Skip to main content
Log in

The growth responses of coastal dune species are determined by nutrient limitation and sand burial

  • Ecosystem Ecology - Original Paper
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Past work suggests that burial and low nutrient availability limit the growth and zonal distribution of coastal dune plants. Given the importance of these two factors, there is a surprising lack of field investigations of the interactions between burial and nutrient availability. This study aims to address this issue by measuring the growth responses of four coastal dune plant species to these two factors and their interaction. Species that naturally experience either high or low rates of burial were selected and a factorial burial by nutrient addition experiment was conducted. Growth characteristics were measured in order to determine which characteristics allow a species to respond to burial. Species that naturally experience high rates of burial (Arctotheca populifolia and Scaevola plumieri) displayed increased growth when buried, and this response was nutrient-limited. Stable-dune species had either small (Myrica cordifolia, N-fixer) or negligible responses to burial (Metalasia muricata), and were not nutrient-limited. This interspecific difference in response to burial and/or fertiliser is consistent with the idea that burial maintains the observed zonation of species on coastal dunes. Species that are unable to respond to burial are prevented from occupying the mobile dunes. Species able to cope with high rates of burial had high nitrogen-use efficiencies and low dry mass costs of production, explaining their ability to respond to burial under nutrient limitation. The interaction between burial and nutrient limitation is understudied but vital to understanding the zonation of coastal dune plant species.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bach CE (1998) Interactive effects of herbivory and sand burial on growth of a tropical dune plant, Ipomoea pes-caprae. Ecol Entomol 23:238–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barker NP, Harman KT, Ripley BS, Bond JA (2002) The genetic diversity of Scaevola plumieri L. (Goodeniaceae), an indigenous dune coloniser, as revealed by inter simple sequence repeat (ISSR) fingerprinting. S Afr J Bot 68(2):532–541

    Google Scholar 

  • Berendse F, Aerts R (1987) Nitrogen-use-efficiency: a biologically meaningful definition? Funct Ecol 1:293–296

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapin FS III (1989) The cost of tundra plant structures: evaluation of concepts and currencies. Am Nat 133(1):1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Disraeli DJ (1984) The effect of sand deposits on the growth and morphology of Ammophila breviligulata. J Ecol 72:145–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans JR (1989) Photosynthesis and nitrogen relationships in leaves of C3 plants. Oecologia 78:9–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Field CBH, Mooney A (1986) The photosynthesis-nitrogen relationship in wild plants. In: Givnish TJ (eds) The economy of plant form and function. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 25–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Franks SJ, Peterson CJ (2003) Burial disturbance leads to facilitation among coastal dune plants. Plant Ecol 168:13–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Güsewell S (2004) N : P ratios in terrestrial plants: variation and functional significance. New Phytol 164:243–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kachi N, Hirose T (1983) Limiting nutrients for plant growth in coastal sand dune soils. J Ecol 71(3):937–944

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Killingbeck KT (1996) Nutrients in senesced leaves: keys to the search for potential resorption and resorption proficiency. Ecology 77(6):1716–1727

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lubke RA (1983) A survey of the coastal vegetation near Port Alfred, Eastern Cape. Bothalia 14:725–738

    Google Scholar 

  • Maun MA (1994) Adaptations enhancing survival and establishment of seedlings on coastal dune systems. Vegetation 111:59–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Maun MA (1998) Adaptations of plants to burial in coastal sand dunes. Can J Bot 76(5):713–738

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maun MA, Lapierre J (1984) The effects of burial by sand on Ammophila breviligulata. J Ecol 72:827–839

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maun MA, Perumal J (1999) Zonation of vegetation on lacustrine coastal dunes: effects of burial by sand. Ecol Lett 2:14–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moreno-Casasola P (1986) Sand movement as a factor in the distribution of plant communities in a coastal dune system. Vegetation 65:67–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pavlik BM (1983) Nutrient and productivity relations of the dune grasses Ammophila arenaria and Elymus mollis I. Blade photosynthesis and nitrogen use efficiency in the laboratory and field. Oecologia (Berl) 57:227–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perumal JV, Maun MA (1999) The role of mycorrhizal fungi in growth enhancement of dune plants following burial in sand. Funct Ecol 13:560–566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poorter H, Garnier E (1999) Ecological significance of inherent variation in relative growth rate and its components. In: Pugnaire I, Valladares F (eds) Handbook of functional plant ecology. Dekker, New York, Chap 3, pp 81–120

  • Shi L, Zhang ZJ, Zhang CY, Zhang JZ (2004) Effects of sand burial on survival, growth, gas exchange and biomass allocation of Ulmus pumila seedlings in the Hunshandak Sandland, China. Ann Bot 94:553–560

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shumway SW (2000) Facilitative effects of a sand dune shrub on species growing beneath the shrub canopy. Oecologia 124:138–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • StatSoft Inc. (2007) STATISTICA (data analysis software system), version 8.0. http://www.statsoft.com. Accessed 19th January 2008

  • Sykes MT, Wilson JB (1990) An experimental investigation into the response of New Zealand sand dune species to different depths of burial of sand. Acta Bot Neerl 39(2):171–181

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Der Valk AG (1974) Environmental factors controlling the distribution of forbs on coastal foredunes in Cape Hatteras National Seashore. Can J Bot 52:1057–1073

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Putten WH, Van Dijk C, Peters BAM (1993) Plant-specific soil-borne diseases contribute to succession in foredune vegetation. Nature 362:53–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Ryssen FWJ, Grobbelaar N (1970) The nodulation and nitrogen fixing ability of South African Myrica spp. S Afr J Sci 66:22–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Vitousek PM, Walker LR (1989) Biological invasion by Myrica faya in Hawai’i: plant demography, nitrogen fixation, ecosystem effects. Ecol Monogr 59(3):247–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willis AJ (1965) The influence of mineral nutrients on the growth of Ammophila arenaria. J Ecol 53:735–745

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson JB, Sykes MT (1999) Is zonation on coastal sand dunes determined primarily by sand burial or by salt spray? A test in New Zealand dunes. Ecol Lett 2:233–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuan T, Maun MA, Hopkins WG (1993) Effects of sand accretion on photosynthesis, leaf-water potential and morphology of two dune grasses. Funct Ecol 7:676–682

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang J (1996) Interactive effects of soil nutrients, moisture and sand burial on the development, physiology, biomass and fitness of Cakile edentula. Ann Bot 78:591–598

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank D. Ibrahim, G. Coombs, D. Gaba and the Fish River Sun management for their help in the setup and maintenance of these experiments, and two anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments on this manuscript. This work was supported by a NRF Prestigious Doctoral scholarship (M.E.G.), a NRF Grant to N.W.P, and a Rhodes University JRC grant to B.S.R. The experiments reported in this paper comply with the current laws and regulations of the Republic of South Africa.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthew Gilbert.

Additional information

Communicated by Marilyn Ball.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gilbert, M., Pammenter, N. & Ripley, B. The growth responses of coastal dune species are determined by nutrient limitation and sand burial. Oecologia 156, 169–178 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-008-0968-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-008-0968-3

Keywords

Navigation