Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Spatiotemporal variability of stream habitat and movement of three species of fish

  • Population Ecology
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Relationships between environmental variability and movement are poorly understood, due to both their complexity and the limited ecological scope of most movement studies. We studied movements of fantail (Etheostoma flabellare), riverweed (E. podostemone), and Roanoke darters (Percina roanoka) through two stream systems during two summers. We then related movement to variability in measured habitat attributes using logistic regression and exploratory data plots. We indexed habitat conditions at both microhabitat (i.e., patches of uniform depth, velocity, and substrate) and mesohabitat (i.e., riffle and pool channel units) spatial scales, and determined how local habitat conditions were affected by landscape spatial (i.e., longitudinal position, land use) and temporal contexts. Most spatial variability in habitat conditions and fish movement was unexplained by a site’s location on the landscape. Exceptions were microhabitat diversity, which was greater in the less-disturbed watershed, and riffle isolation and predator density in pools, which were greater at more-downstream sites. Habitat conditions and movement also exhibited only minor temporal variability, but the relative influences of habitat attributes on movement were quite variable over time. During the first year, movements of fantail and riverweed darters were triggered predominantly by loss of shallow microhabitats; whereas, during the second year, microhabitat diversity was more strongly related (though in opposite directions) to movement of these two species. Roanoke darters did not move in response to microhabitat-scale variables, presumably because of the species’ preference for deeper microhabitats that changed little over time. Conversely, movement of all species appeared to be constrained by riffle isolation and predator density in pools, two mesohabitat-scale attributes. Relationships between environmental variability and movement depended on both the spatiotemporal scale of consideration and the ecology of the species. Future studies that integrate across scales, taxa, and life-histories are likely to provide greater insight into movement ecology than will traditional, single-season, single-species approaches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albanese B, Angermeier PL, Gowan C (2003) Designing mark-recapture studies to reduce effects of distance weighting on movement distance distributions of stream fishes. Trans Am Fish Soc 132:925–939

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Albanese B, Angermeier PL, Dorai-Raj S (2004) Ecological correlates of fish movement in a network of Virginia streams. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 61:857–869

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angermeier PL, Schlosser IJ (1989) Species-area relationships for stream fishes. Ecology 70:1450–1462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aparicio E, De Sostoa A (1999) Pattern of movements of adult Barbus haasi in a small Mediterranean stream. J Fish Biol 55:1086–1095

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn TM, Lawton JH, Perry JN (1992) A method of estimating the slope of upper bounds of plots of body size and abundance in natural animal assemblages. Oikos 65:107–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Croft DP, Albanese B, Arrowsmith BJ, Botham M, Webster M, Krause J (2003) Sex-biased movement in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata). Oecologia 137:62–68

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser DF, Sise TE (1980) Observations on stream minnows in a patchy environment: a test of a theory of habitat distribution. Ecology 61:790–797

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser DF, Gilliam JF, Daley MJ, Le AN, Skalski GT (2001) Explaining leptokurtic movement distributions: intrapopulation variation in boldness and exploration. Am Nat 158:124–135

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman MC (1995) Movements by two small fishes in a large stream. Copeia 1995:361–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frissell CA, Liss WJ, Warren CE, Hurley MD (1986) A hierarchical framework for stream habitat classification: viewing streams in a watershed context. Environ Manag 10:199–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerking SD (1953) Evidence for the concepts of home range and territory in stream fishes. Ecology 34:347–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilliam JF, Fraser DF (2001) Movement in corridors: enhancement by predation threat, disturbance, and habitat structure. Ecology 82:258–273

    Google Scholar 

  • Goforth RR, Foltz JW (1998) Movements of the yellowfin shiner, Notropis lutipinnis. Ecol Fresh Fish 7:49–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorman OT (1986) Assemblage organization of stream fishes: the effect of rivers on adventitious streams. Am Nat 128:611–616

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gowan C, Fausch KD (1996) Mobile brook trout in two high-elevation Colorado streams: re-evaluating the concept of restricted movement. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 53:1370–1381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gowan C, Fausch KD (2002) Why do foraging stream salmonids move during summer? Environ Biol Fish 64:139–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gowan C, Young MK, Fausch KD, Riley SC (1994) Restricted movement in resident stream salmonids: a paradigm lost? Can J Fish Aquat Sci 51:2626–2637

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg LA (1988) Interactive segregation between the stream fishes Etheostoma simoterum and E. rufilineatum. Oikos 51:193–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall CAS (1972) Migration and metabolism in a temperate stream ecosystem. Ecology 53:585–604

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey BC, Nakamoto RJ, White JL (1999) Influence of large woody debris and bankfull flood on movement of adult resident cutthroat trout (Oncorhyncus clarki) during fall and winter. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 56:2161–2166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill J, Grossman GD (1987) Home range estimates for three North American stream fishes. Copeia 1987:376–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howell DC (2000) Resampling procedures. Available online at http://www.uvm.edu/∼dhowell/StatPages/StatHomePage.html

  • Ingersoll CG, Hlohowskyj I, Mundahl ND (1984) Movements and densities of the darters Etheostoma flabellare, E. spectabile, and E. nigrum during spring spawning. J Fresh Ecol 2:345–351

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins RE, Burkhead NM (1993) Freshwater fishes of Virginia. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda

    Google Scholar 

  • Labbe TR, Fausch KD (2000) Dynamics of intermittent stream habitat regulate persistence of a threatened fish at multiple scales. Ecol Appl 10:1774–1791

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leopold LB, Wolman MG, Miller JP (1964) Fluvial processes in geomorphology. Freeman Press, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Lonzarich DG, Lonzarich MR, Warren ML (2000) Effects of riffle length on the short-term movement of fishes among stream pools. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 57:1508–1514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lotrich VA (1973) Growth, production, and community composition of fishes inhabiting a first-, second-, and third-order stream of Kentucky. Ecol Monogr 43:377–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matheny MP, Rabeni CF (1995) Patterns of movement and habitat use by northern hogsuckers in an Ozark stream. Trans Am Fish Soc 124:886–897

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews WJ (1990) Spatial and temporal variation in fishes of riffle habitats: a comparison of analytical approaches for the Roanoke River. Am Midl Nat 124:31–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews WJ, Bek J, Surat E (1982) Comparative ecology of the darters Etheostoma podostemone, E. flabellare, and Percina roanoka in the upper Roanoke River drainage, Virginia. Copeia 1982:805–814

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mundahl ND, Ingersoll CG (1983) Early autumn movements and densities of Johnny (Etheostoma nigrum) and fantail (E. flabellare) darters in a southwestern Ohio stream. Ohio J Sci 83:103–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Northcote TG (1978) Migratory strategies and production in freshwater fishes. In: Gerking SD (ed) Ecology of freshwater fish production. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 326–359

    Google Scholar 

  • Petty JT, Grossman GD (2004) Restricted movement by mottled sculpin (Pisces: Cottidae) in a southern Appalachian stream. Freshw Biol 49:631–645

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillipi TE (1994) Multiple regression: herbivory. In: Scheiner SM, Gurevitch J (eds) Design and analysis of ecological experiments. Chapman and Hall, New York, pp 183–210

    Google Scholar 

  • Power ME (1987) Predator avoidance by grazing fishes in temperate and tropical streams: importance of stream depth and prey size. In: Kerfoot WC, Sih A (eds) Predation. University Press of New England, Hanover, pp 333–351

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed RJ (1968) Mark and recapture studies of eight species of darters (Pisces: Percidae) in three streams of northwestern Pennsylvania. Copeia 1968:172-175

  • Roberts JH, Angermeier PL (2004) A comparison of injectable fluorescent marks in two genera of darters: effects on survival and retention rates. N Am J Fish Manag 24:1017–1024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SAS (2000) SAS/STAT user’s guide, version 8. SAS Institute, Cary

  • Schaefer J (2001) Riffles as barriers to interpool movement by three cyprinids (Notropis boops, Campostoma anomalum, and Cyprinella venusta). Freshw Biol 46:379–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlosser IJ (1982) Fish community structure and function along two habitat gradients in a headwater stream. Ecol Monogr 52:395–414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlosser IJ, Toth LA (1984) Niche relationships and population ecology of rainbow (Etheostoma caeruleum) and fantail (E. flabellare) darters in a temporally variable environment. Oikos 42:229–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlosser IJ (1991) Stream fish ecology: a landscape perspective. Bioscience 41:704–712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlosser IJ (1995a) Dispersal, boundary processes, and trophic-level interactions in streams adjacent to beaver ponds. Ecology 76:908–925

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlosser IJ (1995b) Critical landscape attributes that influence fish population dynamics in headwater streams. Hydrobiologia 303:71–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Skalski GT, Gilliam JF (2000) Modeling diffusive spread in a heterogeneous population: a movement study with stream fish. Ecology 81:1685–1700

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slack WT, Ross ST, Ewing JA (2004) Ecology and population structure of the bayou darter, Etheostoma rubrum: disjunct riffle habitats and downstream transport of larvae. Environ Biol Fish 71:151–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stancil VF (2000) Effects of watershed and habitat conditions on stream fishes in the upper Roanoke River watershed, Virginia. Masters Thesis. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, p 131

  • Thomson JD, Weiblen G, Thomson BA, Alfaro S, Legendre P (1996) Untangling multiple factors in spatial distributions: lilies, gophers, and rocks. Ecology 77:1698–1715

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner TF (2001) Comparative study of larval transport and gene flow in darters. Copeia 2001:766–774

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Deventer JS, Platts WS (1986) Microfish 3.0. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda

    Google Scholar 

  • Winn HE (1958) Comparative reproductive behavior and ecology of fourteen species of darters (Pisces–Percidae). Ecol Monogr 28:155–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The M.S. thesis work of J.H.R. was funded by the US Army Corps of Engineers and a B.S. McGinnes Graduate Fellowship. We are indebted to our field crew (G. Galbreath, B. Albanese, A. Rosenberger, D. Dutton, J. Griffin, G. Lintecum, P. Wheeler, T. Rosenberger, and B. Blood), graduate committee members (A. Dolloff and T. Newcomb), and others who helped in various ways (R. Rose, H. Rebecca, and T. Roberts). The manuscript benefitted immensely from the comments of B. Albanese, G. Grossman, T. Hitt, S. Ross, I. Schlosser, J. Trexler, and three anonymous reviewers.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James H. Roberts.

Additional information

Communicated by Joel Trexler.

The Virginia Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit is jointly sponsored by the US Geological Survey, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries, and Wildlife Management Institute.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Roberts, J.H., Angermeier, P.L. Spatiotemporal variability of stream habitat and movement of three species of fish. Oecologia 151, 417–430 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-006-0598-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-006-0598-6

Keywords

Navigation