Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

HIV-Positive Persons’ Awareness and Understanding of Their State’s Criminal HIV Disclosure Law

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
AIDS and Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Commentary on the potential impact of HIV-specific disclosure laws on persons living with HIV has been critical, plentiful, and enduring. Yet empirical information with which to answer even the most basic questions about these laws, such as whether HIV-positive persons living in a state with a disclosure law are aware of the law, is absent. This study reports on data gathered from a statewide sample of 384 HIV-positive persons living in a state with an HIV disclosure law. Participant awareness and understanding of the law were assessed. Data on the sources from which participants received information on the law and the perceived helpfulness of these sources were also collected. Analyses were conducted to identify associations between participant awareness or understanding of the law and demographic characteristics of participants or information sources encountered. The majority of participants were aware that their state had enacted an HIV-specific disclosure law. Understanding of the law was good, although there was substantial confusion over several provisions. The most prevalent and most helpful sources of information on the law were AIDS-related resources as opposed to mass media. Forty-two percent of the participants learned about the law when first diagnosed with HIV. Sixty-two percent of the participants reported that their case manager had told them about the law.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Ark. Code Ann. § 5-14-123; Cal. Health & Saf. Code § 120291; Fla. Stat. § 384.24; Ga. Code Ann. § 16-5-60; Idaho Code § 39-608 ; 720 ILCS 5/12-16.2; Ind. Code Ann. § 16-41-7-1; Iowa Code § 709C.1; Kan. Stat. Ann. § 21-3435; La. Rev. Stat. § 14:43.5; Md. Code Ann. § 18-601.1; Mich. Comp. Law Serv. § 333.5210; Miss. Code Ann. §97-27-14; Mo. Rev. Stat. § 191.677; Nev. Rev. Stat. § 201.205; N.J. Stat. § 2C:34-5; N.D. Cent. Code, § 12.1-20-17; Ohio Rev. Code Ann. § 2903.11; 21 Okla. Stat. § 1192.1; S.C. Code Ann. § 44-29-145; S.D. Codified Laws § 22-18-31; Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-13-109; Va. Code Ann. § 18.2-67.4:1; Wash. Rev. Code Ann. § 9A.36.011.

References

  • AL H.B. 146 (2004).

  • Ark. Code Ann. § 5-14-123 (Michie, LEXIS through the 2007 regular session).

  • Ark. Code Ann. § 5-4-401 (Michie, LEXIS through the 2007 regular session).

  • Bennett, R., Draper, H., & Frith, L. (2000). Ignorance is bliss? HIV and moral duties and legal duties to forewarn. Journal of Medical Ethics, 26, 9–15. doi:10.1136/jme.26.1.9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Berk, R., Abramson, P. R., & Okami, P. (1995). Sexual activities as told in surveys. In P. R. Abramson & S. D. Pinkerton (Eds.), Sexual nature/sexual culture (pp. 371–386). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burris, S., Beletsky, L., Burleson, J., Case, P., & Lazzarini, Z. (2007). Do criminal laws influence HIV risk behavior? An empirical trial. Arizona State Law Journal, 39(467), 467–519.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cal. Health & Safety Code § 120291 (Deering, LEXIS through 2007).

  • Catania, J. A., Gibson, D. R., Chitwood, D. D., & Coates, T. J. (1990). Methodological problems in AIDS behavioral research: Influences on measurement errors and participation bias in studies of sexual behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 339–362. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.339.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2006). Revised recommendations for HIV testing of adults, adolescents, and pregnant women in health-care settings. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 55(RR-14), 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Closen, M. L., Bobinski, M. A., Hermann, D. H. J., Hernandez, J. F., Schultz, G. P., & Strader, J. K. (1994). Criminalization of an epidemic: HIV-AIDS and criminal exposure laws. Arkansas Law Review, 46, 921–983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fla. Stat. § 384.24 (2) (LEXIS through 2008 Regular Session).

  • Ga. Code Ann. § 16-5-60 (Michie, LEXIS through all 2007 legislation).

  • Galletly, C. L., & Pinkerton, S. D. (2006). Conflicting messages: How criminal HIV disclosure laws undermine public health efforts to control the spread of HIV. AIDS and Behavior, 10, 451–461. doi:10.1007/s10461-006-9117-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma. Notes on the management of spoiled identity. New York: Simon & Schuster, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gostin, L. O. (2001). Public health, ethics, and human rights: A tribute to the late Jonathan Mann. The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 29, 121–130.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gostin, L. (2004). The politics of AIDS: Compulsory state powers, public health and civil liberties (Chapter 10). In The AIDS pandemic (pp. 179–198). Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.

  • Hermes, J. S. (2002). The criminal transmission of HIV: A proposal to eliminate Iowa’s statute. Journal of Gender, Race & Justice, 6, 473.

    Google Scholar 

  • Idaho Code § 39-608 (LEXIS through 2007 Regular Session).

  • 720 Ill. Comp. Stat. 5/12-16.2 (West 2007) [Prior to 1/1/93 cited as: Ill. Rev. Stat., Ch. 38, para. 12-16.2].

  • Ind. Code § 16-41-7-1 (Michie, LEXIS through P.L. 1-2008 and P.L. 5-2008 and P.L. 16-2008 of the 2008 Regular session).

  • Iowa Code Ann. § 709C.1 (West, LEXIS through the 2007 Supplement (2007 legislation)).

  • Kan. Stat. Ann. § 21-3435 (LEXIS through the 2006 Supplement).

  • La. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 14:43.5 (West, LEXIS through 2008 1st Current and 2nd Extraordinary Sessions).

  • Lazzarini, Z., Bray, S., & Burris, S. (2002). Evaluating the impact of criminal laws on HIV risk behavior. The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 30, 239–253. doi:10.1111/j.1748-720X.2002.tb00390.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Link, B. G., & Phelan, J. C. (2001). Conceptualizing stigma. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 363–385. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Md. Code Ann. Health-Gen. I § 18-601.1 (LEXIS through CH. 1-6 2008 Regular Session.

  • MD H.B. 1529 (2006).

  • Mich. Comp. Laws § 333.5210 (LEXIS through P.A. 105, 04/23/08).

  • Miss. Code Ann. § 97-27-14 (LEXIS through 2007 1st Extraordinary Session).

  • Mo. Ann. Stat. § 191.677 (West, LEXIS through Current Extra Session of the Regular Session 2007).

  • N. D. Cent. Code § 12.1-20-17 (LEXIS through the 2007 Session).

  • NE L.B. 872 (2003).

  • NH S.B. 123 (2005).

  • N. J. Stat. Ann. § 2C:34-5 (West, LEXIS current through the 217th Legislature 2008).

  • Nev. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 201.205 (Michie, LEXIS through the 74th Session and 23rd Special session 2007).

  • NY A.B. 742707 (2007).

  • Ohio Rev. Code Ann. § 2903.11 (Anderson, LEXIS legislation passed by the 127th Ohio General Assembly and filed 4/21/2008).

  • 21 Okla. Stat. § 1192.1 (LEXIS through the end of the 1st Regular Session of the 51st Legislature).

  • Ryan White CARE Act 42 U.S.C. 300ff-47 (2000).

  • Scambler, G. (2006). Sociology, social structure and health-related stigma. Psychology, Health & Medicine, 11, 288–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scambler, G., & Hopkins, A. (1986). Being epileptic: coming to terms with stigma. Sociology of Health and Illness, 8, 26–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • S.C. Code Ann. § 44-29-145 (Law. Co-op., LEXIS through all legislation enacted in 2007).

  • SD S.B. 65 (2008).

  • S. D. Codified Laws §§ 22-18-31 (Michie, LEXIS through all 2007 legislation).

  • Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-13-109 (LEXIS current through the 2007 Regular Session).

  • Va. Code Ann. § 18.2-67.4:1 (Michie, LEXIS through the 2007 Regular Session, Acts 2007, cc. 1 to 948).

  • Wash. Rev. Code Ann. § 9A.36.011 (West, LEXIS through current through all legislation effective 3/17/2008).

  • Wolf, L. E., & Vezina, R. (2004). Crime and punishment: Is there a role for criminal law in HIV prevention policy? 25 Whittier Law Review, 821, 1–59.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by grants R21-MH073495 and P30-MH52776 from the National Institute of Mental Health. The authors thank Ralph Resenhoeft and Patricia Walsh for their assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carol L. Galletly.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Galletly, C.L., DiFranceisco, W. & Pinkerton, S.D. HIV-Positive Persons’ Awareness and Understanding of Their State’s Criminal HIV Disclosure Law. AIDS Behav 13, 1262–1269 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-008-9477-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-008-9477-y

Keywords

Navigation