A, Datta B 1999b Development of management models for sustainable use of coastal aquifers.J. Irrigation Drainage Eng., Am. Soc. Civ. Eng. 125: 112–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das A, Datta B 2000 Optimisation based solution of density dependent seawater intrusion in coastal aquifers.J. Hydrol. Eng., Am. Soc. Civ. Eng. 5: 82–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deninger R A 1970 Systems analysis of water supply systems.Water Resour. Bull. 6: 573–579

    Google Scholar 

  • Dougherty D E, Marryott R A 1991 Optimal groundwater management 1. Simulated annealing.Water Resour. Res. 27: 2493–2508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Douglas J Jr, Jones B F 1963 On predictor-corrector methods for nonlinear parabolic differential equations.SIAM J. Appl. Math. : 195–204

  • Duckstein L, Treichel W, ElMagnouni S 1994 Ranking groundwater management alternatives by multicriterion analysis.J. Water Resour. Planning Manage., Div. Am. Soc. Civ. Eng. 120: 546–565

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elango K, Rouve G 1980 Aquifers: Finite-element linear programming model.J. Hydraul. Div., Am. Soc. Civ. Eng. HY10-106: 1641–1658

    Google Scholar 

  • Elango K 1981 Discussion of groundwater management with fixed charges by Aguado E and Remson I.J. Water Resour. Planning Manage. Div., Am. Soc. Civ. Eng. 107: 583

    Google Scholar 

  • Essaid H I 1990 A multilayered sharp interface model of coupled freshwater and saltwater in coastal systems: Model development and application.Water Resour. Res. 27: 1431–1454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • El Magnouni S, Treichel W 1994 A multicriterion approach to groundwater management.Water Resour. Res. 30: 1881–1895

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans B, Remson I 1982 Closure: groundwater management with fixed charges by Aguado E and Remson I.J. Water Resour. Planning Manage. Div., Am. Soc. Civ. Eng. 108: 237

    Google Scholar 

  • Finney B A, Samsuhadi, Willis R 1992 Quasi-three-dimensional optimisation model for Jakarta basin.J. Water Resour. Planning Manage. Div., Am. Soc. Civ. Eng. 118: 18–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Flores E Z, Gutjahr A L, Gelhar L W 1975 A stochastic model of the operation of a stream-aquifer system.Water Resour. Res. 14: 30–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Futagami T, Tamai N, Yatsuzuka M 1976 FEM coupled with LP for water pollution control.J. Hydraul. Div., Am. Soc. Civ. Eng. HY7-102: 881–897

    Google Scholar 

  • Galeati G, Gambolati G 1988 Optimal dewatering schemes in the foundation design of an electronuclear plant.Water Resour. Res. 24: 541–552

    Google Scholar 

  • Gharbi A, Peralta R C 1994 Integrated embedding optimisation applied to Salt Lake valley aquifers.Water Resour. Res. 30: 817–832

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg D E 1989Genetic algorithm in search, optimisation, and machine learning (Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorelick S M 1982 A model for managing sources of groundwater pollution.Water Resour. Res. 18: 773–781

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorelick S M 1983 A review of distributed parameter groundwater management modeling methods.Water Resour. Res. 19: 305–319

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorelick S M 1987 Sensitivity analysis of optimal groundwater contaminant capture curves: spatial variability and robust solutions. InProceedings, NWWA Conference Solving Groundwater Problems with Models (Dublin, OH: National Water Well Association) pp 133–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorelick S M, Remson I 1982 Optimal location and management of waste disposal facilities affecting groundwater quality.Water. Resour. Bull. 18: 43–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorelick S M, Voss C I, Gill P E, Murray W, Saunders M A, Wright M H 1984 Aquifer reclamation design: The use of contaminant transport simulation combined with nonlinear programming.Water Resour. Res. 20: 415–427

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallaji K, Yazicigil H 1996 Optimal management of a coastal aquifer in southern Turkey.J. Water Res. Planning Manage. Div., Am. Soc. Civ. Eng. 122: 233–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hantush M M S, Marino M A 1989 Chance-constrained model for management of a stream-aquifer system.J. Water Resour. Planning Manage. Div., Am. Soc. Civ. Eng. 115: 259–277

