Skip to main content
Log in

Implicative twist-structures

  • Published:
Algebra universalis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The twist-structure construction is used to represent algebras related to non-classical logics (e.g., Nelson algebras, bilattices) as a special kind of power of better-known algebraic structures (distributive lattices, Heyting algebras). We study a specific type of twist-structure (called implicative twist-structure) obtained as a power of a generalized Boolean algebra, focusing on the implication-negation fragment of the usual algebraic language of twist-structures. We prove that implicative twist-structures form a variety which is semisimple, congruence-distributive, finitely generated, and has equationally definable principal congruences. We characterize the congruences of each algebra in the variety in terms of the congruences of the associated generalized Boolean algebra. We classify and axiomatize the subvarieties of implicative twist-structures. We define a corresponding logic and prove that it is algebraizable with respect to our variety.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abad M., Díaz Varela J.P., Torrens A.: Topological representation for implication algebras. Algebra Universalis 52, 39–48 (2004)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Almukdad A., Nelson D.: Constructible falsity and inexact predicates. J. Symb. Logic 49, 231–233 (1984)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Arieli O., Avron A.: Reasoning with logical bilattices. J. Log. Lang. Inf. 5, 25–63 (1996)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Blok W.J., Pigozzi D.: On the structure of varieties with equationally definable principal congruences I. Algebra Universalis 15, 195–227 (1982)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Blok, W.J., Pigozzi, D.: Algebraizable logics. Mem. Amer. Math. Soc., vol. 396. A.M.S., Providence (1989)

  6. Blok W.J., Pigozzi D.: On the structure of varieties with equationally definable principal congruences III. Algebra Universalis 32, 545–608 (1994)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Bou F., Jansana R., Rivieccio U.: Varieties of interlaced bilattices. Algebra Universalis 66, 115–141 (2011)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Bou F., Rivieccio U.: The logic of distributive bilattices. Log. J. IGPL 19, 183–216 (2011)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Bou F., Rivieccio U.: Bilattices with implications. Studia Logica 101, 651–675 (2013)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Burris, S., Sankappanavar, H.P.: A course in Universal Algebra. The millennium edition, (2000)

  11. Busaniche M., Cignoli R.: Residuated lattices as an algebraic semantics for paraconsistent Nelson’s logic. J. Logic Comput. 19, 1019–1029 (2009)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Busaniche M., Cignoli R.: Constructive logic with strong negation as a substructural logic. J. Logic Comput. 20, 761–793 (2010)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Celani S.A., Cabrer L.M.: Topological duality for Tarski algebras. Algebra Universalis 58, 73–94 (2008)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Celani S.A., Cabrer L.M., Montangie D.: Representation and duality for Hilbert algebras. Cent. Eur. J. Math. 7, 463–478 (2009)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Clark, D.M., Davey, B.A.: Natural dualities for the working algebraist. Cambridge Stud. Adv. Math., vol. 57. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1998)

  16. Curry, H.B.: Foundations of mathematical logic. Dover, New York (1977)

  17. Figallo A.V., Landini P.: On generalized I-algebras and 4-valued modal algebras. Rep. Math. Logic 29, 3–18 (1995)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Galatos, N., Jipsen, P., Kowalski, T., Ono, H.: Residuated Lattices: an algebraic glimpse at substructural logics. Stud. Logic Found. Math., vol. 151. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2007)

  19. Jansana R., Rivieccio U.: Residuated bilattices. Soft Comput. 16, 493–504 (2012)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Jung, A., Rivieccio, U.: Kripke semantics for modal bilattice logics. Proc. 28th IEEE Annual Symp. on Logic in Computer Science, 438–447 (2013)

  21. Kogabaev N.T.: Universal numbering for constructive I-algebras. Algebra Logic 40, 315–326 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Mobasher B., Pigozzi D., Slutzki G., Voutsadakis G.: A duality theory for bilattices. Algebra Universalis 43, 109–125 (2000)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Movsisyan, Y.M., Romanowska, A.B., Smith, J.D.H.: Superproducts, hyperidentities, and algebraic structures of logic programming. J. Combin. Math. Combin. Comput. 58, 101–111 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Nelson D.: Constructible falsity. J. Symb. Logic 14, 16–2 (1949)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Odintsov S.P.: On the representation of N4-lattices. Studia Logica 76, 385–405 (2004)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Odintsov S.P., Latkin E.I.: BK-lattices. Algebraic semantics for Belnapian modal logics. Studia Logica 100, 319–338 (2012)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Odintsov S.P., Wansing H.: Modal logics with Belnapian truth values. J. Appl. Non-Classical Logics 20, 279–301 (2010)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. Ono, H., Rivieccio, U.: Modal twist-structures over residuated lattices. Log. J. IGPL, DOI:10.1093/jigpal/jzt043 (2013)

  29. Rivieccio. U.: An Algebraic Study of Bilattice-based Logics. PhD thesis, University of Barcelona (2010)

  30. Rivieccio U.: Paraconsistent modal logics. Electron. Notes Theor. Comput. Sci. 278, 173–186 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  31. Sendlewski A.: Nelson algebras through Heyting ones: I. Studia Logica 49, 105–126 (1990)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  32. Tsinakis C., Wille A.M.: Minimal varieties of involutive residuated lattices. Studia Logica 83, 407–423 (2006)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  33. Vakarelov D.: Notes on N-lattices and constructive logic with strong negation. Studia Logica 36, 109–125 (1977)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  34. Díaz Varela J.P., Torrens A.: Decomposability of free Tarski algebras. Algebra Universalis 50, 1–5 (2003)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  35. Wójcicki, R.: Theory of logical calculi. Basic theory of consequence operations. Synth. Libr., vol. 199. Reidel, Dordrecht, (1988)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Umberto Rivieccio.

Additional information

Presented by J. Raftery.

The research leading to these results has received funding from the People Programme (Marie Curie Actions) of the European Unions Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) under REA grant agreement PIEF-GA-2010-272737 and from Vidi grant 016.138.314 of the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rivieccio, U. Implicative twist-structures. Algebra Univers. 71, 155–186 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00012-014-0272-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00012-014-0272-5

2010 Mathematics Subject Classification

Key words and phrases

Navigation