Abstract
Reconfigurable Manufacturing System (RMS) is a new manufacturing systems paradigm that aims at achieving cost-effective and rapid system changes, as needed and when needed, by incorporating principles of modularity, integrability, flexibility, scalability, convertibility, and diagnosability. RMS promises customized flexibility on demand in a short time, while Flexible Manufacturing Systems (FMSs) provides generalized flexibility designed for the anticipated variations and built-in a priori. The characteristics of the two paradigms are outlined and compared. The concept of manufacturing system life cycle is presented. The main types of flexibility in manufacturing systems are discussed and contrasted with the various reconfiguration aspects including hard (physical) and soft (logical) reconfiguration. The types of changeability and transformability of manufacturing systems, their components as well as factories, are presented along with their enablers and compared with flexibility and reconfigurability. The importance of having harmonized human-machine manufacturing systems is highlighted and the role of people in the various manufacturing paradigms and how this varies in pursuit of productivity are illustrated. Finally, the industrial and research challenges presented by these manufacturing paradigms are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amico M, Asl F, Pasek Z, Perrone G (2003) Real options: an application to rms investment evaluation, CIRP 2nd Conference on Reconfigurable Manufacturing, Ann Arbor MI, USA
Beach R, Muhlemann AP, Price DHR, Paterson A, Sharp JA (2000) A review of manufacturing flexibility. Eur J Oper Res 122:41–57
Browne J, Dubois D, Rathmill K, Sethi SP, Stecke KE (1984) Classification of flexible manufacturing systems. FMS Mag 2:114–117
Buzacott JA, Kahyaoglu Y (2000) Flexibility and robustness in manufacturing systems. Int J Manuf Technol Manage 2:546–558
Cochran DS, Arinez FJ, Duda JW, Linck J (2001, 2002) A decomposition approach for manufacturing system design. J Manuf Syst 20(6):371–389
Correa HL (1994) Linking flexibility, uncertainty and variability in manufacturing systems: Managing un-planned change in the automotive industry, Avebury, Aldershot, Brookfield, USA
D’Souza DE, Williams FP (2000) Toward a taxonomy of manufacturing flexibility dimension. J Oper Res Manage 18:577–593
Deif AM, ElMaraghy WH (2006) Investigating optimal capacity scalability scheduling in reconfigurable manufacturing systems. Int J Adv Manuf Technol Paper Number 3320, (in press).
ElMaraghy HA (May 2005) Flexible and reconfigurable manufacturing systems. Paradigms of manufacturing—a panel discussion, 3rd Conference on Reconfigurable Manufacturing, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
ElMaraghy HA (2000) Flexible Manufacturing systems 91–512 class notes, industrial and manufacturing systems engineering department, University of Windsor, Ontario, Canada.
ElMaraghy HA, Kuzgunkaya O, Urbanic J (2005) Manufacturing system configurations complexity. 55th CIRP Ann 54(1):445–450
Fujii S, Morita H, Kakino Y, Ihara Y, Takata Y, Murakami D, Miki T, Tatsuta Y (2000) Highly productive and reconfigurable manufacturing system. Proc Pacific Conf Manuf 2:970–980
Hedrick B, Urbanic RJ, ElMaraghy HA (May 2004) Multi-tasking machine tools and their impact on process planning. CIRP 2004 International Design Conference, Cairo, Egypt
Hu SJ (May 2005) Paradigms of manufacturing—a panel discussion, 3rd Conference on Reconfigurable Manufacturing, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
Hyatt GA (May 2005) FMS vs. RMS. Paradigms of manufacturing–a panel discussion, 3rd Conference on Reconfigurable Manufacturing, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
Kim Y-S (1999) A system complexity approach for the integration of product development and production system design, M.Sc. at MIT, USA
Koren Y (May 2005) What are the differences between FMS & RMS. Paradigms of manufacturing—a panel discussion, 3rd Conference on Reconfigurable Manufacturing, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
Koren Y, Heisel U, Jovane F, Moriwaki T, Pritschow G, Ulsoy G, Van Brussel H (1999) Reconfigurable manufacturing systems. CIRP Ann 48(2):527–540
Koren Y, Hu J, (1998) Weber timpact of manufacturing system configuration on performance. CIRP Ann 1:689–698
Kota S, Koren Y (August 31, 1999) Reconfigurable machine tool. US Patent 5943750, issued
Kuzgunkaya O, ElMaraghy HA (July 2005) Entropy based metric for assessing complexity of manufacturing systems configurations. Int J Flexible Manuf Syst Paper Number: FLEX214–05 (submitted.)
