Skip to main content
Log in

Mapping of slow landslides on the Palos Verdes Peninsula using the California landslide inventory and persistent scatterer interferometry

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Landslides Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Extremely slow landslides, those with a displacement rate <16 mm/year, may be imperceptible without proper instrumentation. These landslides can cause infrastructure damage on a long-term timescale. The objective is to identify these landslides through the combination of information from the California landslide inventory (CLI) and ground displacement rates using results from persistent scatterer interferometry (PSI), an interferometric synthetic aperture radar (InSAR) stacking technique, across the Palos Verdes Peninsula in California. A total of 34 ENVISAT radar images (acquired between 2005 and 2010) and 40 COSMO-SkyMed radar images (acquired between 2012 and 2014) were processed. An InSAR landslide inventory (ILI) is created using four criteria: minimum PS count, average measured ground velocity, slope angle, and slope aspect. The ILI is divided into four categories: long-term slides (LTSs), potentially active slides (PASs), relatively stable slopes (RSSs), and unmapped extremely slow slides (UESSs). These categories are based on whether landslides were previously mapped on that slope (in the CLI), if persistent scatterers (PSs) are present, and whether PSs are unstable or stable. The final inventory includes 263 mapped landslides across the peninsula, of them 67 landslides were identified as UESS. Although UESS exhibit low velocity and are relatively small (average area of 8865 m2 per slide), their presence in a highly populated area such as the Palos Verdes Peninsula could lead to destruction of infrastructure and property over the long term.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Antronico L, Borrelli L, Peduto D, Fornaro G, Gullà G, Paglia L, Zeni G (2013) Conventional and innovative techniques for the monitoring of displacements in landslide affected area. In Landslide Science and Practice Proceedings of The Second World Landslide Forum, 3–9 October 2011, Rome Vol. 2, 125–131. DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/978–3–642-31445-2_16, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013, ISBN 978-3-642-31444-5

  • Baran I, Stewart MP, Kampes BM, Perski Z, Lilly P (2003) A modification to the Goldstein radar interferogram filter. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 41(9):2114–2118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berardino P, Fornaro G, Lanari R, Sansosti E (2002) A new algorithm for surface deformation monitoring based on small baseline differential SAR interferograms. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 40(11):2375–2383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bianchini S, Herrera G, Mateos RM, Notti D, Garcia I, Mora O, Moretti S (2013) Landslide activity maps generation by means of persistent scatterer interferometry. Remote Sens 5:6198–6222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouali EH, Oommen T, Escobar-Wolf R (2016a) Interferometric stacking toward geohazard identification and geotechnical asset monitoring. J Infrastruct Syst 22(2):12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouali EH, Oommen T, Vitton S, Escobar-Wolf R, Brooks C (2016b) Rockfall hazard rating system: benefits of utilizing remote sensing. Env Eng Geosci:1078–7275. doi:https://doi.org/10.2113/EEG-1812

  • Bouali EH, Oommen T, Escobar-Wolf R (2017) Structure mapping through spatial and temporal deformation monitoring using persistent scatterer interferometry and geographic information systems. Geotech Front 278:509–519

  • Calabro MD, Schmidt DA, Roering JJ (2010) An examination of seasonal deformation at the Portuguese Bend landslide, Southern California, using radar interferometry. J Geophys Res 115(F2):10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • California Department of Water Resources (CDWR) (2014) Summary of recent, historical, and estimated potential for future land subsidence in California. State of California Department of Water Resources. http://www.water.ca.gov/groundwater/docs/Summary_of_Recent_Historical_Potential_Subsidence_in_CA_Final_with_Appendix.pdf. Accessed 6 January 2017

  • California Geological Survey (CGS) (2017) California landslide inventory [web-based GIS]. California Department of Conservation, http://maps.conservation.ca.gov/cgs/lsi/. Accessed 13 August 2016

