Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Sustaining decentralized collaborative governance arrangements in Africa: a case study of land management committees in the Upper West Region, Ghana

  • Published:
GeoJournal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sustaining collaboration in decentralized land governance has become the center of attention in land discourse due to the evolving realities and diverse interest involved in hybrid land governance systems in Africa. Drawing theoretical insights from collaborative governance, this study examined the formation and sustainability of Land Management Committees under Ghana’s Land Administration Project. Using in-depth interviews and focus group discussions, the study found that facilitative traditional leadership, inclusiveness, context driven approaches and transparency and accountability sustains decentralized collaborative arrangements for land governance. Whilst the collaborative governance literature acknowledges that in some instances, strong trust may serve as a disincentive to collaboration, this study has shown that strong trust through social capital could actually serve as the foundation for sustaining collaborative systems. Also, this study has shown that it is possible to sustain collaboration when collaborative policies are situated within the cultural context of stakeholders and empower groups to abide by the principles of transparency and accountability through effective traditional leadership. We recommend that there should be regulated flexibility in the operationalization of collaborative arrangements in order to ensure that they are context dependent for their sustainability to be assured.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Source: Authors own 2020

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. ‘Drink Money’ is the local term for capital payments made by a tenant which may be equivalent to premium.

  2. Kuoro is the traditional name of the paramount chief of Tumu traditional area .

References

  • Acheson, J. (2018). Common property. The International Encyclopedia of Anthropology. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118924396.wbiea1339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acheson, J. M., Begossi, A., Berge, E., Eggertsson, T., Haller, T., Hann, C., et al. (2015). Private land and common oceans: Analysis of the development of property regimes. Current Anthropology, 56(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1086/679482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agrawal, A. (2001). Common property institutions and sustainable governance of resources. World Development, 29(10), 1649–1672. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(01)00063-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agrawal, A. (2003). Sustainable governance of common-pool resources: Context, methods, and politics. Annual Review of Anthropology, 32(1), 243–262. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.32.061002.093112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agrawal, A., & Benson, C. S. (2011). Common property theory and resource governance institutions: Strengthening explanations of multiple outcomes. Environmental Conservation, 38(2), 199–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akaateba, M. A. (2018). Urban planning practice under neo-customary land Tenure: The interface between Government Agencies and Traditional Authorities in Peri-Urban Ghana. Berlin: der Technischen Universität.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amanor, K. (2012). Land Governance in Africa: How historical context has shaped key contemporary issues relating to policy on land. Rome: International Land Coalition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ananda, J., & Proctor, W. (2013). Collaborative approaches to water management and planning: An institutional perspective. Ecological Economics, 86, 97–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.10.018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson, K. P., & Ostrom, E. (2008). Analyzing decentralized resource regimes from a polycentric perspective. Policy Sciences, 41(1), 71–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-007-9055-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum032.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2012). Stewards, mediators, and catalysts: Toward a model of collaborative leadership1. The Innovation Journal, 17(1), 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arko-Adjei, A. (2011). Adapting land administration to the institutional framework of customary tenure: The case of peri-urban Ghana. Sustainable Urban Areas, 39, 262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayitio, J. (2019). Hybrid land governance and the politics of institutional change in Ghana: Explaining divergent trajectories (Doctoral dissertation, University of Reading).

  • Bäckstrand, K. (2006). Multi-stakeholder partnerships for sustainable development: Rethinking legitimacy, accountability and effectiveness. European Environment, 16(5), 290–306. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benjaminsen, T. A., Holden, S., Lund, C., & Sjaastad, E. (2009). Formalisation of land rights: Some empirical evidence from Mali, Niger and South Africa. Land Use Policy, 26(1), 28–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2008.07.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergh, G., Foresti, M., Menocal, A. R., & Wild, L. (2012). Building governance into a post-2015 framework: Exploring transparency and accountability as an entry point. London: Overseas Development Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biitir, S. B., & Kuusaana, E. D. (2019). Customary Land Rents Administration in Ghana: Emerging Discourse on Family Lands in the Upper West Region. Survey Review. https://doi.org/10.1080/00396265.2019.1610609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biitir, S. B., & Nara, B. B. (2014). Securing land rights under the tendamba/family customary system of land tenure. Wa: The case of Wa Municipality.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biitir, S. B., & Nara, B. B. (2016). The role of Customary Land Secretariats in promoting good local land governance in Ghana. Land Use Policy, 50, 528–536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.10.024.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biitir, S. B., Nara, B. B., & Ameyaw, S. (2017). Integrating decentralized land administration systems with traditional land governance institutions in Ghana: Policy and praxis. Land Use Policy, 68, 402–414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.08.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bingham, L. B., O’Leary, R., & Carlson, C. (2014). Frame shifting: Lateral thinking for collaborative public management. In Big ideas in collaborative public management (pp. 13–26). London: Routledge.

  • Blench, R. (2006). Interim evaluation of UWADEP working paper: Background conditions in Upper West Region, Northern Ghana, 2005. Cambridge: IFAD-office of evaluation.

  • Blocher, J. (2006). Building on custom: Land tenure policy and economic development in Ghana. Yale Hum. Rts. & Dev. LJ, 9, 166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruce, J. (2014). Decentralization of land administration in Sub-Saharan Africa: Recent experiences and lessons learned. Agricultural Land Redistribution and Land Administration in Sub-Saharan Africa, 30, 55–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bugri, J. T. (2008). The dynamics of tenure security, agricultural production and environmental degradation in Africa: Evidence from stakeholders in north-east Ghana. Land Use Policy, 25(2), 271–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2007.08.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bugri, J. (2012). Sustaining customary land secretariats for improved interactive land governance in Ghana. In Presentation at the Annual World Bank Conference on Land and Poverty (Vol. 23, No. 26.04, p. 2012).

  • Byamugisha, F. F. (2013). Securing Africa’s land for shared prosperity: A program to scale up reforms and investments. Washington: The World Bank.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Byamugisha, F. F. (Ed.). (2014). Agricultural land redistribution and land administration in sub-Saharan Africa: Case studies of recent reforms. Washington: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casari, M., & Plott, C. R. (2003). Decentralized management of common property resources: Experiments with a centuries-old institution. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 51(2), 217–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2681(02)00098-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chauveau, J. P. (2006). Changes in land access and governance in West Africa: Markets, social mediations and public policies: Results of the CLAIMS research project. London: IIED.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheadle, A., Senter, S., Solomon, L., Beery, W. L., & Schwartz, P. M. (2005). A qualitative exploration of alternative strategies for building community health partnerships: Collaboration-versus issue-oriented approaches. Journal of Urban Health, 82(4), 638–652. https://doi.org/10.1093/jurban/jti120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conti, D. D. M., Guevara, A. J. D. H., Heinrichs, H., Silva, L. F. D., Quaresma, C. C., & Beté, T. D. S. (2019). Collaborative governance towards cities sustainability transition. urbe. Revista Brasileira de Gestão Urbana, 11, 1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cotula, L., Anseeuw, W., & Baldinelli, G. M. (2019). Between Promising Advances and Deepening Concerns: A Bottom-Up Review of Trends in Land Governance 2015–2018. Land, 8(7), 106. https://doi.org/10.3390/land8070106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. New York: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, B., Blackstock, K., Brown, K., & Shannon, P. (2004). Challenges in creating local agri-environmental cooperation action amongst farmers and other stakeholders. Aberdeen: The Macaulay Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, E. J., Hajjar, R., Charnley, S., Moseley, C., Wendel, K., & Jacobson, M. (2020). Community-based forestry on federal lands in the western United States: A synthesis and call for renewed research. Forest Policy and Economics, 111, 102042. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2019.102042.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Satgé, R. (2017). Decentralised land governance: Case studies and local voices from Botswana. Botswana documents: Madagascar and Mozambique.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diep, L., Archer, D., & Gueye, C. (2016). Decentralisation in West Africa: The implications for urban climate change governance. London: IIED.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doberstein, C. (2016). Designing collaborative governance decision-making in search of a ‘collaborative advantage’. Public Management Review, 18(6), 819–841. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2015.1045019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durand-Lasserve, A., Durand-Lasserve, M., & Selod, H. (2015). Land Delivery Systems in West African Cities: The Example of Bamako. Mali: The World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0433-5.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Edge, S., & Meyer, S. B. (2019). Pursuing dignified food security through novel collaborative governance initiatives: Perceived benefits, tensions and lessons learned. Social Science and Medicine, 232, 77–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.04.038.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, K., & Gerlak, A. K. (2014). Adaptation in collaborative governance regimes. Environmental Management, 54(4), 768–781. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-014-0334-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, K., Nabatchi, T., & Balogh, S. (2012). An integrative framework for collaborative governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mur011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, K., Orr, P. J., Keyes, D. L., & McKnight, K. M. (2009). Environmental conflict resolution: Evaluating performance outcomes and contributing factors. Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 27(1), 27–64. https://doi.org/10.1002/crq.247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, J. (1997). Collaborative governance in the administrative state. UCLA Law Review, 45, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghana Statistical Service. (2013). 2010 Population and Housing Census: Regional Analytical Report (Vol. 1). Accra: Ghana Statistical Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillinson, S. (2004). Why Cooperate?: A Multi-disciplinary Study of Collective Action. London: Overseas Development Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunningham, N. (2009). The new collaborative environmental governance: The localization of regulation. Journal of Law and Society, 36(1), 145–166. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6478.2009.00461.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardy, S. D., & Koontz, T. M. (2009). Rules for collaboration: Institutional analysis of group membership and levels of action in watershed partnerships. Policy Studies Journal, 37(3), 393–414. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2009.00320.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heikkila, T., & Gerlak, A. K. (2005). The formation of large-scale collaborative resource management institutions: Clarifying the roles of stakeholders, science, and institutions. Policy Studies Journal, 33(4), 583–612. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2005.00134.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huxham, C., Vangen, S., Huxham, C., & Eden, C. (2000). The challenge of collaborative governance. Public Management an International Journal of Research and Theory, 2(3), 337–358. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719030000000021.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Innes, J. E., & Booher, D. E. (2010). Planning with Complexity: An Introduction to Collaborative Rationality for Public Policy. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ishimaru, A. (2014). Rewriting the rules of engagement: Elaborating a model of district-community collaboration. Harvard Educational Review, 84(2), 188–216. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.84.2.r2007u165m8207j5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kakraba-Ambeh, M. (2008). Administration of rural lands–Customary Land Secretariats as local structures for effective rural land administration in Ghana.

