Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Quality of life after microsurgery for vestibular schwannoma via the middle cranial fossa approach

  • Otology
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study was to analyse the quality of life (QOL) of patients who had undergone microsurgery for vestibular schwannomas (VS). A questionnaire was sent to 117 consecutive patients who had been operated on using the middle cranial fossa (MCF) approach between October 2005 and June 2011. The response rate was 91/117 (78 %) of which 86 were suitable for analysis. The questionnaire consisted of the Short Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey including a self-designed, disease-specific section. Demographic data, tumour size, hearing status and facial nerve function were extracted from our VS database. Patients scored significantly lower in seven of the eight subscales of the SF-36 compared to German normative QOL data. But when compared to a normative group of patients with hearing loss, only two subscales were affected. The alteration of the subscales was correlated with objective and subjective parameters. Vertigo and postoperative hearing status could be identified as the parameters with the strongest influence on QOL.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Roche PH, Bouvier C, Chinot O, Figarella-Branger D (2008) Genesis and biology of vestibular schwannomas. In: Regis J, Roche PH (eds) Modern management of acoustic neuroma, vol 21., Prog Neurol Surg, Karger, Basel, pp 24–31

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Regli F (1978) Neurological aspects of cerebellopontine angle tumours [in German]. In: Plester D, Wende S, Nakayama N (eds) Kleinhirnbrückenwinkel tumoren, diagnostik und therapie. Springer-Verlag Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 76–86

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Stangerup SE, Tos M, Thomsen J, Caye-Thomasen P (2010) True incidence of vestibular schwannoma? Neurosurgery 67(5):1335–1340. doi:10.1227/NEU.0b013e3181f22660 (discussion 1340)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Samii M, Matthies C (1997) Management of 1,000 vestibular schwannomas (acoustic neuromas): surgical management and results with an emphasis on complications and how to avoid them. Neurosurgery 40(1):11–21 (discussion 21–13)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Meyer TA, Canty PA, Wilkinson EP, Hansen MR, Rubinstein JT, Gantz BJ (2006) Small acoustic neuromas: surgical outcomes versus observation or radiation. Otol Neurotol 27(3):380–392. doi:10.1097/00129492-200604000-00015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sughrue ME, Yang I, Aranda D, Kane AJ, Parsa AT (2010) Hearing preservation rates after microsurgical resection of vestibular schwannoma. J Clin Neurosci 17(9):1126–1129. doi:10.1016/j.jocn.2010.01.018

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Tufarelli D, Meli A, Alesii A, De Angelis E, Badaracco C, Falcioni M, Sanna M (2006) Quality of life after acoustic neuroma surgery. Otol Neurotol 27(3):403–409. doi:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16639281

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ginzkey C, Scheich M, Harnisch W, Bonn V, Ehrmann-Muller D, Shehata-Dieler W, Mlynski R, Hagen R (2013) Outcome on hearing and facial nerve function in microsurgical treatment of small vestibular schwannoma via the middle cranial fossa approach. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 270(4):1209–1216. doi:10.1007/s00405-012-2074-8

    Google Scholar 

  9. Scheich M, Ginzkey C, Harnisch W, Ehrmann D, Shehata-Dieler W, Hagen R (2012) Use of flexible CO(2) laser fiber in microsurgery for vestibular schwannoma via the middle cranial fossa approach. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 269(5):1417–1423. doi:10.1007/s00405-011-1791-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. DeMonte F, Gidley PW (2012) Hearing preservation surgery for vestibular schwannoma: experience with the middle fossa approach. Neurosurg Focus 33(3):E10. doi:10.3171/2012.7.FOCUS12172

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ansari SF, Terry C, Cohen-Gadol AA (2012) Surgery for vestibular schwannomas: a systematic review of complications by approach. Neurosurg Focus 33(3):E14. doi:10.3171/2012.6.FOCUS12163

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. House WF (1961) Surgical exposure of the internal auditory canal and its contents through the middle cranial fossa. Laryngoscope 71:1363–1385. doi:10.1288/00005537-196111000-00004

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. House WF, Gardner G, Hughes RL (1968) Middle cranial fossa approach to acoustic tumor surgery. Arch Otolaryngol 88(6):631–641

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Fisch U (1969) Transtemporal extralabyrinthine operations on the internal auditory canal, the eighth and the seventh cranial nerves. In: Yasargil G (ed) Microsurgery applied to neurosurgery. Thieme, Stuttgart, pp 195–210

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wigand ME, Haid T, Berg M, Rettinger G (1982) The enlarged transtemporal approach to the cerebellopontine angle: technique and indications. [In Italian]. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 2:571–582

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kanzaki J, Kawase T, Sano K, Shiobara R, Toya S (1977) A modified extended middle cranial fossa approach for acoustic tumors. Arch Otorhinolaryngol 217(1):119–121

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Briggs RJ, Fabinyi G, Kaye AH (2000) Current management of acoustic neuromas: review of surgical approaches and outcomes. J Clin Neurosci 7(6):521–526. doi:10.1054/jocn.2000.0728

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Da Cruz MJ, Moffat DA, Hardy DG (2000) Postoperative quality of life in vestibular schwannoma patients measured by the SF36 health questionnaire. Laryngoscope 110(1):151–155. doi:10.1097/00005537-200001000-00027

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ware JE (1993) Measuring patients’ views: the optimum outcome measure. BMJ 306(6890):1429–1430

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD (1992) The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 30(6):473–483

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Morfeld M, Bullinger M, Nantke J, Brahler E (2005) The version 2.0 of the SF-36 health survey: results of a population-representative study [in German]. Soz Praventivmed 50(5):292–300

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ware JE, Snow KK, Kosinski M, Gandeck B (1993) SF-36 health-survey: manual and interpretation guide. The Health Institute, New England Medical Center, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  23. Bullinger M, Kirchberger I (1998) SF-36 health survey—german manual [in German]. Hogrefe Göttingen, Bern

    Google Scholar 

  24. Myrseth E, Moller P, Wentzel-Larsen T, Goplen F, Lund-Johansen M (2006) Untreated vestibular schwannomas: vertigo is a powerful predictor for health-related quality of life. Neurosurgery 59(1):67–76. doi:10.1227/01.NEU.0000219838.80931.6B (discussion 67–76)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Pollock BE, Driscoll CL, Foote RL, Link MJ, Gorman DA, Bauch CD, Mandrekar JN, Krecke KN, Johnson CH (2006) Patient outcomes after vestibular schwannoma management: a prospective comparison of microsurgical resection and stereotactic radiosurgery. Neurosurgery 59(1):77–85. doi:10.1227/01.NEU.0000219217.14930.14 (discussion 77–85)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Breivik CN, Varughese JK, Wentzel-Larsen T, Vassbotn F, Lund-Johansen M (2012) Conservative management of vestibular schwannoma-a prospective cohort study: treatment, symptoms, and quality of life. Neurosurgery 70(5):1072–1080. doi:10.1227/NEU.0b013e31823f5afa (discussion 1080)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Shaffer BT, Cohen MS, Bigelow DC, Ruckenstein MJ (2010) Validation of a disease-specific quality-of-life instrument for acoustic neuroma: the penn acoustic neuroma quality-of-life scale. Laryngoscope 120(8):1646–1654. doi:10.1002/lary.20988

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Rameh C, Magnan J (2010) Quality of life of patients following stages III-IV vestibular schwannoma surgery using the retrosigmoid and translabyrinthine approaches. Auris Nasus Larynx 37(5):546–552. doi:10.1016/j.anl.2010.01.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Lloyd SK, Kasbekar AV, Baguley DM, Moffat DA (2010) Audiovestibular factors influencing quality of life in patients with conservatively managed sporadic vestibular schwannoma. Otol Neurotol 31(6):968–976

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Cheng S, Naidoo Y, da Cruz M, Dexter M (2009) Quality of life in postoperative vestibular schwannoma patients. Laryngoscope 119(11):2252–2257. doi:10.1002/lary.20217

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Myrseth E, Moller P, Pedersen PH, Vassbotn FS, Wentzel-Larsen T, Lund-Johansen M (2005) Vestibular schwannomas: clinical results and quality of life after microsurgery or gamma knife radiosurgery. Neurosurgery 56(5):927–935 (discussion 927–935)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Di Maio S, Akagami R (2009) Prospective comparison of quality of life before and after observation, radiation, or surgery for vestibular schwannomas. J Neurosurg 111(4):855–862. doi:10.3171/2008.10.JNS081014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Godefroy WP, Kaptein AA, Vogel JJ, van der Mey AG (2009) Conservative treatment of vestibular schwannoma: a follow-up study on clinical and quality-of-life outcome. Otol Neurotol 30(7):968–974. doi:10.1097/MAO.0b013e3181b4e3c9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Browne S, Distel E, Morton RP, Petrie KJ (2008) Patients’ quality of life, reported difficulties, and benefits following surgery for acoustic neuroma. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 37(3):417–422

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Vogel JJ, Godefroy WP, van der Mey AG, le Cessie S, Kaptein AA (2008) Illness perceptions, coping, and quality of life in vestibular schwannoma patients at diagnosis. Otol Neurotol 29(6):839–845. doi:10.1097/MAO.0b013e3181820246

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Nicoucar K, Momjian S, Vader JP, De Tribolet N (2006) Surgery for large vestibular schwannomas: how patients and surgeons perceive quality of life. J Neurosurg 105(2):205–212. doi:10.3171/jns.2006.105.2.205

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Baumann I, Polligkeit J, Blumenstock G, Mauz PS, Zalaman IM, Maassen MM (2005) Quality of life after unilateral acoustic neuroma surgery via middle cranial fossa approach. Acta Otolaryngol 125(6):585–591. doi:10.1080/00016480510026935

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. MacAndie C, Crowther JA (2004) Quality of life in patients with vestibular schwannomas managed conservatively. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 29(3):215–218. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2273.2004.00806.xCOA806

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Betchen SA, Walsh J, Post KD (2003) Self-assessed quality of life after acoustic neuroma surgery. J Neurosurg 99(5):818–823. doi:10.3171/jns.2003.99.5.0818

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Kelleher MO, Fernandes MF, Sim DW, O’Sullivan MG (2002) Health-related quality of life in patients with skull base tumours. Br J Neurosurg 16(1):16–20

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Martin HC, Sethi J, Lang D, Neil-Dwyer G, Lutman ME, Yardley L (2001) Patient-assessed outcomes after excision of acoustic neuroma: postoperative symptoms and quality of life. J Neurosurg 94(2):211–216. doi:10.3171/jns.2001.94.2.0211

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Iyer AP, Gunn R, Sillars H (2010) Quality of life after vestibular schwannoma surgery: does hearing preservation make a difference? J Laryngol Otol 124(4):370–373. doi:10.1017/S0022215109992040

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Brackmann DE, House JR 3rd, Hitselberger WE (1994) Technical modifications to the middle fossa craniotomy approach in removal of acoustic neuromas. Am J Otol 15(5):614–619

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Gardner G, Robertson JH (1988) Hearing preservation in unilateral acoustic neuroma surgery. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 97(1):55–66

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. House JW, Brackmann DE (1985) Facial nerve grading system. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 93(2):146–147

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Timmer FC, van Haren AE, Mulder JJ, Hanssens PE, van Overbeeke JJ, Cremers CW, Graamans K (2010) Quality of life after gamma knife radiosurgery treatment in patients with a vestibular schwannoma: the patient’s perspective. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 267(6):867–873. doi:10.1007/s00405-009-1140-3

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Park CE, Park BJ, Lim YJ, Yeo SG (2011) Functional outcomes in retrosigmoid approach microsurgery and gamma knife stereotactic radiosurgery in vestibular schwannoma. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 268(7):955–959. doi:10.1007/s00405-011-1596-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Kondziolka D, Mousavi SH, Kano H, Flickinger JC, Lunsford LD (2012) The newly diagnosed vestibular schwannoma: radiosurgery, resection, or observation? Neurosurg Focus 33(3):E8. doi:10.3171/2012.6.FOCUS12192

