Abstract
The goal of this study was to increase our understanding of the learning-oriented verbal interactions taking place between students during the problem-based learning (PBL) cycle. The verbal interactions of one PBL group of five students throughout an entire PBL cycle were recorded in this data-intensive case study. The verbatim transcript consisting of more than 1,000 utterances was analyzed to investigate whether and how PBL stimulates students towards constructive, self-directed and collaborative learning. Our results demonstrate the occurrence of all above-mentioned learning activities, with 53.3% of episodes being collaborative, 27.2% self-directed and 15.7% constructive.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barrows, H. S. (1988). The tutorial process. Springfield Illinois: Southern Illinois University School of Medicine.
Chi, M. T. H., Bassok, M., Lewis, M. W., Reimann, P., & Glaser, R. (1989). Self-explanations—How students study and use examples in learning to solve problems. Cognitive Science, 13(2), 145–182.
De Grave, W. S., Boshuizen, H. P. A., & Schmidt, H. G. (1996). Problem based learning: Cognitive and metacognitive processes during problem analysis. Instructional Science, 24(5), 321–341.
De Grave, W. S., Schmidt, H. G., & Boshuizen, H. P. A. (2001). Effects of problem-based discussion on studying a subsequent text: A randomized trial among first year medical students. Instructional Science, 29(1), 33–44.
Dolmans, D., De Grave, W. S., Wolfhagen, I. H., & Van der Vleuten, C. P. M. (2005). Problem-based learning: future challenges for educational practice and research. Medical Education, 39(7), 732–741.
Dolmans, D., Schmidt, H. G., & Gijselaers, W. H. (1995). The relationship between student-generated learning issues and self-study in problem-based learning. Instructional Science, 22(4), 251–267.
Glaser, R. (1991). The maturing of the relationship between the science of learning and cognition and educational practice. Learning and Instruction, 1(2), 129–144.
Hak, T., & Maguire, P. (2000). Group process: The black box of studies on problem-based learning. Academic Medicine, 75(7), 769–772.
Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 235–266.
Koschmann, T., Glenn, P., & Conlee, M. (1997). Analyzing the emergence of a learning issue in a problem-based learning meeting. Retrieved February 14, 2007, from http://www.med-ed-online.org/res00003.htm
Lloyd-Jones, G., & Hak, T. (2004). Self-directed learning and student pragmatism. A Advances in Health Sciences Education: Theory and Practice, 9(1), 61–73.
Miflin, Campbell, Price, & Miflin, B. (2000). A conceptual framework to guide the development of self-directed, lifelong learning in problem-based medical curricula. Medical Education, 34(4), 299–306.
Norman, G. R., & Schmidt, H. G. (1992). The Psychological Basis of Problem-Based Learning—A Review of the Evidence. Academic Medicine, 67(9), 557–565.
Schmidt, H. G. (1993). Foundations of problem-based learning—Some explanatory notes. Medical Education, 27(5), 422–432.
Schmidt, H. G., De Volder, M. L., De Grave, W. S., Moust, J. H. C., & Patel, V. L. (1989). Explanatory models in the processing of science text: The role of prior knowledge activation through small-group discussion. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(4), 610–619.
Slavin, R. E. (1996). Research on Cooperative Learning and Achievement: What We Know, What We Need to Know. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21, 43–69.
Van Boxtel, C., Van der Linden, J., & Kanselaar, G. (2000). Collaborative learning tasks and the elaboration of conceptual knowledge. Learning and Instruction, 10(4), 311–330.
Van den Hurk, M. M., Wolfhagen, I., Dolmans, D., & Van der Vleuten, C. P. M. (1999). The impact of student-generated learning issues on individual study time and academic achievement. Medical Education, 33(11), 808–814.
Visschers-Pleijers, A. J., Dolmans, D., Wolfhagen, I. H., & Van der Vleuten, C. P. (2004). Exploration of a method to analyze group interactions in problem-based learning. Medical Teacher, 26(5), 471–478.
Visschers-Pleijers, A. J., Dolmans, D. H., de Leng, B. A., Wolfhagen, I. H., & Van der Vleuten, C. P. (2006). Analysis of verbal interactions in tutorial groups: A process study. Medical Education, 40(2), 129–137.
Webb, N. M. (1991). Task-related Verbal Interaction and Mathematics Learning in Small Groups. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 22(5), 366–389.
Webb, N. M., Troper, J. D., & Fall, R. (1995). Constructive Activity and Learning in Collaborative Small-Groups. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87(3), 406–423.
Zimmerman, B. J. (1990). Self-Regulated Learning and Academic Achievement: An Overview. Educational Psychologist, 25(1), 3.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(2), 64–70.
Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinezpons, M. (1988). Construct-Validation of a Strategy Model of Student Self-Regulated Learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(3), 284–290.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendices
Appendix 1
Basic Science problem that students worked on for the day
Code of Life
The idea of the gene came first. The gene is the thing that carries information about the living organism. The gene tells if one’s hair is black and eyes are blue. The gene tells if one can curl one’s tongue. The gene carries the ‘family face’ that goes ‘through time to times anon’ from mother to daughter, father to son, or the other ways across, over time.
Is the gene a substance you can find in your body, or a kind of a soul-like invisible thing?
Explore the concept of a gene and the role it plays in an organism. Is it possible that the gene is represented by an identifiable molecule, one that is able to carry information akin to a line of code, giving it the ability to execute highly detailed tasks? Determine the qualities such a molecule should have.
Appendix 2
Unedited version of Example 7:
-
F: You know right for the Mendel’s first law right- I see something about chi squre test, I mean the chi square test
-
A: Huh, how come got chi squre?
-
F: I don’t know
-
C: Today got equation meh?
-
L: Let’s not do that lah (Nb: ‘lah’ is a word often used at the end of sentences in ‘Singaporean English’ for emphasis)
-
S: Can we not do?
-
C: Can we not do any calculations?
-
A: Yeah or else we have to...
-
A few minutes later:
-
F: I know why they got the chi-square thing already
-
A: Why?
-
F: To see which one is green which one is yellow... the chance of yellow...that sort of thing lor (Nb: ‘lor’ is a word often used at the end of sentences in ‘Singaporean English’ for emphasis and often carries a sense of resignation)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yew, E.H.J., Schmidt, H.G. Evidence for constructive, self-regulatory, and collaborative processes in problem-based learning. Adv in Health Sci Educ 14, 251–273 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-008-9105-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-008-9105-7