Skip to main content
Log in

Canola genotypes differ in potassium efficiency during vegetative growth

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There is no knowledge about the differential capacity of canola genotypes to take up potassium (K) and produce dry matter under conditions of low soil K availability. Hence, 84 canola genotypes were screened for K efficiency in the glasshouse. Plants were grown in sealed pots containing K-responsive, sandy soil without or with K added. Twelve genotypes were selected for advanced screening in the glasshouse in a different K-responsive soil. Genotypes with a mean K efficiency ratio (the ratio of shoot dry weight at deficient and adequate K supply) greater than one standard error above or below the median genotype value were classified as K-efficient or K-inefficient, respectively. There were significant differences between genotypes in the K efficiency ratio in both screening experiments, indicating that genotypes responded differently to K availability. In the initial screening experiment, 19 genotypes were rated as K-efficient and nine genotypes rated as K-inefficient based on the K efficiency ratio. In the advanced screening experiment with 12 genotypes, three genotypes were rated as K-efficient and two as K-inefficient. Genotypes Wesbarker and Rainbow were K-efficient and Genkai K-inefficient in both experiments. Correlation of the K efficiency ratio with (i) shoot K content in the initial and advanced screening and (ii) shoot K concentration in the advanced screening, indicates that the observed differences in K efficiency were due to genotypic differences in both the uptake and the utilization of K. K-efficient genotypes have a potential to improve canola yields on soils with low K availability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson WK, French RJ, Seymour M (1992) Yield responses of wheat and other crops to agronomic practices on duplex soils compared with other soils in Western Australia. Aust J Exp Agric 32:963–970

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brennan RF, Bolland MDA (2006) Soil and tissue tests to predict the potassium requirements of canola in south-western Australia. Aust J Exp Agric 46:675–679

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brennan RF, Bolland MDA, Bowden JW (2004) Potassium deficiency, and molybdenum deficiency and aluminium toxicity due to soil acidification, have become problems for cropping sandy soils in south-western Australia. Aust J Exp Agric 44:1031–1039

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen JJ, Gabelman WH (1995) Isolation of tomato strains varying in potassium acquisition using a sand-zeolite culture system. Plant Soil 176:65–70

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Colwell JD (1963) The estimation of the phosphorus fertilizer requirements of wheat in southern New South Wales by soil analysis. Aust J Exp Agric Ani Husb 3:190–197

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Colwell JD, Esdail RJ (1968) The calibration, interpretation, and evaluation of tests for the phosphorus fertilizer requirements of wheat in northern New South Wales. Aust J Soil Res 6:105–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Damon PM, Rengel Z (2004) Genotypic variation in potassium efficiency of wheat. In: R Horne, N Morgan, W Parker, K Regan, M Harries and A Douglas (eds) Agribusiness crop updates 2004: Cereals. 18–19 February 2004, Perth, Western Australia, pp 47–48. http://www.agric.wa gov.au Cited January 2007

  • Edwards N (1997) Potassium fertilizer improves wheat yield and grain quality on duplex soils. In: Wong MTF, Pal Y, Edwards N (eds) Proceedings of the first workshop on potassium in Australian agriculture, UWA Press, Perth, pp 69–75

  • El Bassam N (1998) A concept for selection of ‘low input’ wheat varieties. Euphytica 100:95–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GenStat 8 Committee (2005) GenStat Reference Manual. VSN International, Oxford, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerloff GC (1987) Intact-plant screening for tolerance of nutrient deficiency stress. Plant Soil 99:3–16

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Glass ADM, Perley JE (1980) Varietal differences in potassium uptake by barley Hordeum vulgare. Plant Physiol 65:160–164

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Grami B, La Croix LJ (1977) Cultivar variation in total nitrogen uptake in rape. Can J Plant Sci 57:619–624

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Guoping Z, Jingxing C, Tirore A (1999) Genotypic variation for potassium uptake and utilization efficiency in wheat. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 54:41–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson CM, Ulrich A (1959) Analytical methods for use in plant analysis. Californian Agricultural Experimental Station. Bulletin no. 766

  • Leach BJ (1981) Potassium deficiency with continuous cropping of wheat on sandplain soils. Our Land 13:11–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Northcote KH (1971) A factual key for the recognition of Australian soils. Rellim, Glenside, South Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Oilseeds WA (2006) WA Canola Production Benchmarks 2006. http://www.australianoilseeds.com/__data/page/311/Canola_Benchmarks_for_WA_2006.pdf. Cited 8 June 2006

  • Pal Y, Gilkes RJ, Wong MTF (2001) Soil factors affecting the availability of potassium to plants for Western Australian soils: a glasshouse study. Aust J Soil Res 39:611–625

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen P, Petterson S (1980) Varietal variation in uptake and utilization of potassium (rubidium) in high-salt seedlings of barley. Physiol Plant 48:411–415

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rayment GE, Higginson FR (1992) Australian laboratory handbook of soil and water chemical methods. Inkata Press, Melbourne, Vic

    Google Scholar 

  • Rengel Z, Graham RD (1995) Wheat genotypes differ in Zn efficiency when grown in chelate-buffered nutrient solution. I. Growth. Plant Soil 176:307–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sale PWG, Campbell LC (1987) Differential response to K deficiency among soybean cultivars. Plant Soil 104:183–190

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sattelmacher B, Horst W, Becker HC (1994) Factors that contribute to genetic variation for nutrient efficiency of crop plants. Zeit für Pflanz und Bodenk 157:215–224

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shea PE, Gerloff GC, Gabelman WH (1968) Differing efficiencies of potassium utilization in strains of snapbeans, Phaseolus vulgaris L. Plant Soil 28:337–346

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Svečnjak Z, Rengel Z (2006) Canola cultivars differ in nitrogen utilization efficiency at vegetative stage. Field Crops Res 97:221–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tennant D, Scholz JD, Purdie B (1992) Physical and chemical characteristics of duplex soils and their distribution in the south-west of Western Australia. Aust J Exp Agric 32:827–843

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Walkey A, Black IA (1934) An examination of the Degtjareffe method for determining soil organic matter and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci 37:29–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodend JJ, Glass ADM (1993) Genotype–environment interaction and correlation between vegetative and grain production measures of potassium use-efficiency in wheat (T. aestivum L.) grown under potassium stress. Plant Soil 151:39–44

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yang XE, Liu JX, Wang WM, Ye ZQ, Luo AC (2004) Potassium internal use efficiency relative to growth vigor, potassium distribution and carbohydrate allocation in rice genotypes. J Plant Nut 27:837–852

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yau SK, Thurling N (1987) Variation in nitrogen response among spring rape (Brassica napus) cultivars and its relationship to nitrogen uptake and utilization. Field Crops Res 16:139–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Mr M. Sanders and Prof. W. Cowling, Canola Breeders WA; Mr K. Murray, Australian Temperate Field Crops Collection; Mr T. Trent and Mr P. Carmody, Department of Agriculture WA; and Dr P. Si, The University of Western Australia for providing the seed used in this experiment. This research was funded by the Grains Research and Development Corporation, Australia.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. M. Damon.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Damon, P.M., Osborne, L.D. & Rengel, Z. Canola genotypes differ in potassium efficiency during vegetative growth. Euphytica 156, 387–397 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-007-9388-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-007-9388-4

Keywords

Navigation