Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Order review and release in make-to-order flow shops: analysis and design of new methods

  • Published:
Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Increased customization has strengthened the importance of make-to-order companies. The advent of lean management and the introduction of smart and flexible technologies has enabled many of these companies to create flow shop routings. Order review and release (ORR) research, which originally focused on job shops, has started paying attention to flow shops. However, the results have not provided clarity on the best ORR method for flow shops. This study aims at developing such a method by applying a modular design approach. It identifies the relevant elements of ORR methods for flow shops, combines them into new methods and evaluates them in a simulation study. The simulation results demonstrate that performance in pure flow shops can be strongly improved by applying the right combination of workload measures, load balancing, and order dispatching. Specifically, the results show that (1) classical workload measures are still as effective as novel measures that have been suggested for flow shops, (2) balancing workloads explicitly through optimization at the order release stage strongly improves performance, and (3) shortest processing time dispatching is highly effective in flow shops as it avoids starvation of stations. In-depth analyses have been executed to unravel the reasons of performance improvements. As such, the article provides clarity on the improvement potential that is available for ORR in flow shops, while the new modular methods provide a first step in exploiting this potential.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baker KR (1984) Sequencing rules and due-date assignments in a job shop. Manag Sci 30(9):1093–1104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baykasoğlu A, Göçken M (2011) A simulation based approach to analyse the effects of job release on the performance of a multi-stage job-shop with processing flexibility. Int J Prod Res 49(2):585–610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergamaschi D, Cigolini R, Perona M, Portioli A (1997) Order review and release strategies in a job shop environment: a review and a classification. Int J Prod Res 35(2):399–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caprihan R, Kumar A, Stecke KE (2006) A fuzzy dispatching strategy for due-date scheduling of FMSs with information delays. Int J Flex Manuf Syst 18:29–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cigolini R, Portioli-Staudacher A (2002) An experimental investigation on workload limiting methods within ORR policies in a job shop environment. Prod Plan Contr 13(7):602–613

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cigolini R, Perona M, Portioli A (1998) Comparison of order review and release techniques in a dynamic and uncertain job shop environment. Int J Prod Res 36(11):2931–2951

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das SR, Khumawala BM (1991) An efficient heuristic for scheduling batches of parts in a flexible flow system. Int J Flex Manuf Syst 3:121–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandes NO, Land MJ, Carmo-Silva S (2016) Aligning workload control theory and practice: lot splitting and operation overlapping issues. Int J Prod Res 54(10):2965–2975

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandes NO, Thürer M, Pinho TM, Torres P, Carmo-Silva S (2020) Workload control and optimised order release: an assessment by simulation. Int J Prod Res 58(10):3180–3193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fullerton RR, Kennedy FA, Widener SK (2014) Lean manufacturing and firm performance: the incremental contribution of lean management accounting practices. J Oper Manag 32(7–8):414–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Germs R, Riezebos J (2010) Workload balancing capability of pull systems in MTO production. Int J Prod Res 48(8):2345–2360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haeussler S, Netzer P (2019) Comparison between rule- and optimization-based workload control concepts: a simulation optimization approach. Int J Prod Res. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2019.1634297(to appear)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haeussler S, Stampfer C, Missbauer H (2020) Comparison of two optimization based order release models with fixed and variable lead times. Int J Prod Econ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107682(to appear)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henrich P, Land M, Gaalman G (2004) Exploring applicability of the workload control concept. Int J Prod Econ 90:187–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irastorza JC, Deane RH (1974) Loading and balancing methodology for job shop control. AIIE Trans 6(4):302–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krishnamurthy A, Suri R (2009) Planning and implementing POLCA: a card-based control system for high variety or custom engineered products. Prod Plan Contr 20(7):596–610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Land MJ (2006) Parameters and sensitivity in workload control. Int J Prod Econ 40:196–209

    Google Scholar 

  • Land MJ, Gaalman GJC (1996) Workload control concepts in job shops: a critical assessment. Int J Prod Econ 46–47:535–548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Land MJ, Gaalman GJC (1998) Performance of workload control concepts in job shops: improving the release method. Int J Prod Econ 56–57:347–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Land MJ, Stevenson M, Thürer M (2014) Integrating load-based order release and priority dispatching. Int J of Prod Res 52(4):1059–1073

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin JT, Chen CM (2015) Simulation optimization approach for hybrid flow shop scheduling problem in semiconductor back-end manufacturing. Simul Model Pract Theory 51:100–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin JT, Chiu CC, Chang YH (2019) Simulation-based optimization approach for simultaneous scheduling of vehicles and machines with processing time uncertainty in FMS. Flex Serv Manuf J 31(1):104–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Missbauer H (2020) Order release planning by iterative simulation and linear programming: theoretical foundation and analysis of its shortcomings. Eur J Oper Res 280(2):495–507

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Onur L, Fabrycky WJ (1987) Input/output control system for the dynamic job shop. IIE Trans 19(1):88–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oosterman B, Land M, Gaalman G (2000) The influence of shop characteristics on workload control. Int J Prod Econ 68:107–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perona M, Portioli A (1998) The impact of parameters setting in load oriented manufacturing control. Int J Prod Econ 55:133–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Portioli-Staudacher A, Tantardini M (2012) A lean-based ORR system for non-repetitive manufacturing. Int J Prod Res 50(12):3257–3273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Portioli-Staudacher A, Costa F, Thürer M (2020) The use of labour flexibility for output control in workload controlled flow shops: a simulation analysis. Int J Ind Eng Comput 11(3):429–442

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabuncuoglu I, Karapinar HY (1999) Analysis of order review/release problems in production systems. Int J Prod Econ 62:259–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shimoyashiro S, Isoda K, Awane H (1984) Input scheduling and load balance control for a job shop. Int J Prod Res 22(4):597–605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Theorin A, Bengtsson K, Provost J, Lieder M, Johnsson C, Lundholm T, Lennartson B (2017) An event-driven manufacturing information system architecture for Industry 4.0. Int J Prod Res 55(5):1297–1311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thürer M, Stevenson M (2016) Card-based delivery date promising in pure flow shops with order release control. Int J Prod Res 54(22):6798–6811

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thürer M, Silva C, Stevenson M (2011) Optimising workload norms: the influence of shop floor characteristics on setting workload norms for the workload control concept. Int J Prod Res 49(4):1151–1171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thürer M, Stevenson M, Silva C, Land MJ, Fredendall LD, Melnyk SA (2014) Lean control for make-to-order companies: integrating customer enquiry management and order release. Prod Oper Manag 23(3):463–476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thürer M, Stevenson M, Protzman CW (2015a) COBACABANA (control of balance by card based navigation): an alternative to kanban in the pure flow shop? Int J Prod Econ 166:143–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thürer M, Land MJ, Stevenson M, Fredendall LD, Godinho Filho M (2015b) Concerning workload control and order release: the pre-shop pool sequencing decision. Prod Oper Manag 24(7):1179–1192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thürer M, Stevenson M, Silva C, Qu T (2017) Drum-buffer-rope and workload control in high-variety flow and job shops with bottlenecks: an assessment by simulation. Int J Prod Econ 188:116–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thürer M, Stevenson M, Renna P (2019a) Workload control in dual-resource constrained high-variety shops: an assessment by simulation. Int J Prod Res 57(3):931–947

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thürer M, Zhang H, Stevenson M, Costa F, Ma L (2019b) Worker assignment in dual resource constrained assembly job shops with worker heterogeneity: an assessment by simulation. Int J Prod Res. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2019.1677963(to appear)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thürer M, Stevenson M, Land MJ, Fredendall LD (2019c) On the combined effect of due date setting, order release, and output control: an assessment by simulation. Int J Prod Res 57(6):1741–1755

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thürer M, Ma L, Stevenson M (2020) Workload control order release in general and pure flow shops with limited buffer size induced blocking: an assessment by simulation. Int J Prod Res. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2020.1735667(to appear)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Ooijen HPG (1998) Delivery performance improvement by controlled work-order release and work-center load balancing. Int J Prod Econ 56–57:661–675

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yan H, Stevenson M, Hendry LC, Land MJ (2016) Load-oriented order release (LOOR) revisited: bringing it back to the state of the art. Prod Plan Contr 27(13):1078–1091

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zorzini M, Corti D, Pozzetti A (2008) Due date (DD) quotation and capacity planning in make-to-order companies: results from an empirical analysis. Int J Prod Econ 112:919–933

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Management, Economics and Industrial Engineering, Politecnico di Milano, Piazza Leonardo da Vinci 32, 20133, Milan, Italy

    Kaustav Kundu & Alberto Portioli-Staudacher

  2. Department of Operations, University of Groningen, PO Box 800, 9700 AV, Groningen, The Netherlands

    Martin J. Land & Jos A. C. Bokhorst

Authors
  1. Kaustav Kundu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Martin J. Land
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Alberto Portioli-Staudacher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jos A. C. Bokhorst
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alberto Portioli-Staudacher.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kundu, K., Land, M.J., Portioli-Staudacher, A. et al. Order review and release in make-to-order flow shops: analysis and design of new methods. Flex Serv Manuf J 33, 750–782 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10696-020-09392-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10696-020-09392-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation