Abstract
We present an analysis of interactions among neurons in stimulus-driven networks that is designed to control for effects from unmeasured neurons. This work builds on previous connectivity analyses that assumed connectivity strength to be constant with respect to the stimulus. Since unmeasured neuron activity can modulate with the stimulus, the effective strength of common input connections from such hidden neurons can also modulate with the stimulus. By explicitly accounting for the resulting stimulus-dependence of effective interactions among measured neurons, we are able to remove ambiguity in the classification of causal interactions that resulted from classification errors in the previous analyses. In this way, we can more reliably distinguish causal connections among measured neurons from common input connections that arise from hidden network nodes. The approach is derived in a general mathematical framework that can be applied to other types of networks. We illustrate the effects of stimulus-dependent connectivity estimates with simulations of neurons responding to a visual stimulus.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aertsen AMHJ, Gerstein GL, Habib MK, Palm G (1989) Dynamics of neuronal firing correlation: Modulation of “effective connectivity”. J Neurophysiol 61: 900–917
Baccalá LA, Sameshima K (2001) Partial directed coherence: a new concept in neural structure determination. Biol Cybern 84: 463–474
Brillinger DR (1981) Time series: data analysis and theory. Holden Day, San Francisco
Brown EN, Kass RE, Mitra PP (2004) Multiple neural spike train data analysis: state-of-the-art and future challenges. Nat Neurosci 7: 456–461
Chornoboy ES, Schramm LP, Karr AF (1988) Maximum likelihood identification of neural point process systems. Biol Cybern 59: 265–275
Granger CWJ (1969) Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica 37: 424–438
Harris KD, Csicsvari J, Hirase H, Dragoi G, Buzsáki G (2003) Organization of cell assemblies in the hippocampus. Nature 424: 552–556
Keat J, Reinagel P, Reid RC, Meister M (2001) Predicting every spike: a model for the responses of visual neurons. Neuron 30: 803–817
Kulkarni JE, Paninski L (2007) Common-input models for multiple neural spike-train data. Network Comput Neural Syst 18: 375–407
Martignon L, Deco G, Laskey K, Diamond M, Freiwald W, Vaadia E (2000) Neural coding: higher-order temporal patterns in the neurostatistics of cell assemblies. Neural Comp 12: 2621–2653
Nicolelis MAL, Dimitrov D, Carmena JM, Crist R, Lehew G, Kralik JD, Wise SP (2003) Chronic, multisite, multielectrode recordings in macaque monkeys. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100: 11041–11046
Nykamp DQ (2005) Revealing pairwise coupling in linear-nonlinear networks. SIAM J Appl Math 65: 2005–2032
Nykamp DQ (2007) A mathematical framework for inferring connectivity in probabilistic neuronal networks. Math Biosci 205: 204–251
Nykamp DQ (2007) Exploiting history-dependent effects to infer network connectivity. SIAM J Appl Math 68: 354–391
Nykamp DQ (2008) Pinpointing connectivity despite hidden nodes within stimulus-driven networks. Phys Rev E 78: 021902
Okatan M, Wilson MA, Brown EN (2005) Analyzing functional connectivity using a network likelihood model of ensemble neural spiking activity. Neural Comp 17: 1927–1961
Palm G, Aertsen AMHJ, Gerstein GL (1988) On the significance of correlations among neuronal spike trains. Biol Cybern 59: 1–11
Paninski L (2004) Maximum likelihood estimation of cascade point-process neural encoding models. Network Comput Neural Syst 15: 243–262
Paninski L, Pillow JW, Simoncelli EP (2004) Maximum likelihood estimation of a stochastic integrate-and-fire neural encoding model. Neural Comp 16: 2533–2561
Perkel DH, Gerstein GL, Moore GP (1967) Neuronal spike trains and stochastic point processes. II. Simultaneous spike trains. Biophys J 7: 419–440
Rosenberg JR, Amjad AM, Breeze P, Brillinger DR, Halliday DM (1989) The Fourier approach to the identification of functional coupling between neuronal spike trains. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 53: 1–31
Sameshima K, Baccalá LA (1999) Using partial directed coherence to describe neuronal ensemble interactions. J Neurosci Methods 94: 93–103
Schreiber T (2000) Schreiber. Phys Rev Lett 85: 461–464
Snyder D, Miller M (1991) Random point processes in time and space. Springer, Heidelberg
Stuart L, Walter M, Borisyuk R (2005) The correlation grid: analysis of synchronous spiking in multi-dimensional spike train data and identification of feasible connection architectures. Biosystems 79: 223–234
Swets JA (1996) Signal detection theory and ROC analysis in psychology and diagnostics: collected papers. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah
Truccolo W, Eden UT, Fellows MR, Donoghue JP, Brown EN (2005) A point process framework for relating neural spiking activity to spiking history, neural ensemble, and extrinsic covariate effects. J Neurophysiol 93: 1074–1089
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by the National Science Foundation grants DMS-0415409 and DMS-0748417.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nykamp, D.Q. A stimulus-dependent connectivity analysis of neuronal networks. J. Math. Biol. 59, 147–173 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00285-008-0224-9
Received:
Revised:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00285-008-0224-9