Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Reliability Analysis of a Composite Wind Turbine Blade Section Using the Model Correction Factor Method: Numerical Study and Validation

  • Published:
Applied Composite Materials Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Reliability analysis of fiber-reinforced composite structures is a relatively unexplored field, and it is therefore expected that engineers and researchers trying to apply such an approach will meet certain challenges until more knowledge is accumulated. While doing the analyses included in the present paper, the authors have experienced some of the possible pitfalls on the way to complete a precise and robust reliability analysis for layered composites. Results showed that in order to obtain accurate reliability estimates it is necessary to account for the various failure modes described by the composite failure criteria. Each failure mode has been considered in a separate component reliability analysis, followed by a system analysis which gives the total probability of failure of the structure. The Model Correction Factor method used in connection with FORM (First-Order Reliability Method) proved to be a fast and efficient way to calculate the reliability index of a complex composite structure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ronold, K.O., Larsen GC.: Reliability-based design of wind-turbine rotor blades against failure in ultimate loading. Eng. Struct. 22(6), 565–574 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Lekou, D.J., Philippidis, T.P.: PRE- and POST-THIN: a tool for the probabilistic design and analysis of composite rotor blade strength. Wind Energy 12(7), 676–691 (2009). doi:10.1002/we.322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ditlevsen, O.: Model correction factor method in structural reliability. J. Eng. Mech. 120, 1 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Branner, K.: Capacity and lifetime of foam core sandwich structures. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Naval Architecture and Offshore Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Denmark (1995)

  5. Madsen H.O., Krenk, S., Lind, N.C.: Methods of Structural Safety. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ (1986)

  6. Bucher, C.G., Bourgund, U.: A fast and efficient response surface approach for structural reliability problems. Struct. Saf. 7, 57–66 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Xiu, D., Li, J.: Evaluation of failure probability via surrogate models. J. Comput. Phys. 229, 8966–8980 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bourgund, U., Bucher, C.G.: Importance Sampling Procedure Using Design points (ISPUD)–a user’s manual. Report No. 8-86, Institute of Engineering Mechanics, University of Innsbruck, Austria (1986)

  9. Au, S.K., Beck, J.: A new adaptive importance sampling scheme for reliability calculations. Struct. Saf. 21(2), 135–158 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Au, S.K., Beck, J.: Estimation of small failure probabilities in high dimensions by subset simulation. Probab. Eng. Mech. 16, 263–277 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Eamon, C.D., Charumas, B.: Reliability estimation of complex numerical problems using modified conditional expectation method. Comput. Struct. 89, 181–188 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Abramowitz M., Stegun I.: Handbook of Mathematical Functions With Formulas, Graphs and Mathematical Tables. Dover Publications, New York (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rubinstein, B.Y.: Simulation and the Monte Carlo Method. Wiley, New York (1981)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. Bjerager, P.: Probability integration by directional simulation. J. Eng. Mech. 114(8), 1285–1302 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lepage, P.G.: A new algorithm for adaptive multidimensional integration. J. Comput. Phys. 27, 192–203 (1978)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Augusti, G., Baratta, A., Casciati, F.: Probabilistic Methods in Structural Engineering. Chapman and Hall, London (1984)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  17. Hashin, Z.: Failure criteria for unidirectional fiber composites. J. Appl. Mech. 47, 329–334 (1980)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Tsai, S., Wu, E.: A general theory for strength of anisotropic materials. J. Compos. Mater. 5, 58–80 (1971)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ditlevsen, O., Madsen, H.O.: Structural Reliability Methods. Wiley, Chichester (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Johnson, N., Kotz, S.: Distributions in Statistics: Continuous Multivariate Distributions. Wiley, New York(1972)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Gollwitzer, S., Rackwitz, R.: An efficient numerical solution to the multinormal integral. Probab. Eng. Mech. 3(2), 98–101 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Drezner, Z.: Computation of the multivariate normal integral. ACM Trans. Math. Softw. 18(4), 470–480 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Pandey, M.D.: An effective approximation to evaluate multinormal integrals. Struct. Saf. 20, 51–67 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kirk, G.S., Raven, J.E., Schofield, M.: The Presocratic Philosophers: A Critical History with a Selection of Texts, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0521274559 (1984)

  25. Madsen, H.O.: Omission sensitivity factors. Struct. Saf. 5, 35–45 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nikolay Dimitrov.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dimitrov, N., Friis-Hansen, P. & Berggreen, C. Reliability Analysis of a Composite Wind Turbine Blade Section Using the Model Correction Factor Method: Numerical Study and Validation. Appl Compos Mater 20, 17–39 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10443-011-9246-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10443-011-9246-3

Keywords

Navigation