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidari M 1982 Application of linear systems theory and linear programming to groundwater management in Kansas.Water Resour. Bull. 18: 1003–1012

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland J H 1975Adaption in natural and artificial systems (Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Jones L, Willis R, Yeh W W G 1987 Optimal control of nonlinear groundwater hydraulics using differential dynamic programming.Water Resour. Res. 23: 2097–2107

    Google Scholar 

  • Karatzas G P, Pinder G F 1993 Groundwater management using numerical simulation and the outer approximation method for global optimisation.Water Resour. Res. 29: 3371–3378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karatzas G P, Pinder G F 1996 The solution of groundwater quality management problems with a nonconvex feasible region using a cutting plane optimisation technique.Water Resour. Res. 32: 1091–1100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaunas J R, Haimes Y Y 1985 Risk management of groundwater contamination in a multiobjective framework.Water Resour. Res. 21: 1721–1730

    Google Scholar 

  • Keltron Inc. 1979 MPS/III, Mathematical programming system, User Manual, Management Sci. System Div., Arlington, Va

    Google Scholar 

  • Keshari A K, Datta B 1996 Multiobjective management of a contaminated aquifer for agricultural use.Water Resour. Manage. 10: 373–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick S, Gelatt C D, Vecchi M P 1983 Optimisation by simulated annealing.Science 220: 671–680

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Konikow L F, Bredehoeft 1978 Computer model of two-dimensional solute transport and dispersion in groundwater. US Geol. Survey Tech. Water Resour. Investigation, Book no. 7

  • Lee A S, Aronafsky J S 1958 A linear programming model for scheduling crude oil production.J. Petrol Technol. 213: 51–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefkoff L J, Gorelick S M 1986 Design and cost analysis of rapid aquifer restoration systems using flow simulation and quadratic programming.Ground Water 24: 777–790

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loaiciga H A, Charbeneau R J, Everett L G, Fogg G E, Hobbs B F, Rouhani S 1992 Review of groundwater quality monitoring network design.J. Hydraul. Eng. 118: 11–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Maddock T III 1972a Algebraic technological function from a simulation model.Water Resour. Res. 8: 129–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Maddock T III 1972b A groundwater planning model: A basis for a data collection network. Presented at theInt. Symp. on Uncertainties in Hydrologic and Water Resource Systems (Tuscon, AZ: Int. Assoc. Sci. Hydrol.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Maddock T III 1974 The operation of stream-aquifer system under stochastic demands.Water Resour. Res. 10: 1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Makinde-Odusola B A, Marino M A 1989 Optimal control of groundwater by the feedback method of control.Water Resour. Res. 25: 1341–1352

    Google Scholar 

  • Marryott R A, Dougherty D E, Stollar R L 1993 Optimal groundwater management: Application of simulated annealing to a field scale contamination site.Water Resour. Res. 29: 847–860

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald M G, Harbaugh A W 1984A modular three-dimensional finite difference ground-water flow model (Washington, DC: Scientific Publication Co.)

    Google Scholar 

  • McKinney D C, Lin M 1994 Genetic algorithm solution of groundwater management models.Water Resour. Res. 30: 1897–1906

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mercer J W, Larson S P, Faust C R 1980 Simulation saltwater interface motion.Ground Water 18: 374–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer P D, Brill E D 1988 A method for locating wells in a groundwater monitoring network under conditions of uncertainty.Water Resour. Res. 24: 1277–1282

    Google Scholar 

  • Misirli F, Yazicigil H 1997 Optimal ground-water pollution containment with fixed charges.J. Water Res. Planning Manage. Am. Soc. Civ. Eng. 123: 2–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molz F J, Bell L C 1977 Head gradient control in aquifers used for fluid storage.Water Resour. Res. 13: 795–798

    Google Scholar 

  • Morel-Seytoux H J 1975a A simple case of conjunctive surface-groundwater management.Ground Water 13: 505–515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morel-Seytoux H J 1975b Optimal legal conjunctive operation of surface and ground waters. Presented at theSecond World Congress Int. Water Resour. Assoc. New Delhi

  • Morel-Seytoux H J, Daly C J 1975 A discrete kernel generator for stream-aquifer studies.Water Resour. Res. 11: 253–260

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan D R, Eheart J W, Valocchi A J 1993 Aquifer remediation design under uncertainty using a new chance constrained programming technique.Water Resour. Res. 29: 551–561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murtagh B A, Saunders M A 1993 MINOS 5.4 user’s guide. Technical report, SOL 83-20R, Systems Optimisation Laboratory, Department of Operations Research, Stanford University, Stanford, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Padmanabhan G 1981 Discussion of groundwater management with fixed charges by Aguado E and Remson I.J. Water Resour. Planning Manage. Div., Am. Soc. Civ. Eng. 107: 584

    Google Scholar 

  • Peralta R C, Datta B 1990 Reconnaissance — level alternative optimal groundwater use strategies.J. Water Resour. Planning Manage. Div., Am. Soc. Civ. Eng 116: 676–692

    Google Scholar 

  • Peralta R C, Cantiller R R, Terry J E 1995 Optimal large-scale conjunctive water-use planning: case study.J. Water Resour. Planning Manage. Div., Am. Soc. Civ. Eng. 121: 471–478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peralta R C, Solaimanian J, Musharrafich G R 1995b Optimal dispersed groundwater contaminant management: MODCON method.J. Water Resour. Planning Manage. Am. Soc. Civ. Eng. 121: 490–498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinder G F 1979 Galerkin finite element models for aquifer simulation. Rep. 76-WR-5, Department of Civil Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Press W H, Flannery B P, Tenkolsky S A, Vetterling W T 1986Numerical recipes, the art of scientific computing (New York: Cambridge University Press)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ranjithan S, Eheart J W, Garrett Jr J H 1993 Neural network-based screening for groundwater reclamation under uncertainty.Water Resour. Res. 29: 563–574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ratzlaff S A, Aral M M, Al-Khayyal F 1992 Optimal design of ground-water capture systems using segmental velocity-direction constraints.Ground Water 30: 6507–612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reklaitis G V, Ravindran A, Ragsdell K M 1983Engineering optimisation methods and applications (New York: John Wiley and Sons)

    Google Scholar 

  • Remson K A, Aguado E, Remson I 1974 Tests of a groundwater optimisation technique.Ground Water 12: 273–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritzel B J, Eheart J W, Ranjithan S 1994 Using genetic algorithms to solve a multiple objective groundwater pollution containment problem.Water Resour. Res. 30: 1589–1603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rizzo D M, Dougherty D E 1996 Design optimisation for multiple management period groundwater remediation.Water Resour. Res. 32: 2549–2561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers L L, Dowla F U 1994 Optimisation of groundwater remediation using artificial neural networks with parallel solute transport modeling.Water Resour. Res. 30: 457–481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenwald G W, Green D W 1974 A method for determining the optimum location of wells in a reservoir using mixed-integer programming.Soc. Res. Eng. J. 14: 44–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Shafike N G, Duckstein L, Maddock T III 1992 Multiobjective analysis of groundwater contamination management.Water Resour. Bull. 28: 33–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Shamir U, Bear J, Gamliel A 1984 Optimal annual operation of a coastal aquifer.Water Resour. Res. 20: 435–444

    Google Scholar 

  • Takahashi S, Peralta R C 1995 Optimal perennial yield planning for complex nonlinear aquifers: Methods and examples.Adv. Water Resour. 18: 49–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Theis C V 1935 The relation between the lowering of the piezometric surface and the rate and duration of discharge of a well using groundwater storage.Trans. Am. Geophys. Union 16: 519–524

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiedeman G, Gorelick S M 1993 Analysis of uncertainty in optimal groundwater contaminant capture design.Water Resour. 29: 2139–2153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tui H 1964 Concave programming under linear constraints.Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 159: 32–35

