Skip to main content
Log in

Real-time monitoring of physicochemical parameters in water using big data and smart IoT sensors

  • Published:
Environment, Development and Sustainability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Water pollution is the most important factor affecting the environment. Appropriate monitoring is a big challenge to make sustainable growth by maintaining it for society. In recent times, water monitoring has turned into a smart monitoring system for water pollution (SMS-wp), with the advances on the Internet of things (IoT), machine learning (ML), and the improvement in current sensors. River Ganga is one of the major sources of water for drinking, irrigation, and industries in the northern part of India. Day by day, Ganga River is getting polluted, due to anthropogenic activities, such as the construction of dams, extensive use of fertilizers in agriculture, and untreated discharges from industries. Contamination in the river water is adversely affecting human health and river biota. Therefore, to improve the river ecosystem and to check infections and diseases, water quality assessment is very much important. The main aim of this study is to determine the Water Quality Index (WQI) of the River Ganges at the upper part of the Indo-Gangetic plain, just downstream of the Himalayan foothill using the last 3 years of data (2017–2019). Trend analysis for River Ganga water at considered locations is also a part of this study. Trend analysis is presenting the water quality of river Ganga in the coming years up to 2025. Twelve physicochemical parameters (TDS, chlorides, alkalinity, DO, temperature, COD, BOD, pH, magnesium, hardness, total coliform, and calcium) were analyzed to determine the water quality of River Ganga. As a result, WQI for next 5 years (from 2020 to 2025) is forecasted as an increment of 17.34% at Haridwar, 4.16% at Roorkee, and 21.63% at Dehradun. Results of the study indicated that WQI values just downstream of the Himalayan foothills in the upper reaches of the Gangetic plain are increasing every year. The authors have concentrated on how the advances in sensor innovation, the Internet of things, and machine learning techniques make water pollution monitoring a genuinely brilliant checking framework. Finally, the system of robust strategies for ML, denoising techniques, and advancement of appropriate guidelines for wireless sensor networks (WSNs) have been recommended.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24
Fig. 25
Fig. 26
Fig. 27
Fig. 28
Fig. 29
Fig. 30

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aenab, A. M., & Singh, S. K. (2013). Evaluating water quality of Ganga river within Uttar Pradesh State by water quality index analysis using C ?? Program. Civil Environ Res, 3(1), 57–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad, I. K., Salih, N. M., & Nzar, Y. H. (2012). Determination of water quality index (WQI) for Qalyasan stream in Sulaimani city/Kurdistan region of Iraq. Int J Plant Anim Environ Sci, 2(4), 148–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alam, M., & Pathak, J. K. (2010). Rapid assessment of water quality index of Ramganga river, Western Uttar Pradesh (India) using a computer programme. Natural Science, 8(11), 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ali, S. Y., Sunar, S., Saha, P., Mukherjee, P., Saha, S., & Dutta, S. (2021). Drinking water quality assessment of river Ganga in West Bengal, India through integrated statistical and GIS techniques. Water Science and Technology, 84(10–11), 2997–3017. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2021.293

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Asiful Islam, M.; Khan, R.H.; Syeed, M. A smart and integrated surface water monitor system architecture: Bangladesh perspective. In ACM Int. Conf. Proc. Ser. 2020, pp. 8–13.

  • Balan, I. N., Shivakumar, M., & Kumar, P. D. M. (2012). An assessment of ground water quality using water quality index in Chennai, Tamil Nadu. India. Chron Young Sci, 3(2), 146–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhardwaj, V., Singh, D. S., & Singh, A. K. (2010). Water quality of the Chhoti Gandak River using principal component analysis, Ganga Plain, India. Journal of Earth System Science, 119, 117–127.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bhutiani, R., Khanna, D. R., Kulkarni, D. B., et al. (2016). Assessment of Ganga river ecosystem at Haridwar, Uttarakhand, India with reference to water quality indices. Applied Water Science, 6, 107–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouamar, M.; Ladjal, M. Evaluation of the performances of ANN and SVM techniques used in water quality classification. In Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Electron. Circuits Syst. 2007, 1047–1050.

  • Budiarti, R.P.N., Sukaridhoto, S., Hariadi, M., Purnomo, M.H. Big Data Technologies using SVM (Case Study: Surface Water Classification on Regional Water Utility Company in Surabaya). In Proceedings of the 2019 International Conference on Computer Science, Information Technology, and Electrical Engineering (ICOMITEE 2019), Jember, Indonesia, 16–17 October 2019; Volume 1, pp. 94–101.

  • Chen, Q., Cheng, G., Fang, Y., Liu, Y., Zhang, Z., Gao, Y., Horn, B.K.P. Real-time Learning-based Monitoring System for Water Contamination. In Proceedings of the 2018 4th International Conference on Universal Village (UV 2018), Boston, MA, USA, 21–24 October 2018; pp. 1–5.

  • Chowdhury, R. M., Muntasir, S. Y., & Hossain, M. M. (2012). Water quality index of water bodies along Faridpur-Barisal road in Bangladesh. Glob Eng Tech Rev, 2(3), 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cude, C. G. (2001). Oregon water quality index: A tool for evaluating water quality management effectiveness. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 37(1), 125–137.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dimri, D., et al. (2021). Monitoring water quality of river ganga using multivariate techniques and wqi in upper Ganga basin of Uttarakhand, India. Environmental Nanotechnology, Monitoring & Management, 15, 100375.

  • Dutta, V., Fatima, N., & Kumar, N. (2019). Excessive fluoride in groundwater of central Ganga Alluvial Plain: A case study of Fatehpur, North India. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 16, 7791–7798.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dwivedi, S., Mishra, S., & Tripathi, R. D. (2018). Ganga water pollution: A potential health threat to inhabitants of Ganga basin. Environment International, 117, 327–338.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Farooquee, N. A., Budal, T. K., & Maikhuri, R. K. (2008). Environmental and socio-cultural impacts of river rafting and camping on Ganga in Uttarakhand Himalaya. Current Science, 94, 5–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horton, R. K. (1965). An index number system for rating water quality. Journal-Water Pollution Control Federation, 37, 300–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • https://www.haridwartourism.in/Festivals_In_Haridwar.html

  • https://simplewater.squarespace.com/simplewater-blog/tag/alkalinity

  • Imen, S., Chang, N. B., Yang, Y. J., & Golchubian, A. (2018). Developing a Model-Based Drinking Water Decision Support System Featuring Remote Sensing and Fast Learning Techniques. IEEE Systems Journal, 12, 1358–1368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jalal, D.; Ezzedine, T. Toward a smart real time monitoring system for drinking water based on machine learning. In Proceedings of The 27th International Conference on Software, Telecommunications and Computer Networks (SoftCOM 2019), Split, Croatia, 19–21 September 2019; pp. 1–5.

  • Li, Y., Wang, X., Zhao, Z., Han, S., & Liu, Z. (2020). Lagoon water quality monitoring based on digital image analysis and machine learning estimators. Water Research, 172, 115471.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, J. Zhang, Y. Qian, X. Modeling chlorophyll-a in Taihu Lake with machine learning models. In Proceedings of The 3rd International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedical Engineering (iCBBE 2009), Beijing, China, 11–13 June 2009; pp. 1–6.

  • Maji, K. J., & Chaudhary, R. (2019). Principal Component Analysis for Water Quality Assessment of the Ganga River in Uttar Pradesh India. Water Resources, 46, 789–806.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matta, G., Nayak, A., Kumar, A., & Kumar, P. (2020). Water quality assessment using nsfwqi, oip and multivariate techniques of ganga river system, Uttarakhand, India. Applied Water Science, 10(9), 1–12.

  • Namrata, S. (2010). Physicochemical properties of polluted water of river Ganga at Varanasi, International Journal of. Energy and Environment, 1(5), 823–832.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen, P. T., Ha, D. H., Avand, M., Jaafari, A., Nguyen, H. D., Al-Ansari, N., Van Phong, T., Sharma, R., Kumar, R., Le, H. V., Ho, L. S., Prakash, I., & Pham, B. T. (2020). Soft Computing Ensemble Models Based on Logistic Regression for Groundwater Potential Mapping. Applied Sciences, 10, 2469.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pandey, J., Pandey, U., & Singh, A. V. (2014). Impact of changing atmospheric deposition chemistry on carbon and nutrient loading to Ganga River: Integrating land–atmosphere–water components to uncover cross domain carbon linkages. Biogeochemistry, 119, 179–198.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pang, Z., Jia, K., Feng, J. A water environment security monitoring algorithm based on intelligent video surveillance. In Proceedings of the 2014 Tenth International Conference on Intelligent Information Hiding and Multimedia Signal Processing (IIH-MSP 2014), Kitakyushu, Japan, 27–29 August 2014; pp. 191–1050

  • Ragi, N.M., Holla, R., Manju, G. Predicting Water Quality Parameters Using Machine Learning. In Proceedings of the 4th IEEE International Conference on Recent Trends on Electronics, Information & Communication Technology (RTEICT-2019), Bengaluru, India, 17–18 May 2019; pp. 1109–1112.

  • Ramakrishniah, C. R., Sadashivaiah, C., & Ranganna, G. (2009). Assessment of water quality index for the groundwater in Tumkur Taluk. E-J Chem, 6(2), 523–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rao, C. S., Rao, B. S., Hariharan, A., & Bharathi, N. M. (2010). Determination of water quality index of some areas in Guntur district Andhra Pradesh. Int J Appl Bio Pharm Tech I, 1, 79–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reddy, B. S., & Parameshwar, K. S. (2016). Water quality studies of Saralasagar reservoir with reference to physico–chemical parameters. Indian Journal of Science and Technology., 9, 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, C., Jindal, R., Singh, U. B., et al. (2018). Assessment of water quality of river Sutlej, Punjab (India). Sustainable Water Resources Management, 4, 809–822. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40899-017-0173-9.

  • Sharma, R., Kumar, R., Satapathy, S. C., Al-Ansari, N., Singh, K. K., Mahapatra, R. P., Agarwal, A. K., Le, H. V., & Pham, B. T. (2020). Analysis of Water Pollution Using Different Physicochemical Parameters: A Study of Yamuna River. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 8, 581591. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2020.581591

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, R., Kumar, R., Sharma, D. K., Son, L. H., Priyadarshini, I., Pham, B. T., Bui, D. T., & Rai, S. (2019). Inferring air pollution from air quality index by different geographical areas: case study in India. Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health, 12, 1347–1357.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, S., Roy, A., & Agrawal, M. (2016). Spatial variations in water quality of river Ganga with respect to land uses in Varanasi. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 23(21), 21872–21882. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-7411-9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, U., & Dutta, V. (2020). Establishing environmental flows for intermittent tropical rivers: Why hydrological methods are not adequate? International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 17, 2949–2966.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shrivastava, R. K., Sinha, A. K., Pande, D. P., Singh, K. P., & Chandra, H. (1996). Water quality of River Ganga at Phaphamau (Allahabad):effect of mass bathing during Mahakumbh. Environ ToxicoWater Qlty, 11(1), 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prabhakar Shukla, (2014), Assessment of pollution load on river Ganga from Haridwar to Garhmukteshwar, Munich, GRIN Verlag, https://www.grin.com/document/284637.

  • Shukla, A. K., Ojha, C. S. P., Mijic, A., Buytaert, W., Pathak, S., Garg, R. D., & Shukla, S. (2018). Population growth, land use and land cover transformations, and water quality nexus in the Upper Ganga River basin. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 22, 4745–4770. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-4745-2018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siddiqui, E., & Pandey, J. (2019). Assessment of heavy metal pollution in water and surface sediment and evaluation of ecological risks associated with sediment contamination in the Ganga River: A basin-scale study. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26, 10926–10940.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, K. P., Malik, A., Mohan, D., & Sinha, S. (2004). Multivariate statistical techniques for the evaluation of spatial and temporal variations in water quality of Gomti River (India)—a case study. Water Research, 38(18), 3980–3992.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Theodoropoulos, C., Papadaki, C., Vardakas, L., Dimitriou, E., Kalogianni, E., & Skoulikidis, N. (2019). Conceptualization and pilot application of a model-based environmental flow assessment adapted for intermittent rivers. Aquatic Sciences, 81, 10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trombadore, O., Nandi, I., & Shah, K. (2020). Effective data convergence, mapping, and pollution categorization of ghats at Ganga River Front in Varanasi. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27, 15912–15924. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-06526-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tyagi, S., Sharma, B., Singh, P., & Dobhal, R. (2013). Water quality assessment in terms of water quality index. Am J Water Resour, 1(3), 34–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UEPPCB 2017.

  • Venkatesharaju, K., Ravikumar, P., Somashekhar, R. K., & Prakash, K. L. (2010). Physico-chemical and bacteriological investigation on the river Cauvery of Kollegal stretch in Karnataka. Kathmandu University. J Sci Eng Tech, 6(1), 10–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yan, C. A., Zhang, W., Zhang, Z., Liu, Y., Deng, C., & Nie, N. (2015). Assessment of Water Quality and Identification of Polluted Risky Regions Based on Field Observations & GIS in the Honghe River Watershed. China. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0119130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yan, H., Liu, Y., Han, X., Shi, Ya. An evaluation model of water quality based on DSA-ELM method. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Optical Communications and Networks (ICOCN2017), Wuzhen, China, 7–10; pp. 1–3

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rohit Sharma.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sharma, N., Sharma, R. Real-time monitoring of physicochemical parameters in water using big data and smart IoT sensors. Environ Dev Sustain (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02142-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02142-8

Keywords

Navigation