Skip to main content
Log in

“Measuring Sustainability”: A Multi-Criterion Framework

  • Published:
Environment, Development and Sustainability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

So far, the elementary question of whether one country’s or region’s economy is moving towards sustainability or away from it cannot be answered with unanimous consensus on the ‘measuring rod(s)’ to be employed. The main assumption of this article is that sustainability assessment needs a set of multi-dimensional indicators. From this assumption a question arises: how could such indicators be aggregated? Often, some indicators improve while others deteriorate. For instance, when incomes grow, SO2 might go down while CO2 increases. It has to be noted that this is the classical conflictual situation studied in multi-criteria decision theory. The use of a multi-criterion framework for making operational the ‘measuring of sustainability’ is discussed here by means of illustrative examples and more formal arguments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • T.F.H. Allen J.A. Tainter T.W. Hoekstra (2002) Supply-Side Sustainability Columbia University Press New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • K.J. Arrow H. Raynaud (1986) Social Choice and Multicriterion Decision Making M.I.T Press Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • E.B. Barbier A. Markandya (1990) ArticleTitleThe conditions for achieving environmentally sustainable growth European Economic Review. 34 659–669 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0014-2921(90)90138-O

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • G. Barbiroli (1993) Direct and indirect indicators of sustainable development Proceedings of the International Conference on Environmental Pollution Barcelona 489–496

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Beinat P. Nijkamp (1998) Multicriteria Evaluation in Land-Use Management: Methodologies and Case Studies Kluwer Academic Publishers Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Chichilnisky (1996) ArticleTitleAn axiomatic approach to sustainable development Social Choice and Welfare. 13 IssueID2 219–248

    Google Scholar 

  • H.E. Daly J.J. Cobb (1989) For the Common Good: Redirecting the Economy Toward Community, the Environment and a Sustainable Future Beacon Press Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Faucheux M. O’Connor (1998) Valuation for Sustainable Development: Methods and Policy Indicators Edward Elgar Cheltenham.

    Google Scholar 

  • S.O. Funtowicz J.R. Ravetz (1990) Uncertainty and Quality in Science for Policy Kluwer Academic Publishers Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • S.O. Funtowicz G. Munda M. Paruccini (1990) ArticleTitleThe aggregation of environmental data using multicriteria methods Environmetrics. 1 IssueID4 353–368

    Google Scholar 

  • S.O. Funtowicz J.R. Ravetz (1994) ArticleTitleThe worth of a songbird: Ecological economics as a post-normal science Ecological Economics. 10 197–207 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0921-8009(94)90108-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Funtowicz, S., Martinez-Alier, J., Munda, G. and Ravetz, J. (1999). ‘Information tools for environmental policy under conditions of complexity’). European Environmental Agency, Experts’ Corner, Environmental Issues Series, No. 9.

  • S.O. Funtowicz J. Martinez-Alier G. Munda J. Ravetz (2002) Multicriteria-based environmental policy H. Abaza A. Baranzini (Eds) Implementing Sustainable Development. UNEP/Edward Elgar Cheltenham 53–77

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Giampietro (1994) ArticleTitleUsing hierarchy theory to explore the concept of sustainable development Futures. 26 IssueID6 616–625 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0016-3287(94)90033-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. Giampietro K. Mayumi (2000a) ArticleTitleMultiple-scale integrated assessment of societal metabolism: Introducing the approach Population and Environment. 22 IssueID2 109–154 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1026691623300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. Giampietro K. Mayumi (2000b) ArticleTitleMultiple-scale integrated assessment of societal metabolism: Integrating biophysical and economic representations across scales Population and Environment. 22 IssueID2 155–210 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1026643707370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R. Horwarth R.B. Norgaard (1990) ArticleTitleIntergenerational resource rights, efficiency and social optimality Land Economics. 66 1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Horwarth R.B. Norgaard (1992) ArticleTitleEnvironmental valuation under sustainable development American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings. 80 473–477

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Kacprzyk M. Roubens (1988) Non-Conventional Preference Relations in Decision Making Springer-Verlag Heidelberg.

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Munda (1995) Multicriteria Evaluation in a Fuzzy Environment, Series: Contributions to economics Physica-Verlag Heidelberg.

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Munda (1997a) ArticleTitleEnvironmental economics, ecological economics and the concept of sustainable development Environmental Values. 6 IssueID2 213–233

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Munda (1997b) Multicriteria evaluation as a multidimensional approach to welfare measurement J. Bergh Particlevan den J. Straaten Particlevan der (Eds) Economy and Ecosystems in Change: Analytical and Historical Approaches. Edward Elgar Cheltenham 96–115

    Google Scholar 

  • Munda, G. and Nardo, M. (2003). On the methodological foundations of composite indicators for ranking countries’). Proceedings of the First OECD/JRC Workshop on Composite Indicators of Country Performance, Ispra, JRC, available at http://webfarm.jrc.cec.eu.int/uasa/events/oecd_12 may 03/background/.

  • Munda, G. (2004). Social multi-criteria evaluation (SMCE)’: Methodological foundations and operational consequences, European Journal of Operational Research.

  • Munda, G. (forthcoming) ‘A NAIADE based approach for sustainability benchmarking. International Journal of Environment Technology and Management.

  • I. Musu D. Siniscalco (1996) National Accounts and the Environment Kluwer Academic Publishers Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD: 2003, Composite Indicators of Country Performance: A Critical Assessment, DST/IND(2003)5, Paris.

  • D.W. Pearce G.D. Atkinson (1993) ArticleTitleCapital theory and the measurement of sustainable development: An indicator of ‘weak’ sustainability Ecological Economics. 8 103–108 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0921-8009(93)90039-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D. Pearce G. Hamilton G.D. Atkinson (1996) ArticleTitleMeasuring sustainable development: Progress on indicators Environment and Development Economics. 1 85–101

    Google Scholar 

  • V.V. Podinovskii (1994) ArticleTitleCriteria importance theory Mathematical Social Sciences. 27 237–252 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0165-4896(93)00737-F

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • F.S. Roberts (1979) Measurement Theory with Applications to Decision Making, Utility and the Social Sciences Addison-Wesley London.

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Roy (1996) Multicriteria Methodology for Decision Analysis Kluwer Academic Publishers Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Saisana S. Tarantola (2002) State-of-the-art report on current methodologies and practices for composite indicator development, EUR 20408 EN, Report European Commission JRC Ispra, Italy

    Google Scholar 

  • H.A. Simon (1976) From Substantive to procedural rationality J.S. Latsis (Eds) Methods and Appraisal in Economics. Cambridge University Press Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • F. Schmidt-Bleek (1994) Wieviel umwelt braucht der mensch? MIPS Das Mass für ökologisches wirtschaften Birkh user Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urban Indicators Programme, http://www.urbanobservatory.org/indicators/database.

  • P. Vitousek P. Ehrlich A. Ehrlich P. Matson (1986) ArticleTitleHuman appropriation of the products of photosynthesis Bioscience. 34 IssueID6 368–373

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Wackernagel W.E. Rees (1995) Our Ecological Footprint: Reducing Human Impact on the Earth New Society Publishers Gabriola Island, BC and Philadelphia, PA

    Google Scholar 

  • P.L. Yu (1985) Multi Criteria Decision Making: Concepts, Techniques and Extensions Plenum Press New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • J.A. Yusuf S. El Serafy E. Lutz (1989) Environmental Accounting for Sustainable Development A UNEP World Bank Symposium Washington D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • L.A. Zadeh (1965) ArticleTitleFuzzy sets Information and Control. 8 338–353 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. Zeleny (1982) Multiple Criteria Decision Making McGraw Hill New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giuseppe Munda.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Munda, G. “Measuring Sustainability”: A Multi-Criterion Framework. Environ Dev Sustain 7, 117–134 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-003-4713-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-003-4713-0

Keywords

Navigation