Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The desirable input of undesirable factors in data envelopment analysis

  • Original - Survey or Exposition
  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recent papers have provided a number of overviews in connection with the fast growing literature on bad outputs in Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA), such as defective products, emissions and waste. However, there does not seem to exist any comprehensive overview of the opposite phenomenon, particularly not regarding DEA, namely of bads as undesirable objects or factors which are desirable input (flow) into transformation processes, e.g. into waste incineration. Moreover, the terms ‘bad input’ and ‘(un-)desirable input/factor’ are not clearly defined. We use a purely preference-based notion for the desirability of inputs and outputs. A systematic literature search reveals only 22 DEA articles which explicitly address the (desirable) input of bads as original undesirable factors, i.e. as input into the first stage of a single- or multi-stage process. Their detailed analysis shows that current approaches are based on two core ideas involving various efficiency measures. Only four papers deal with real applications of original undesirable factors, namely waste water treatment. Moreover, those disposability assumptions for DEA models often critically discussed in relation to bad outputs (e.g. weak disposability) are not used in these papers, presumably because the processes modelled are themselves disposal processes. Finally, we exemplarily demonstrate how DEA models with bads as inputs (and outputs) can be systematically derived from a decision-theoretic generalization of DEA methodology proposed in the literature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbasali, M., & Ebadi, S. (2012). Determination measure of efficiency using by undesirable inputs of DEA. Life Science Journal-Acta Zhengzhou University Overseas Edition, 9(4), 4714–4718.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akther, S., Fukuyama, H., & Weber, W. L. (2013). Estimating two-stage network slacks-based inefficiency: An application to Bangladesh banking. Omega, 41(1), 88–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aliakbarpoor, Z., & Izadikhah, M. (2012). Evaluation and ranking DMUs in the presence of both undesirable and ordinal factors in data envelopment analysis. International Journal of Automation and Computing, 9(6), 609–615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, K. (1999). DEA in the ecological context—an overview. In G. Westermann (Ed.), Data envelopment analysis in the service sector (pp. 203–235). Wiesbaden: Deutscher Universitäts-Verlag.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Amirteimoori, A., Kordrostami, S., & Sarparast, M. (2006). Modeling undesirable factors in data envelopment analysis. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 180(2), 444–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ardabili, J. S., Aghayi, N., & Monzali, A. (2007). New efficiency using undesirable factors of data envelopment analysis. AMO—Advanced Modeling and Optimization, 9(2), 249–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashrafi, A., & Jaafar, A. B. (2011). Performance measurement of two-stage production systems with undesirable factors by data envelopment analysis. Journal of Applied Sciences, 11(20), 3515–3519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumgärtner, S., Dyckhoff, H., Faber, M., Proops, J., & Schiller, J. (2001). The concept of joint production and ecological economies. Ecological Economics, 36(3), 365–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boggs, R. L. (1997). Hazardous waste treatment facilities: Modeling production with pollution as both an input and an output. Ann Arbor: UMI Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C.-M., Du, J., Huo, J., & Zhu, J. (2012). Undesirable factors in integer-valued DEA: Evaluating the operational efficiencies of city bus systems considering safety records. Decision Support Systems, 54(1), 330–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y., Cook, W. D., Li, N., & Zhu, J. (2009). Additive efficiency decomposition in two stage DEA. European Journal of Operational Research, 196(3), 1170–1176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, G., Zervopoulos, P., & Qian, Z. (2013). A variant of radial measure capable of dealing with negative inputs and outputs in data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 225(1), 100–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chung, Y. H., Färe, R., & Grosskopf, S. (1997). Productivity and undesirable outputs: A directional distance function approach. Journal of Environmental Management, 51(3), 229–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, W. D., & Zhu, J. (2014). Data envelopment analysis: A handbook on the modeling of internal structures and networks. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, W. W., Seiford, L. M., & Tone, K. (2007). Data envelopment analysis: A comprehensive text with models, applications, references and DEA-solver software (2nd ed.). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, W. W., Seiford, L. M., & Zhu, J. (2011). Handbook on data envelopment analysis (2nd ed.). New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dakpo, K. H., Jeanneaux, P., & Latruffe, L. (2016). Modelling pollution-generating technologies in performance benchmarking: Recent developments, limits and future prospects in the nonparametric framework. European Journal of Operational Research, 250(2), 347–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daly, H. E. (2005). Economics in a full world. Scientific American, 293(3), 100–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diabat, A., Shetty, U., & Pakkala, T. P. M. (2015). Improved efficiency measures through directional distance formulation of data envelopment analysis. Annals of Operations Research, 229(1), 325–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyckhoff, H. (1992). Betriebliche Produktion: Theoretische grundlagen einer umweltorientierten Produktionswirtschaft. Berlin: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dyckhoff, H. (2000). The natural environment—towards an essential factor of the future. International Journal of Production Research, 38(12), 2583–2590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyckhoff, H. (2016). Sustainability performance measurement with data envelopment analysis: A combined production- and decision-theoretic approach. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2868027.

