Skip to main content
Log in

Ingrowth of osteochondral grafts under the influence of growth factors: 6-month results of an animal study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction: In the age of growth factors and gene therapy, the induction of cartilage healing remains an unsolved problem. Even in autologous grafting, one of the preferred methods of treatment for focal osteochondral lesions, chondral integration remains difficult. This study aims to define a possible positive influence of growth factor augmentation on the ingrowth of these transplants. Materials and methods: In an ovine model, questions regarding the healing of osteochondral transplants under the influence of two different growth factors were to be addressed. Two osteochondral autologous transplantations (OAT), one in the weight-bearing surface of each femoral condyle, were performed on the ovine knee using the standard operative protocol. One of the grafts was bathed in augmented PBS containing 50 μg bFGF or bone morphogenetic protein (BMP)-2 directly prior to implantation, while the other condyle served as the control. Two groups, consisting of eight sheep each, were evaluated for each growth factor after 6 months. Results: During the evaluation of all the specimens, neither osteophytes nor synovial changes were observed. The mechanical consistency of the cartilaginous tissue began to reach a level equivalent to the surrounding tissue at 6 months, independent of the use of growth factor. Macroscopically, the superficial border of the transplanted osteochondral plug could easily be outlined in all groups, while the cartilage interface of the bFGF specimens was determined to be less demarcated than the BMP augmented plugs or the controls. Radiographically, a solid osteointegration of the graft could be documented at 6 months in the native and augmented groups. In contrast, integration of the chondral surface of the OAT was not seen macro- or microscopically in any specimen, even though cartilage surfaces remained viable. A firm physical interdigitation of the reconstructed joint surface could not be demonstrated in either of the two augmented groups or the control population. The augmentation with bFGF and BMP-2 stimulated the osseous ingrowth and seems to expedite the remodelling process, but was not able to improve chondral healing. Conclusion: The lack of integration of the cartilaginous portion of the transplanted plugs into the reconstructed joint surface, even following the augmentation with bFGF and BMP-2, does not bode well for the long-term survival of the joint itself.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ahmad CS, Cohen ZA, Levine WN, Ateshian GA, Mow VC (2001) Biomechanical and topographic considerations for autologous osteochondral grafting in the knee. Am J Sports Med 29:201–206

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Binnet MS, Guerkan I, Karakas A, Yilmaz C, Erekul S, Cetin C (2001) Histopathologic assessment of healed osteochondral fractures. Arthroscopy 17:278–285

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bobic V (1999) The utilisation of osteochondral autologous grafts in the treatment of articular cartilage lesions. Orthopaede 28:19–25

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Browne J, Branch TP (2000) Surgical alternatives for treatment of articular cartilage lesions. J Acad Orthop Surg 8:180–189

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Cuevas P, Burgos J, Baird A (1988) Basis fibroblast growth factor (FGF) promotes cartilage repair in vivo. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 156:611–618

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Duchow J, Hess T, Kohn D (2000) Primary stability of press-fit-implanted osteochondral grafts. Am J Sports Med 28:24–27

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Fujimoto E, Ochi M, Kato Y, Mochizuki Y, Sumen Y, Ikuta Y (1999) Beneficial effect of basic fibroblast growth factor on the repair of full thickness defects in rabbit articular cartilage. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 119:139–145

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Fujisato T, Sajiki T, Liu Q, Ikada Y (1996) Effect of basic fibroblast growth factor on cartilage regeneration in chondrocyte-seeded collagen sponges. Biomaterials 17:155–166

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hangody L, Kish G, Kárpáti Z, Szerb I, Udvarhelyi I (1997) Arthroscopic autogenous osteo-chondral mosaicplasty for the treatment of femoral condylar articular defects. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 5:262–267

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Herr G, Schnettler R (1997) Osteoinduktive Aktivitaet von BMP-beschichteten ß-TCP-Keramiken und Charakterisierung der Knochen-Implantat-Grenzschicht. In: Schnettler R, Markgraf E (eds) Knochenersatzmaterialien und Wachstumsfaktoren. Georg Thieme Stuttgart, pp 60–68

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hunter W (1995) The classic: of the structure and disease of articulating cartilages. Clin Orthop 317:3–6

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Imhoff AB, Oettl GM, Burkart A, Traub S (1999) Osteochondral autologous transplantation in various joints. Orthopaede 28:33–44

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Iwasaki M, Nakahara H, Nakata K, Nakase T, Kimura T, Ono K (1995) Regulation of proliferation and osteochondrogenic differentiation of periosteum-derived cells by transforming growth factor-β and basic fibroblast growth factor. J Bone Joint Surg 77A:543–554

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jackson DW, Lalor PA, Aberman HM, Simon TM (2001) Spontaneous repair of full-thickness defects of articular cartilage in a goat study. J Bone Joint Surg 83A:53–64

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kato Y, Iwamoto M (1990) Fibroblast growth factor is an inhibitor of chondrocyte terminal differentiation. J Biol Chem 265:5903–5909

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kawaguchi H, Kurokawa T, Hanada K, Hiyama Y, Tamura M, Ogata E, Matsumoto T (1994) Stimulation of fracture repair by recombinant human basic fibroblast growth factor in normal and streptozotocin-diabetic rats. Endocrinology 135:774–781

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Laprell H, Petersen W (2001) Autologous osteochondral transplantation using the diamond bone-cutting system. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 121:248–253

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Sellers RS, Peluso D, Morris EA (1997) The effect of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 on the healing of full-thickness defects of articular cartilage. J Bone Joint Surg 79A:1452–1463

    Google Scholar 

  19. Shahgaldi BF, Amis AA, Heatley FW, McDowell J, Bentley G (1991) Repair of cartilage lesions using biological implants. J Bone Joint Surg 73B:57–64

    Google Scholar 

  20. Shapiro F, Koide S, Glimcher MJ (1993) Cell origin and differentiation in the repair of full-thickness defects of articular cartilage. J Bone Joint Surg 75A:532–553

    Google Scholar 

  21. Siebert CH, Miltner O, Schneider U, Wahner T, Koch S, Niedhart C (2001) Healing of osteochondral grafts—an animal study. Z Orthop 139:295–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Siebert CH, Miltner O, Weber M, Sopka S, Koch S, Niedhart C (2003) Healing of osteochondral grafts in an ovine model under the influence of bFGF. Arthroscopy 19:182–187

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Stuetzle H, Hallfeldt K, Keßler S, Schweiberer L (1997) Experimentelle und klinische Ergebnisse mit teildemineralisierter Knochenmatrix. In: Schnettler R, Markgraf E (eds) Knochenersatzmaterialien und Wachstumsfaktoren. Georg Thieme Verlag, Stuttgart, pp 85–89

    Google Scholar 

  24. Trippel SB, Coutts RD, Einhorn TA, Mundy GR, Rosenfeld RG (1996) Growth factors as therapeutic agents. J Bone Joint Surg 78A:1272–1284

    Google Scholar 

  25. Urist MR (1995) The first three decades of bone morphogenetic protein research. Osteologie 4:207–223

    Google Scholar 

  26. Wagner H (1964) Operative Behandlung der Osteochondrosis dissecans des Kniegelenkes. Z Orthop 98:333–355

    Google Scholar 

  27. Wozney JM (1995) The potential role of bone morphogenetic proteins in periodontal reconstruction. J Periodontol 66:506–510

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Zellin G, Linde A (2000) Effects of recombinant human fibroblast growth factor 2 on osteogenic cell populations during orthotopic osteogenesis in vivo. Bone 26:161–168

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Zlotolow DA, Vaccaro AR, Salamon ML (2000) The role of human bone morphogenetic proteins in spinal fusion. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 8:3–9

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

Financial support was granted by the interdisciplinary centre for clinical research in biomaterials and tissue-material-interaction in implants (BMBF project No. 01 KS 9503/9) of the medical faculty of the RWTH Aachen, Germany and the “Deutsche Arthrose Hilfe”.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christian H. Siebert.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Siebert, C.H., Schneider, U., Sopka, S. et al. Ingrowth of osteochondral grafts under the influence of growth factors: 6-month results of an animal study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 126, 247–252 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-005-0061-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-005-0061-x

Keywords

Navigation