Abstract
The cultivation of cocoa is a commodity of great importance worldwide. In Mexico, cocoa is grown in Tabasco and Chiapas states in agroforestry systems since pre-Hispanic times, where cocoa is grown under the canopy of shade trees. Crops such as sugarcane and extensive livestock production have gradually reduced the area devoted to cocoa cultivation in the region. Yet, farmers keep small portions of the cocoa agroforestry systems to maintain the local floristic diversity. This practice seems to be a successful contribution to plant conservation. To determine the management practices used by farmers in the agroforestry cocoa systems and the diversity of products they harvest, a non-probabilistic sampling was carried out in 38 shade cocoa plots of 20 × 50 m each (19 in Tabasco and 19 in Chiapas). We counted and identified all trees with DBH ≥ 5 cm, recording their height. We estimated canopy cover at 20 points within each plot. Our results show no tree species richness differences between states, but there were differences at the municipality level; Pichucalco (Chiapas) had the highest tree species richness. Considering all tree species, there was a higher tree density in Tabasco than in Chiapas. Regarding only cocoa trees, there was also a higher abundance in Tabasco than in Chiapas. In both cases, farmers obtain a wide variety of products for self-consumption and local market sale from their cocoa agroforestry systems (e.g., timber, fruit, and grains). The wide floristic diversity in these agroecosystems aids native plant species conservation and could favor the increase of agroforestry plantations associated with cocoa cultivation.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The ejido is a type of land in Mexican legislation, product of the revolutionary agrarian reform. The ejidos and agrarian communities are a type of social property or agrarian nuclei; constitute forms of exclusive ownership of land in the country (Morett-Sánchez and Cosío-Ruíz 2017).
References
Aguirre-Ríos CE, Santoyo-Cortés VH (2013) El cultivo del árbol del hule (Hevea brasiliensis Muell Arg): avances y retos en la gestión de la innovación. Colección Trópico Húmedo 1st edn. Universidad Autónoma de Chapingo, Estado de Mexico
Anderzén J, Guzmán LA, Luna-González DV, Merrill SC, Caswell M, Méndez EV, Hernández JR, Giménez CMMT (2020) Effects of on-farm diversification strategies on smallholder coffee farmer food security and income sufficiency in Chiapas, Mexico. J Rural Stud 77:33–46
Andres C, Comoé H, Beerli A, Schneider M, Rist S, Jacobi J (2016) Cocoa in monoculture and dynamic agroforestry. In: Lichtfouse E (ed) Sustainable agriculture reviews, vol 19. Springer, Switzerland, AG. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26777-7_3
Anglaaere LCN, Cobbina J, Sinclair FL, McDonald MA (2011) The effect of land use systems on tree diversity: farmer preference and species composition of cocoa-based agroecosystems in Ghana. Agroforest Syst 81:249–265. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-010-9366-z
Anim-Kwapong GJ, Osei-Bonsu K (2009) Potential of natural and improved fallow using indigenous trees to facilitate cacao replanting in Ghana. Agroforest Syst 76:533–542. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-008-9196-4
Attolini LA (2011) Cuentas, dares y tomares del cacao: delicia, convite, rito mesoamericano. Aspectos antropológicos. Revista Digital Universitaria 12(4):3–22. http://www.revista.unam.mx/vol.12/num4/art38/art38.pdf
Avendaño-Arrazate CH, Villarreal-Fuentes JM, Campos-Rojas E, Gallardo-Méndez RA, Mendoza-López A, Aguirre-Medina JF, Sandoval-Esquivez A, Espinosa-Zaragoza S (2011) Diagnóstico del Cacao en México. SAGARPA, SNICS, SINAREFI, Universidad Autónoma de Chapingo, INIFAP, México DF
Beer J, Muschler R, Kass D, Somarriba E (1998) Shade management in coffee and cacao plantations. Agroforest Syst 38:139–164
