Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Dynamics of renewable energy consumption and economic activities across the agriculture, industry, and service sectors: evidence in the perspective of sustainable development

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study aims to examine the impact of renewable and non-renewable energy consumption on the agriculture, industry, services, and overall economic activities (GDP) across a panel of G20 nations. The study makes use of annual data from 1980 to 2012 on 17 countries of the G20. To achieve the study objectives, we apply several robust panel econometric models which account for cross-sectional dependence and heterogeneity in the analysis. The empirical findings confirm the significant long-run equilibrium relationship among the variables. The long-run elasticities indicate that both renewable and non-renewable energy consumptions have significant positive effect on the economic activities across the sectors and also on the overall economic output. These results also imply that the impact is more from renewable energy on economic activities than that of non-renewable energy. Given that, our results offer significant policy implications. We suggest that the policy makers should aim to initiate effective policies to turn domestic and foreign investments into renewable energy projects. This eventually ensures low carbon emissions and sustainable economic development across the G20 nations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Authors have considered industrial and service sectors as the modern sectors.

  2. We excluded Russia and Saudi Arabia from the sample due to unavailability of the data.

  3. A number of recent studies (e.g., Alam et al. 2017; Alam and Paramati 2016; Paramati et al. 2017a) have applied the panel unit root tests which account for cross-sectional dependence in the analysis, while some other studies (e.g., Alam and Paramati 2015) did not account for cross-sectional dependence while estimating panel unit root tests.

  4. Cerrato et al. (2013) provide detailed discussion on linear and non-linear panel unit root tests.

  5. On the other hand, Gozgor (2016) and Gozgor and Demir (2017) provide detailed discussion on the structural breaks in time-series data set.

  6. A number of recent empirical studies (Alam et al. 2015; Alam and Paramati 2017; Paramati et al. 2017d) have used heterogeneous panel no-causality test to explore the direction of causality between the variables.

References

  • Abbas F, Choudhury N (2013) Electricity consumption-economic growth nexus: an aggregated and disaggregated causality analysis in India and Pakistan. J Policy Model 35(4):538–553

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alam MS, Paramati SR (2015) Do oil consumption and economic growth intensify environmental degradation? Evidence from developing economies. Appl Econ 47(48):5186–5203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alam MS, Paramati SR (2016) The impact of tourism on income inequality in developing economies: does Kuznets curve hypothesis exist? Ann Tour Res 61:111–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alam MS, Paramati SR (2017) The dynamic role of tourism investment on tourism development and CO2 emissions. Ann Tour Res 66(C):213–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alam, M. S., Paramati, S. R., Shahbaz, M., & Bhattacharya, M. (2015). Dynamics of natural gas consumption, output and trade: empirical evidence from the emerging economies. No. 21-15. Monash Economics Working Papers, Monash University, Department of Economics

  • Alam MS, Paramati SR, Shahbaz M, Bhattacharya M (2017) Natural gas, trade and sustainable growth: empirical evidence from the top gas consumers of the developing world. Appl Econ 49(7):635–649

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-mulali U, Fereidouni HG, Lee JY, Sab CNBC (2013) Examining the bi-directional long run relationship between renewable energy consumption and GDP growth. Renew Sust Energ Rev 22:209–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alper A, Oguz O (2016) The role of renewable energy consumption in economic growth: evidence from asymmetric causality. Renew Sust Energ Rev 60:953–959

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Apergis N, Payne JE (2010) Renewable energy consumption and economic growth: evidence from a panel of OECD countries. Energy Policy 38(1):656–660

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Apergis N, Payne JE (2011) The renewable energy consumption–growth nexus in Central America. Appl Energy 88(1):343–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Apergis N, Payne JE (2012) Renewable and non-renewable energy consumption-growth nexus: evidence from a panel error correction model. Energy Econ 34(3):733–738

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ben Aïssa MS, Ben Jebli M, Ben Youssef S (2014) Output, renewable energy consumption and trade in Africa. Energy Policy 66:11–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ben Jebli M, Ben Youssef S (2015) Output, renewable and non-renewable energy consumption and international trade: evidence from a panel of 69 countries. Renew Energy 83:799–808

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya M, Awaworyi Churchill S, Paramati SR (2017) The dynamic impact of renewable energy and institutions on economic output and CO2 emissions across regions. Renewable Energy 111:157–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya M, Paramati SR, Ozturk I, Bhattacharya S (2016) The effect of renewable energy consumption on economic growth: evidence from top 38 countries. Appl Energy 162:733–741

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloch H, Rafiq S, Salim R (2015) Economic growth with coal, oil and renewable energy consumption in China: prospects for fuel substitution. Econ Model 44:104–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowden N, Payne JE (2009) The causal relationship between U.S. energy consumption and real output: a disaggregated analysis. J Policy Model 31(2):180–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowden N, Payne JE (2010) Sectoral analysis of the causal relationship between renewable and non-renewable energy consumption and real output in the US. Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy 5(4):400–408

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cerrato M, De Peretti C, Stewart C (2013) Is the consumption–income ratio stationary? Evidence from linear and non-linear panel unit root tests for OECD and non-OECD countries. Manch Sch 81(1):102–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costantini V, Martini C (2010) The causality between energy consumption and economic growth: a multi-sectoral analysis using non-stationary cointegrated panel data. Energy Econ 32(3):591–603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dumitrescu E-I, Hurlin C (2012) Testing for Granger non-causality in heterogeneous panels. Econ Model 29(4):1450–1460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gozgor G (2016) Are shocks to renewable energy consumption permanent or transitory? An empirical investigation for Brazil, China, and India. Renew Sust Energ Rev 66:913–919