  • Dyckhoff, H., & Allen, K. (2001). Measuring ecological efficiency with data envelopment analysis (DEA). European Journal of Operational Research, 132(2), 312–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ethridge, D. (1973). The inclusion of wastes in the theory of the firm. Journal of Political Economy, 81(6), 1430–1441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emrouznejad, A., Anouze, A. L., & Thanassoulis, E. (2010). A semi-oriented radial measure for measuring the efficiency of decision making units with negative data, using DEA. European Journal of Operational Research, 200(1), 297–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Färe, R., & Grosskopf, S. (1983). Measuring output efficiency. European Journal of Operational Research, 13(2), 173–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., Lovell, C. A. K., & Pasurka, C. (1989). Multilateral productivity comparisons when some outputs are undesirable: A nonparametric approach. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 71(1), 90–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., & Pasurka, C. (1986). Effects on relative efficiency in electric power generation due to environmental controls. Resources and Energy, 8(2), 173–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., & Pasurka, C. (2007). Environmental production functions and environmental directional distance functions. Energy, 32(7), 1055–1066.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Georgescu-Roegen, N. (1975). Energy and economic myths. Southern Economic Journal, 41(3), 347–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harzing, A. W. (2013). Journal quality list, 50th version (5th July 2013). Demand (14th October 2013) at: http://www.harzing.com/jql.htm.

