Abstract
Distorted allocation of capital factors will lead to the loss of capital market-based soil as the background support for green technology innovation, which will not be able to climb up the value chain and eventually become an economic “colony.” This study empirically investigates the relationship between distorted capital factor allocation and green technology innovation using data from 2005 to 2018 for prefecture-level cities in China. The empirical results show that the distortion of capital factor allocation not only has a significant inhibiting effect on green technology innovation in the city, but also hinders the development of green technology innovation in neighboring cities. Mechanism test analysis suggests that there is negative impact via generating mismatch, crowding out, and rent-seeking effects. Further research shows that the effect of distorted capital factor allocation on urban green technology innovation is more influential in the eastern and western regions. The conclusions of this study have important practical significance for optimizing the rational allocation of factor resources, promoting green technology innovation, and achieving high-quality economic growth.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study can be provided on reasonable request.
References
Acemoglu D, Akcigit U, Alp H et al (2013) Innovation, reallocation and growth. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA
Allen F, Qian J, Qian M (2005) Law, finance, and economic growth in China. J Financ Econ 77:57–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2004.06.010
Andrea C, Chiara DB (2019) Smart innovative cities: the impact of smart city policies on urban innovation. Technol Forecast Soc Change 142:373–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.07.022
Aoki S (2012) A simple accounting framework for the effect of resource misallocation on aggregate productivity. J Jpn Int Econ 26:473–494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjie.2012.08.001
Baldwin R, Forslid R, Martin P et al (2003) Economic geography and public policy. Princeton University Press
Baumol WJ (1996) Entrepreneurship: productive, unproductive, and destructive. J Bus Ventur 11:3–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(94)00014-X
Boldrin M, Levine DK (2004) Rent-seeking and innovation. J Monet Econ 51:127–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoneco.2003.07.006
Brandt L, Tombe T, Zhu X (2013) Factor market distortions across time, space and sectors in China. Rev Econ Dyn 16:39–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.red.2012.10.002
Chen Y, Henderson JV, Cai W (2017) Political favoritism in China’s capital markets and its effect on city sizes. J Urban Econ 98:69–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2015.10.003
Claessens S, Feijen E, Laeven L (2008) Political connections and preferential access to finance: the role of campaign contributions. J Financ Econ 88:554–580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2006.11.003
Comin D, Hobijn B (2010) An exploration of technology diffusion. Am Econ Rev 100:2031–2059. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.100.5.2031
Cong LW, Gao H, Ponticelli J, Yang X (2019) Credit allocation under economic stimulus: evidence from China. Rev Financ Stud 32:3412–3460. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhz008
Czarnitzki D, Licht G (2006) Additionality of public R&D grants in a transition economy, the case of Eastern Germany. Econ Transit 14:101–131. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0351.2006.00236.x
Drucker J, Feser E (2012) Regional industrial structure and agglomeration economies: an analysis of productivity in three manufacturing industries. Reg Sci Urban Econ 42:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2011.04.006
Elhorst JP (2014) Matlab software for spatial panels. Int Reg Sci Rev 37:389–405. https://doi.org/10.1177/0160017612452429
Faccio M (2006) Politically connected firms. Am Econ Rev 96:369–386. https://doi.org/10.1257/000282806776157704
Getis A (2009) Spatial weights matrices: spatial weights matrices. Geogr Anal 41:404–410. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-4632.2009.00768.x
Guo Y, Xia X, Zhang S, Zhang D (2018) Environmental regulation, government R&D funding and green technology innovation: evidence from China provincial data. Sustainability 10:940. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10040940
Han W, Zhang X, Zheng X (2020) Land use regulation and urban land value: evidence from China. Land Use Policy 92:104432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104432
Hsieh C-T, Klenow PJ (2009) Misallocation and manufacturing TFP in China and India. Q J Econ 124:1403–1448. https://doi.org/10.1162/qjec.2009.124.4.1403
Huang Y (2010) China’s great ascendancy and structural risks: consequences of asymmetric market liberalisation. Asian-Pac Econ Lit 24:65–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8411.2010.01250.x
Jin H, Qian Y, Weingast BR (2005) Regional decentralization and fiscal incentives: federalism, Chinese style. J Public Econ 89:1719–1742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2004.11.008