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Tung Y K 1986 Groundwater management by chance-constrained model.J. Water Resour. Planning Manage. Div., Am. Soc. Civ. Eng. 112: 1–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Tung Y K, Kolterman C E 1985 Some computational experience using embedding technique for groundwater management.Ground Water 23: 455–456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Laarhoven P J M, Aarts E H L 1987Simulated annealing: Theory and applications (Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner B J, Gorelick S M 1987 Optimal groundwater quality management under parameter uncertainty.Water Resour. Res. 23: 1162–1174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner B J, Gorelick S M 1989 Reliable aquifer remediation in the presence of spatially variable hydraulic conductivity: From data to design.Water Resour. Res. 25: 2210–2225

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner J M, Shamir U, Nemati H R 1992 Groundwater quality management under uncertainty: Stochastic programming approaches and the value of information.Water Resour. Res. 28: 1233–1246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wanakule N, Mays L W, Lasdon L S 1986 Optimal management of large-scale aquifers: methodology and applications.Water Resour. Res. 22: 447–465

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang W, Ahlfeld D P 1994 Optimal groundwater remediation with well location as a decision variable: Model development.Water Resour. Res. 30: 1605–1618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wattenberger R A 1970 Maximising seasonal withdrawals from gas storage reservoirs.J. Petrol Technol.: 994–998

  • Whiffen G J, Shoemaker C A 1993 Nonlinear weighted feedback control of groundwater remediation under uncertainty.Water Resour. Res. 29: 3277–3289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willis R 1976 Optimal groundwater quality management: Well injection of waste water.Water Resour. Res. 12: 47–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Willis R 1977 Optimal groundwater resource management using the response equation method. InFinite elements in water resources (eds) W G Gray, G F Pinder (London: Pentech)

    Google Scholar 

  • Willis R 1979 A planning model for the management of groundwater quality.Water Resour. Res. 15: 1305–1312

    Google Scholar 

  • Willis R 1983 A unified approach to regional groundwater management, in groundwater hydraulics.Water resources monograph series (eds) J S Rosenshein, G D Bennett (Washington, DC: Am. Geophys. Union)

    Google Scholar 

  • Willis R, Finney B A 1985 Optimal control of nonlinear groundwater hydraulics: theoretical development and numerical experiments.Water Resour. Res. 21: 1476–1482

    Google Scholar 

  • Willis R, Finney B A 1988 Planning model for optimal control of saltwater intrusion.J. Water Resour. Planning Manage., Div. Am. Soc. Civ. Eng. 114: 163–178

    Google Scholar 

  • Willis R, Liu P 1984 Optimisation model for groundwater planning.J. Water Resour. Planning Manage. Div., Am. Soc. Civ. Eng. 110: 333–347

    Google Scholar 

  • Willis R, Newman B A 1977 Management model for groundwater development.J. Water Resour. Planning Manage Div., Am. Soc. Civ. Eng. 103: 159–171

    Google Scholar 

  • Willis R, Yeh W W G 1987Groundwater systems planning and management (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall)

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiang Y, Sykes J F, Thomson N R 1995 Alternative formulations for optimal groundwater remediation design.J. Water Resour. Planning Manage. Div., Am. Soc. Civ. Eng. 121: 171–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yakowitz S J 1982 Dynamic programming applications in water resources.Water Resour. Res. 18: 637–696

    Google Scholar 

  • Yazicigil H 1990 Optimal planning and operation of multiaquifer system.J. Water Resour. Planning Manage. Div., Am. Soc. Civ. Eng. 116: 435–454

    Google Scholar 

  • Yazicigil H, Rasheeduddin M 1987 Optimisation model for groundwater management in multi-aquifer systems.J. Water Resour. Planning Manage. Div., Am. Soc. Civ. Eng. 113: 257–273

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeh W W G 1992 Systems analysis in groundwater planning and management.J. Water Resour. Planning Manage. Div., Am. Soc. Civ. Eng. 118: 224–237

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Das, A., Datta, B. Application of optimisation techniques in groundwater quantity and quality management. Sadhana 26, 293–316 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02703402

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02703402

Keywords

Navigation