  • Huang, R., & Li, Y. (2013). Undesirable input–output two-phase DEA model in an environmental performance audit. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 58(5–6), 971–979.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jahanshahloo, G. R., Vencheh, A. H., Foroughi, A. A., & Matin, R. K. (2004). Inputs/outputs estimation in DEA when some factors are undesirable. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 156(1), 19–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jahanshahloo, G. R., Lotfi, F. H., Shoja, N., Tohidi, G., & Razavyan, S. (2005). Undesirable inputs and outputs in DEA models. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 169(2), 917–925.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koopmans, T. C. (1951). Analysis of production as an efficient combination of activities. In T. C. Koopmans (Ed.), Activity analysis of production and allocation (pp. 33–97). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kordrostami, S., & Amirteimoori, A. (2005). Un-desirable factors in multi-component performance measurement. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 171(2), 721–729.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lampe, H. W., & Hilgers, D. (2015). Trajectories of efficiency measurement: A bibliometric analysis of DEA and SFA. European Journal of Operational Research, 240(1), 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, H. F., & Sexton, T. R. (2004). Data envelopment analysis with reverse inputs and outputs. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 21(2), 113–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, J. S., Lu, L. Y. Y., Lu, W.-M., & Lin, B. J. Y. (2013a). Data envelopment analysis 1978–2010: A citation-based literature survey. Omega, 41(1), 3–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, J. S., Lu, L. Y. Y., Lu, W.-M., & Lin, B. J. Y. (2013b). A survey on of DEA applications. Omega, 41(5), 893–902.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, W., Meng, W., Li, X. X., & Zhang, D. Q. (2010). DEA models with undesirable inputs and outputs. Annals of Operations Research, 173(1), 177–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, W., Sharp, J., & Wu, Z. (2006). Preference, production and performance in data envelopment analysis. Annals of Operations Research, 145(1), 105–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, W., Zhou, Z., Ma, C. X., Liu, D., & Shen, W. (2015). Two-stage DEA models with undesirable input-intermediate-outputs. Omega, 56, 74–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lovell, C. A. K., & Pastor, J. T. (1995). Units invariant and translation invariant DEA models. Operations Research Letters, 18(3), 147–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molinos-Senante, M., Hernández-Sancho, F., Mocholí-Arce, M., & Sala-Garrido, R. (2015). Productivity growth of wastewater treatment plants—accounting for environmental impacts: A Malmquist-Luenberger index approach. Urban Water Journal, 13(5), 476–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Müser, M., & Dyckhoff, H. (2017). Quality splitting in waste incineration due to non-convex production possibilities. Journal of Business Economics, 87(1), 73–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pastor, J. T. (1996). Translation invariance in data envelopment analysis: A generalization. Annals of Operations Research, 66(2), 93–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pittman, R. W. (1983). Multilateral productivity comparisons with undesirable outputs. The Economic Journal, 93(372), 883–891.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Portela, M. C. A. S., Thanassoulis, E., & Simpson, G. (2004). Negative data in DEA: A directional distance approach applied to bank branches. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 55(10), 1111–1121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rees, W. E., & Wackernagel, M. (2013). The shoe fits, but the footprint is larger than earth. PLOS Biology, 11(11), 1–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahoo, B. K., Luptacik, M., & Mahlberg, B. (2011). Alternative measures of environmental technology structure in DEA: An application. European Journal of Operational Research, 215(3), 750–762.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seiford, L. M., & Zhu, J. (2002). Modeling undesirable factors in efficiency evaluation. European Journal of Operational Research, 142(1), 16–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharp, J. A., Meng, W., & Liu, W. (2007). A modified slacks-based measure model for data envelopment analysis with ‘Natural’ negative outputs and inputs. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 58(12), 1672–1677.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shephard, R. W. (1970). Theory of cost and production functions. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Song, M., An, Q., Zhang, W., Wang, Z., & Wu, J. (2012). Environmental efficiency evaluation based on data envelopment analysis: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16(7), 4465–4469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tone, K. (2001). A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 130(3), 498–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tyteca, D. (1996). On the measurement of the environmental performance of firms: Literature review and a productive efficiency perspective. Journal of Environmental Management, 46(3), 281–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vencheh, A. H., Matin, R. K., & Kajani, M. T. (2005). Undesirable factors in efficiency measurement. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 163(2), 547–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wojcik, V., Dyckhoff, H., Gutgesell, S., Müser, M. (2015). Übelinputs in der Data Envelopment Analysis. Unpublished working paper, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen. Demand (1st July 2016) at: http://www.lut.rwth-aachen.de/index.php/forschung/arbeitsberichte.

  • Worthington, A. C. (2014). A review of frontier approaches to efficiency and productivity measurement in Urban water utilities. Urban Water Journal, 1(11), 55–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yaisawarng, S., & Klein, J. D. (1994). The effects of sulfur dioxide controls on productivity change in the U.S. electric power industry. Review of Economics and Statistics, 76(3), 447–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, N., & Choi, Y. (2014). A note on evolution of directional distance function and its development in energy and environment studies 1997–2013. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 33, 50–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, Z., & Liu, W. (2015). DEA models with undesirable inputs, intermediates, and outputs. In J. Zhu (Ed.), Data envelopment analysis: A handbook of models and methods (pp. 415–446). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are most grateful to two anonymous reviewers who helped to improve a former version of this paper a lot.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Chair of Business Theory, Sustainable Production and Industrial Control, RWTH Aachen University, Templergraben 64, 52062, Aachen, Germany

    Victoria Wojcik, Harald Dyckhoff & Sebastian Gutgesell

Authors
  1. Victoria Wojcik
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Harald Dyckhoff
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sebastian Gutgesell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Victoria Wojcik.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wojcik, V., Dyckhoff, H. & Gutgesell, S. The desirable input of undesirable factors in data envelopment analysis. Ann Oper Res 259, 461–484 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-017-2523-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-017-2523-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation