Skip to main content
Log in

Modeling sediment transport around a rectangular bridge abutment

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Fluid Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the present paper, the results are explained for an experimental and numerical study on scouring phenomenon around a rectangular, impermeable and non-submerged bridge abutment cross section with perpendicular attitude to the flow axes. In this study, SSIIM 2.0 is used to simulate the scouring problem at the abutment. SSIIM 2.0 is a three-dimensional computational fluid dynamics program that uses a finite volume method to discretize the equations. According to the results, the kε turbulence model with some RNG extensions is the best model for predicting turbulence around the rectangular abutment. In addition, different grids are compared in the simulations and the best grid is selected based on the accuracy of numerical results and the computation times. Finally, the findings are explained, and the bed changes and local scour profiles resulting from the numerical simulation are compared with the available experimental results. It is concluded from the achieved results that SSIIM 2.0 numerical modeling is capable of simulating scouring around a rectangular abutment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shirhole A, Holt R (1991) Planning for a comprehensive bridge safety program. Transp Res Rec 1290:39–50

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kattell J, Eriksson M (1998) Bridge scour evaluation: screening, analysis, and countermeasures. F.S. United States Department of Agriculture, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lagasse PF (1997) Instrumentation for measuring scour at bridge piers and abutments. American Association of State Highway Transportation Officials National Research Council. Transportation Research Board National Cooperative Highway Research Program, National Academy Press, Washington D.C.

  4. Melville BW, Coleman SE (2000) Bridge scour. Water Resources Publication, Highland

    Google Scholar 

  5. Karami H et al (2012) Verification of numerical study of scour around spur dikes using experimental data. Water Environ J 28:1–11

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dargahi B (1990) Controlling mechanism of local scouring. J Hydraul Eng 116(10):1197–1214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chiew Y-M (1992) Scour protection at bridge piers. J Hydraul Eng 118(9):1260–1269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dey S, Barbhuiya AK (2005) Time variation of scour at abutments. J Hydraul Eng 131(1):11–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kayaturk S, Kokpinar M, Gogus M (2004) Effect of collar on temporal development of scour around bridge abutments. In: 2nd international conference on scour and erosion, IAHR, Singapore

  10. Kumar V, Raju KGR, Vittal N (1999) Reduction of local scour around bridge piers using slots and collars. J Hydraul Eng 125(12):1302–1305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Li H-MT, Kuhnle R, Barkdoll B-MT (2005) Countermeasures against scour at abutments. Lab Publ 49:150

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mashair M, Zarrati A Rezayi A (2004) Time development of scouring around a bridge pier protected by collar. In: 2nd international conference on scour and erosion, ICSE-2, Singapore

  13. Melville BW, Dongol D (1992) Bridge pier scour with debris accumulation. J Hydraul Eng 118(9):1306–1310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Molinas A, Kheireldin K, Wu B (1998) Shear stress around vertical wall abutments. J Hydraul Eng 124(8):822–830

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Akib S, Jahangirzadeh A, Basser H (2014) Local scour around complex pier groups and combined piles at semi-integral bridge. J Hydrol Hydromech 62(2):108–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Akib S et al (2011) Influence of flow shallowness on scour depth at semi-integral bridge piers. Adv Mater Res 243:4478–4481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Basser H et al (2014) Adaptive neuro-fuzzy selection of the optimal parameters of protective spur dike. Nat Hazards 73:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Jahangirzadeh A et al (2014) Experimental and numerical investigation of the effect of different shapes of collars on the reduction of scour around a single bridge pier. PLoS One 9(6):e98592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Jahangirzadeh A et al (2014) A cooperative expert based support vector regression (Co-ESVR) system to determine collar dimensions around bridge pier. Neurocomputing 140:172–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Khosronejad A, Kang S, Sotiropoulos F (2012) Experimental and computational investigation of local scour around bridge piers. Adv Water Resour 37:73–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Karami H et al (2012) Verification of numerical study of scour around spur dikes using experimental data. Water Environ J 28:124–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Akib S, Mohammadhassani M, Jahangirzadeh A (2014) Application of ANFIS and LR in prediction of scour depth in bridges. Comput Fluids 91:77–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. EL-Ghorab EA (2013) Reduction of scour around bridge piers using a modified method for vortex reduction. Alexandria Engineering Journal 52(3):467–478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kang S, Khosronejad A, Sotiropoulos F (2012) Numerical simulation of turbulent flow and sediment transport processes in arbitrarily complex waterways. In: Environmental fluid mechanics, memorial volume in honour of Prof. Gerhard H. Jirka, CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 123–151

  25. Khosronejad A et al (2013) Computational and experimental investigation of scour past laboratory models of stream restoration rock structures. Adv Water Resour 54:191–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Paik J, Escauriaza C, Sotiropoulos F (2010) Coherent structure dynamics in turbulent flows past in-stream structures: some insights gained via numerical simulation. J Hydraul Eng 136(12):981–993

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Khosronejad A et al (2011) Curvilinear immersed boundary method for simulating coupled flow and bed morphodynamic interactions due to sediment transport phenomena. Adv Water Resour 34(7):829–843

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Olsen NRB (2006) A three-dimensional numerical model for simulation of sediment movements in water intakes with multiblock option. User’s manual

  29. Van Rijn LC (1987) Mathematical modelling of morphological processes in the case of suspended sediment transport. Waterloopkundig Laboratorium, Delft

    Google Scholar 

  30. Wu W, Rodi W, Wenka T (2000) 3D numerical modeling of flow and sediment transport in open channels. J Hydraul Eng 126(1):4–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Khosronejad A et al (2007) 3D numerical modeling of flow and sediment transport in laboratory channel bends. J Hydraul Eng 133(10):1123–1134

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The financial support of the high impact research grant from University of Malaya (UM.C/625/1/HIR/61, account number: H-16001-00-D000061) is gratefully acknowledged. The authors would also like to thank Amirkabir University of Technology for facilitating of the experiments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Hossein Basser or Shahaboddin Shamshirband.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Basser, H., Cheraghi, R., Karami, H. et al. Modeling sediment transport around a rectangular bridge abutment. Environ Fluid Mech 15, 1105–1114 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10652-015-9398-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10652-015-9398-z

Keywords

Navigation