Skip to main content
Log in

The Role of Family Structure and Attachment in College Student Hookups

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Archives of Sexual Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We examined the relationship between family structure and hooking up among emerging adults (N = 881) and the extent to which attachment moderated this relationship. Neither family structure nor number of structure transitions were related to the number of hookup partners in the past 12 months. Having an avoidant attachment, being an underclassman, consuming more alcohol, and not being in an exclusive relationship were related to having a greater number of hookup partners, and avoidant attachment was a stronger indicator of hooking up for men than for women. Among those who had hooked up in the past 12 months (63.8 %), family structure did not significantly differentiate those having a penetrative sex hookup (i.e., oral sex and/or intercourse) versus a non-penetrative sex hookup (i.e., kissing and/or sexual touching only). Findings were discussed in terms of their methodological implications for studying hookups, such as the collection of event level data and examining how family structure influences other correlates of hooking up.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albrecht, C., & Teachman, J. D. (2003). Childhood living arrangements and the risk of premarital intercourse. Journal of Family Issues, 24, 867–894. doi:10.1177/0192513X03252731.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnett, J. J. (2000). Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist, 55, 469–480. doi:10.1037//0003-066x.55.5.469.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Arnett, J. J. (2004). Emerging adulthood: The winding road from the late teens through the twenties. New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Barriger, M., & Vélez-Blasini, C. J. (2013). Descriptive and injunctive social norm overestimation in hooking up and their role as predictors of hook-up activity in a college student sample. Journal of Sex Research, 50, 84–94. doi:10.1080/00224499.2011.607928.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baumer, E. P., & South, S. J. (2001). Community effects on youth sexual activity. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63, 540–554. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2001.00540.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bogaert, A. F., & Sadava, S. (2002). Adult attachment and sexual behaviors. Personal Relationships, 9, 191–204. doi:10.1111/1475-6811.00012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bogle, K. A. (2008). Hooking up: Sex, dating, and relationships on campus. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss: Attachment (Vol. 1). New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradshaw, C., Kahn, A. S., & Saville, B. K. (2010). To hook up or date: Which gender benefits? Sex Roles, 62, 661–669. doi:10.1007/s11199-010-9765-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Browning, C. R., Leventhal, T., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (2005). Sexual initiation in early adolescence: The nexus of parental and community control. American Sociological Review, 70, 758–778. doi:10.1177/000312240507000502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavanagh, S. E., & Huston, A. C. (2006). Family instability and children’s early problem behavior. Social Forces, 85, 551–581. doi:10.1353/sof.2006.0120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cherlin, A. J. (2010). Demographic trends in the United States: A review of research in the 2000s. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72, 403–419. doi:10.1111/j.17413737.2010.00710.x.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, M. L. (2002). Alcohol use and risky sexual behavior among college students and youth: Evaluating the evidence. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 14, 101–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crowell, J. A., Treboux, D., & Brockmeyer, S. (2009). Parental divorce and adult children attachment representations and marital status. Attachment & Human Development, 11, 87–101. doi:10.1080/14616730802500867.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Downing-Matibag, T. M., & Geisinger, B. (2009). Hooking up and sexual risk taking among college students: A health belief model perspective. Qualitative Health Research, 19, 1196–1209. doi:10.1177/1049732309344206.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, M., Calzo, J. P., Smiler, A. P., & Ward, L. M. (2009). “Anything from making out to having sex”: Men’s negotiations of hooking up and friends with benefits scripts. Journal of Sex Research, 46, 414–424. doi:10.1080/00224490902775801.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Feeney, J. A., Noller, P., & Patty, J. (1993). Adolescent’s interactions with the opposite sex: Influence of attachment style and gender. Journal of Adolescence, 16, 169–186. doi:10.1006/jado.1993.1015.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fielder, R. L., & Carey, M. P. (2010a). Predictors and consequences of sexual “hookups” among college students: A short-term prospective study. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 1105–1119. doi:10.1007/s10508-008-9448-4.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fielder, R. L., & Carey, M. P. (2010b). Prevalence and characteristics of sexual hookups among first-semester female college students. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 36, 346–359. doi:10.1080/0092623X.2010.488118.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Flack, W. F., Daubman, K. A., Caron, M. L., Asadorian, J. A., D’Aurelia, N. R., Gigliotti, S. N., et al. (2007). Risk factors and consequences of unwanted sex among university students: Hooking up, alcohol, and stress response. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 22, 139–157. doi:10.1177/0886260506295354.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fraley, R. C., & Shaver, P. R. (2000). Adult romantic attachment: Theoretical developments, emerging controversies, and unanswered questions. Review of General Psychology, 4, 132–154. doi:10.1037//1089-2680.4.2.132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gentzler, A. L., & Kerns, K. A. (2004). Association between insecure attachment and sexual experiences. Personal Relationships, 11, 249–265. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.2004.00081.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grello, C. M., Welsh, D. P., Harper, M. S., & Dickinson, J. W. (2003). Dating and sexual relationship trajectories and adolescent functioning. Adolescent & Family Health, 3, 103–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gute, G., & Eshbaugh, E. M. (2008). Personality as a predictor of hooking up among college students. Journal of Community Health Nursing, 25, 26–43. doi:10.1080/07370010701836385.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Herold, E. S., Maticka-Tyndale, E., & Mewhinney, D. (1998). Predicting intentions to engage in casual sex. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 15, 502–516. doi:10.1177/0265407598154004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holman, A., & Sillars, A. (2012). Talk about “hooking up”: The influence of college student social networks on nonrelationship sex. Health Communication, 27, 205–216. doi:10.1080/10410236.2011.575540.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, S. S., Borawski, E. A., Flocke, S. A., & Keen, K. J. (2003). The role of sequential and concurrent sexual relationships in the risk of sexually transmitted disease among adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Health, 32, 296–305. doi:10.1016/S1054-139X(02)00710-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kraemer, H. C., & Blasey, C. M. (2006). Centering in regression analyses: A strategy to prevent errors in statistical inference. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 13, 141–151. doi:10.1002/mpr.170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levinson, R. A., Jaccard, J., & Beamer, L. (1995). Older adolescents’ engagement in casual sex: Impact of risk perception and psychosocial motivations. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 24, 349–364. doi:10.1007/BF01537601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, M. A., Granato, H., Blayney, J. A., Lostutter, T. W., & Kilmer, J. R. (2012). Predictors of hooking up sexual behaviors and emotional reactions among U.S. college students. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41, 1219–1229. doi:10.1007/s10508-011-9817-2.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2007). Attachment in adulthood: Structure, dynamics, and change. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, N. J., & Servaty-Seib, H. L. (2010). Parental marital status and young adult offsprings’ attitudes about marriage and divorce. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 51, 209–220. doi:10.1080/10502551003597865.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, B. C., Norton, M. C., Curtis, T., Hill, E. J., Schvaneveldt, P., & Young, M. H. (1997). The timing of sexual intercourse among adolescents: Family, peer, and other antecedents. Youth Society, 29, 54–83. doi:10.1177/0044118X97029001003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mullett, E., & Stolberg, A. L. (2002). Divorce and its impact on the intimate relationships of young adults. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 38, 39–59. doi:10.1300/J087v38n01_03.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olmstead, S. B., Pasley, K., & Fincham, F. D. (2013). Hooking up and penetrative hookups: Correlates that differentiate college men. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 42, 573–583. doi:10.1007/s10508-012-9907-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Owen, J., & Fincham, F. D. (2011). Young adults’ emotional reactions after hooking up encounters. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40, 321–330. doi:10.1007/s10508-010-9652-x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Owen, J., Fincham, F. D., & Moore, J. (2011). Short-term prospective study of hooking up among college students. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40, 331–341. doi:10.1007/s10508-010-9697-x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Owen, J., Rhoades, G. K., Stanley, S. M., & Fincham, F. D. (2010). “Hooking up” among college students: Demographic and psychosocial correlates. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 653–663. doi:10.1007/s10508-008-9414-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Paul, E. L., & Hayes, K. A. (2002). The casualties of ‘casual sex’: A qualitative exploration of the phenomenology of college students’ hookups. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 19, 639–661. doi:10.1177/0265407502195006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paul, E. L., McManus, B., & Hayes, A. (2000). “Hookups”: Characteristics and correlates of college students’ spontaneous and anonymous sexual experience. Journal of Sex Research, 37, 76–88. doi:10.1080/00224490009552023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petersen, J. L., & Hyde, J. S. (2010). A meta-analytic review of research on gender differences in sexuality, 1993–2007. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 21–38. doi:10.1037/a0017504.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, J. B., Aasland, O. G., Babor, T. F., de la Fuente, J. R., & Grant, M. (1993). Development of the alcohol use disorders identification test (AUDIT): WHO collaborative project on early detection of persons with harmful alcohol consumption-II. Addiction, 88, 791–804. doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.1993.tb02093.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schachner, D. A., & Shaver, P. R. (2004). Attachment dimensions and sexual motives. Personal Relationships, 11, 179–195. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.2004.00077.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stinson, R. D. (2010). Hooking up in young adulthood: A review of factors influencing sexual behavior of college students. Journal of College Student Psychotherapy, 24, 98–115. doi:10.1080/87568220903558596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tracy, J. L., Shaver, P. R., Albino, A. W., & Cooper, M. L. (2003). Attachment styles and adolescent sexuality. In P. Florsheim (Ed.), Adolescent romance and sexual behavior: Theory, research, and practical implications (pp. 137–159). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • U. S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2011). Digest of Education Statistics, 2010 (NCES 2011-015) (Chap. 3). Retrieved August 18, 2012 from http://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d10/ch_3.asp.

  • Vander Ven, T., & Beck, J. (2009). Getting drunk and hooking up: An exploratory study of the relationship between alcohol intoxication and casual coupling in a university sample. Sociological Spectrum, 29, 626–648. doi:10.1080/02732170903051417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wei, M., Russell, D. W., Mallinckrodt, B., & Vogel, D. L. (2007). The Experiences in Close Relationship scale (ECR)-short form: Reliability, validity, and factor structure. Journal of Personality Assessment, 88, 187–204. doi:10.1080/00223890701268041.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, T., & Adler-Baeder, F. (2009). The intergenerational transmission of relationship quality: The effects of parental remarriage quality on young adults’ relationships. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 47(3/4), 87–102. doi:10.1300/J087v47n03_0.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chelsea Garneau.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Garneau, C., Olmstead, S.B., Pasley, K. et al. The Role of Family Structure and Attachment in College Student Hookups. Arch Sex Behav 42, 1473–1486 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-013-0118-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-013-0118-9

Keywords

Navigation