Skip to main content
Log in

Optimal characterization of a microwave transistor using grey wolf algorithms

  • Published:
Analog Integrated Circuits and Signal Processing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Modern time microwave stages require low power consumption, low size, low-noise amplifier (LNA) designs with high-performance measures. These demands need a single transistor LNA design, which is a challenging multi-objective, multi-dimensional optimization problem that requires solving objectives with non-linear feasible design target space, that can only be achieved by optimally selecting the source (ZS) and load (ZL) terminations. Meta-heuristic algorithms (MHAs) have been extensively used as a search and optimization method in many problems in the field of science, commerce, and engineering. Since feasible design target space (FDTS) of an LNA transistor (NE3511S02 biased at VDS = 2 V and IDS = 7 mA) is a multi-objective multi-variable optimization problem the MHA can be considered as a suitable choice. Three different types of grey wolf variants inspired algorithms had been applied to the LNA FDTS problem to obtain the optimal source and load terminations that satisfies the required performance measures of the aimed LNA design. Furthermore, the obtained results are justified via the use of the Electromagnetic Simulator tool AWR. As a result, an efficient optimization method for optimal determination of ZS and ZL terminations of a high-performance LNA design had been achieved.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gunes, F., Belen, M. A., & Mahouti, P. (2018). Competitive evolutionary algorithms for building performance database of a microwave transistor. International Journal of Circuit Theory and Applications, 46(2), 244–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Gunes, F., Uluslu, A., & Mahouti, P. (2020). Pareto optimal characterization of a microwave transistor. IEEE Access, 8, 47900–47913.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Gunes, F., Gunes, M., & Fidan, M. (1994). Performance characterisation of a microwave transistor. IEE Proceedings-Circuits, Devices and Systems, 141(5), 337–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gunes, F., & Cetiner, B. A. (1998). Smith chart formulation of performance characterisation for a microwave transistor. IEE Proceedings-Circuits, Devices and Systems, 145(6), 419–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Demirel, S., & Gunes, F. (2013). Performance characterisation of a microwave transistor for the maximum output power and the required noise. IET Circuits, Devices & Systems, 7(1), 9–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gunes, F., & Demirel, S. (2016). Performance characterization of a microwave transistor subject to the noise and matching requirements. International Journal of Circuit Theory and Applications, 44(5), 1012–1028.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gunes, F., Ozkaya, U., & Demirel, S. (2009). Particle swarm intelligence applied to determination of the feasible design target for a low-noise amplifier. Microwave and Optical Technology Letters, 51(5), 1214–1218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gunes, F., Demirel, S., & Mahouti, P. (2016). A simple and efficient honey bee mating optimization approach to performance characterization of a microwave transistor for the maximum power delivery and required noise. International Journal of Numerical Modelling: Electronic Networks, Devices and Fields, 29(1), 4–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Belen, M. A., Alic, M., Cor, A., & Gunes, F. (2014). Performance characterization of a microwave transistor using firefly algorithm. In Proceedings of the symposium in the electrical and electronics computer engineering (ELECO) (pp. 491–493). Bursa, Turkey.

