Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Identifying thresholds and barriers to adaptation through measuring climate sensitivity and capacity to change in an Australian primary industry

  • Published:
Climatic Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Primary producers, including graziers, crop farmers and commercial fishers are especially vulnerable to climate change because they depend on highly climate-sensitive natural resources. Adaptation to climate change will make a major difference to the severity of the impacts experienced. However, individuals (resource users) can erect sometimes seemingly peculiar barriers to potential adaptation options that need to be addressed if adaptation is to be effective. Our aim was to understand the nature of barriers to change for cattle graziers in the northern Australian rangelands. We conceptualised barriers as adverse reactions where resource users are unlikely to contemplate adaptations that threaten core values or perceptions about themselves. We assumed that resource users that were more sensitive to climate change impacts—or more dependent on the resource—were more proximate to thresholds of coping and thus more likely to erect barriers, especially people with little adaptive capacity. Given that climate sensitivity and adaptive capacity are important components of vulnerability, our approach was to conduct a vulnerability assessment to identify potential but important barriers to change. Data from 240 graziers suggest that graziers in northern Australia might be especially vulnerable to climate change because their identity, place attachment, low employability, weak networks and dependents can make them sensitive to change, and their sensitivity can be compounded by a low adaptive capacity. We argue that greater attention needs to be placed on the social context of climate change impacts and on the processes shaping vulnerability and adaptation, especially at the scale of the individual.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adger WN (2000) Social and ecological resilience: are they related? Prog Hum Geogr 24:347–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adger WN, Dessai S, Goulden M, Hulme M, Lorenzoni I, Nelson D, Naess L, Wolf J, Wreford A (2009) Are there social limits to adaptation to climate change? Clim Chang 93(3):335–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allison HE, Hobbs RJ (2004) Resilience, adaptive capacity, and the “lock-in trap” of the Western Australian Agricultural Region. Ecology and Society 9 (1). http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol9/iss1/art3/. Accessed 22 Aug 2014

  • Bailey C, Pomeroy C (1996) Resource dependency and development options in Coastal Southeast Asia. Soc Nat Resour 9:191–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker HS, Carper JW (1956) Elements of identification with an occupation. Am Sociol Rev 21:341–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkes F, Jolly D (2001) Adapting to climate change: social-ecological resilience in a Canadian Western Artic community. Conserv Ecol 5. www.consecol.org/vol5/iss2/art18. Accessed 22 Aug 2014

  • Berkhout F (2002) Technological regimes, path dependency and the environment. Glob Environ Chang 12:1–4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolton R (1992) Place prosperity via people prosperity revisited: an old issue with a new angle. Urban Stud 29:185–203

  • Bryman A (2012) Social research methods, 4th edn. Oxford University, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Burch S (2011) Sustainable development paths: investigating the roots of local policy responses to climate change. Sustain Dev 19:176–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burch S (2014) Transforming barriers into enablers of action on climate change: insights from three municipal case studies in British Columbia, Canada. Global Environmental Change, Corrected Proof (in press)

  • Cabrera VE, Hildebrand P, Jones JW, Letson D. de Vries A (2006) An integrated North Florida dairy farm model to reduce environmental impacts under seasonal climate variability. Agric Ecosyst Environ 113:82–97

  • Carroll MS, Lee RG (1990) Occupational community and identity among pacific North Western loggers: Implications for adapting to economic changes. In: Lee RG, Field DR, Burch WRJ (eds) Community and forestry: continuities in the sociology of natural resources. Westview Press, Colorado, pp 141–154

  • Carpenter S, Gunderson L (2001) Coping with collapse: ecological and social dynamics in ecosystem management. Bioscience 51:451–457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cinner JE, Marnane MJ, McClanahan TR, Clark TH, Ben J (2005) Trade, tenure, and tradition: influence of sociocultural factors on resource use in Melanesia. Conserv Biol 19(5):1469–1477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CSIRO (2007) Technical Report. http://www.climatechangeinaustralia.gov.au/resources.php. Accessed 22 Aug 2014