Bentley JW, Boa E, Stonehouse J (2004) Neighbor trees: shade, intercroping and cocoa in Ecuador. Human Ecol 32:241. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:HUEC.0000019759.46526.4d
Bergman JF (1969) The Distribution of Cacao Cultivation in Pre-Columbian America. Annal Assoc Am Geograph 59:85–96
Bhagwat SA, Willis KJ, Birks HJB, Whittaker RJ (2008) Agroforestry: a refuge for tropical biodiversity? Trend Ecol Evol 23:261–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2008.01.005
Bisseleua DHB, Missoup AD, Vidal S (2009) Biodiversity conservation, ecosystem functioning, and economic incentives under cocoa agroforestrry intensification. Conserv Biol 23:1176–1184. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01220.x
Blaser W, Oppong J, Hart S, Landolt J, Yeboah E, Six J (2018) Climate-smart sustainable agriculture in low-to-intermediate shade agroforests. Nature Sustainability 1(5):234–239
Braga DPP, Domene F, Gandara FB (2018) Shade trees composition and diversity in cacao agroforestry systems of southern Pará, Brazilian Amazon. Agroforest Syst 93:1409–1421. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-018-0250-6
CONABIO (2019 Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y uso de la Biodiversidad, Gliricidia sepium. CONABIO. http://www.conabio.gob.mx/conocimiento/info_especies/arboles/doctos/29-legum19m.pdf. Accessed 12 Sept 2019
Córdova R, Hogarth NJ, Kanninen M (2018) Sustainability of smallholder livelihoods in the Ecuadorian highlands: a comparison of agroforestry and conventional agriculture systems in the indigenous territory of Kayambi people. Land 7(2):45. https://doi.org/10.3390/land7020045
Córdova-Ávalos V, Sánchez-Hernández M, Estrella-Chulím NG, Macías-Layalle A, Sandoval-Castro E, Martínez-Saldaña T, Ortiz-García CF (2001) Factores que Afectan la Producción de Cacao (Theobroma cacao L.) en el Ejido Francisco I. In: Madero del Plan Chontalpa, vol 17, no. 34. Universidad y Ciencia, Tabasco, México, pp 93–100
da Silva Moco MK, da Gama-Rodrìguez AC, Machado RCR, Baligar VC (2008) Soil and litter fauna of cacao agroforestry systems in Bahia, Brazil. Agroforest Syst 76:127–138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-008-9178-6
Dawoe E, Asante W, Acheampong E, Bosu P (2016) Shade tree diversity and aboveground carbón stocks in therobroma cacao agroforestry systems: Implications for REDD+ implementation in a West African cacao landscape. Carbon Balance Manag 11(1):11–17
Calix de DH, Castillo MR, Rodríguez CA, Castañeda CR (2005) El cultivo de la Pitahaya en el trópico. Gobierno el estado de Tabasco, México
FIRA (2020a) Estímulos a la producción para Palma de aceite 2018. https://www.fira.gob.mx/Nd/estimulosPalma.jsp. Accessed 26 Feb 2021
FIRA (2020b) Fideicomiso Instituido en Relación con la Agricultura. https://www.fira.gob.mx/Nd/AcercadeNosotros.jsp. Accessed 26 Feb 2021
Gómez-Pompa A, Salvador-Flores J, Aliphat-Fernández M (1990) The sacred groves of the Maya. Lat Am Antiq 1(3):247–257
Greenberg R, Bichier P, Sterling J (1997) Bird populations in rustic and planted shade coffee plantations of Eastern Chiapas, México. Biotropica 29:501–514
Greenberg R, Bichier P, Cruz Angón A (2000) The conservation value for birds of cacao plantations with diverse plented shade in Tabasco, Mexico. Anim Conserv 3:105–112
Gyau A, Smoot K, Kouame C, Diby L, Kahia J, Ofori D (2014) Farmer attitudes and intentions towards trees in cocoa (Theobroma cacao L.) farms in Côte d’Ivoire. Agroforest Syst 88:1035–1045. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-014-9677-6
Ibarra AE, Arriaga WE, Estrada MA (2001) Avifauna asociada a dos cacaotales tradicionales en la región de la Chontalpa, Tabasco. Mexico Universidad y Ciencia 17(34):101–112
INEGI (2013a) Prontuario de información geográfica municipal de los Estados Unidos Mexicanos. Cárdenas, Tabasco. Clave geodésica 27008. INEGI, México
INEGI (2013b) Prontuario de información geográfica municipal de los Estados Unidos Mexicanos. Huimanguillo, Tabasco. Clave geodésica 27002. INEGI, México
