Abstract
This paper compares how well satellite versus weather station measurements of climate predict agricultural performance in Brazil, India, and the United States. Although weather stations give accurate measures of ground conditions, they entail sporadic observations that require interpolation where observations are missing. In contrast, satellites have trouble measuring some ground phenomenon such as precipitation but they provide complete spatial coverage of various parameters over a landscape. The satellite temperature measurements slightly outperform the interpolated ground station data but the precipitation ground measurements generally outperform the satellite surface wetness index. In India, the surface wetness index outperforms station precipitation but this may be reflecting irrigation, not climate. The results suggest that satellites provide promising measures of temperature but that ground station data may still be preferred for measuring precipitation in rural settings.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Basist A, Williams Jr C, Grody N, Ross TE, Shen S, Chang A, Ferraro R, Menne MJ (2001) Using the Special Sensor Microwave Imager to monitor surface wetness. J of Hydrometeorology 2:297–308
Basist A, Peterson N, Peterson T, Williams C (1998) Using the Special Sensor Microwave Imager to monitor land surface temperature, wetness, and snow cover. J Appl Meteor 37:888–911
Gutman GG (1991) Vegetation Indices from AVHRR Data: An Update and Future Prospects. Remote Sens Environ 35:121–136
Group on Earth Observation (2003) Draft Framework, http://earthobservations.org
Houghton J, Ding Y, Griggs D, Noguer M, van der Linden P, Dai X, Maskell K, Johnson C (eds) (2001) Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis. Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Kidwell KB (1997) Global Vegetation Index User's Guide. Department of Commerce, NOAA/NESDIS, National Climate Data Center. Washington D.C., p 52
Kogan FN (2001) Operational Space Technology for Global Vegetation Assessment. Bull Amer Meteor Soc 82:1949–1964
Kogan FN (1997) Global Drought Watch from Space. Bull Amer Meteor Soc 78:621–636
Kogan FN (1990) Remote sensing of weather impacts on vegetation in non-homogeneous areas. Int J Remote Sens 11:1405–1419
Kogan FN (1995) Droughts of the Late 1980s in the United States as Derived from NOAA Polar Orbiting Satellite Data. Bull Amer Meteor Soc 76:655–668
Lakshmi V, Susskind J (2000) Validation of TOVS Land Surface Parameters Using Ground Observations. J of Geophysical Research 105:2179–2190
McCarthy J, Canziani O, Leary N, Dokken D, White K (eds) (2001) Climate Change 2001: Impacts. Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Mendelsohn R, Nordhaus W, Shaw D (1994) The Impact of Global Warming on Agriculture: A Ricardian Analysis. American Economic Review 84:753–771
Mendelsohn R, Dinar A, Sanghi A (2001) The Effect of Development on the Climate Sensitivity of Agriculture. Environment and Development Economics 6:85–101
Mendelsohn R, Dinar A (2003) Climate, Water, and Agriculture. Land Economics 79:328–341
Rao CRN, Chen J (1999) Revised post-launch calibration of the visible and near-infrared channels of the Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer on the NOAA-14 spacecraft. Int J Remote Sens 20:3485–3491
Teng W, Wang J, Doraiswamy P (1993) Relationship between satellite microwave radiometric data, antecedent precipitation index, and regional soil moisture. Int J Remote Sens 14:2483–2500
Valery M, Champeaux J, Chauvin F, Meriquet C, Lacaze R (2003) A Global database of land surface parameters at 1-km resolution in meteorological and climate models. J of Climate 16:1261–1282
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mendelsohn, R., Kurukulasuriya, P., Basist, A. et al. Climate analysis with satellite versus weather station data. Climatic Change 81, 71–83 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-006-9139-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-006-9139-x