Abstract
Government and environmental entities are becoming increasingly concerned with qualifying and quantifying the erosion effects that are observed in sandy shores. Correspondingly, survey methodologies that gather data for such erosion studies are increasingly being demanded. The responsible entities are continually broadening their areas of interest, are concerned in the establishment of regular monitoring programmes and are demanding high accuracy from the geo-spatial data that is collected. The budget available for such monitoring activities, however, does not parallel the trend in the increasing demand for quality specifications. Survey methodologies need improvement to meet these requirements. We have developed a new land-based survey system—the INSHORE system—that is ideal for low cost, highly efficient and highly precise coastal surveys. The INSHORE system uses hi-tech hardware that is based on high-grade global positioning system (GPS) receivers and a laser distance sensor combined with advanced software algorithms. This system enables the determination of the ground coordinates of the surveyed areas with a precision of 1 to 2 cm, without having a sensor in contact with the ground surface. The absence of physical contact with the ground makes this system suitable for high-efficiency surveys. The accuracy of the positioning, which is based on advanced differential GPS processing, is enhanced by considering the estimated attitude of the GPS receiver holding structure and eliminates undesirable offsets. This paper describes the INSHORE survey system and presents the results of validation tests that were performed in a sandy shore environment.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anders, F. J., & Byrnes, M. A. (1991). Accuracy of shoreline change rates as determined from maps and aerial photographs. Shore Beach, 59(1), 17–26.
Baptista, P., Bastos, L., Bernardes, C., Cunha, T., & Dias, J. (2008). Monitoring sandy shore morphologies by DGPS—A practical tool to generate digital elevation models. Journal of Coastal Research, 24(6), 1516–1528.
Baptista, P., Cunha, T., Bernardes, C., Gama, C., Ferreira, Ó., Dias, J. (2010). A precise and efficient methodology to analyse the shoreline displacement rate. Journal of Coastal Research. doi:10.2112/09-1187.1.
Barnard, P., & Warrick, J. (2010). Dramatic beach and nearshore morphological changes due to extreme flooding at a wave-dominated river mouth. Marine Geology, 271, 131–148.
Dornbusch, U., Moses, C., Robinson, D. A., & Williams, R. (2008). Soft copy photogrammetry to measure shore platform erosion on decadal timescales. Journal of Coastal Conservation, 11, 193–200.
Emery, K. O. (1961). A simple method of measuring beach profiles. Limnology and Oceanography, 6, 90–93.
Fletcher, C., Rooney, J., Barbee, M., Siang-Chyn, L., & Richmond, B. (2002). Mapping shoreline change using digital orthophotogrammetry on Maui, Hawaii. Journal of Coastal Research, NS38, 106–124.
Groat, C. G. (2000). U.S. geological survey: Facing the new century. Sea Technology, 41(1), 45–47.
Hansen, J., & Barnard, P. (2010). Sub-weekly to interannual variability of a high-energy shoreline. Coastal Engineering, 57, 959–972.
Haxel, J. H., & Holman, R. A. (2004). The sediment response of a dissipative beach to variations in wave climate. Marine Geology, 206, 73–99.
Hofmann-Wellenhof, B., Lichtenegger, H., & Collins, J. (2001). GPS: Theory and practice (5th ed.). Wien: Springer.
Holman, R. A., Sallenger, A. H., Lippmann, T. C., & Haines, J. W. (1993). The application of video image processing to the study of nearshore processes. Oceanography, 6(3), 78–85.
Huising, E. J., & Gomes Pereira, L. M. (1998). Errors and accuracy estimates of laser data acquired by various laser scanning systems for topographic applications. Journal of Photogrammetry & Remote Sensing, 53, 245–261.
James, L., & Farrell, J. L. (1976). Integrated aircraft navigation. New York: Academic Press.
Komar, P. D. (1976). Beach processes and sedimentation. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Lancker, V., Lanckneus, J., Hearn, S., Hoekstra, P., Levoy, F., Miles, J., et al. (2004). Coastal and nearshore morphology, bedforms and sediment transport pathways at Teignmouth (UK). Continental Shelf Research, 24, 1171–1202.
Lippmann, T. C., & Holman, R. A. (1989). Quantification of sand bar morphology: A video technique based on wave dissipation. Journal of Geophysical Research, 94(C1), 995–1011.
List, J. H., Farris, A. S., & Sullivan, C. (2006). Reversing storm hotspots on sandy beaches: Spatial and temporal characteristics. Marine Geology, 226, 261–279.
Morton, R. A., Leach, M. P., Paine, J. G., & Cardoza, M. A. (1993). Monitoring beach changes using GPS surveying techniques. Journal of Coastal Research, 9(3), 702–720.
Shrestha, R. L., Carter, W. E., Sartori, M., Luzum, B. J., & Slatton, K. C. (2005). Airborne laser swath mapping: Quantifying changes in sandy beaches over time scales of weeks to years. Journal of Photogrammetry & Remote Sensing, 59, 222–232.
Wright, L. D., & Short, A. D. (1984). Morphodynamic variability of surf zones and beaches: A synthesis. Marine Geology, 56, 93–118.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Baganha Baptista, P.R., Bernardes, C. & Cunha, T.R. The validation analysis of the INSHORE system—a precise and efficient coastal survey system. Environ Monit Assess 179, 589–604 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-010-1765-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-010-1765-0