  • Danielzyk R (1992) Is there a postfordistic regional policy in the Ruhr District. Geogr Z 80(2):84–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Darnhofer I, Bellon S, Dedieu B, Milestad R (2010) Adaptiveness to enhance the sustainability of farming systems. A review. Agron Sustain Dev 30(3):545–555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falkenmark M (2003) Freshwater as shared between society and ecosystems: from divided approaches to integrated challenges. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 358(1440):2037–2049

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleming A, Vanclay F (2010) Farmer responses to climate change and sustainable agriculture. A review. Agron Sustain Dev 30(1):11–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folke C (2003) Conservation, driving forces, and institutions. Ecol Appl 6:370–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folke C, Carpenter S, Elmqvist T, Gunderson L, Holling CS, Walker B (2002) Resilience and sustainable development: building adaptive capacity in a world of transformations. Ambio 31:437–440

    Google Scholar 

  • Fried M (1963) Grieving for a lost home. In: Duhl LJ (ed) The urban condition: people and policy in the metropolis. Simon & Schuster, New York

  • Fried M (2000) Continuities and discontinuities of place. J Environ Psychol 20:193–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunderson L (2000) Ecological resilience—in theory and application. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 31:425–439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howden SM, Soussana J, Tubiello FN, Chhetri N, Dunlop M, Meinke H (2007) Adapting agriculture to climate change. Proc Natl Acad Sci 104:19691–19696

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James RJ (2000) The first step for the environmental management of Australian beaches: establishing an effective policy framework. Coast Manag 28(2):149–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones L, Boyd E (2011) Exploring social barriers to adaptation: insights from Western Nepal. Glob Environ Chang 21:1262–1274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LaFlamme M (2011) A framework for sustainable rangeland livelihoods. Rangel J 33(4):339–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewicka M (2011) Place attachment: how far have we come in the last 40 years? J Environ Psychol 31(3):207–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall NA (2010) Understanding social resilience to climate variability in primary enterprises and industries. Glob Environ Chang 20(1):36–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall NA (2011) Assessing resource dependency on the rangelands as a measure of climate sensitivity. Soc Nat Resour 24(10):1105–1115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall NA, Stokes CJ (2014) Influencing adaptation processes on the Australian rangelands for social and ecological resilience. Ecology and Society 19

  • Marshall NA, Gordon IJ, Ash AJ (2011) The reluctance of resource-users to adopt seasonal climate forecasts that can enhance their resilience to climate variability. Clim Chang 107(3):511–529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall NA, Park SE, Adger WN, Brown K, Howden SM (2012) Transformational capacity and the influence of place and identity. Environmental Research Letters 7 (3)

  • Marshall NA, Tobin RC, Gooch M, Hobday A, Marshall PA (2013) Social vulnerability of marine resource users to extreme weather events. Ecosystems 16(5):797–809

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall NA, Stokes CJ, Webb NP, Marshall PA, Lankester AJ (2014) Social vulnerability to climate change in primary producers: a typology approach. Agric Ecosyst Environ 186:86–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAllister RRJ, Cheers B, Darbas T, Davies J, Richards C, Robinson CJ, Ashley M, Fernando D, Maru YT (2008) Social networks in arid Australia: a review of concepts and evidence. Rangel J 30(1):167–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKeon GM, Day KA, Howden SM, Mott JJ, Orr DM, Scattini WJ, Weston EJ (1990) Management for pastoral production in northern Australian savannas. J Biogeogr 17:355–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore A, Parahoo K, Fleming P (2011) Managers’ understanding of workplace health promotion within small and medium-sized enterprises: a phenomenological study. Health Educ J 70(1):92–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moser SC, Ekstrom JA (2010) A framework to diagnose barriers to climate change adaptation. Proc Natl Acad Sci 107(51):22026–22031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen JØ, Reenberg A (2012) Cultural barriers to climate change adaptation: a case study from Northern Burkina Faso. Glob Environ Chang 20(1):142–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olsson P, Gunderson LH, Carpenter SR, Ryan P, Lebel L, Folke C, Holling CS (2006) Shooting the rapids: navigating transitions to adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society 11 (1)