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gozgor G, Demir E (2017) Evaluating the efficiency of nuclear energy policies: an empirical examination for 26 countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24(22):18596–18604

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IEA, 2014a. World energy statistics and balances (2014), UN Energy Statistics, Paris

  • IEA. 2014b. International energy administration, World Energy Statistics and Balances, UN Energy Statistics

  • IEO, 2016. International energy outlook, U.S. International Energy Administration. Washington, DC

  • Im KS, Lee J, Tieslau M (2005) Panel LM unit root tests with level shifts. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 67(1):393–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Im KS, Pesaran MH, Shin Y (2003) Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. J Econ 115(1):53–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inglesi-Lotz R (2016) The impact of renewable energy consumption to economic growth: a panel data application. Energy Econ 53:58–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IRENA. (2016a), IRENA resource renewable energy statistics. IRENA Data Stat. IRENA, Abu Dhabi

  • IRENA. (2016b), G20 toolkit for renewable energy deployment: country options for sustainable growth based on REmap. International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA)

  • Kutan AM, Paramati SR, Ummalla M, Zakari A (2017) Financing renewable energy projects in major emerging market economies: evidence in the perspective of sustainable economic development. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade available online

  • Lau CKM, Suvankulov F, Su Y, Chau F (2012) Some cautions on the use of nonlinear panel unit root tests: evidence from a modified series-specific non-linear panel unit-root test. Econ Model 29(3):810–816

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marques AC, Fuinhas JA, Menegaki AN (2016) Renewable vs non-renewable electricity and the industrial production nexus: evidence from an ARDL bounds test approach for Greece. Renewable Energy 96(Part A):645–655

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menegaki AN (2011) Growth and renewable energy in Europe: a random effect model with evidence for neutrality hypothesis. Energy Econ 33(2):257–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newey WK, West KD (1994) Automatic lag selection in covariance matrix estimation. Rev Econ Stud 61(4):631–653

  • Ocal O, Aslan A (2013) Renewable energy consumption–economic growth nexus in Turkey. Renew Sust Energ Rev 28:494–499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ohler A, Fetters I (2014) The causal relationship between renewable electricity generation and GDP growth: a study of energy sources. Energy Econ 43:125–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pao H-T, Fu H-C (2013) Renewable energy, non-renewable energy and economic growth in Brazil. Renew Sust Energ Rev 25:381–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paramati SR, Alam MS, Chen CF (2017a) The effects of tourism on economic growth and CO2 emissions: a comparison between developed and developing economies. J Travel Res 56(6):712–724

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paramati SR, Apergis N, Ummalla M (2017b) Financing clean energy projects through domestic and foreign capital: the role of political cooperation among the EU, the G20 and OECD countries. Energy Econ 61:62–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paramati SR, Mo D, Gupta R (2017c) The effects of stock market growth and renewable energy use on CO2 emissions: evidence from G20 countries. Energy Econ 66:360–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paramati SR, Shahbaz M, Alam MS (2017d) Does tourism degrade environmental quality? A comparative study of Eastern and Western European Union. Transp Res Part D: Transp Environ 50:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paramati SR, Sinha A, Dogan E (2017e) The significance of renewable energy use for economic output and environmental protection: evidence from the next 11 developing economies. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24(15):13546–13560

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Paramati SR, Ummalla M, Apergis N (2016) The effect of foreign direct investment and stock market growth on clean energy use across a panel of emerging market economies. Energy Econ 56:29–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Payne JE (2009) On the dynamics of energy consumption and output in the US. Appl Energy 86(4):575–577

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pesaran, M. H. (2004). General diagnostic tests for cross-section dependence in panels working paper: University of Cambridge

  • Pesaran MH (2006) Estimation and inference in large heterogeneous panels with a multifactor error structure. Econometrica 74(4):967–1012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pesaran MH (2007) A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross-section dependence. J Appl Econ 22(2):265–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips PCB, Sul D (2003) Dynamic panel estimation and homogeneity testing under cross section dependence. Econometrics Journal 6(1):217–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadorsky P (2009) Renewable energy consumption and income in emerging economies. Energy Policy 37(10):4021–4028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salim RA, Hassan K, Shafiei S (2014) Renewable and non-renewable energy consumption and economic activities: further evidence from OECD countries. Energy Econ 44:350–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shahbaz M, Islam F, Butt MS (2016) Finance–growth–energy nexus and the role of agriculture and modern sectors: evidence from ARDL bounds test approach to cointegration in Pakistan. Glob Bus Rev 17(5):1037–1059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith LV, Leybourne S, Kim T-H, Newbold P (2004) More powerful panel data unit root tests with an application to mean reversion in real exchange rates. J Appl Econ 19(2):147–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang CF, Shahbaz M (2013) Sectoral analysis of the causal relationship between electricity consumption and real output in Pakistan. Energy Policy 60:885–891

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tugcu CT, Ozturk I, Aslan A (2012) Renewable and non-renewable energy consumption and economic growth relationship revisited: evidence from G7 countries. Energy Econ 34(6):1942–1950

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westerlund J (2008) Panel cointegration tests of the Fisher effect. J Appl Econ 23(2):193–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zachariadis T (2007) Exploring the relationship between energy use and economic growth with bivariate models: new evidence from G-7 countries. Energy Econ 29(6):1233–1253

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sudharshan Reddy Paramati.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Philippe Garrigues

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Paramati, S.R., Apergis, N. & Ummalla, M. Dynamics of renewable energy consumption and economic activities across the agriculture, industry, and service sectors: evidence in the perspective of sustainable development. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25, 1375–1387 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-0552-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-0552-7

Keywords

JEL classifications

Navigation