Joo H-Y, Seo Y-W, Min H (2018) Examining the effects of government intervention on the firm’s environmental and technological innovation capabilities and export performance. Int J Prod Res 56:6090–6111. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2018.1430902
Kogan L, Papanikolaou D, Seru A, Stoffman N (2017) Technological innovation, resource allocation, and growth. Q J Econ 132:665–712. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjw040
Krugman P (1991) Increasing returns and economic geography. J Polit Econ 99:483–499. https://doi.org/10.1086/261763
Midrigan V, Xu DY (2014) Finance and misallocation: evidence from plant-level data. Am Econ Rev 104:422–458. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.104.2.422
Moll B (2014) Productivity losses from financial frictions: can self-financing undo capital misallocation? Am Econ Rev 104:3186–3221. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.104.10.3186
Moran PAP (1950) Notes on continuous stochastic phenomena. Biometrika 37:17. https://doi.org/10.2307/2332142
Murphy KM, Shleifer A, Vishny RW (1993) Why is rent-seeking so costly to growth? Am Econ Rev 83:409–414
Sandleris G, Wright MLJ (2014) The costs of financial crises: resource misallocation, productivity, and welfare in the 2001 Argentine crisis. Scand J Econ 116:87–127. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjoe.12050
Sergio JR, Brett DM (1999) US regional income convergence: a spatial econometric perspective. Reg Stud 33:143–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343409950122945
Silva F, Carreira C (2012) Do financial constraints threat the innovation process? Evidence from Portuguese firms. Econ Innov New Technol 21:701–736. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599.2011.639979
Stankovic L, Popovic A (2016) Market size as a determinant of Serbian national competitiveness. Marketing 47:191–205. https://doi.org/10.5937/markt1603191S
Wu GL (2018) Capital misallocation in China: financial frictions or policy distortions? J Dev Econ 130:203–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2017.10.014
Xie R, Yao S, Han F, Fang J (2019) Land finance, producer services agglomeration, and green total factor productivity. Int Reg Sci Rev 42:550–579. https://doi.org/10.1177/0160017619836270
Xu S-C, Li Y-F, Zhang J-N et al (2021) Do foreign direct investment and environmental regulation improve green technology innovation? An empirical analysis based on panel data from the Chinese manufacturing industry. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28:55302–55314. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14648-1
Andrews D, Criscuolo C, Menon C (2014) Do resources flow to patenting firms? Cross-country evidence from firm level data. OECD Economics Department Working Papers
Bai J, Bian Y (2016) Factor market distortion and the efficiency losses of Chinese innovative production. China Ind Econ 39–55. https://doi.org/10.19581/j.cnki.ciejournal.2016.11.005
Chen J, Jiang N (2020) The transmission mechanism of Chinese OFDI affecting technological innovation. J Financ Res:74–92
Chen S, Liu C, Feng B (2019) Capital allocation efficiency, city-size distribution and social welfare analysis. Econ Res J:133–147
Dai K, Liu Y (2016) How factor market distortion affects innovation performance. J World Econ 54–79
Gai Q, Zhu X, Chen M, Shi Q (2015) Factor market’s distortion, markup and TFP. Econ Res J:61–75
Hall BH (1999) Innovation and Market Value. SSRN Electron J 130. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.151912
Jian Z, Xu Y, Lv D, et al (2018) Capital misallocation across firms in China: financial frictions or insitution bias of credit allocation. China Ind Econ 24–41
LeSage J, Pace L (2009) Introduction to spatial econometrics. Chapman Hall/CRC
Li Y, Wang Y, Meng X (2013) Does factor market distortions barrage international technology spillovers? J Financ Res 140–153
Wang Y, Li W, Dai Y (2018) How do zombie firms affect innovation? -Evidence from China’s industrial firms. Econ Res J 99–114
Zhu X, Shi Q, Ge Q (2011) Misallocation and TFP in rural China. Econ Res J 86–98
Funding
This work was supported by the Hunan Provincial Innovation Foundation for Postgraduate in 2020 (CX20200471).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Siling Yao contributed to data curation, formal analysis, writing—original draft, and writing—review and editing. Shenghua Yu contributed to conceptualization, methodology, and writing—review and editing. Wentao Jia contributed to conceptualization, methodology, formal analysis, and supervision. All the authors read and approved the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
Not applicable.
Consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Nicholas Apergis
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Yao, S., Yu, S. & Jia, W. Does distorted allocation of capital factors inhibit green technology innovation in Chinese cities? An empirical analysis based on spatial effect. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30, 19234–19249 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-23419-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-23419-5