INEGI (2013c) Prontuario de Información geográfica municipal de los Estados Unidos Mexicanos. Pichucalco, Chiapas. Clave geodésica 07068. INEGI, México
INEGI (2013d) Prontuario de información geográfica municipal de los Estados Unidos Mexicanos. Ixtacomitán, Chiapas. Clave geodésica 07043. INEGI, México
INPI Instituto Nacional de los Pueblos Indígenas (2020) Atlas de los pueblos indígenas de México. INPI. http://atlas.inpi.gob.mx/?page_id=5420. Accessed 16 Sept 2020
Jagoret P, Kwesseu J, Messie C, Michel-Dounias I, Malézieux E (2014) Farmers’ assessment of the use value of agrobiodiversity in complex cocoa agroforestry systems in central Cameroon. Agroforest Syst 88:983–1000. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-014-9698-1
Jezeer R, Verweij P, Santos M, Boot R (2017) Shaded coffee and cocoa—double dividend for biodiversity and small-scale farmers. Ecol Econ 140:136–145
Lefcheck JS (2016) piecewiseSEM: piecewise structural equation modeling in R for ecology, evolution, and systematics. Method Ecol Evol 7:573–579. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12512
MacGregor-Fors I, Payton ME (2013) Contrasting diversity values: statistical inferences based on overlapping confidence intervals. PLoS ONE 8:e56794. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0056794
MacGregor-Fors I, González-García F, Hernández-Lara C, Santiago-Alarcón D (2018) Where are the birds in the matrix? Avian diversity in a Neotropical landscape mosaic. Wilson J Ornithol 130:81–93. https://doi.org/10.1676/16-087.1
Magaña AMA (2006) Catálogo de nombres vulgares y científicos de plantas de Tabasco. Universidad Juárez Autónoma de Tabasco, Tabasco, México
Magurran AE (2003) Measuring biological diversity. Blackwell Science Ltd, Oxford
Maldonado MF, Vargas SG, Molina MRF, Sánchez SA (2000) Frutales tropicales de Tabasco, 2nd edn. Universidad Juárez Autónoma de Tabasco, Tabasco, México
Marconi L, Armengot L (2020) Complex agroforesty systems against biotic homogenization: the case of plants in the herbaceous stratum of cocoa production systems. Agricult Ecosyst Environ 287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2019.106664
Middendorp R, Vanacker V, Lambin E (2018) Impacts of shaded agroforestry management on carbon sequestration, biodiversity and farmers income in cocoa production landscapes. Landscape Ecol 33(11):1953–1874
Millon RF (1955) When money grew on trees: a study of cacao in ancient Mesoamerica. Columbia University, New York, PhD. Dis
Morett-Sánchez JC, Cosío-Ruíz C (2017) Outlook of ejidos and agrarian communities in México. Agricultura, Sociedad y Desarrollo 14:125–152. http://www.scielo.org.mx/pdf/asd/v14n1/1870-5472-asd-14-01-00125-en.pdf
Muñoz D, Estrada A, Naranjo E, Ochoa S (2006) Foraging ecology of howler Monkeys in a Cacao (Theobroma cacao) plantation in Comalcalco Mexico. Am J Primatol 68:127–142. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajp.20211
Newton AC (2007) Forest ecology and conservation. A handbook of techniques. Oxford University Press, New York
Niether W, Schneidewind U, Fuchs M, Schneider M, Armengot L (2019) Below-and aboveground production in cocoa monocultures and agroforestry systems. Sci Total Environ 657:558–567
Notaro M, Gary C, Deheuvels O (2020) Plant diversity and density in cocoa-based agroforestry systems: how farmers´ income is effected in the Dominican Republic. Agroforest Syst. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-019-00472-7
Oporto-Peregrino S, Hidalgo-Mihart HG, Collado-Torres RA, Castro-Luna AA, Gama-Campillo LM, Arriaga-Weiss SL (2019) Effects of land tenure and urbanization on the change of land use of cacao (Theobroma cacao) agroforestry systems in southeast Mexico. Agroforest Syst. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-019-00453-w
