Abstract
Over the past four decades, the more developed countries have experienced a marked decline in the marriage rates of both men and women. The reasons for the decline remain a debated issue. Three explanations predict that the decline in marriage is a period effect, while two predict that it is a birth cohort effect. To determine whether the decline is a period or a cohort effect, this study performed an age–period–cohort analysis. Using data from Israel, our results show that both cohort replacement and period factors were important. Until 1990–1994 the decline in marriage was a period effect, whereas after 1990–1994 the decline was a cohort effect. We conclude with a discussion of the implications of our results for the three major explanations of the decline in marriage.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ahn, N., & Mirah, P. (2001). Job bust, baby bust? Evidence from Spain. Journal of Population Economics, 14(3), 505–521.
Allison, P. D. (2010). Survival analysis using the SAS ® system: A practical guide (2nd ed.). Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.
Andersen, R., & Fetner, T. (2008). Cohort differences in tolerance of homosexuality: Attitudinal change in Canada and the United States, 1981–2000. Public Opinion Quarterly, 72(2), 311–330.
Bachrach, C., Hindin, M. J., & Thomson, E. (2000). The changing shape of ties that bind: An overview and synthesis. In L. J. Waite (Ed.), The ties that bind: Perspectives on marriage and cohabitation (pp. 3–16). New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
Baloush-Kleinman, V., & Sharlin, S. A. (2004). Social, economic, and attitudinal characteristics of cohabitation in Israel. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 25(22), 255–269.
Becker, G. (1991). A treatise on the family. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Ben-Moshe, E. (1989). Marriage squeeze and marriage patterns in Israel. In U. O. Schmelz & S. Dellapergola (Eds.), Papers in Jewish demography 1985 (pp. 87–95). Jerusalem: The Institute of Contemporary Jewry, Hebrew University.
Billari, F., Liefbroer, A. C., & Philipov, D. (2006). The postponement of childbearing in Europe: Driving forces and implications. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research, 4, 1–17.
Blossfeld, H.-P., & Jaenichen, U. (1992). Educational expansion and changes in women’s entry into marriage and motherhood in the Federal Republic of Germany. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 54(2), 302–315.
Bracher, M., & Santow, G. (1998). Economic independence and union formation in Sweden. Population Studies, 52(3), 275–294.
Brewster, K., & Padavic, I. (2000). Change in gender ideology, 1977–1996: The contributions of intracohort change and population turnover. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62(2), 477–487.
Brooks, C., & Bolzendahl, C. (2004). The transformation of US gender role attitudes: Cohort replacement, socio-structural change, and ideological learning. Social Science Research, 33, 106–133.
Bukodi, E. (2012). The relationship between work history and partnership formation in cohorts of British men born in 1958 and 1970. Population Studies, 66(2), 123–145.
Bumpass, L. L., & Lu, H.-H. (2000). Trends in cohabitation and implications for children’s family contexts in the United States. Population Studies, 54(1), 29–41.
Bumpass, L. L., & Sweet, J. A. (1989). National estimates of cohabitation. Demography, 26(4), 615–625.
Bumpass, L. L., Sweet, J. A., & Cherlin, A. (1991). The role of cohabitation in declining rates of marriage. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 53(4), 913–927.
Bystrov, E. (2012). The second demographic transition in Israel: One for all? Demographic Research, 21, 261–298.
Choe, M. K., Bumpass, L. L., Tsuya, O., & Rindfuss, R. R. (2014). Nontraditional family-related attitudes in Japan: Macro and micro determinants. Population and Development Review, 40(2), 241–271.
Clarkberg, M., Stolzenberg, R. M., & Waite, L. J. (1995). Attitudes, values, and entrance into cohabitational versus marital unions. Social Forces, 74(22), 609–632.
Cooney, T. M., & Hogan, D. P. (1991). Marriage in an institutionalized life course: First marriage among American men in the Twentieth Century. Journal of Marriage and Family, 53, 178–190.
Cotter, D., Hermsen, J. M., & Vanneman, R. (2011). The end of the gender revolution? Gender role attitudes from 1977 to 2008. American Journal of Sociology, 117(1), 259–289.
Easterlin, R. (1978). What will 1984 be like? Socioeconomic implications of recent twists in age structure. Demography, 15(4), 397–432.
Ekert-Jaffe, O., & Solaz, A. (2001). Unemployment, marriage, and cohabitation in France. Journal of Socio-Economics, 30, 75–98.
Ermisch, J. (1979). The relevance of the ‘Easterlin Hypothesis’ and the ‘New Home Economics’ to fertility movements in Great Britain. Population Studies, 33(1), 39–58.
European Social Survey. (2010). Round 5. Data file edition 3.0. Norwegian Social Science Data Services, Norway.
Friedlander, D., & Feldmann, C. (1993). The modern shift to below-replacement fertility: Has Israel’s population joined the process? Population Studies, 47(2), 295–306.
Goldin, C. (2004). From the valley to the summit: The quiet revolution that transformed women’s work. NBER Working paper No. 10335.