  • Osterblom H, Gardmark A, Bergstrom L, Muller-Karulis B, Folke C, Lindegren M, Casini M, Olsson P, Diekmann R, Blenckner T, Humborg C, Mollmann C (2010) Making the ecosystem approach operational—can regime shifts in ecological- and governance systems facilitate the transition? Mar Policy 34(6):1290–1299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pannell DJ, Marshall GR, Barr N, Curtis A, Vanclay F, Wilkinson R (2006) Understanding and promoting adoption of conservation practices by rural landholders. Aust J Exp Agric 46:1407–1424

  • Park SE, Marshall NA, Jakku E, Dowd AM, Howden SM, Mendham E, Fleming A (2012) Informing adaptation responses to climate change through theories of transformation. Glob Environ Chang 22(1):115–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pelling M, High C (2005) Understanding adaptation: what can social capital offer assessments of adaptive capacity? Glob Environ Chang 15(4):308–319. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2005.02.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pelling M, High C, Dearing J, Smith D (2008) Shadow spaces for social learning: a relational understanding of adaptive capacity to climate change within organisations. Environ Plan A 40(4):867–884. doi:10.1068/A39148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poggie JJ, Gersuny C (1974) Fishermen of Galilee. The human ecology of a New England coastal community. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Kingston

    Google Scholar 

  • Price L, Evans N (2009) From stress to distress: conceptualizing the British family farming patriarchal way of life. J Rural Stud 25:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam RD (1993) The prosperous community. Social capital and public life. Am Prospect 13:35–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Robards MD, Schoon ML, Meek CL, Engle NL (2011) The importance of social drivers in the resilient provision of ecosystem services. Glob Environ Chang 21(2):522–529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sayer J, Sunderland T, Ghazoul J, Pfund JL, Sheil D, Meijaard E, Venter M, Boedhihartono AK, Day M, Garcia C, van Oosten C, Buck LE (2013) Ten principles for a landscape approach to reconciling agriculture, conservation, and other competing land uses. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110:8349–8356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stedman RC (1999) Sense of place as an indicator of community sustainability. For Chron 75:765–770

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stokes CJ, Howden SM (2010) Adapting agriculture to climate change: preparing Australian agriculture, forestry and fisheries for the future. CSIRO Publishing, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Twigger-Ross CL, Uzzell DL (1996) Place and identity processes. J Environ Psychol 16:205–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vanclay F (2004) Social principles for agricultural extension to assist in the promotion of natural resource management. Aust J Exp Agric 44(3):213–222. doi:10.1071/Ea02139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vanclay F, Howden P, Mesiti L, Glyde S (2006) The social and intellectual construction of farming styles: testing Dutch ideas in Australian agriculture. Sociol Rural 46:61–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Volney WJA, Fleming RA (2000) Climate change and impacts of boreal forest insects. Agric Ecosyst Environ 82(1–3):283–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker W (2000) Entrapment in large technology systems: institutional commitment and power relations. Res Policy 29:833–846

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker B. & Meyers J. A. (2004) Thresholds in Ecological and Social-Ecological Systems: a Developing Database. Ecology and Society 9. www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol9/iss2/art3.

  • Walker NJ, Schulze RE (2008) Climate change impacts on agro-ecosystem sustainability across three climate regions in the maize belt of South Africa. Agric Ecosyst Environ 124(1–2):114–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson GA (2013) Community resilience: path dependency, lock-in effects and transitional ruptures. J Environ Plan Manag 57:1–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zilberman D, Zhao JH, Heiman A (2012) Adoption versus adaptation, with emphasis on climate change. Ann Rev Resour Econ 4:27–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The funding for this study was obtained from the Federal Department for Agriculture, Forests and Fisheries (DAFF) through the Meat and Livestock Association (MLA) project B.NBP.0617 and the Climate Adaptation Flagship, CSIRO. We are sincerely grateful to the 240 graziers that agreed to participate in the study and to Amanda Elledge, Kate Nairn, Svetlana Ukulova, Charlie Morgan and Jamie Atwell for their dedicated efforts and brilliant skills as interviewers. Sincere thanks also to Ryan McAllister and Ian Watson for constructive comments on various drafts of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nadine Marshall.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Marshall, N., Stokes, C.J. Identifying thresholds and barriers to adaptation through measuring climate sensitivity and capacity to change in an Australian primary industry. Climatic Change 126, 399–411 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-014-1233-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-014-1233-x

Keywords

Navigation