Payton ME, Greenstone MH, Schenkerk N (2003) Overlapping confidence intervals or standard error intervals: What do they mean in terms of statistical significance? J Insect Sci 3:34. https://doi.org/10.1093/jis/3.1.34
Pennington TD, Sarukán J (2005) Árboles Tropicales de México. Manual para la identificacion de las principales especies, 3rd edn. UNAM FCE, México
Perween T, Mandal KK, Hasan MA (2018) Dragon fruit: an exotic super future fruit of India. J Pharmacogn Phytochem 7(2):1022–1026
Philpott SM, Arendt WJ, Armbrecht I, Bichier P, Diestch V, Gordon C, Greenberg R, Perfecto I, Reynosos-Santos R, Soto-Pinto L, Tejeda-Cruz C, Williams-Linera G, Valenzuela J, Zolotoff JM (2008) Biodiversity loss in Latin American coffee landscapes: review of the evidence on ants, birds, and trees. Conserv Biol 22:1093–1105. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.01029.x
PRCC (2012) Plan rector cacao Chiapas. Comité Estatal Sistema Producto Cacao en Chiapas. http://dev.pue.itesm.mx/sagarpa/estatales/ept%20comite%20sistema%20producto%20cacao%20chiapas/plan%20rector%20que%20contiene%20programa%20de%20trabajo%202012/pr_cacao_chiapas_2012.pdf. Accessed 9 Sept 2020
Rani BD, Kumar KR, Jose S, Pal SH (2008) Ecological Basis of Agroforestry. CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, USA
Rueda X, Paz A, Gibbs-plessl T, Leon R, Moyano B, Lambin EF (2018) Smallholders at a crossroad: intensify or fall behind? Exploring alternative livelihood strategies in a globalized world. Bus Strat Env 27:215–229. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse
SAGARPA (2020) Guía práctica de los programas de apoyo de la SAGARPA para los productores de caña de azúcar, reglas de operación 2018. SAGARPA. https://www.zafranet.com/2018/01/sagarpapublico-la-guia-practica-de-los-programas-de-apoyo-para-productores-de-cana-de-azucar/. Accessed 12 Feb 2020
Salgado-Mora MG, Ibarra-Núñez G, Macías-Sámano JE, López-Báez O (2007) Diversidad arbórea en cacaotales del Soconusco, Chiapas, México. Interciencia 32(11):763–768. https://www.ceune.unach.mx/images/pdf_audes/publicaciones/11.pdf
Salvador-Morales P, Cámara-Cabrales L del C, Martínez-Sánchez JL, Sánchez-Hernández R, Valdés-Velarde E (2019) Diversity, structure and carbon of the arboreal vegetation on cocoa agroforestry systems. Madera y Bosques 25:1–14. https://doi.org/10.21829/myb.2019.2511638
Sandoval MC (2012) Al rescate del cacao criollo en México. Consultores en Difusión y Comunicación Social. http://codicsconsultores.blogspot.mx/2012/09/al-rescate-del-cacao-criollo-en-mexico.html. Accessed 15 Mar 2019
Santhyami S, Basukriadi A, Petala PM, Abdulhadi R (2018) The comparison of aboveground C-stock between cacao-based agroforestry system and cacao monoculture practice in West Sumatra. Indonesia Biodiversitas 19(2):472–479. https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d190214
Santos-Heredia C, Andersen E, Zárate DA, Escobar F (2018) Dung beetles and their ecological functions in three agroforestry systems in the Lacandona rainforest of Mexico. Biodivers Conserv 27:2379–2394. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-018-1542-x
Scott DW (2009) Sturges Rule. Wires Comput Stat 1(3):303–306. https://doi.org/10.1002/wics.35
Seinfeld DM (2007) Molecular archaeological investigations of Olmec feasting in ceramics from San Andrés. Dissertation, Florida State University, Tabasco, Mexico
SIAP Servicio de Información Agroalimentaria y Pesquera (2019) Produccion Agricola por cultivo. SAGARPA. http://www.siap.gob.mx/cierre-de-la-produccion-agricola-por-cultivo/. Accessed 25 Sep 2019
Somarriba E (2002) Estimación visual de la sombra en cacaotales y cafetales. Agroforestería De Las Américas 9(35–36):86–94
Somarriba EJ, López-Sampson A (2018) Coffee and cocoa agroforestry systems: pathways to deforestation, reforestation, and tree cover change. Tech Rep. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.29700.78724
Somarriba E, Quesada CF, Orozco AL, Cerda BR, Villalobos RM, Orozco-Estrada S, Astorga-Domian C, Deheuvels O, Say-Chávez E, Villegas-Cáseres R (2011) El manejo de la sombra del cacao. Serie Técnica. Materiales de Extensión no. 5. CATIE, Costa Rica
Somarriba E, Cerda R, López-Sampson A (2018) Analysis and design of the shade canopy of cocoa-based agroforestry systems. Burleigh Dodds Sci Publish. https://doi.org/10.19103/AS.2017.0021.29
Sonwa DJ, Weisw SF, Schroth G, Janssens MJJ, Shapiro HY (2014) Plant diversity management in cocoa agroforestry systems in West and Central Africa – effects of markets and household needs. Agroforest Syst 88:1021–1034. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-014-9714-5
Sturges HA (1926) The choice of a class interval. J Am Stat Assoc 21(153):65–66
Sunshine A, Bael V, Bichier P, Ochoa I, Greenberg R (2007) Bird diversity in cacao farms and forest fragments of western Panama. Biodivers Conserv 16:2245–2256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-007-9193-3
Thompson S JE (1997) Historia y Religión de los Mayas. Siglo XXI, México
Toledo VM, Barrera Bassols N, García Frapollo E, Alarcón Chaires P (2007) Manejo y uso de la biodiversidad entre los mayas yucatecos. CONABIO Biodiversitas 70:10–15
Tscharntke T, Clough Y, Bhagwat SA, Buchori D, Faust H, Hertel D, Holscher D, Juhrbandt J, Kessler M, Perfecto I, Scherber C, Schroth G, Veldkamp E, Wanger TC (2011) Multifunctional shade-tree management in tropical agroforestry landscapes – a review. J Appl Ecol 48:619–629. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01939.x
Useche P, Blare T (2013) Traditional vs. Modern production systems: Price and nonmarket consideratios of cacao producers in Northern Ecuador. Ecol Economic 93:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.03.010
West RC, Thom BG, Psuty NP (1985) Las tierras bajas de Tabasco en el Sureste de Mexico. Tabasqueña, biblioteca básica. Gobierno del Estado de Tabasco, Mexico
Xantomilla J (2019) Incorporan a caña de azúcar al programa de producción para el bienestar. Periódico la Jornada. https://www.jornada.com.mx/ultimas/sociedad/2019/04/22/incorporan-a-cana-de-azucar-alprograma-de-produccion-para-el-bienestar-5925.html. Accessed 22 May 2019
Yamada M, Gholz HL (2002) An evaluation of agroforestry systems as a rural development option for the Brazilian Amazon. Agroforest Syst 55:81–87. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020523107243
Young AM (2007) The chocolate tree. A natural history of cacao. Univ Florida Press, Gainesville, Florida
Young KJ (2018) Floristics of cacao agroforestry in the Mata Atlantica of southern Bahia, Brazil. Tropic Resour 37:23–28
Zequeira-Larios C (2014) La producción de cacao (Theobroma cacao) en México. Dissertation, Centro de Investigaciones Tropicales, Universidad Veracruzana, Tabasco, estudio de caso
Zequeira-Larios C, Ogata N, Gama-Campillo L, Brown D (2012) Escuelas de campo para agricultores en cultivo de cacao en México. Kuxulkab’ Revista de Divulgación XVIII (34):95–102. http://www.revistas.ujat.mx/index.php/kuxulkab/article/view/249
Acknowledgements
We thank comments provided by three anonymous reviewers, which highly improved the quality of the manuscript. To Nestle Mexico, S.A. de C.V. for the financial support, project: rescue, morphological and genetic characterization of wild and domesticated populations-abandoned pre-Hispanic possible origin of Theobroma cacao L., in Mexico. The engineers Felix Rodriguez and Ruben Jimenez Moran for their support in the field and to all farmers who provided their time and expertise. Figure 1 is prepared by Adriana Sandoval-Comte.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zequeira-Larios, C., Santiago-Alarcon, D., MacGregor-Fors, I. et al. Tree diversity and composition in Mexican traditional smallholder cocoa agroforestry systems. Agroforest Syst 95, 1589–1602 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-021-00673-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-021-00673-z