Goldman, N., Westoff, C. F., & Hammerslough, C. (1984). Demography of the marriage market in the United States. Population Index, 50, 5–25.
Harding, D. J., & Jencks, C. (2003). Changing attitudes toward premarital sex: Cohort, period, and aging effects. Public Opinion Quarterly, 67(2), 211–226.
Haskey, J. (2001). Cohabitation in Great Britain: Past, present and future. Trends and attitudes. Population Trends, 103, 3–25.
Heckman, J., & Robb, R. (1985). Using longitudinal data to estimate age, period, and cohort effects in earnings equations. In W. M. Mason & S. E. Fienberg (Eds.), Cohort analysis in social research (pp. 137–150). New York: Springer.
Hobcraft, J., Menken, J., & Preston, S. (1982). Age, period, and cohort effects in demography: A review. Population Index, 48(1), 4–43.
Hoem, J. M., & Kreyenfeld, M. (2006). Anticipatory analysis and its alternatives in life-course research. Part 1: The role of education in the study of first childbearing. Demographic Research, 15, 461–484.
Inglehart, R. (1985). Aggregate stability and individual-level flux in mass belief systems: The level of analysis paradox. American Political Science Review, 79(1), 97–116.
Kalmijn, M. (2007). Explaining cross-national differences in marriage, cohabitation, and divorce in Europe, 1990–2000. Population Studies, 61(3), 243–263.
Kalmijn, M. (2011). The influence of men’s income and employment on marriage and cohabitation: Testing Oppenheimer’s theory in Europe. European Journal of Population, 27, 269–293.
Kalmijn, M., & Luijkx, R. (2005). Has the reciprocal relationship between employment and marriage changed for men? An analysis of the life histories of men born in the Netherlands between 1930 and 1970. Population Studies, 59(2), 211–231.
Kravdal, Ø. (1999). Does marriage require a stronger economic underpinning than informal cohabitation? Population Studies, 53(1), 63–80.
Leridon, H., & Villeneuve-Gokalp, C. (1988). Les nouveaux couples: Nombre, caractéristiques et attitudes. Population, 43(2), 331–374.
Lesthaeghe, R., & Neidert, L. (2006). The second demographic transition in the United States: Exception or textbook example. Population and Development Review, 32(4), 669–698.
Lesthaeghe, R., & Surkyn, J. (1988). Cultural dynamics and economic theories of fertility change. Population and Development Review, 14(1), 1–45.
Lesthaeghe, R., & van de Kaa, D. J. (1986). Twee demografische transities? In R. Lesthaeghe & J. Van de Kaa (Eds.), Groei of Krimp, book volume of Mens en Maatschappij (pp. 9–24). Deventer: Van Loghum-Slaterus.
Liefbroer, A. C. (2009). Changes in family size intentions across young adulthood: A life-course perspective. European Journal of Population, 25(4), 363–386.
Liefbroer, A. C., & Corijn, M. (1999). Who, what, where, and when? Specifying the impact of educational attainment and labour force participation on family formation. European Journal of Population, 15(1), 45–76.
Lloyd, K. M., & South, S. J. (1996). Contextual influences on young men’s transition to first marriage. Social Forces, 74(3), 1097–1119.
Macunovich, D. J. (2012). Relative cohort size, relative income, and married women’s labor force participation: United States, 1968–2010. Population and Development Review, 38(4), 631–648.
Ní Bhrolcháin, M. (1992). Period paramount? A critique of the cohort approach to fertility. Population and Development Review, 18(4), 599–629.
Noordhuizen, S., de Graaf, P., & Sieben, I. (2010). The public acceptance of voluntary childlessness in the Netherlands: From 20 to 90 per cent in 30 years. Social Indicators Research, 99(1), 163–181.
O’Brien, R. M. (2000). Age period cohort characteristic models. Social Science Research, 29(1), 123–139.
Okun, B. S. (2013). Fertility and marriage behavior in Israel: Diversity, change, and stability. Demographic Research, 28, 457–504.
Oppenheimer, V. K. (1988). A theory of marriage timing. American Journal of Sociology, 94(3), 563–591.
Oppenheimer, V. K. (1994). Women’s rising employment and the future of the family in industrial societies. Population and Development Review, 20(2), 293–342.
Oppenheimer, V. K. (2003). Cohabiting and marriage during young men’s career-development process. Demography, 40(1), 127–149.
Oppenheimer, V. K., Kalmijn, M., & Lim, N. (1997). Men’s career development and marriage timing during a period of rising inequality. Demography, 34(3), 311–330.
Oppenheimer, V. K., & Lew, V. (1995). American marriage formation in the 1980s: How important was women’s economic independence? In K. O. Mason & A.-M. Jensen (Eds.), Gender and family change in industrialized countries (pp. 105–138). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Perelli-Harris, B., Sigle-Rushton, W., Kreyenfeld, M., Lappegård, T., Keizer, R., & Berghammer, C. (2010). The educational gradient of childbearing within cohabitation. Population and Development Review, 36(4), 775–801.
Raftery, A. E., Lewis, S. M., & Aghajanian, A. (1995). Demand or ideation? Evidence from the Iranian marital fertility decline. Demography, 32(2), 159–182.
Raymo, J. M. (2003). Educational attainment and the transition to first marriage among Japanese women. Demography, 40(1), 83–103.
Raz-Yurovich, L. (2010). Men’s and women’s economic activity and first marriage: Jews in Israel, 1987–1995. Demographic Research, 22, 933–964.
Raz-Yurovich, L. (2012). Economic determinants of divorce among dual-earner couples: Jews in Israel. European Journal of Population, 28, 177–203.
Rodgers, W. L., & Thornton, A. (1985). Changing patterns of first marriage in the United States. Demography, 22(2), 265–279.
Ryder, N. B. (1965). The cohort as a concept in the study of social change. American Sociological Review, 30(6), 843–861.
Santow, G., & Bracher, M. (1994). Change and continuity in the formation of first marital unions in Australia. Population Studies, 48(3), 475–496.
Sassler, S., & Goldscheider, F. K. (2004). Revisiting Jane Austen’s theory of marriage timing: Changes in union formation among American men in the late 20th century. Journal of Family Issues, 25(2), 139–166.
Sassler, S., & Schoen, R. (1999). The effect of attitudes and economic activity on marriage. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61(1), 147–159.
Schellekens, J. (2017). The marriage boom and marriage bust in the United States: An age-period-cohort analysis. Population Studies, 71(1), 65–82.
Schellekens, J., & Gliksberg, D. (2013). Inflation and marriage in Israel. Journal of Family History, 38, 78–93.
Scherbov, S., & van Vianen, H. (2001). Marriage and fertility in Russia of women born between 1900 and 1960: A cohort analysis. European Journal of Population, 17, 281–294.
Scott, J. (1998). Changing attitudes to sexual morality: A cross-national comparison. Sociology, 32(4), 815–845.
Singer, J. D., & Willett, J. B. (2003). Applied longitudinal data analysis: Modeling change and event occurrence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Smith, H. L., Mason, W. M., & Fienberg, S. E. (1982). Estimable functions of age, period, and cohort effects: More chimeras of the age-period-cohort accounting framework: Comment on Rodgers. American Sociological Review, 47(6), 787–793.
State of Israel. (1960–2014). Statistical abstract of Israel (Vols. 11–65).
State of Israel. (2012). Household and families: Demographic characteristics 2009–2010. Publication number 1490.
Sweeney, M. M. (2002). Two decades of family change: The shifting economic foundations of marriage. American Sociological Review, 67(1), 132–147.
Thornton, A. (1985). Changing attitudes toward separation and divorce: Causes and consequences. American Journal of Sociology, 90(4), 856–872.
Thornton, A., Axinn, W. G., & Teachman, J. D. (1995). The influence of school enrollment and accumulation on cohabitation and marriage in early adulthood. American Sociological Review, 60(5), 762–774.
Treas, J. (2002). How cohorts, education, and ideology shaped a new sexual revolution on American attitudes toward nonmarital sex, 1972–1998. Sociological Perspectives, 45(3), 267–283.
Trovato, F. (1988). A macrosociological analysis of change in the marriage rate: Canadian women, 1921–25 to 1981–85. Journal of Marriage and Family, 50(2), 507–521.
Van de Kaa, D. J. (1987). Europe’s second demographic transition. Population Bulletin, 42, 1–59.
Wilson, J. A., Zozula, C., & Gove, W. R. (2011). Age, period, cohort and educational attainment: The importance of considering gender. Social Science Research, 40, 136–149.
Wood, R. G. (1995). Marriage rates and marriageable men: A test of the Wilson hypothesis. Journal of Human Resources, 30(1), 163–193.
Xie, Y., Raymo, J. M., Goyette, K., & Thornton, A. (2003). Economic potential and entry into marriage and cohabitation. Demography, 40(2), 351–367.
Yang, Y. (2008). Social inequalities in happiness in the United States, 1972 to 2004: An age-period-cohort analysis. American Sociological Review, 73(2), 204–226.
Yang, Y., & Land, K. C. (2006). A mixed models approach to the age-period-cohort analysis of repeated cross-section surveys, with an application to data on trends in verbal test scores. Sociological Methodology, 36, 75–97.
Zabel, C. (2009). Do imputed education histories provide satisfactory results in fertility analysis in the Western German context? Demographic Research, 21(6), 135–176.
Acknowledgements
The research for this paper was supported by a grant from the National Insurance Institute of Israel. Earlier versions were presented at a colloquium at the Vienna Institute of Demography, August 2012, and at the Annual Meeting of the Population Association of America, New Orleans, April 2013. We would like to thank three anonymous reviewers and the editors for their comments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schellekens, J., Gliksberg, D. The Decline in Marriage in Israel, 1960–2007: Period or Cohort Effect?. Eur J Population 34, 119–142 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-017-9457-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-017-9457-x