Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Multi-objective optimization of laidback fan-shaped film cooling hole on Turbine Vane Suction Surface

  • Original
  • Published:
Heat and Mass Transfer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A CFD-based multi-objective optimization is performed for improving the film cooling performance of the laidback fan-shaped holes on the suction surface of a turbine guide vane under a typical blowing ratio of M = 1.5. Among the main geometric parameters, the inclination angle (α), lateral expansion angle (β) and forward expansion angle (γ) are selected as the design variables, with respective lower and upper bounds of (25°, 55°), (10°, 20°) and (3°, 15°) in turns. Two independent objective functions that are simultaneously optimized are selected as the spatially-averaged adiabatic film cooling effectiveness (ranging from s/d = 0 to s/d = 12) and the discharge coefficient. By using a variant of non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm (NSGA-II) coupled with the RBFNN-based surrogate model, the Pareto front of optimal solutions is obtained, providing a variety of options for seeking the maximum spatially-averaged adiabatic film cooling effectiveness, the maximum discharge coefficient, or the compromise of both aspects. The optimized results show that the optimal geometers of (α, β, γ) are (50.3°, 19.5°, 9.8°), (25°, 18.7°, 11.8°) and (27.3°, 19°, 5.1°) for achieving the most maximum film cooling effectiveness, the most maximum discharge coefficient and the compromise of both aspects, respectively. In general, a large lateral expansion angle of the laidback fan-shaped film-cooling hole is necessary in the shape optimization for all of the optimal options. However, with regard to the other design variables, their selections are very distinct following the optimal option. Further, the influence role of optimal fan-shaped geometry on the film cooling performance is illustrated according to the detailed flow and thermal behaviors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

C :

Chord length (m)

C d :

Discharge coefficient

c p :

Static pressure coefficient

C x :

Axial chord length (m)

d :

Film hole diameter (m)

F 1 :

Fitness function of spatially-averaged adiabatic film cooling effectiveness

F 2 :

Fitness function of discharge coefficient

k :

Ratio of specific heats

l 1 :

Length of cylindrical section (m)

l 2 :

Length of lateral expansion section (m)

l 3 :

Length of forward expansion section (m)

M :

Blowing ratio

Ma :

Mach number

P :

Cascade pitch (mm)

P hole :

Hole-to-hole pitch (mm)

p :

Pressure (MPa)

R :

Gas constant

Re :

Reynolds number

s :

Streamwise-direction

T :

Temperature (K)

t :

Film hole height (m)

u :

Velocity (m/s)

x :

Axial-direction

y :

Normal-direction

z :

Spanwise-direction

α :

Inclination angle (°)

β :

Lateral expansion angle (°)

γ :

Forward expansion angle (°)

δ :

Primary flow angle (°)

θ :

Stagger angle (°)

μ :

Dynamic viscosity (N∙s/m2)

ρ :

Density (kg/m3)

η :

Film cooling effectiveness

Θ :

Dimensionless temperature

ψ :

Pressure-drop ratio

ad:

Adiabatic

av:

Spatially-averaged

avs:

Laterally-averaged

aw:

Adiabatic wall

c:

Coolant or secondary flow

ref:

Reference laidback fan-shaped hole

∞:

Primary flow

*:

Total

References

  1. Acharya S, Kanani Y (2017) Advances in Film Cooling Heat Transfer. Adv Heat Tran 49:91–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bunker RS (2005) A review of turbine shaped film cooling technology. ASME J Heat Transfer 127:441–453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ely MJ, Jubran BA (2009) A numerical evaluation on the effect of sister holes on film cooling effectiveness and the surrounding flow field. Heat Mass Transf 45:1435–1446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Abdelmohiman MAH (2017) Improving film cooling from compound angle holes by adding secondary holes branched out from the main holes. Heat Mass Transf 53:1805–1815

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kim SM, Lee KD, Kim KY (2012) A comparative analysis of various shaped film-cooling holes. Heat Mass Transf 48:1929–1939

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dai P, Lin F (2011) Numerical study on film cooling effectiveness from shaped and crescent holes. Heat Mass Transf 47:147–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Baheri S, Tabeizi SPA, Jubran BA (2008) Film cooling effectiveness from trenched shaped and compound holes. Heat Mass Transf 44:989–998

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Yang CF, Zhang JZ (2012) Experimental investigation on film cooling characteristics from a row of holes with ridge-shaped tabs. Exp Thermal Fluid Sci 37:113–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sargison JE, Oldfield MLG, Guo SM et al (2005) Flow visualization of the external flow from a converging slot-hole film-cooling geometry. Exp Fluids 38:304–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Azzi A, Jubran BA (2007) Numerical modelling of film cooling from converging slot hole. Heat Mass Transf 43:381–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Goldstein RJ, Eckert ERG, Burggraf F (1974) Effects of hole geometry and density on three-dimensional film cooling. Int J Heat Mass Transf 17:595–607

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Thole K, Gritsch M, Schulz A et al (1998) Flowfield measurements for film-cooling holes with expanded exits. ASME J Turbomach 120:327–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gritsch M, Schulz A, Wittig S (1998) Adiabatic wall effectiveness measurements of film-cooling holes with expanded exits. ASME J Turbomach 120:549–556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Gritsch M, Schulz A, Wittig S (1998) Discharge coefficient measurements of film-cooling holes with expanded exits. ASME J Turbomach 120:557–563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gritsch M, Colban W, Schar H (2005) Effect of hole geometry on the thermal performance of fan-shaped film cooling holes. ASME J Turbomach 127:718–725

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Mahmood S, Kassab AJ, Divo E (2005) Film cooling effectiveness from a single scaled-up fan-shaped hole: a CFD simulation of adiabatic and conjugate heat transfer models. ASME Paper GT2005–68431

  17. Leedom DH, Acharya S (2008) Large eddy simulation of film cooling flow field from cylindrical and shaped holes. ASME Paper GT2008–51009

  18. Bonanni L, Facchini B, Tarchi L, et al (2010) Heat transfer performance of fan-shaped film cooling holes, part 1: experimental analysis. ASME Paper GT2010–22808

  19. Bonanni L, Facchini B, Tarchi L, et al (2010) Heat transfer performance of fan-shaped film cooling holes, part 2: numerical analysis. ASME Paper GT2010–22809

  20. Saumweber C, Schulz A (2012) Effect of geometry variations on the cooling performance of fan-shaped cooling holes. ASME J Turbomach 134:061008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Colban WF, Thole KA, Bogard D (2011) A film-cooling correlation for shaped holes on a flat-plate surface. ASME J Turbomach 133:011002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lee KD, Kim KY (2009) Optimization of a cylindrical film cooling hole using surrogate modelling. Num Heat Transfer Part A 55:362–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Lee KD, Kim KY (2010) Shape optimization of a fan-shaped hole to enhance film-cooling effectiveness. Int J Heat Mass Transf 53:2996–3005

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Lee KD, Kim KY (2011) Surrogate based optimization of a laidback fan-shaped hole for film-cooling. Int J Heat Fluid Flow 32:226–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Naghashnejad M, Amanifard N, Deylami HM (2014) A predictive model based on a 3-D computational approach for film cooling effectiveness over a flat plate using GMDH-type neural networks. Heat Mass Transf 50:139–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Wang CH, Zhang JZ, Zhou JH (2016) Optimization of a fan-shaped hole to improve film cooling performance by RBF neural network and genetic algorithm. Aerosp Sci Technol 58:18–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Huang Y, Zhang JZ, Wang CH (2018) Shape-optimization of round-to-slot-holes for improving film cooling effectiveness on a flat surface. Heat Mass Transf 126:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  28. Lee KD, Kim SM, Kim KY (2011) Multi-objective optimization of film cooling holes considering heat transfer and aerodynamic loss. ASME Paper GT2011–45402

  29. Lee KD, Kim SM, Kim KY (2013) Multi-objective optimization of a row of film cooling holes using an evolutionary algorithm and surrogate modelling. Num Heat Transfer Part A 63:623–641

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Proietti D, Biancolini ME, Pranzitelli A, et al (2015) Multi-objective CFD optimisation of shaped hole film cooling with mesh morphing. ASME Paper GT2015–42249

  31. Ayoubi CEI, Ghaly W, Hassan I (2012) Optimization of film cooling holes on the suction surface of a high pressure turbine blade. ASME Paper GT2012–69773

  32. Jiang YT, Lin HF, Yue GQ et al (2017) Aero-thermal optimization on multi-rows film cooling of a realistic marine high pressure turbine vane. Appl Therm Eng 111:537–549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Gao ZH, Narzary DP, Han JC (2008) Film cooling on a gas turbine blade pressure side or suction side with axial shaped holes. Int J Heat Mass Transf 51:2139–2152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Colban W, Thole KA, Haendler M (2008) A comparison of cylindrical and fan-shaped film-cooling holes on a vane endwall at low and high freestream turbulence levels. ASME J Turbomach 130:031007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Yao Y, Zhang JZ, Wang LP (2013) Film cooling on a gas turbine blade suction side with converging slot-hole. Int J Therm Sci 65:267–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Yao Y, Zhang JZ, Tan XM (2014) Numerical study of film cooling from converging slot-hole on a gas turbine blade suction side. Int Commun Heat Mass Transfer 52:61–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Arts T, De Rouvroit ML, Rutherford AW (1990) Aero-thermal investigation of a highly loaded transonic linear turbine guide vane cascade. VKI Technical Note 174

  38. ANSYS (2012) ANSYS Fluent 14.0 User’s Guide. ANSYS Inc, Canonsburg

    Google Scholar 

  39. Harrison K, Bogard D (2008) Comparison of RANS turbulence models for prediction of film cooling performance. ASME Paper GT2008–50366

  40. Silieti M, Kassab AJ, Divo E (2009) Film cooling effectiveness: comparison of adiabatic and conjugate heat transfer CFD models. Int J Therm Sci 48:2237–2248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Ely MJ, Jubran BA (2009) A numerical evaluation on the effect of sister holes on film cooling effectiveness and the surrounding flow field. Heat Mass Transf 45(11):1435–1446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Demuth H, Beale M, Hagan M (1992) MATLAB neural network toolbox: User's guide

  43. Deb K (2001) Multi-objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  44. Kohli A, Thole KA (1998) Entrance effects on diffused film-cooling holes. ASME Paper 98-GT-402

  45. Walters DK, Leylek JH (2000) A detailed analysis of film-cooling physics: part I-streamwise injection with cylindrical holes. ASME J Turbomach 122:102–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial supports for this project from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant No: U1508212, 51706097).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jing-Zhou Zhang.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Huang, Y., Zhang, JZ., Wang, CH. et al. Multi-objective optimization of laidback fan-shaped film cooling hole on Turbine Vane Suction Surface. Heat Mass Transfer 55, 1181–1194 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00231-018-2500-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00231-018-2500-6

Navigation