Abstract
The aim of this article was to analyse an attempt to promote sustainable consumption by shaping the conditions for consumption. In particular, the focus lies on sustainable public catering as an approach to shaping both the supply of and demand for sustainable meals. In order to capture the processes of governing consumption, the way is traced in which rationalities (ways of thinking and calculating), technologies (means and instruments), visibilities (concrete manifestations), and identities (types of agents assumed) related to a policy intervention for sustainable public catering are interpreted and recreated by three main groups of actors involved: policy makers, catering professionals, and consumers. This analysis highlights the active role of practitioners in realizing policies for sustainable consumption. It has implications for policy makers and analysts: Reflexive policies should heed to actors’ unfolding interpretations as they can take the policy process in different directions.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aalto, K., & Heiskanen, E. (2011). Kestävä ruokalautanen joukkoruokailun kestävän kehityksen edistäjänä. Kuluttajatutkimuskeskus, työselosteita ja esitelmiä 130. Helsinki: National Consumer Research Centre.
Alcantud, A., & Geuder, A. (2010). Exploratory analysis of Mense Bio (organic school canteens) Italy. EUPOPP Project (Work Package 3.2). Retrieved 09 September 2010 from http://www.eupopp.net/documents.
Berg, A. (2011). Not roadmaps but toolboxes: Analysing pioneering national programmes for sustainable consumption and production. Journal of Consumer Policy, 34, 9–23.
Binkley, S. (2006). The perilous freedoms of consumption: Toward a theory of the conduct of consumer conduct. Journal for Cultural Research, 4, 343–362.
Collier, A., Cotterill, A., Everett, T., Muckle, R., Pike, T., & Vanstone, A. (2010). Understanding and influencing behaviours: A review of social research, economics and policy making in Defra. UK: Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs.
Corley, K. G., & Gioia, D. (2011). Building theory about theory building: What constitutes a theoretical contribution. Academy of Management Review, 36, 12–32.
Day, C. (2005). Buying green: The crucial role of public authorities. Local Environment, 10, 201–209.
Dean, M. (2010). Governmentality—Power and rule in modern society (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
European Commission. (2004). Buying green! A handbook on environmental public procurement. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
European Commission. (2008). Public procurement for a better environment. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Commission of the European Communities, Brussels, 16 July 2008, COM (2008) 400 final.
Fiddes, N. (1991). Meat. A natural symbol. London: Routledge.
Finnish Government. (2009). Periaatepäätös kestävien valintojen edistämisestä julkisissa hankinnoissa 8.4.2009. [Council of State Decision of Principle on the promotion of sustainable public procurement.] Retrieved 20 May 2010 from http://www.valtioneuvosto.fi/toiminta/periaatepaatokset/periaatepaatos/fi.jsp?oid=258914.
Finnish Ministry of the Environment. (2009). Sustainable public procurement. Public sector becomes a pioneer in sustainable procurement. Retrieved 18 May 2010 from http://www.ymparisto.fi/default.asp?contentid=323695&lan=en&clan=en.
Foucault, M. (1991). Governmentality. In G. Burchell, C. Gordon, & P. Miller (Eds.), The Foucault effect. Studies in governmentality (pp. 87–104). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Fuchs, D., & Lorek, S. (2005). Sustainable consumption governance: A history of promises and failures. Journal of Consumer Policy, 28, 261–288.
Halkier, B., Katz-Gero, T., & Martens, L. (2011). Applying practice theory to the study of consumption: Theoretical and methodological considerations. Journal of Consumer Culture, 11, 3–13.
Hansen, U., & Schrader, U. (1997). A modern model of consumption for a sustainable society. Journal of Consumer Policy, 20, 443–468.
Hargreaves, T. (2011). Practice-ing behaviour change: Applying social practice theory to pro-environmental behaviour change. Journal of Consumer Culture, 11, 79–99.
Heiskanen, E. (2005). The performative nature of consumer research: Consumers’ environmental awareness as an example. Journal of Consumer Policy, 28, 179–201.
Heiskanen, E., Brohmann, B., Fritsche, U., Schönherr, N., & Aalto, K. (2010). Policies to promote sustainable consumption: Framework for a future-oriented evaluation. Progress in Industrial Ecology, 6, 387–403.
Hobson, K. (2011). Environmental politics, green governmentality and the possibility of a ‘creative grammar’ for domestic sustainable consumption. In R. Lane & A. Gorman-Murray (Eds.), Material geographies of household sustainability (pp. 193–210). Farnham: Ashgate.
HS. (2011). Päivän kysymys: Onko koulun kasvisruokapäivä hyvä idea? [Poll of the day: Is the weekly vegetarian day a good idea? Retrieved 15February 2011 from http://www.hs.fi/paivankysymys/1135262971241?kk=20101201.
Huttunen, K., & Autio, M. (2010). Consumer ethoses in Finnish consumer life stories—Agrarianism, economism and green consumerism. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 34, 146–152.
ICLEI. (2009). Ghent goes veggie once a week. ICLEI in Europe News 2/2009. Retrieved 20May 2010 from http://news-archive.iclei-europe.org/?id=7299.
Kitzinger, R. S., & Barbour, J. (1999). Developing focus group research. Politics, theory and practice. London: Sage.
Lemke, T. (2007). An indigestible meal? Foucault, governmentality and state theory. Distinktion, 15, 43–64.
Mikkola, M. (2009). Shaping professional identity for sustainability. Evidence in Finnish public catering. Appetite, 53, 56–65.
Miller, P., & Rose, N. (2008). Governing the present. Administering economic, social and personal life. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Moisander, J., Markkula, A., & Eräranta, K. (2010). Construction of consumer choice in the market: Challenges for environmental policy. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 34, 73–79.
Proposal for an Action Programme for Sustainable Public Procurement. (2008). Ehdotus kestävien hankintojen toimintaohjelmaksi. Julkisten hankintojen työryhmän ehdotus 13.2.2008. (Working group proposal on public procurement). Helsinki: Ministry of Environment. Retrieved 15 February 2011 from www.ymparisto.fi/default.asp?node=7468&lan=fi.
PWC. (2009). Collection of statistical information on green public procurement in the EU. Report on data collection results. Retrieved 20 May 2010 from http://ec.europa.eu/environment/gpp/pdf/statistical_information.pdf.
Raulio, S., Roos, E., & Prättälä, R. (2010). School and workplace meals promote healthy food habits. Public Health Nutrition, 13, 987–992.
Reisch, L. (2004). Principles and visions of a new consumer policy. Discussion paper by the Scientific Advisory Board for Consumer, Food, and Nutrition Policies to the German Federal Ministry of Consumer Protection, Food, and Agriculture. Journal of Consumer Policy, 27, 1–42.
Rokka, J., & Moisander, J. (2010). Environmental dialogue in online communities: Negotiating ecological citizenship among global travellers. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 33, 199–205.
Røpke, I. (2009). Theories of practice—New inspirations for ecological economics studies on consumption. Ecological Economics, 68, 2490–2497.
Shove, E. (2003). Converging conventions of comfort, cleanliness and convenience. Journal of Consumer Policy, 26, 395–418.
Shove, E., & Walker, G. (2010). Governing transitions in the sustainability of everyday life. Research Policy, 39, 471–476.
Spaargaren, G. (2003). Sustainable consumption: A theoretical and environmental policy perspective. Society and Natural Resources, 16, 687–701.
Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2008). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Thøgersen, J. (2005). How may consumer policy empower consumers for sustainable lifestyles? Journal of Consumer Policy, 28, 143–178.
Wahlen, S. (2009). The consumer stuck between a rock of victimhood and a hard place called responsibility: Political discourses on the ‘consumer’ in Finnish and German governmental policy documents. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 33, 361–368.
Warde, A. (2005). Consumption and theories of practice. Journal of Consumer Culture, 5, 131–153.
World Commission on Environment and Development. (1987). Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our common future. Annex to the document A/42/427. Retrieved 20 May 2010 from http://www.un-documents.net/a42-427.htm.
YLE. (2011) Helsinkiläiskoululaiset äänestävät kasvisruokaa vastaan jaloillaan [Helsinki school kids vote with their feet against vegetarian food]. National broadcasting company YLE, Helsinki news. Retrieved 15 February 2011 from http://yle.fi/alueet/helsinki/2011/02/helsinkilaiskoululaiset_aanestavat_kasvisruokaa_vastaan_jaloillaan_2361301.html.
Zwick, D., Bonsu, S. K., & Darmody, A. (2008). Putting consumers to work. Co-creation and a new marketing govern-mentality. Journal of Consumer Culture, 8, 163–193.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wahlen, S., Heiskanen, E. & Aalto, K. Endorsing Sustainable Food Consumption: Prospects from Public Catering. J Consum Policy 35, 7–21 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10603-011-9183-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10603-011-9183-4