  • Calvello M, Peduto D, Arena A (2017) Combined use of statistical and DInSAR data analyses to define the state of activity of slow-moving landslides. Landslides 14(2):473–489. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-016-0722-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrara A, Cardinali M, Detti R, Guzzetti F, Pasqui V, Reichenbach P (1991) GIS techniques and statistical models in evaluating landslide hazard. Earth Surf Process Landf 16:427–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casagli N, Frodella W, Morelli S, Tofani V, Ciampalini A, Intrieri E, Raspini F, Rossi G, Tanteri L, Lu P (2017) Spaceborne, UAV and ground-based remote sensing techniques for landslide mapping, monitoring and early warning. Geo Environ Disasters 4.1(9):1–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Cascini L, Peduto D, Pisciotta G, Arena L, Ferlisi S, Fornaro G (2013) The combination of DInSAR and facility damage data for the updating of slow-moving landslide inventory maps at medium scale. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 13:1527–1549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Catani F, Casagli N, Ermini L, Righini G, Menduni G (2005) Landslide hazard and risk mapping at catchment scale in the Arno River basin. Landslides 2:329–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cigna F, Bianchini S, Casagli N (2013) How to assess landslide activity and intensity with persistent scatterer interferometry (PSI): the PSI-based matrix approach. Landslides 10:267–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • City of Los Angeles (CLA) (2016) White Point landslide: project summary http://eng.lacity.org/whitepoint/whitepointlandslide.htm. Accessed 18 May 2017

  • City of Rancho Palos Verdes (CRPV) (2012) Landslide Workshop http://www.rpvca.gov/documentcenter/view/5564. Accessed 22 November 2016

  • Chung CF, Fabbri AG (1999) Probabilistic prediction models for landslide hazard mapping. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 65(2):1389–1399

    Google Scholar 

  • Colesanti C, Wasowski J (2006) Investigating landslides with space-borne synthetic aperture radar (SAR) interferometry. Eng Geol 88:173–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Constantini M (1998) A novel phase unwrapping method based on network programming. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 36(3):813–821

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Constantini M, Falco S, Malvarosa F, Minati F (2008) A new method for identification and analysis of persistent scatterers in series of SAR images. IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium 2:449–452

  • Crosetto M, Biescas E, Duro J (2008) Generation of advanced ERS and Envisat interferometric SAR products using the stable point network technique. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 4:443–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crosetto M, Monserrat O, Cuevas-González M, Devanthéry N, Crippa B (2016) Persistent scatterer interferometry: a review. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 115:78–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cruden DM (1991) A simple definition of a landslide. Bull Int Assoc Eng Geol 43:27–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cruden DM, Varnes DJ (1996) Landslide types and processes. In: Turner KA, Schuster RL (eds) Landslides: Investigation and Mitigation (Chapter 3), Transportation Research Board Special Report 247:36–75

  • Dai FC, Lee CF, Ngai YY (2002) Landslide risk assessment and management: an overview. Eng Geol 64:65–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehlig PL (1982) The Palos Verdes Peninsula: its physiography, land use and geologic setting. In: Cooper JD (ed) Volume and Guidebook: Landslides and Landslide Abatement, Geological Society of America, Palos Verdes Peninsula, Southern California, Cordilleran Section, 78th Annual Meeting, pp 3–6

  • Ehlig PL, Bean RT (1982) Dewatering of the Abalone Cove landslide, Rancho Palos Verdes, Los Angeles County, CA. In: Cooper JD (comp) Volume and Guidebook: Landslides and Landslide Abatement, Geological Society of America, Palos Verdes Peninsula, Southern California, Cordilleran Section, 78th Annual Meeting, 67–79

  • Fell R (1994) Landslide risk assessment and acceptable risk. Can Geotech J 31:261–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fell R, Hartford D (1997) Landslide risk management. In: Cruden D, Fell R (eds) Landslide Risk Assessment. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 51–109

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferretti A, Prati C, Rocca F (2000) Nonlinear subsidence rate estimation using permanent scatterers in differential SAR interferometry. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 38(5):2202–2212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferretti A, Prati C, Rocca F (2001) Permanent scatterers in SAR interferometry. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 39(1):8–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finlay PJ (1996) The risk assessment of slopes. University of New South Wales School of Civil Engineering, Dissertation

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher MA, Normark WR, Langenheim VE, Calvert AJ, Sliter R (2004) The offshore Palos Verdes Fault Zone near San Pedro, Southern California. Bull Seismol Soc Am 94(2):506–530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gatelli F, Guamieri AM, Parizzi F, Pasquali P, Prati C, Rocca F (1994) The wave number shift in SAR interferometry. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 32(4):855–865

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghulam A, Amer R, Ripperdan R (2010) A filtering approach to improve deformation accuracy using large baseline, low coherence DInSAR phase images. Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (GARSS), 2010 I.E. International, Honolulu, p 3494–3497

  • Göblirsch W, Pasquali P (1996) Algorithms for calculation of digital surface models from the unwrapped interferometric phase. Remote sensing—a scientific vision for sustainable development 1997. IEEE Int 1:656–658

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein RM, Werner CL (1998) Radar interferogram filtering for geophysical applications. Geophys Rese Lett 25(21):4035–4038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guarnieri AM, Guccione P, Pasquali P, Desnos YL (2003) Multi-mode ENVISAT ASAR interferometry: techniques and preliminary results. IEE Proc-Radar, Sonar Navigation 150(3):193–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gullà G, Peduto L, Antronico L, Fornaro G (2017) Geometric and kinematic characterization of landslides affecting urban areas: the Lungro case study (Calabria, southern Italy). Landslides 14:171–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrera G, Gutierrez F, Garcia-Davalillo JC, Guerrero J, Notti D, Galve JP, Fernandez-Merodo JA, Cooksley G (2013) Multi-sensor advanced DInSAR monitoring of very slow landslides: the Tena Valley case study (central Spanish Pyrenees). Remote Sens Environ 128:31–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holecz F, Moreira J, Pasquali P, Voight S, Meier E, Nuesch D (1997) Height model generation, automatic geocoding and a mosaicking using airborne AeS-1 InSAR data. Remote Sensing—A Scientific Vision for Sustainable Development, 1997 I.E. International 4:1929–1931

  • Hooper A, Zebker P, Segall P, Kampes B (2004) A new method for measuring deformation on volcanoes and other non-urban areas using InSAR persistent scatterers. Geophys Res Lett 31(23):1–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu J, Li ZW, Ding XL, Zhu JJ, Zhang L, Sun Q (2014) Resolving three-dimensional surface displacements from InSAR measurements: a review. Earth-Sci Rev 133:1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hungr O (2007) Dynamics of rapid landslides. In: Fukuoka H (ed) Progress of landslide science. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 47–57

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jennings CW, Strand RG, Rogers TH (1977) Geologic map of California, California Division of Mines and Geology

  • Jones CE, An K, Blom RG, Kent JD, Ivins ER, Bekaert D (2016) Anthropogenic and geologic influences on subsidence in the vicinity of New Orleans, Louisiana. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 121(5):3867–3887

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kayen RE, Lee HJ, Hein JR (2002) Influence of the Portuguese Bend landslide on the character of the effluent-affected sediment deposit, Palos Verdes margin, Southern California. Cont Shelf Res 22:911–922

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kousteni A, Hill R, Dixon N, Kavanagh J (1999) Acoustic emission technique for monitoring soil and rock slope instability. In: Yagi N, Yamagami T, Jiang JC (eds) Slope stability engineering. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 150–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Leroueil S, Locat J, Vaunat J, Picarelli L, Lee H, Faure R (1996) Geotechnical characterization of slope movements. In: Senneset K (ed) Landslides. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 53–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu P, Stumpf A, Norman K, Casagli N (2011) Object-oriented change detection for landslide rapid mapping. IEEE Geosci Remote Sens Lett 8(4):701–705

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu P, Catani F, Tofani V, Casagli N (2014) Quantitative hazard and risk assessment for slow-moving landslides from persistent scatterer interferometry. Landslides 11(4):685–696

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayuga MN, Allen DR (1970) Subsidence in the Wilmington oil field, Long Beach, California, USA. Land Subsid 1:66–79

  • Mazzanti P, Rocca A, Bozzano F, Cossu R, Floris M (2012) Landslide forecasting analysis by displacement time series derived from satellite InSAR data: preliminary results. ESA SP-697:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • McNulty B (2012) Geology of the Palos Verdes Peninsula, Los Angeles, CA: A Field Guide for the Non-Geologist. Department of Earth Science, California State University Dominguez Hills and CSUDH Presidential Creative Initiative Fund. http://www4.csudh.edu/earth/palos-verdes. Accessed September 20 2016

  • Merriam R (1960) Portuguese Bend landslide, Palos Verdes Hills, California. J Geol 68(2):140–153

  • Morgenstern NR (1997) Toward landslide risk assessment in practice. In: Cruden D, Fell R (eds) Landslide risk assessment. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 15–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Nascetti A, Capaldo P, Porfini M, Pieralice F, Fratarcangeli F, Benenati L, Crespi M (2015) Fast terrain modelling for hydrogeological risk mapping and emergency management: the contribution of high-resolution satellite SAR imagery. Geomat, Nat Hazards Risk 6(5–7):554–582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Notti D, Davalillo JC, Herrera G, More O (2010) Assessment of the performance of X-band satellite radar data for landslide mapping and monitoring: Upper Tena Valley case study. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 10:1865–1875

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Novellino A, Cigna F, Sowter A, Ramondini M, Calcaterra D (2017) Exploitation of the intermittent SBAS (ISBAS) algorithm with COSMO-SkyMed data for landslide mapping in north-western Sicily, Italy. Geomorphology 280:153–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parise M (2001) Landslide mapping techniques and their use in the assessment of the landslide hazard. Phys Chem Earth C 26(9):679–703

    Google Scholar 

  • Parise M (2003) Observation of surface features on an active landslide, and implications for understanding its history of movement. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 3:569–580

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peduto D, Ferlisi S, Nicodemo G, Reale D, Pisciotta G, Gullà G (2017) Empirical fragility and vulnerability curves for buildings exposed to slow-moving landslides at medium and large scales. Landslides (in press) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-017-0826-7

  • Ramsey E III, Werle D, Lu Z, Rangoonwala A, Suzuoki Y (2009) A case of timely satellite image acquisitions in support of coastal emergency environmental response management. J Coast Res:1168–1172

  • Reigber A, Moreira J (1997) Phase unwrapping by fusion of local and global methods. Remote sensing—a scientific vision for sustainable development, 1997. IEEE Int 2:869–871

    Google Scholar 

  • Salvi S, Tolomei C, Boncori JPM, Pezzo G, Atzori S, Antonioli A, Trasatti E, Giuliani R, Zoffoli S, Coletta A (2012) Activation of the SIGRIS monitoring system for ground deformation mapping during the Emilia 2012 seismic sequence, using COSMO-SkyMed InSAR data. Ann Geophys 55(4):797–802

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarmap (2009) Synthetic aperture radar and SARscape guidebook. 274 p

  • Schaefer LN, Lu Z, Oommen T (2015) Dramatic volcanic instability revealed by InSAR. Geol 43(8):743–746

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaefer LN, Lu Z, Oommen T (2016) Post-eruption deformation processes measured using ALOS-1 and UAVSAR InSAR at Pacaya Volcano, Guatemala. Remote Sens 8(1):15 p

  • Schaefer LN, Wang T, Escobar-Wolf R, Oommen T, Lu Z, Kim J, Lundgren PR, Waite GP (2017) Three-dimensional displacements of a large volcano flank movement during the May 2010 eruptions at Pacaya Volcano, Guatemala. Geophys Res Let 44(1):135–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheidegger A (1973) On the prediction of the reach and velocity of catastrophic landslides. Rock Mech 5:231–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schulz WH, Coe JA, Ricci PP, Smoczyk GM, Shurtleff BL, Panosky J (2017) Landslide kinematics and their potential controls from hourly to decadal timescales: insights from integrating ground-based InSAR measurements with structural maps and long-term monitoring data. Geomorphology 285:121–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simons M, Rosen PA (2007) 3.12—interferometric synthetic aperture radar geodesy. Treatise Geophys 3:391–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephenson WJ, Rockwell TK, Odum JK, Shedlock KM, Okaya DA (1995) Seismic reflection and geomorphic characterization of the onshore Palos Verdes Fault Zone, Los Angeles, California. Bull Seismol Soc Am 85(3):943–950

    Google Scholar 

  • Terzaghi K (1950) Mechanisms of landslides. In: Paige S (ed) Application of geology to engineering practice. Geological Society of America, New York, pp 83–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Tofani V, Raspini F, Catani F, Casagli N (2013) Persistent scatterer interferometry (PSI) technique for landslide characterization and monitoring. Remote Sens 5:1045–1065

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United States Geological Survey (USGS) (2005) Landslide hazards—a national threat. USGS Fact Sheet 2005–3156, Dec. 2005, 2 p

  • United States Geological Survey (USGS) (2017) National Elevation Dataset (NED) 1/3 arc-second (10-m) DEM https://lta.cr.usgs.gov/NED. Accessed 16 May 2017

  • van Westen CJ, Rengers N, Terlien MTJ, Soeters R (1997) Prediction of the occurrence of slope instability phenomena through GIS-based hazard zonation. Geol Rundsch 86:404–414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vonder Linden K (1989) The Portuguese Bend landslide. Eng Geol 27:301–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vonder Linden K, Lindvall CE (1982) The Portuguese Bend landslide. In: Cooper JD (ed) Volume and Guidebook: Landslides and Landslide Abatement, Geological Society of America, Palos Verdes Peninsula, Southern California, Cordilleran Section, 78th Annual Meeting, pp 49–56

  • Wang Y, Zhu XX, Zeisl B, Pollefeys M (2017) Fusing meter-resolution 4-D InSAR point clouds and optical images for semantic urban infrastructure monitoring. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 55(1):14–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wei M, Sandwell DT (2010) Decorrelation of L-band and C-band interferometry over vegetated areas in California. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 48(7):2942–2952

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodring WP, Bramlette MN, Kew WSW (1946) Geology and paleontology of the Palos Verdes Hills, California. U.S. Geological Survey Professor Papers 207, 145 p

  • Wright TL (1991) Structural geology and tectonic evolution of the Los Angeles basin, California. In: Biddle KT (ed) Active margin basins, American Association of Petroleum Geologists memoir, vol 52, pp 35–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao C, Zhang Q, He Y, Peng J, Yang C, Kang Y (2016) Small-scale loess landslide monitoring with small baseline subsets interferometric synthetic aperture radar technique—case study of Xingyuan landslide, Shaanxi, China. J Appl Remote Sens 10(2):1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The study was funded through the NASA Earth and Space Science Fellowship Program (proposal: 16-EARTH16F-0086). Data were provided by many agencies and organizations. COSMO-SkyMed radar images were originally acquired by the Italian Space Agency and provided to the authors by the European Space Agency (proposal ID 31684). ENVISAT radar images were acquired and provided by the European Space Agency (proposal ID 82169). The California Landslide Inventory GIS shapefile for the Palos Verdes Peninsula was provided by the California Geological Survey, a division of the California Department of Conservation. Three digital elevation models were used: Shuttle Radar Topography Mission model is a product of the Jet Propulsion Laboratory; Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer model is a product of National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) and Ministry of Economy, Trade, and Industry; a 1/3 arc-second (10-m) NED DEM from the USGS. Three-component (vertical, north, and east) displacement time-series composing the four GPS time-series were downloaded from the UNAVCO Data Archive Interface Version 2. The background image displayed in Figs. 2, 4, 5, 6, and 8 were provided by the USGS, NASA, Google, and Digital Globe. The authors would finally like to thank the Landslide editors and two reviewers for their comments and assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to El Hachemi Bouali.

Ethics declarations

Disclaimer

Maps throughout this paper were created using ArcGIS® software by Esri. ArcGIS® and ArcMap are the intellectual property of Esri and are used herein under license. Copyright © Esri. All rights reserved. For more information about Esri® software, please visit www.esri.com.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bouali, E.H., Oommen, T. & Escobar-Wolf, R. Mapping of slow landslides on the Palos Verdes Peninsula using the California landslide inventory and persistent scatterer interferometry. Landslides 15, 439–452 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-017-0882-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-017-0882-z

Keywords

Navigation