Skip to main content
Log in

Equivalence of axioms for bankruptcy problems

  • Published:
International Journal of Game Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract.

The bankruptcy problem is concerned with how to divide the net worth of the bankrupt firm among its creditors. In this paper, we investigate the logical relations between various axioms in the context of bankruptcy. Those axioms are: population-and-resource monotonicity, consistency, converse consistency, agreement, and separability. In most axiomatic models, they are not directly related. However, we show that they are equivalent on the class of bankruptcy problems under minor additional requirements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Received: April 1998/Revised version: January 1999

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chun, Y. Equivalence of axioms for bankruptcy problems. Game Theory 28, 511–520 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/s001820050122

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s001820050122

Navigation