  10. Kiani, F., Rad, A., Sis, M. K., Kut, A., & Alpkocak, A. (2013). EEAR: An energy effective-accuracy routing algorithm for wireless sensor networks. Life Science Journal, 10(2), 39–45.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kiani, F., Nematzadehmiandoab, S., & Seyyedabbasi, A. (2019). Designing a dynamic protocol for real-time Industrial Internet of Things-based applications by efficient management of system resources. Advances in Mechanical Engineering, 11(10), 1687814019866062.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Seyyedabbasi, A., Dogan, G., & Kiani, F. (2020). HEEL: A new clustering method to improve wireless sensor network lifetime. IET Wireless Sensor Systems, 10(3), 130–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gunes, F., Demirel, S., & Mahouti, P. (2014). Design of a front–end amplifier for the maximum power delivery and required noise by HBMO with support vector microstrip model. Radioengineering, 23(1), 134–143.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Talbi, E. G. (2009). Metaheuristics: From design to implementation (Vol. 74). Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  15. Guney, K., & Onay, M. (2008). Bees algorithm for design of dual-beam linear antenna arrays with digital attenuators and digital phase shifters. International Journal of RF and Microwave Computer‐Aided Engineering: Co‐sponsored by the Center for Advanced Manufacturing and Packaging of Microwave, Optical, and Digital Electronics (CAMPmode) at the University of Colorado at Boulder, 18(4), 337–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Galehdar, A., Thiel, D. V., Lewis, A., & Randall, M. (2009). Multiobjective optimization for small meander wire dipole antennas in a fixed area using ant colony system. International Journal of RF and Microwave Computer-Aided Engineering: Co‐sponsored by the Center for Advanced Manufacturing and Packaging of Microwave, Optical, and Digital Electronics (CAMPmode) at the University of Colorado at Boulder, 19(5), 592–597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Glover, F. W., & Kochenberger, G. A. (Eds.). (2006). Handbook of metaheuristics (Vol. 57). Springer.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Yildirim, A., Gunes, F., & Belen, M. A. (2017). Differential evolution optimization applied to the performance analysis of a microwave transistor. Sigma Journal of Engineering and Natural Sciences, 8(2), 135–144.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Mahouti, P. (2019). Design optimization of a pattern reconfigurable microstrip antenna using differential evolution and 3D EM simulation-based neural network model. International Journal of RF and Microwave Computer‐Aided Engineering, 29(8), e21796.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Belen, A., Güneş, F., Belen, M. A., & Mahouti, P. (2020). 3D printed wideband flat gain multilayer nonuniform reflectarray antenna for X-band applications. International Journal of Numerical Modelling: Electronic Networks, Devices and Fields, 33(6), e2753.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Belen, A., Mahouti, P., Güneş, F., & Tari, Ö. (2021). Gain enhancement of a traditional horn antenna using 3D printed square-shaped multi-layer dielectric lens for X-band applications. Applied Computational Electromagnetics Society Journal, 36(2), 132–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Belen, A., & Günes¸, F., & Mahouti, P., (2020). Design optimization of a dual-band microstrip SIW antenna using differential evolutionary algorithm for X and K-band radar applications. ACES Journal, 35(7), 778–783.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Mirjalili, S., Mirjalili, S. M., & Lewis, A. (2014). Grey wolf optimizer. Advances in Engineering Software, 69, 46–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Seyyedabbasi, A., Aliyev, R., Kiani, F., Gulle, M., Basyildiz, H. & Shah, M. (2021). Hybrid algorithms based on combining reinforcement learning and metaheuristic methods to solve global optimization problems. Knowledge-Based Systems, 223, 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kaveh, A., & Shokohi, F. (2016). Application of grey wolf optimizer in design of castellated beams. Asian Journal Of Civil Engıneering (BHRC), 17(5), 683–700.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Emary, E., Zawbaa, H. M., Grosan, C., & Hassenian, A. E. (2015). Feature subset selection approach by gray-wolf optimization. Afro-European Conference for Industrial Advancement Springer, 334, 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kiani, F., Seyyedabbasi, A., Aliyev, R., Shah, MA. & Gulle, M. (2021). 3D path planning method for multi-UAVs inspired by grey wolf algorithms. Journal of Internet Technology, 22(4), 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Muro, C., Escobedo, R., Spector, L., & Coppinger, R. P. (2011). Wolf-pack (Canis lupus) hunting strategies emerge from simple rules in computational simulations. Behavioural Processes, 88(3), 192–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Seyyedabbasi A. & Kiani F. (2021). I-GWO and Ex-GWO: Improved algorithms of the Grey Wolf Optimizer to solve global optimization problems. Engineering with Computers, 37, 509–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amir Seyyedabbasi.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kiani, F., Seyyedabbasi, A. & Mahouti, P. Optimal characterization of a microwave transistor using grey wolf algorithms. Analog Integr Circ Sig Process 109, 599–609 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10470-021-01914-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10470-021-01914-y

Keywords

Navigation