  • Kansanga, M., Andersen, P., Atuoye, K., & Mason-Renton, S. (2018). Contested commons: Agricultural modernization, tenure ambiguities and intra-familial land grabbing in Ghana. Land Use Policy, 75, 215–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kansanga, M. M., Arku, G., & Luginaah, I. (2019). Powers of exclusion and counter-exclusion: The political ecology of ethno-territorial customary land boundary conflicts in Ghana. Land Use Policy, 86, 12–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.04.031.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight, R. S. (2010). Statutory recognition of customary land rights in Africa: An investigation into best practices for lawmaking and implementation. FAO Legislative Study, 105, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koontz, T. M., Steelman, T. A., Carmin, J., Korfmacher, K. S., Moseley, C., & Thomas, C. W. (2010). Collaborative Environmental Management: What Roles for Government-1. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kuba, R., & Lentz, C. (2002). Arrows and earth shrines: Towards a history of Dagara expansion in southern Burkina Faso. The Journal of African History, 43(3), 377–406. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021853702008241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuusaana, E. D., & Eledi, J. A. (2015). Customary land allocation, urbanization and land use planning in Ghana: Implications for food systems in the Wa Municipality. Land Use Policy, 48, 454–466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.06.030.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuusaana, E. D., & Gerber, N. (2015). Institutional Synergies in Customary Land Markets—Selected Case Studies of Large-Scale Land Acquisitions (LSLAs) in Ghana. Land, 4(3), 842–868. https://doi.org/10.3390/land4030842.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lai, E. R. (2011). Collaboration: A literature review. Pearson Research Report, 2.

  • Lathrop, D., & Ruma, L. (2010). Open government: Collaboration, transparency, and participation in practice. Sebastopol: O’Reilly Media Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lentz, C. (2003). Stateless societies or chiefdoms? A debate among Dagara intellectuals. Ghana’s North: Research on Culture, Religion, and Politics of Societies in Transition, 1, 129–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lentz, C., & Sturm, H. J. (2001). Of trees and earth shrines: An interdisciplinary approach to settlement histories in the West African savanna. History in Africa, 28, 139–168. https://doi.org/10.2307/3172212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liederbach, J., Fritsch, E. J., Carter, D. L., & Bannister, A. (2008). Exploring the limits of collaboration in community policing. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies and Management, 1, 1. https://doi.org/10.1108/13639510810878721.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marcaletti, F., & Riniolo, V. (2015). A participatory governance model toward the inclusion of ethnic minorities: An action research experience in Italy.

  • Marikkani, M. (2012). Managing of common property resources by gramma panchayat–A case study.

  • McManus, T., Holtzman, Y., Lazarus, H., Anderberg, J., & Jahansoozi, J. (2006). Organization-stakeholder relationships: Exploring trust and transparency. Journal of Management Development. https://doi.org/10.1108/02621710610708577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meinzen-Dick, R., DiGregorio, M., & McCarthy, N. (2004). Methods for studying collective action in rural development. Agricultural Systems, 82(3), 197–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2004.07.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morse, R. S. (2014). Developing public leaders in an age of collaborative governance. In Innovations in public leadership development (pp. 91–112). Routledge.

  • Murdock, B. S., Wiessner, C., & Sexton, K. (2005). Stakeholder participation in voluntary environmental agreements: Analysis of 10 Project XL case studies. Science, Technology and Human Values, 30(2), 223–250. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243904266104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Musavengane, R., & Simatele, D. M. (2016). Community-based natural resource management: The role of social capital in collaborative environmental management of tribal resources in KwaZulu-Natal. South Africa. Development Southern Africa, 33(6), 806–821. https://doi.org/10.1080/0376835X.2016.1231054.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Musavengane, R., Tantoh, H. B., & Simatele, D. (2019). A comparative analysis of collaborative environmental management of natural resources in Sub-Saharan Africa: A study of Cameroon and South Africa. Journal of Asian and African Studies, 54(4), 512–532. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021909618825276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Musyoka, R. (2006). Non-compliance and formalisation: Mutual accommodation in land subdivision processes in Eldoret. Kenya. International Development Planning Review, 28(2), 235–262. https://doi.org/10.3828/idpr.28.2.6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mwingyine, D. T. (2019). Emergent Land Commodification and Intergenerational Land Relations in Northwestern Ghana (Doctoral dissertation, Universitäts-und Landesbibliothek Bonn).

  • Nikolakis, W., & Hotte, N. (2020). How law shapes collaborative forest governance: A focus on indigenous peoples in Canada and India. Society & Natural Resources, 33(1), 46–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nkurunziza, E. (2006). Two states, one city?: Conflict and accommodation in land delivery in Kampala. Uganda. International Development Planning Review, 28(2), 159–180. https://doi.org/10.3828/idpr.28.2.3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nnkya, T. J. (2007). Why Planning Does Not Work. Land Use Planning and Residents’ Rights in Tanzania. African Books Collective.

  • Ntumy, E. K. B. (2014). The state and land legislation in Botswana.

  • Nyarko, J. O., & Adu-Gyamfi, O. (2012). Managing Peri-urban land Development: Building On Pro-Poor Land Management Principles. International Federation of Surveyors (FIG) Working Week.

  • Obaikol, E. (2014). Draft Final Report of the Implementation of The Land Governance Assessment Framework in Uganda.

  • Obeng, W. (2018). Integrating land administration systems in peri-urban customary areas in Ghana (Doctoral dissertation, University of Cape Town).

  • Onyebueke, V., & Ikejiofor, C. (2017). Neo-customary land delivery systems and the rise of community-mediated settlements in peri-urban Enugu, Nigeria. International Development Planning Review, 39(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.3828/idpr.2016.33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. (2003). How types of goods and property rights jointly affect collective action. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 15(3), 239–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Purdy, J. M. (2012). A framework for assessing power in collaborative governance processes. Public Administration Review, 72(3), 409–417. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02525.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reilly, T. (2001). Collaboration in action: An uncertain process. Administration in Social Work, 25(1), 53–74. https://doi.org/10.1300/J147v25n01_06.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roe, D., Nelson, F., & Sandbrook, C. (Eds.). (2009). Community management of natural resources in Africa: Impacts, experiences and future directions (No. 18). IIED.

  • Roth, A. P., & de Loë, R. C. (2017). Incorporating outcomes from collaborative processes into government decision making: A case study from low water response planning in Ontario, Canada. Ecological Economics, 132, 169–178. https://doi.org/10.1300/J147v25n01_06.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarah, A.B. (2017). Assessment of impacts of pilot interventions in customary land administration: Evidence from the Ghana Land Administration Project. 2017 World Bank Conference on Land and Poverty, 1–36. Washington DC: The World Bank.

  • Saunders, F. (2014). The promise of common pool resource theory and the reality of commons projects. International Journal of the Commons, 8(2), 1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, T. A. (2016). Is collaboration a good investment? Modeling the link between funds given to collaborative watershed councils and water quality. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 26(4), 769–786. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muw033.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seufert, P. (2013). The FAO voluntary guidelines on the responsible governance of tenure of land, fisheries and forests. Globalizations, 10(1), 181–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2013.764157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sirianni, C. (2010). Investing in democracy: Engaging citizens in collaborative governance. Brookings: Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smoke, P. (2003). Decentralisation in Africa: Goals, dimensions, myths and challenges. Public Administration and Development: The International Journal of Management Research and Practice, 23(1), 7–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stratoudakis, Y., Farrall, H., & Vasconcelos, L. (2019). Collaborative lessons towards marine sustainability: A long-term collective engagement. Sustainability Science, 14(4), 1147–1160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, A., White, D. D., & Hanemann, M. (2019). Designing collaborative governance: Insights from the drought contingency planning process for the lower Colorado River basin. Environmental Science & Policy, 91, 39–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2018.10.011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, A. M., & Perry, J. L. (2006). Collaboration processes: Inside the black box. Public Administration Review, 66, 20–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00663.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, A. M., Perry, J. L., & Miller, T. K. (2008). Linking collaboration processes and outcomes. Big ideas in collaborative public management, 97, 120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ubink, J. M., & Quan, J. F. (2008). How to combine tradition and modernity? Regulating customary land management in Ghana. Land Use Policy, 25(2), 198–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2007.06.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Economic Commission for Africa (UNECA). (2017). Addressing and mainstreaming land governance in the African peer review mechanism. Addis Ababa.

  • Vangen, S., & Huxham, C. (2003). Enacting leadership for collaborative advantage: Dilemmas of ideology and pragmatism in the activities of partnership managers. British Journal of Management, 14, S61–S76. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2003.00393.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vij, S., & Narain, V. (2016). Land, water & power: The demise of common property resources in periurban Gurgaon, India. Land Use Policy, 50, 59–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.08.030.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vodden, K. (2015). Governing sustainable coastal development: The promise and challenge of collaborative governance in Canadian coastal watersheds. The Canadian Geographer/Le Géographe canadien, 59(2), 167–180. https://doi.org/10.1111/cag.12135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westerink, J., Opdam, P., Van Rooij, S., & Steingröver, E. (2017). Landscape services as boundary concept in landscape governance: Building social capital in collaboration and adapting the landscape. Land Use Policy, 60, 408–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.11.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilks, I. (2002). Wa and the Wala: Islam and polity in northwestern Ghana (Vol. 63). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wily, L. A., & Hammond, D. (2001). Land security and the poor in Ghana: Is there a way forward. A Land Sector Scoping Study, DFID Ghana’s Rural Livelihoods Programme.

  • World Bank. (2003). Ghana Land Administration Project. Project Appraisal Document. Washington, D.C. (World Bank): 103.

  • World Bank. (2018). Implementation completion and results report—Ghana: Land Administration Project 2(Report No. ICR00004453). Washington, DC: The World Bank.

  • Wyatt, S., Hébert, M., Fortier, J. F., Blanchet, É. J., & Lewis, N. (2019). Strategic approaches to Indigenous engagement in natural resource management: Use of collaboration and conflict to expand negotiating space by three Indigenous nations in Quebec. Canada. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 49(4), 375–386. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfr-2018-0253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yaro, J. A. (2010). Customary tenure systems under siege: Contemporary access to land in Northern Ghana. GeoJournal, 75(2), 199–214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-009-9301-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuka, S. (2013). Myths and realities in community management of common pool resources in Malawi: Social stratification as a negative side-effect of social capital. Journal of Natural Resources Policy Research, 5(4), 227–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/19390459.2013.826466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuka, S. P. (2016). Contesting institutional engineering for decentralized natural resource governance in Malawi. SAGE Open, 6(3), 2158244016659527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the financial support of the German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD).

Funding

German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Governance and Development Management, University for Development Studies, Post Office Box TL 1350, Tamale, Ghana

    Abdul-Salam Ibrahim

  2. Department of Planning, SD Dombo University of Business and Integrated Development Studies, Wa, Upper West Region, Ghana

    Bernard Afiik Akanpabadai Akanbang

  3. Department of Political and Cultural Change, Center for Development Research (ZEF), University of Bonn, Walter-Flex-Str. 3, 53113, Bonn, Germany

    Wolfram Laube

Authors
  1. Abdul-Salam Ibrahim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Bernard Afiik Akanpabadai Akanbang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Wolfram Laube
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abdul-Salam Ibrahim.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

Not applicable.

Availability of data and material

Data available on request.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ibrahim, AS., Akanbang, B.A.A. & Laube, W. Sustaining decentralized collaborative governance arrangements in Africa: a case study of land management committees in the Upper West Region, Ghana. GeoJournal 87, 641–660 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-020-10276-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-020-10276-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation