Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Modeling erosion and sediment control practices with RUSLE 2.0: a management approach for natural gas well sites in Denton County, TX, USA

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Geology

Abstract

Sediment yields from natural gas well sites in Denton County, TX, USA can be substantial and warrant consideration of appropriate erosion and sediment control best management practices (BMPs). Version 2 of the revised universal soil loss equation (RUSLE 2.0) was used to predict sediment yields and evaluate the efficiency of BMPs for multiple combinations of different land surface conditions (soil erodibility and slope) commonly found at gas well sites in the area. Annual average sediment yield predictions from unprotected site conditions ranged from 12.1 to 134.5 tonnes per hectare per year (t/ha/yr). Sediment yield predictions for 1, 2, 5, and 10-year design storms ranged from 8.1 to 20.6 t/ha. When site conditions were modeled with BMPs, predicted sediment yields were 52–93% less. A comparison of modeled efficiency values to a review of laboratory and field data suggests that modeled (theoretical) sediment yield results with BMPs are likely best case scenarios. This study also evaluated BMPs in the context of site management goals and implementation cost, demonstrating a practical approach for the application of RUSLE 2.0 for managing soil loss and understanding the importance of selecting appropriate site-specific BMPs for disturbed site conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Petroleum Institute (API) (2007) US drilling and completion estimates hit 21-year high. Cited 10 January 2007. http://www.api.org/Newsroom/drilling-all-2006.cfm

  • Barrett ME, Malina JF, Charbeneau RJ (1998) An evaluation of geotextiles for temporary sediment control. Water Environ Res 70(3):283–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benik SR, Wilson BN, Biesboer DD, Hansen B, Stenlund D (2003a) Performance of erosion control products on a highway embankment. Trans ASAE 46(4):1113–1119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benik SR, Wilson BN, Biesboer DD, Hansen B, Stenlund D (2003b) Evaluation of erosion control projects using natural rainfall events. J Soil Water Conserv 58(2):98–105

    Google Scholar 

  • City of Austin (1990) Removal efficiencies of stromwater control structures. Environmental and Conservation Service Dept, Austin

    Google Scholar 

  • Crebbin C (1988) Laboratory evaluation of geotextile performance in silt fence application using a subsoil of glacial origin. MS, University of Washington, Seattle

    Google Scholar 

  • Deletic A (1999) Sediment behavior in grass filter strips. Water Sci Technol 39:129–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deletic A (2001) Modelling of water and sediment transport over grassed areas. J Hydrol 248:168–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dillaha T, Beasley D, Huggins L (1982) Using the ANSWERS model to estimate sediment yield on construction sites. J Soil Water Conserv 37:117–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Doolette JB, Smyle JW (1990) Soil and moisture conservation technologies: review of literature. In: Doolette JB, Magrath WB (eds) Watershed development in Asia: strategies and technologies. World Book Technical Paper No 127, Washington DC

  • Faucette LM, Risse LM, Jordan CF, Cabrera ML, Coleman DC, West LT (2005) Evaluation of stormwater from compost and conventional erosion control practices in construction activities. J Soil Water Conserv 60(6):288–297

    Google Scholar 

  • Faucette LM, Risse LM, Jordan CF, Cabrera ML, Coleman DC, West LT (2006) Vegetation and soil quality effects from hydroseed and compost blankets used for erosion control in construction activities. J Soil Water Conserv 61(6):355–362

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster GR (2005) RUSLE 2.0 science documentation (Draft). USDA-Agricultural Research Service, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster GR, Yoder DC, Weesies GA, Toy TJ (2001) The design philosophy behind RUSLE 2.0: evolution of an empirical model. In: Ascough JC, Flanagan DC (eds) Proc. Int. symp. soil erosion research for the 21st century. ASAE, St. Joseph, pp 95–98

  • Foster GR, Yoder DC, Weesies GA, McCool DK, McGregor KC, Bingner RL (2003) RUSLE 2.0 user’s guide. USDA-Agricultural Research Service, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Gharabaghi B, Fata A, Van Seters T, Rudra RP, MacMillan G, Smith D, Li JY, Bradford A, Tesa G (2006a) Evaluation of sediment control pond performance at construction sites in the Greater Toronto Area. Can J Civil Eng 33:1335–1344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gharabaghi B, Rudra RP, Goel PK (2006b) Effectiveness of vegetative filter strips in removal of sediment from overland flow. Water Qual Res J Can 41(3):275–282

    Google Scholar 

  • Godfrey SH, Curry MK (1995) TTI hydraulics and erosion control laboratory research field performance of erosion-control blankets. Landsc Urban Plan 32:161–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldman SJ, Jackson K, Bursztynsky TA (1986) Erosion and sediment control handbook. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Han J, Wu JS, Allan C (2005) Suspended sediment removal by vegetative filter strip treating highway runoff. J Environ Sci Health Part A 40(8):1637–1649

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harbor J (1999) Engineering geomorphology at the cutting edge of land disturbance: erosion and sediment control on construction sites. Geomorphology 31:247–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harbor JM, Snyder J, Storer J (1995) Reducing nonpoint source pollution from construction sites using rapid seeding and mulching. Phys Geogr 16(5):371–388

    Google Scholar 

  • Havens LD (2007) Assessment of sediment runoff from natural gas well development sites. MS, University of North Texas, Denton

    Google Scholar 

  • Hershfield DM (1961) Technical Paper No. 40: Rainfall frequency atlas of the United States. Department of Commerce, Weather Bureau, Washington DC

  • Horner RR, Guedry J, Kortenhof MH (1990) Improving the cost effectiveness of highway construction site erosion and pollution control. Wash State Transportation Center Washington State Department Transportation, Seattle

  • Jennings GD, Jarrett AR (1985) Laboratory evaluation of mulches in reducing erosion. Trans ASAE 28(5):1466–1470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kayhanian M, Johnston J, Yamaguchi H, Borroum S (2001) CALTRANS storm water management program. Stormwater 2(2):52–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Koelsch RK, Lorimor JC, Mankin KR (2006) Vegetative treatment systems for management of open lot runoff: review of literature. Trans ASABE 22(1):141–153

    Google Scholar 

  • Kouwen N (1990) Silt fences to control sediment movement on construction sites. Report MAT-90-03. Research Division Branch Ontario Ministry Transportation, Downsview, ON

  • Laflen JM, Flanagan DC, Engel BA (2001) Application of WEPP to construction sites. In: Ascough JC, Flanagan DC (eds) Symp proc. int. symp. soil erosion research for the 21st century. ASAE, St. Joseph, pp 135–138

  • McClintock K, Harbor JM (1995) Modeling potential impacts of land development on sediment yields. Phys Geogr 16(5):359–370

    Google Scholar 

  • McCoy S (2005) Sediment control and stormwater management with compost BMPs workshop. In: Presented at US composting council 13th annual conference and trade show, San Antonio, January 2005

  • Meyer LD, Dabney SM, Harmon WC (1995) Sediment-trapping effectiveness of stiff-grass hedges. Trans ASAE 38:809–815

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore AD, McLaughlin RA, Mitasova H, Line DE (2007) Calibrating WEPP model parameters for erosion prediction on construction sites. Trans ASABE 50(2):507–516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munoz-Carpena R, Parsons JE (2004) A design procedure for vegetative filter strips using VFSMOD-W. Trans ASAE 47(6):1933–1941

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nighman D, Harbor J (1997) Trap efficiency of a stormwater basin with and without baffles. Proc Int Erosion Control Assn 28:469–483

    Google Scholar 

  • North Central Texas Council of Governments (NCTCOG) (2003) Integrated storm water management: design manual for construction, Cited 22 August 2005. http://iswm.nctcog.org

  • Risse LM, Faucette B (2001) Compost utilization for erosion control. University of Georgia Cooperative Extension Service Bulletin No. 1189, CAES-UGA, Athens

  • Ross D, Harbor J, Nash T (1993) SERS: computer-base erosion control education. In: Presented at the 26th international erosion control association conference, Atlanta, 28 February 3 March 1995

  • Schueler TR, Lugbill J (1990) Performance of current sediment control measures at Maryland construction sites. Department of Environmental Programs, Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments, Washington DC

  • Shirley K (2002) Barnett shale living up to potential. Explorer, July 2002

  • Tyler R (2001) Compost filter berms and blankets take on the silt fence. Biocycle 42(1):26–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler R, Faucette B (2005) Organic BMPs used for stormwater management—filter media test results from private certification program yield predictable performance. In: Presented at US composting council 13th annual conference and trade show, San Antonio, January 2005

  • US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) (1999) Storm water technology fact sheet: turf reinforcement mats. EPA-832-F-99-002. USEPA, Office of Wastewater Management, Washington DC

  • US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) (2000) National water quality inventory 1998 Report to Congress. USEPA 841-R-00-001; USEPA, Office of Water; Washington DC

  • US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) (2002) National management measures to control nonpoint source pollution from urban areas—draft. EPA 842-B-02-003, Washington DC

  • US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) (2006) Amendments to the national pollutant discharge elimination system (NPDES) regulations for storm water discharges associated with oil and gas exploration, production, processing, or treatment operations or transmission facilities, vol 71(112). GPO, Federal Register, Washington DC, pp 33638–33640

  • USDA NRCS (2007) Revised universal soil loss equation, Version 2 (RUSLE2) Training. Cited 6 November 2007. http://fargo.nserl.purdue.edu/rusle2_dataweb/RUSLE2_Training_Slide_Set.htm

  • USDA SCS (1980) Soil survey of Denton, County, Texas. USDA, Washington DC

  • Wachal DJ, Banks KE (2006) Modeling and monitoring storm water impacts from natural gas well development activities. In: Presented at StormCon: the north american surface water quality conference, Denver CO, July 2006

  • Wachal DJ, Banks KE, Hunter DH (2005) Collecting storm water from overland flow at gas well exploration and production sites. In: Presented at water environment federation 78th annual conference, Washington DC, October 2005

  • Williams HFL, Havens DL, Banks KE, Wachal DJ (2007) Field-based monitoring of sediment runoff from natural gas well sites in Denton County, Texas, USA. Environ Geol. doi:10.1007/s00254-007-1096-9

  • Willett G (1980) Urban erosion. In: National conference of urban erosion and sediment control: institutions and technology. EPA 905/9-80-002, Washington DC

  • Wolman MG, Schick AP (1967) Effects of construction on fluvial sediment: urban and suburban areas of Maryland. Water Resour Res 3(2):451–464

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was partially financed through a Water Quality Cooperative Agreement (104b3 grant) provided to the City of Denton by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). The authors would also like to extend their appreciation to Daniel Yoder for his assistance with RUSLE 2.0.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of North Texas, Institute of Applied Science, Denton, TX, USA

    David J. Wachal

  2. Division of Environmental Quality, City of Denton, USA

    Kenneth E. Banks

  3. Department of Geography, University of North Texas, Denton, USA

    Paul F. Hudak

  4. USDA, ARC, Temple, TX, USA

    R. Daren Harmel

Authors
  1. David J. Wachal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kenneth E. Banks
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Paul F. Hudak
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. R. Daren Harmel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David J. Wachal.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wachal, D.J., Banks, K.E., Hudak, P.F. et al. Modeling erosion and sediment control practices with RUSLE 2.0: a management approach for natural gas well sites in Denton County, TX, USA. Environ Geol 56, 1615–1627 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-008-1259-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-008-1259-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation