Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Allocation in recycling systems

An integrated model for the analyses of environmental impact and market value

  • Published:
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

‘Design for Recycling’ and dematerialization by enhancing the durability of products are major aspects of the quest for sustainable products. This article presents an LCA-based model for the integrated analyses of the product chain, its recycling systems, and its waste treatment systems at the ‘End of Life’ stage. The model is an extension of the EVR (Eco-costs/Value Ratio) model which has been published in this journal (Vogtländer et al. 2001), but can also be applied to other life cycle interpretation models, since the model as such is not restricted to the use of the eco-costs as a single indicator. The model has been developed to evaluate the design alternatives of complex products like buildings and cars. These products comprise several subsystems, each with its own special solution at the End of Life stage: Extending of the product life, object renovation, re-use of components, re-use of materials, useful application of waste materials, immobilization with and without useful applications, incineration with and without energy recovery, land fill.

Since complex product systems always comprise a combination of these design alternatives, a methodology is given to calculate and allocate the eco-costs of the total system in order to select the best solution for sustainability. The methodology is characterized by:

  1. •

    A main allocation model of the recycling flow based on physical relationships,

  2. •

    a strict separation of the market value, the costs and the ecocosts in the system,

  3. •

    a main allocation model for extension of lifetime based on ‘depreciation of eco-costs’, parallel to economic depreciation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ekvall T, Tillman A-M (1997): Open-loop recycling: criteria for allocation procedures. Int J LCA 2 (3) 155–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekvall, T (2000): A market-based approach to allocation at open-loop recycling. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 29, 91–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frischknecht R (1998): Life cycle inventory analysis for decisionmaking. Scope-dependent inventory system models and context-specific joint product allocation. PhD dissenation ETH Nrl2599, Zürich, Switzerland

  • Gale BT (1994): Managing customer value, Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Gielen DJ (1999): Materialising dematerialisation. Integrated energy and materials systems engineering for greenhouse gas emission mitigation. Thesis Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Henley N, Shogren JF, White B (1997): Environmental economics, in theory and practice. Basingstoke, Mac Millan

    Google Scholar 

  • Huisman J, Boks C, Stevels A (2000a): Environmentally weighted recycling quotes — better justifiable and environmentally more correct. Design for Sustainability Research Group, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Huisman J, Boks C, Stevels A (2000b): Applications and implications of using environmentally weighted recycling quotes in assessing environmental effeccs in the end-of-life of consumer electronics. Design for Sustainability Research Group, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim S, Hwang T, Lee KM (1997): Allocation for cascade recycling system. Int J LCA 2 (4) 217–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klöpffer W (1996): Allocation rule for open-loop recycling in life cycle assessment — A review. Int J LCA 1(1) 27–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindeijer E, Huppes G (2000): Partitioning economic in- and outputs to product systems. Annex C from draft document ‘Life Cycle Assessment in Environmental Policy, Scientific Backgrounds’, CML, Leiden, www.leidenuniv.nl/interfac/cml/lca2/ index.html

  • Lindfors L-G, Christiansen K, Hoffman L, Virtanen Y, Juntilla V, Hanssen O-J, Ronning T, Ekvall T, Finnvelden G (1995): Nordic Guidelines on Life-Cycle Assessment, Nord 1995:20, Nordic Council of Ministers, Copenhagen

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce DW, Turner RK (1990): Economics of natural resources and the environment. Harvester Wheatsheaf, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter ME (1985): Competitive advantage. Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Nes CN, Cramer JM, Stevels ALN (1998): Determinants of replacement behaviour for electronic products. Care Innovation ’98, November 16–19, 1998, Austria Centre, Vienna, Austria

    Google Scholar 

  • Seijdel R (1994): Toerekening Recycling: de Estafette-methode. PRC Bouwcentrum, Bodegraven

  • Sirkin T, Ten Houten M (1994): The cascade chain. A theory and tool for achieving resource sustainability with applications for product design. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 10, 213–277

  • Vogtlander JG, Brezet HC, Hendriks ChF (2001): The virtual eco-costs ’99: A single LCA-based indicator for sustainability and the eco-costs/value ratio (EVR) model for economic allocation. Int J LCA 6 (3) 157–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vogtländer JG, Bijma A (2000) The virtual pollution prevention costs ’99: A single LCA-based indicator for emissions. Int J LCA 5 (2) 113–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner F, Richter K (2000): Economic allocation in LCA: A case study about aluminium window frames. Int J LCA 5 (2) 79–83

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty Design Construction and Production, Section Design for Sustainability, Delft University of Technology, Jaffalaan, NL-2628BX, Delft, GA, The Netherlands

    Joost G. Vogtländer & Han C. Brezet

  2. Faculty Civil Engineering and Geoscience, Subfaculty Materials Science Group, Delft University of Technology, Stevinweg 1, P.O.Box 5048, NL-2600, Delft, GA, The Netherlands

    Charles F. Hendriks

Authors
  1. Joost G. Vogtländer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Han C. Brezet
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Charles F. Hendriks
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joost G. Vogtländer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vogtländer, J.G., Brezet, H.C. & Hendriks, C.F. Allocation in recycling systems. Int J LCA 6, 344–355 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02978865

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02978865

Keywords

Search

Navigation