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Regis J, Tamura M, Delsanti C, Roche PH, Pellet W, Thomassin JM (2008) Hearing preservation in patients with unilateral vestibular schwannoma after gamma knife surgery. In: Regis J, Roche PH (eds) Modern management of acoustic neuroma, vol 21., Prog Neurol SurgKarger, Basel, pp 142–151

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  50. Niranjan A, Mathieu D, Kondziolka D, Flickinger JC, Lunsford LD (2008) Radiosurgery for intracanalicular vestibular schwannomas. In: Regis J, Roche PH (eds) Modern management of acoustic neuroma, vol 21., Prog Neurol SurgKarger, Basel, pp 192–199

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  51. Smouha EE, Yoo M, Mohr K, Davis RP (2005) Conservative management of acoustic neuroma: a meta-analysis and proposed treatment algorithm. Laryngoscope 115(3):450–454. doi:10.1097/01.mlg.0000175681.52517.cf

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Sughrue ME, Yang I, Aranda D, Lobo K, Pitts LH, Cheung SW, Parsa AT (2010) The natural history of untreated sporadic vestibular schwannomas: a comprehensive review of hearing outcomes. J Neurosurg 112(1):163–167. doi:10.3171/2009.4.JNS08895

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Regis J, Carron R, Park MC, Soumare O, Delsanti C, Thomassin JM, Roche PH (2010) Wait-and-see strategy compared with proactive Gamma Knife surgery in patients with intracanalicular vestibular schwannomas. J Neurosurg 113(Suppl):105–111. doi:10.3171/2010.8.GKS101058

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Dornhoffer JL, Helms J, Höhmann DH (1995) Hearing preservation in acoustic tumor surgery: results and prognostic factors. Laryngoscope 105(2):184–187. doi:10.1288/00005537-199502000-00014

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Höhmann D, Dornhoffer JL, Helms J (1994) Auditory results after transtemporal removal of acoustic neurinoma [in German]. HNO 42(9):541–545

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Schwager K, Helms J (2002) The wuerzburg concept for acoustic neuroma surgery [in German]. In: Bootz F, Strauss G (eds) Die Chirurgie der lateralen Schädelbasis. Springer, Berlin, pp 76–78

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  57. Schwager K, Baier G, Helms J, Hagen R (2008) Results in otosurgically treated patients with acoustic neuroma. Part 2: hearing results after middle fossa approach [in German]. Laryngorhinootologie 87(9):629–633. doi:10.1055/s-2007-995705

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Tonn JC, Schlake HP, Goldbrunner R, Milewski C, Helms J, Roosen K (2000) Acoustic neuroma surgery as an interdisciplinary approach: a neurosurgical series of 508 patients. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 69(2):161–166

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Gauden A, Weir P, Hawthorne G, Kaye A (2011) Systematic review of quality of life in the management of vestibular schwannoma. J Clin Neurosci 18(12):1573–1584. doi:10.1016/j.jocn.2011.05.009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Sandooram D, Hornigold R, Grunfeld B, Thomas N, Kitchen ND, Gleeson M (2010) The effect of observation versus microsurgical excision on quality of life in unilateral vestibular schwannoma: a prospective study. Skull Base 20(1):47–54. doi:10.1055/s-0029-1242985

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Barre P, Merle C, Conessa C, Desgeorges M, Poncet JL (2004) Postoperative quality of life for patients with a vestibular schwannoma [in French]. Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac 121(2):83–94

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Plastic, Aesthetic and Reconstructive Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital of Wuerzburg, Josef-Schneider-Strasse 11, 97080, Wuerzburg, Germany

    Matthias Scheich, Christian Ginzkey, Edith Reuter, Wilma Harnisch, Desiree Ehrmann & Rudolf Hagen

Authors
  1. Matthias Scheich
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Christian Ginzkey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Edith Reuter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Wilma Harnisch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Desiree Ehrmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Rudolf Hagen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthias Scheich.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Scheich, M., Ginzkey, C., Reuter, E. et al. Quality of life after microsurgery for vestibular schwannoma via the middle cranial fossa approach. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 271, 1909–1916 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-013-2671-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-013-2671-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation