Abstract
Changes to literacy pedagogy are gradually occurring in classrooms in response to contemporary communication and learning contexts. These changes are diverse as teachers and educational researchers attempt to design new pedagogy to respond to the potential of digital technologies within existing curriculum and assessment policies. This paper discusses evidence from recent classroom research where 16 teachers worked in teams in nine primary school classrooms to develop new ways of embedding technology for literacy learning. Data from the nine case studies provides evidence that teachers can combine the teaching of print-based literacy with digital communications technology across a range of curriculum areas. Findings from this research confirm that literacy needs to be redefined within current curriculum contexts, particularly in light of the emergence of a national curriculum. New descriptors of language and literacy criteria are proposed within the framework of multimodal literacy, the literacy that is needed in contemporary times for reading, viewing, responding to and producing multimodal and digital texts.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA) (2009–10). Draft Australian Curriculum for English. Accessed from http://www.acara.edu.au/phase_1_-_the_australian_curriculum.html
Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations (DEEWR) (2008). The Digital Education Revolution. Canberra: Australian Government. Accessed from http://www.digitaleducationrevolution.gov.au/
Barton, D. (1994). Literacy: an introduction to the ecology of written language. London: Blackwell.
Bearne, E. (2003). Rethinking Literacy: Communication, Representation and Text. Reading Literacy and Language, 37(3), 98–103.
Bearne, E. & Wolstencroft, H. (2007). Visual Approaches to Teaching Writing. Multimodal Literacy 5–11. London: Sage.
Bearne, E., Clark, C., Johnson, A., Manford, P, Mottram, M. & Wolstencroft, H. With Anderson, R., Gamble, N. & Overall, L. (2007). Reading on Screen. Research undertaken by the United Kingdom Literacy Association with support from the Qualifications and Curriculum Authority January - June 2006.
Carrington, V. (2005). New textual landscapes, information and early literacy. In J. Marsh (ed.), Popular Culture, New Media and Digital Literacy in Early Childhood. London: Routledge Falmer.
Coiro, J., Knobel, M., Lankshear, C. & Leu, D. (Eds) (2008). Handbook of Research on New Literacies. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Cope, B. & Kalantzis, M. ( Eds.) (2000). Multiliteracies: Literacy Learning and the Design of Social Futures. South Yarra, Victoria: Macmillan.
Gee, J. (2003). What Video Games have to Teach us about Learning and Literacy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Healy, A. (2008). Expanding Student Capacities, In A. Healy (Ed.) Multiliteracies: Pedagogies for diverse learners, (pp. 2–29). Sydney: Oxford University Press.
Kalantzis, M. & Cope, B., et al. (2005). Learning by Design. Melbourne, Victoria: VSIC, Common Ground.
Kress, G. & van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Multimodal Discourse, London: Routledge.
Kress, G. (2003). Literacy in the New Media Age. London: Routledge.
Kress, G. & Jewitt, C. (Eds.) (2003). Multimodal Literacy. New York: Peter Lang.
Lankshear, C. & Knobel, M. (2003). New Literacies Changing Knowledge and Classroom Learning. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Lawless, K.A. & Schrader, P.G. (2008). Where Do We Go Now? Understanding Research on Navigation in Complex Digital Environments. In J Coiro, M. Knobel, C. Lankshear & D. Leu (Eds) (2008). Handbook of Research on New Literacies, (pp. 267–296). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Leu, D.J. Jr. (2000). Literacy and technology: Deictic consequences for literacy education in an information age. In M.N. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research, (Vol. 3, pp. 743–770). NJ: Erlbaum.
Lewis, C. & Farbos, B. (2005). Instant messaging, literacies and social identities. Reading Research Quarterly. 40(4), 470–501.
Merchant, G. (2008). Digital Writing in the Early Years. In J. Coiro, M. Knobel, C. Lankshear & D. Leu (Eds), Handbook of Research on New Literacies, (pp.751–774). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Pahl, K. & Rowsell, J. (2005). Literacy and Education. Understanding the New Literacy Studies in the Classroom. London: Paul Chapman Publishing.
Prensky, M. (2001). Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants. In M. Prensky, On the Horizon, MCB University Press, 9 (5), Accessed on 24 Jan, 2009, from http://www.marc-prensky.com/writing/Prensky%20-%20Digital%20Natives,%20Digital%20Immi-grants%20%20Part1.pdf.
Simpson, A. & Walsh, M. (In press) Multiple literacies: implications for changed pedagogy. Chapter 3. In F. Christie & A. Simpson (Eds.). Literacy and Social Responsibility: Multiple Perspectives, (Chap 3). London: Equinox.
Snyder, I. (Ed.) (1997). From Page to Screen. Taking literacy into the electronic era. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.
Street, B. (1984). Literacy in Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Unsworth, L. (2001). Teaching Multiliteracies Across the Curriculum. Changing contexts of text and image in classroom practice. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Wagner, J. (1997). The unavoidable intervention of educational research: A framework for reconsidering researcher-practitioner co-operation. Educational Researcher. 26 (7) 13–22.
Walsh, M. (2008). Worlds Have Collided And Modes Have Merged: Classroom Evidence of Changed Literacy Practices. Literacy. 42(2), 101–108.
Walsh, M. (2009). In Pedagogic Potentials of Multimodal Literacy. In L. Tan Wee Hin & R. Subramanian (Eds), Handbook of Research on New Media Literacy at the K-12 Level: Issues and Challenges, (pp. 32–47) US: IGI Global.
Yelland, N., Lee, L., O’Rourke, M. & Harrison, C. (2008). Rethinking Learning in Early Childhood Education. Berkshire, UK: Open University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Walsh, M. Multimodal literacy: What does it mean for classroom practice?. AJLL 33, 211–239 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03651836
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03651836