Abstract
We explore a novel transverse line electrode configuration for droplet transport through dielectrophoretic actuation with potential lab-on-chip applications. Using a lumped electromechanical model, we show a weak dependence of DEP actuation force on electrode spacing in this configuration. The configuration successfully triggers translational drop motion with minimal changes in contact angle at considerably low voltages. Two sessile, deionized water drops placed horizontally apart on a indium-tin–oxide-coated glass with additional coatings of polydimethylsiloxane, and a thin layer of Teflon is merged by applying an AC field (88 Vrms at 150 kHz) through a common horizontal wire electrode. A lateral motion of two drops is induced along the horizontal electrode, eventually leading to coalescence. The drop motion is unique compared to electrowetting in its near-constant dynamic contact angle, and irreversibility on withdrawal of electric field. The effect of frequency on the drop behavior is examined through a parametric study on single drops within the range of 2–200 kHz. It is interesting to observe a switch-over from DEP behavior at high frequency to EWOD behavior at low frequency around a critical frequency (Jones in Langmuir 18:4437–4443, 2002).
References
Ahmed R, Jones TB (2007) Optimized liquid DEP droplet dispensing. J Micromech Microeng 17:1052–1058
Ahmed R, Hsu D, Bailey C, Jones TB (2003) Dispensing picoliter droplets using dielectrophoretic (DEP) micro-actuation International conference on microchannels and minichannels. Rochester, NY
Berthier J (2008) Micro-drops and digital microfluidics. William Andrew Publishing, Norwich, NY
Blake TD (2006) The physics of moving wetting lines. J Colloid Interface Sci 299:1–13
Blake TD, De Coninck J (2002) The influence of solid-liquid interactions on dynamic wetting. Adv Colloid Interface Sci 96:21–36
Chen CH, Tsai SL, Chen MK, Jang LS (2011) Effects of gap height, applied frequency, and fluid conductivity on minimum actuation voltage of electrowetting-on-dielectric and liquid dielectrophoresis. Sens Actuators B 159:321–327
Cho SK, Moon H, Kim CJ (2003) Creating, transporting, cutting, and merging liquid droplets by electrowetting based actuation for digital microfluidic circuits. J Microelectromech Syst 12(1):70–80
Chugh D, Kaler KVIS (2010) Integrated liquid and droplet dielectrophoresis for biochemical assays. J Microfluid Nanofluid 8:445–456
Eoe JS, Ghadiri M (2003) Drop drop coalescence in an electric fields the effects of applied electric field and electrode geometry. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp 219:253–279
Fair RB (2007) Digital microfluidics: is a true lab-on-a-chip possible? J Microfluid Nanofluid 3:245–281
Griffiths DJ (1998) Introduction to electrodynamics. 3rd edn. Prentice Hall
Ichikawa T, Itoh K, Yamamotoa S, Sumita M (2004) Rapid demulsification of dense oil-in-water emulsion by low external electric field 1. Experimental evidence. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp 242:21–26
Jones TB (1995) Electromechanics of particles. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Jones TB (2001) Liquid dielectrophoresis on the microscale. J Electrostatics 51:290–299
Jones TB (2002) On the relationship of dielectrophoresis and electrowetting. Langmuir 18:4437–4443
Jones TB, Melcher JR (1973) Dynamics of electromechanical flow structures. Phys Fluids 16:393–400
Jones TB, Perry MP, Melcher JR (1971) Dielectric siphons. Science 174:1232–1233
Jones TB, Gunji M, Washizu M, Feldman M (2001) Dielectrophoretic liquid actuation and nanodrop formation. J Appl Phys 89(2):1441–1448
Jones TB, Fowler JD, Chang YS, Kim CJ (2003) Frequency-based relationship of electrowetting and dielectrophoretic liquid microactuation. Langmuir 19:7646–7651
Jones TB, Wang KL, Yao DJ (2004) Frequency dependent electromechanics of aqueous liquids: electrowetting and dielectrophoresis. Langmuir 20:2813–2818
Jones TB, Gram R, Kentch K, Harding DR (2009) Capillarity and dielectrophoresis of liquid deuterium. J Phys D Appl Phys 42:225505
Kaler KVIS, Prakash R, Chugh D (2010) Liquid dielectrophoresis and surface microfluidics. Biomicrofluidics 4:022805–022817
Kanagasabapathi TT, Kaler KVIS (2007) Surface microfluidics-high-speed DEP liquid actuation on planar substrates and critical factors in reliable actuation. J Micromech Microeng 17:743–752
Mesa G, Fuentes ED, Saenz JJ (1996) Image charge methods for electrostatic calculations in field emission diodes. J Appl Phys 79(1):39–44
Pellat H (1894) CR Acad Sci (Paris) 119:675
Pellat H (1895) Mesure de la force agissant sur les dielectriques liquids non eletrises places dans un champ elitrique. CR Acad Sci Paris 119:691–693
Pohl HA (1951) The motion and precipitation of suspensoids in divergent electric fields. J Appl Phys 22:869–871
Pohl HA (1978) Dielectrophoresis: the behavior of neutral matter in non uniform electric field. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
Pollack MG, Shenderov AD, Fair RB (2002) Electrowetting based actuation of droplets for integrated microfluidics. Lab Chip 2:96–101
Prakash R, Paul R, Kaler KVIS (2010) Liquid DEP actuation and precision dispensing of variable volume droplets. Lab Chip 10:3094–3102
Wang KL, Jones TB (2005) Electrowetting dynamics of microfluidic actuation. Langmuir 21:4211–4217
Wang W, Jones TB (2011) Microfluidic actuation of insulating liquid droplets in a parallel plate device. J Phys Conf Ser 301:012057
Wang KL, Jones TB, Raisanen A (2007) Dynamic control of DEP actuation and droplet dispensing. J Micromech Microeng 17:76–80
Woodson HH, Melcher JR (1968) Electromechanical Dynamics. Wiley, New York
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Supplementary material (AVI 1031 kb)
Supplementary material (AVI 3992 kb)
Appendix
Appendix
ς can be related to the viscosity of the liquid η and reversible work of adhesion \(\gamma \,\left( {1 + \cos \theta_{0} } \right)\) as (Blake and De Coninck 2002)
where V L is the molecular volume of the unit of flow and λ is the jump length. The ratio of ς at different equilibrium contact angles (between the surface used herein, 98o and that reported in Wang et al. 2007; 115°) can be found as
For θ1 = 98° and θ1 = 115°, \(\varsigma_{98} /\varsigma_{110}\) is about 30.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bhaumik, S.K., Das, S., Chakraborty, S. et al. Droplet transport through dielectrophoretic actuation using line electrode. Microfluid Nanofluid 16, 597–603 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10404-013-1242-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10404-013-1242-5