Abstract
The paper focuses on the assessment of urban design quality and sustainable urban spaces. In particular, the study is concentrated on the evaluation of urban quality provided by a good design of open spaces, including green areas, walkable areas and squares. In fact, despite the advancement of research during the past two decades and empirical evidence about the relationship among quality of life, quality of open spaces and urban sustainability, there is still a lack of studies on urban quality assessment. This paper brings forward a multidimensional methodology for assessing the quality of open spaces. More precisely, the contribution of this research is the proposal of a multidimensional and multi-methodological framework for assigning a numerical score to the quality of open spaces. The Multi-Attribute Value Theory has been used for addressing the problem under investigation with the aim of defining a synthetic index for the measurement of the urban quality of open spaces on the basis of different attributes, namely (a) accessibility; (b) liveability; (c) vitality and (d) identity. The methodology has been applied on a recently renovated district in the city of Milan, Italy. The proposed multi-methodological framework provides a robust basis for running different kind of analysis and for supporting policy and investment decisions both in the private and in the public sector.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Angilella, S., Bottero, M., Corrente, S., Ferretti, V. Greco, Lami, S., & Lami, I. (2016). Non additive robust ordinal regression for urban and territorial planning: An application for siting an urban waste landfill. Annals of Operations Research, 245(1), 427–456.
Beinat, E. (1997). Value functions for environmental management. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Belton, V., & Stewart, T. J. (2002). Multiple criteria decision analysis: An integrated approach. Boston: Kluwer Academic Press.
Bosselman, P. (2008). Urban transformation. Understanding cities design and form. Washington: Island Press.
Bottero, M. (2011). Assessing the economic aspects of landscape. In C. Cassatella & A. Peano (Eds.), Landscape indicators. Assessing and monitoring landscape quality (pp. 167–192). Dordrecht: Springer.
Bottero, M., Ferretti V., Figueira J., Greco S., & Roy, B. (2015b), Dealing with a multiple criteria environmental problem with interaction effects between criteria through an extension of the Electre III method. European Journal of Operational Research, 245(3), 837–850.
Bottero, M., Ferretti, V., & Mondini, G. (2015a). How to support strategic decisions in territorial transformation processes. International Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Information Systems, 6(4), 40–55.
CABE. (2001). The value of urban design. London: Thomas Telford.
Capolongo, S., Battistella, A., Buffoli, M., & Oppio, A. (2011). Healthy design for sustainable communities. Annali di igiene: medicina preventiva e di comunità, 23(1), 43–53.
Carmona, M., Heath, T., Oc, T., & Tiesdell, S. (2001). Public places–urban spaces: A guide to urban design. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
Carmona, M., De Magalhães, C., & Edwards, M. (2002). Stakeholder views on value and urban design. Journal of Urban Design, 7(2), 145–169.
Chapman, D. W., & Larkham, P. J. (1999). Urban design, urban quality and the quality of life: Reviewing the department of the environment’s urban design campaign. Journal of Urban Design, 4, 211–232.
Corrente, S., Greco, S., & Slowinski, R. (2012). Multiple criteria hierarchy process in robust ordinal regression. Decision Support Systems, 53(3), 660–674.
Daly, H. E., & Cobb, J. B. (1989). For the common good: Redirecting the economy toward community, the environment, and a sustainable future. Boston: Beacon Press.
Edwards, W., & Hutton Barron, F. (1994). SMARTS and SMARTER: Improved simple methods for multiattribute utility measurement. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 60(3), 306–325.
Edwards, W., Von Winterfeldt, D., & Moody, D. L. (1988). Simplicity in decision analysis: An example and discussion. In D. Bell, H. Raiffa, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Decision making: Descriptive, normative and prescriptive interactions (pp. 443–464). Cambridge: Cambridge Univesrity Press.
Gehl, J. (2001). New city spaces. Copenhagen: Danish Architectural Press.
Gehl, J. (2010). Cities for peoples. London: Island Press.
Greco, S., Kadzinski, M., & Slowinski, R. (2012). Extreme ranking analysis in robust ordinal regression. Omega, 40(4), 488–501.
Hancock, T., & Duhl, L. (1986). Healthy cities: Promoting health in the urban context. Copenaghen: WHO Regional Office Europe.
Jacobs, J. (1961). The death and life of great American cities. New York: Random House.
Keeney, R. L. (1992). Value focused thinking. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Keeney, R. L., & Raiffa, H. (1976). Decisions with multiple objectives: Preferences and value trade-offs. New York: Wiley.
Lahdelma, R., Hokkanen, J., & Salminen, H. P. (1998). SMAA—stochastic multiobjective acceptability analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 106(1), 137–143.
Lynch, K. (1960). The image of the city. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Manganelli, B. (2017). A proposal for a synopsis in real estate appraisal between the italian doctrine and international valuation standards. Valori e Valutazioni, 18, 9–16.
Mondini, G. (2017). Integrated assessment for the management of new social challenges. Valori e Valutazioni, 17, 15–17.
Montibeller, G., & Franco, A. (2007). Decision and risk analysis for the evaluation of strategic options. In F. A. O’Brien & R. G. Dyson (Eds.), Supporting strategy: Frameworks, methods and models. Chichester: Wiley.
Munda, G. (1995). Multicriteria evaluation in a fuzzy environment. Theory and applications in ecological economics. Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag.
Oppio, A., Bottero, M., Giordano, G., & Arcidiacono, A. (2016). A multi-methodological evaluation approach for assessing the impact of neighbourhood quality on public health. Epidemiologia e Prevenzione, 40(3–4), 249–256.
Paolillo, P. L. (2010). Sistemi informativi e costruzione del piano. Rimini: Maggioli.
Rowely, A. (1998). Private property decision-makers and the quality of urban design. Journal of Urban Design, 3(2), 151–173.
Sepe, M., Martone, A., & Micheletti, S. (2015). The people oriented approach to public spaces: The case of Adelaide. Urbanistica Informazioni, 261, 130–134.
Smith, T., Nelischer, M., & Perkins, N. (1997). Quality of an urban community: A framework for under-standing the relationship between quality and physical form. Landscape and Urban Planning, 39, 229–241.
Southworth, M. (2003). Measuring the liveable city. Built Environment, 29(4), 343–354.
Tiesdell, S., Oc, T., & Heat, T. (1996). Revitalizing historic urban quarters. London: Butterworth-Heinemann.
Van Herwijnen, M. (1999). Spatial decision support for environmental management. Amsterdam: Vrije Universiteit.
Van Kamp, I., Leidelmeijer, K., Marsman, G., & De Hollander, A. (2003). Urban environmental quality and human well-being. Towards a conceptual framework and demarcation of concepts; a literature study. Landscape and Urban Planning, 65, 5–18.
Whitehead, M., & Dahlgren, G. (1991). What can be done about inequalities in health? The Lancet, 338, 1059–1063.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Oppio, A., Bottero, M. & Arcidiacono, A. Assessing urban quality: a proposal for a MCDA evaluation framework. Ann Oper Res 312, 1427–1444 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-017-2738-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-017-2738-2