Abstract
Based on a laboratory study of drained direct shear tests of remoulded, pre-cut and polished specimens and drained ring shear tests of uncut and remoulded specimens of slip surface materials of five landslide soils, significant correlations of the mobilized shear strength parameters, cohesion (c, c r) and internal friction angle (Φ, Φr), are proposed. The investigated soils consisted of the slip surface material belonging to tuffaceous clay, mudstone, loess and siltstone. Most of the previous studies on residual shear strength measured by reversal direct shear and ring shear devices have obtained significantly different results using the two devices, even when pre-cut and polished specimens were used in the direct shear device. In this study, the residual shear strength values of remoulded specimens measured by a ring shear device are shown to significantly correlate with the drained large displacement shear strength values of remoulded specimens, which were measured using pre-cut and polished specimens in a direct shear device. The correlation between the cohesion measured in the two shear devices is expressed by the linear relationship, \( {c_{\text{r}}} = 0.{7394}c - {6}.{6857} \), while the correlation between the friction angle measured in the two devices is expressed by the linear relationship, \( {\Phi_{\text{r}}} = {1}.0{852}\Phi - {6}.0{247} \). The proposed linear correlations for effective cohesion (c′) and effective friction angle (Φ′) have yielded significant coefficients of determination within an effective normal stress range of 30–150 kN/m2.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anayi JT, Boyce JR, Rodgers CD (1988) Comparison of alternative methods of measuring the residual strength of a clay. Transp. Res. Record 1192, Transportation Research Board (TRB), Washington, DC, pp 16–26
Anayi JT, Boyce JR, Rodgers CDF (1989) Modified ring shear apparatus. ASTM Georech J 12(2):171–173
ASTM (2000a) Standard test method for direct shear test of soils under consolidated drained conditions (ASTM D 3080-98). ASTM, West Conshohocken
ASTM (2000b) Standard test method for torsional ring shear test to determine drained residual shear strength of cohesive soils (ASTM D 6467-06a). ASTM, West Conshohocken
Bishop AW, Green GE, Garga VK, Anderson A, Brown JD (1971) A new ring shear apparatus and its application to the measurement of residual strength. Geotechnique 21(4):273–328
Bromhead EN (1979) A simple ring shear apparatus. Ground Eng 12(5):40–44
Bromhead EN (1992) Stability of slopes, 2nd edn. Surrey University Press, London
Bromhead EN, Curtis RD (1983) A comparison of alternative methods of measuring the residual strength of London clay. Ground Eng 16(4):39–40
Casagrande A (1932) Research on the Atterberg limits of soil. Public Roads 13(8):121–136
Casagrande A (1948) Classification and identification of soils. Transactions ASCE 113:901–930
Chandler RJ (1966) The measurement of residual strength in triaxial compression. Geotechnique 16(3):181–186
De Alba P, Ballestero TP (2006) Residual strength after liquefaction: a rheological approach. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 26:143–151
De Alba P, Ballestero TP (2008) Effect of fines on sand residual strength after liquefaction. Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics (GSP 181) Congress, pp 1–11
Dijkstra TA, Rogers CDF, Smalley IJ, Derbyshire E, Jin LY, Min MX (1994) The loess of north-central China: geotechnical properties and their relation to slope stability. Eng Geol 36:153–171
Duncan JM, Wright SG (2005) Soil strength and slope stability. Wiley, Hoboken, p 297
Durham GN (1976) Trimming device for obtaining direct shear specimens from samples of stiff fissured clay chales. Soil specimen preparation for laboratory testing, ASTM STP 599. American Society for Testing and Material, West Conshohocken, pp 37–42
Early KR, Skempton AW (1972) The landslide at Walton’s Wood, Staffordshire. Q J Eng Geol 5:19–41
Egashira K, Gibo S (1988) Colloid-chemical and mineralogical differences of smectites taken from argillized layers, both from within and outside the slip surfaces in the Kamenose landslide. Appl Clay Sci 3(3):253–262
Egashira K, Matsuo K, Gibo S, Nakamura S, Zhou Y, Inoue H, Sasaki K (2000) Clay mineralogical approach to the slip surface formation in the Odokoro landslide, Niigata, central Japan. Clay Sci 11:107–113
Gibo S (1994) Ring shear apparatus in measuring residual strength and its measurement accuracy. J Jpn Landslide Soc 31(3):24–30 (in Japanese with English abstract)
Gibo S, Egashira K (1992) Relation between reorientation of clay particles and the residual strength of mudstone of the Shimajiri group. Trans Jpn Soc Irrig Drain Reclam Eng 161:19–24 (in Japanese with English abstract)
Gibo S, Nakamura S, Zhou Y (2000) Shear strengths acting along the slip surface of large-moved mudstone landslide, Tyunjun, Okinawa. Tsuchino Kiso 48(8):9–12 (in Japanese with English abstract)
Hanzawa S (1935) Topography and geology of the Riukiu Islands. Sci Rep Tohoku Imp Univ Ser 2(17):1–61
Harris AJ, Watson PDJ (1997) Optimal procedure for the ring shear test. Ground Eng 30(6):26–28
Hawkins AB, Privett KD (1985) Measurement and use of residual shear strength of cohesive soils. Ground Eng 18(8):22–29
Hawkins AB, Privett KD (1986) Residual strength: does BS 5930 help or hinder? Geol Soc Lond Eng Geol Spec Publ 2:279–282
Hvorslev MJ (1939) Torsion Shear tests and their place in the determination of the shearing resistance of soils. Proc. of ASTM symposium on shear testing of soils, 39, pp 999–1022
Japanese Geotechnical Society (2010) The soil testing standards, guidelines and methods. ISBN 978-4-88644-084-6
Kalteziotis N (1993) The residual shear strength of some Hellenic clayey soils. Geotech Geol Eng 11:125–145
Kenny TC (1967) The influence of mineral composition on the residual shear strength of natural soils. Proc. Geotechnical Conference vol. 1, Oslo, Norway, pp 123–129
Kimura S, Gibo S, Nakamura S, Vithana SB (2010) Landslide stability analysis utilizing shear strength of slip surface soil: Asato and Tyunjun landslides, Okinawa, Japan. Proceedings of GeoFlorida 2010: advances in analysis, modeling and design, West Palm Beach, Florida, USA, 20–24 Feb. 2010, pp 1246–1254
Kukla G (1987) Loess stratigraphy in central China. Quat Sci Rev 6:191–219
La Gatta DP (1970) Residual strength of clays and clay-shale by rotation shear tests. Harvard Soil Mechanics Series (86). Harvard University, Cambridge
Lade PV (2010) The mechanics of surficial failure in soil slopes. Eng Geol 114:57–64
Lambe TW (1985) Amuay landslides. Proc., XI Int. Conf. Soil Mech. and found. Eng. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 137–158
Japan Landslide Society (JLS) (2002) In: Ryosuke T (ed) Landslides in Japan, 6th edn. Japan Landslide Society and National Conference of Landslide Control, Tokyo
Liu TS, An ZS, Yuan BY, Han JM (1985a) The loess paleosol sequence in China and climatic history. Episodes 8:21–28
Liu XM, Liu TS, Cheng MY, Liu C Xu TC (1985b) The primary study on magnetostratigraphy of a loess profile in Xifeng area, Gansu Province. Proceedings of the Intern. Symp. on Loess Res., October 5–16, Xian, 5 pp
Lupini JF, Skinner AE, Vaughan PR (1981) The drained residual strength of cohesive soils. Géotech Lond Engl 31(2):181–213
Meehan CL, Brandon TL, Duncan JM, Tiwari B (2010) Direct shear testing of polished slickensided surfaces. Landslides 7(2):157–167
Naeini SA, Baziar MH (2010) Effect of fines content on steady-state strength of mixed and layered samples of a sand. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 24:181–187
Nakamura S, Gibo S, Zhou Y, Egashira K (1999) Determination of parameters for curved residual strength envelopes of landslide soils. J Jpn Landslide Soc 36(1):28–34, in Japanese with English abstract
Nakamura S, Gibo S, Hayashi Y (2004) Three-dimensional stability analysis procedure in which the residual factor is incorporated—an example of the Tyunjun landslide, Okinawa, Japan. J Jpn Soc Irri Drain Recl Eng 229:47–53
Nakamura S, Gibo S, Egashira K, Kimura S (2010) Platy layer silicate minerals for controlling residual strength in landslide soils of different origins and geology. Geology 38(8):743–746
Pradel DE, Smith PM, Stewart JP, Raad G (2005) Case history of landslide movement during the Northridge earthquake. J Geotech Geoenv Eng ASCE 131(11):1360–1369
Sandoval J, De Alba P, Fussell B (2010) Residual strength of liquefied sand measured in a ring shear device. ASTM Stand Eng Digit Libr 33(1):55–61
Skempton AW (1964) Long term stability of clay slopes. Geotechnique 14(2):77–101
Skempton AW (1985) Residual strength of clays in landslides, folded strata and the laboratory. Geotechnique 35(1):3–18
Skempton AW, Petley DJ (1967) The strength along structural discontinuities in stiff clays. Proc. Geotec. Conf. 2, Oslo, Norway, pp 29–46
Stark TD, Contresars IA (1996) Constant volume ring shear apparatus. J Geotech Eng 123:335–343
Stark TD, Eid HT (1994) Drained residual strength of cohesive soils. J Geotech Eng 120(5):856–871
Stark TD, Vettel JJ (1992) Bromhead Ring Shear Test procedure. Geotech Test J 15(1):24–32
Stark TD, Choi H, McCone S (2005) Drained shear strength parameters for analysis of landslides. J Geotech Geoenvironment Eng 131(5):575–588
Sun B, Gibo S, Sasaki K, Zhao T, Nakamura S (2004) Classification on the basis of position of slip surface and features of loess landslides in the Southern Ningxia Hui Nationality Municipality, China. J Jpn Soc Nat Disaster Sci 23–1:79–92, in Japanese with English abstract
Suzuki M, Tsuzuki S, Yamamoto T (2007) Residual strength characteristics of naturally and artificially cemented clays in reversal direct box shear test. Soils Found 47(6):1029–1044
Terzaghi K, Peck RB, Mesri G (1996) Soil mechanics in engineering practice, 3rd edn. Wiley, New York, pp 150–160
Thevanayagam S, Shenthan T, Mohan S, Liang J (2002) Undrained fragility of clean sands, silty sands, and sandy silts. J Geotech Geoenvir Eng 128(10):849–859
Tika TE (1999) Ring shear tests on a carbonate sandy soil. Geotech Test J GTJODJ 22(4):342–355
Townsend FC, Gilbert PA (1973) Tests to measure residual strength of some clay shales. Geotechnique 23(2):267–271
Townsend FC, Gilbert PA (1976) Effects of specimen type on the residual strength of clays and clay shales. Soil specimen preparation for laboratory testing, ASTM STP 599. American Society for Testing and Material, West Conshohocken, pp 43–65
Ujiie H (1994) Early Pleistocene birth of the Okinawa Trough and the Ryukyu Island Arc at the south-western margin of the Pacific: evidence from Late Cenozoic planktonic foraminiferal zonation. Palaeogeograph Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol 108:457–474
Wan Y, Kwong J (2002) Shear strength of soils containing amorphous clay-size materials in a slow-moving landslide. Eng Geol 65:293–303
Watry SM, Lade PV (2000) Residual shear strength of bentonites on Palos Verdes Peninsula, California. In: Griffiths DV, Fenton GA, Martin TR (eds) Proc., slope stability 2000, geotechnical special publication no. 101. ASCE, Reston, pp 323–342
Yamaguchi S (1980) Editor-in-chief, Landslides in Japan. The Japan Society of Landslide and National Conference of Landslide Control, Tokyo
Yokota K, Yatabe R, Yagi N (1997) Effects of clay minerals and shear strength on the development of serpentine landslides. J Jpn Soc Civil Eng 568(39):125–132
Acknowledgements
The authors thank the Government of Japan for making this research possible through the financial support of the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology under the Grant-in-aid programme for young scientists (B) 22780221 (Nakamura Shinya) and the Monbukagakusho postgraduate scholarship programme. The authors also thank the University of Ruhuna, Sri Lanka, for granting academic leave for the principal author to conduct this research at the Ryukyus University, Japan, in affiliation to the United Graduate School of Agricultural Sciences of Kagoshima University, Japan.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Vithana, S.B., Nakamura, S., Gibo, S. et al. Correlation of large displacement drained shear strength of landslide soils measured by direct shear and ring shear devices. Landslides 9, 305–314 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-011-0301-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-011-0301-9