Landers R, Min BK, Koren Y (2001) Reconfigurable machine tools. CIRP Ann 49(1):269–274
Mandelbaum M (1978) Flexibility in decision making: an exploration and unification. Ph.D. Thesis, Dept. of Industrial Engineering, University of Toronto, Canada
Mehrabi MG, Ulsoy AG, Koren Y (2000) Reconfigurable manufacturing systems: key to future manufacturing. J Intell Manuf 11:403–419
Nada O, ElMaraghy HA, ElMaraghy WH (16–19 July 2006) A quality based assessment of manufacturing ystem design alternatives. 16th CIRP International Design Seminar, Kananaskis, Alberta, Canada, Paper No. 10097
Next generation manufacturing–a framework for action. Agility Forum Report, NGM Project Office, Bethlehem, PA, 1997
(1998) Visionary manufacturing—challenges for 2020. NRC (U.S.) Report, National Academy Press
Sethi AK, Sethi SP (1990) Flexibility in manufacturing, a survey. Int J Flexible Manuf Syst 2:289–328
Shabaka A, ElMaraghy H (2005) Matching products processing requirements and machine structure capabilities in RMS. First International Conference on Changeable, Agile, Reconfigurable and Virtual Production (CARV 2005), 22–23 September 2005, Technical University of Munich, Garching, Germany
Shewchuk JP, Moodie CL (1998) Definition and classification of manufacturing flexibility types and measures. Int J Flexible Manuf Syst 10:325–349
Slack N (1987) The flexibility of manufacturing system. Int J Oper Prod Manage 7(4):35–457
Son SY (2000) Design principles and methodologies for reconfigurable machining systems. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
Spicer JP (2002) A design methodology for scalable machining systems. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
Stecke KE (2005) Flexibility is the future of reconfigurability. Paradigms of Manufacturing—A Panel Discussion, 3rd Conference on Reconfigurable Manufacturing, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
Suh NP (1998) Axiomatic design theory for systems. Res Eng Des 10:189–209
Toni DE, Tonchia S (1998) Manufacturing flexibility: a literature review. Int J Prod Res 36(6):587–1617
Wiendahl HP (May 2005) Some remarks on changeability, reconfigurability and flexibility of manufacturing systems. Paradigms of Manufacturing—A Panel Discussion, 3rd Conference on Reconfigurable Manufacturing, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
Wiendahl H-P, Heger CL (August, 2003) Justifying changeability: a methodical approach to achieving cost effectiveness. In: Proceedings of the CIRP 2nd International Conference on Reconfigurable Manufacturing, Michigan
Wiendahl HP, Scholtissek P (1994) Management and control of complexity in manufacturing. Ann CIRP 43(2):533–540
Yamada R (2000) An overview of IMS-HUTOP Project. Proc Pac Conf on Manuf 2:997–1003
Yamada S, Vink P (2000) Organizational aspects of human-machine coexisting systems. Proc Pac Conf Manuf 2:981–988
Youssef AMA, ElMaraghy HA (2006) Assessment of manufacturing systems reconfiguration smoothness. Int J Ad Manuf Technol (IJAMT), Paper No. 3641, (in press)
Youssef AMA, ElMaraghy HA (2006a) Modelling and optimization of multiple-aspect RMS configurations using gas. Special Issue of International Journal of Production Research on Advances In Evolutionary Computation for Design and Manufacturing Problem, Paper No. IJPR-EC-33 (in press)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
ElMaraghy, H.A. Flexible and reconfigurable manufacturing systems paradigms. Int J Flex Manuf Syst 17, 261–276 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10696-006-9028-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10696-006-9028-7