Abstract
Mainstream research in higher education and motivation has shown the importance of intrinsic and instrumental motivation on student learning and achievement. However, the role of social motivation has been relatively neglected. This gap is especially salient in a collectivist cultural context where social factors play a critical role. Drawing on a nationally representative sample of Chinese college students (n = 67,182), this study investigated how social motivation towards (a) parents and teachers, (b) peers, and (c) the broader society are associated with deep approaches to learning including higher-order, integrative, and reflective learning. Structural equation modelling was used to analyze the data with the different types of social motivation posited as predictors of deep approaches to learning. Confirming prior research, the results showed that students with higher intrinsic and instrumental motivation were more likely to use deep approaches learning. More interestingly, students who had higher levels of social motivation directed towards parents/teachers, peers, and the broader society were also more likely to engage in deep approaches to learning. Furthermore, we also found significant mean-level differences in social motivation and deep approaches to learning for students of different genders, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, year levels, and institutional types. These findings demonstrate the importance of taking students’ diverse socio-demographic and institutional backgrounds into account. This article advocated for the importance of exploring social motivation to develop a more nuanced understanding of college students’ motivation and learning in a collectivist context.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allen, J. M., Muragishi, G. A., Smith, J. L., Thoman, D. B., & Brown, E. R. (2015). To grab and to hold: Cultivating communal goals to overcome cultural and structural barriers in first-generation college students’ science interest. Translational Issues in Psychological Science, 1(4), 331–341.
Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411.
Astin, A. W. (1993). What matters in college: Four critical years revisited. Jossey-Bass.
Biggs, J. B. (1989). Approaches to the enhancement of tertiary teaching. Higher Education Research and Development, 8, 7–25.
Biggs, J. B. (2003). Teaching for quality learning at university. Open University Press.
Chen, L., & Hao, X. (2008). A research on the educational equality of minority students in higher education institutions. University Education Science (in Chinese), 4, 102–105.
Chen, Y., Henning, M., Yielder, J., Jones, R., Wearn, A., & Weller, J. (2015). Progress testing in the medical curriculum: Students’ approaches to learning and perceived stress. BMC Medical Education, 15, 1–8.
Cheng, R. W., & Lam, S. (2013). The interaction between social goals and self-construal on achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 38(2), 136–148.
Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9, 233–255.
Cho, H. J., Levesque-Bristol, C., & Yough, M. (2021). International students’ self-determined motivation, beliefs about classroom assessment, learning strategies, and academic adjustment in higher education. Higher Education, 81(6), 1215–1235.
Crowne, D. P., & Marlowe, D. (1960). A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 24, 349–354.
Dimitrov, D. (2010). Testing for factorial invariance in the context of construct validation. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 43, 121–149.
Entwistle, N. J., & Ramsden, P. (1983). Understanding student learning. Croom Helm.
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109.
Fryer, L. (2017). (Latent) transitions to learning at university: A latent profile transition analysis of first-year Japanese students. Higher Education, 73(3), 519–537.
Fryer, L. K., & Bovee, H. N. (2016). Supporting students’ motivation for e-learning: Teachers matter on and offline. Internet and Higher Education, 30, 21–29.
Fryer, L. K., Zeng, L. M., & Zhao, Y. (2021b). Assessing university and programme experiences: Towards an integrated Asia-Pacific approach. Frontiers in Education, 6, 1–10.
Grant, A. M., & Berry, J. W. (2011). The necessity of others is the mother of invention: Intrinsic and prosocial motivations, perspective taking, and creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 54(1), 73–96.
Haggis, T. (2002). Exploring the “black box” of process: A comparison of theoretical notions of the “adult learner” with accounts of postgraduate learning experience. Studies in Higher Education, 27(2), 207–220.
Haggis, T. (2003). Constructing images of ourselves? A critical investigation into “approaches to learning” research in higher education. British Educational Research Journal, 29(1), 89–104.
Haggis, T. (2004). Meaning, identity and “motivation”: Expanding what matters in understanding learning in higher education? Studies in Higher Education, 29(3), 335–352.
Haggis, T. (2009). What have we been thinking of? A critical overview of 40 years of student learning research in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 34(4), 377–390.
Harun, N. F., Yusof, K. M., Jamaludin, M. Z., & Hassan, S. A. H. S. (2012). Motivation in problem-based learning implementation. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 56, 233–242.
Hong, Y. (2010). Ethnic groups and educational inequalities: An empirical study of the educational attainment of the ethnic minorities in Western China. Chinese Journal of Sociology (in Chinese), 30(2), 45–73.
Kember, D. (2016). Understanding the nature of motivation and motivating students through teaching and learning in higher education. Springer.
King, R. B., & McInerney, D. M. (2014). Culture’s consequences on student motivation: Capturing universality and variability through personal investment theory. Educational Psychologist, 49, 175–198.
King, R. B., & McInerney, D. M. (2019). Family-support goals drive engagement and achievement in a collectivist context: Integrating etic and emic approaches in goal research. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 58, 338–353.
King, R. B., McInerney, D. M., & Jain, R. (2018). Envisioning a culturally imaginative educational psychology. Educational Psychology Review, 30, 1031–1065.
Kuh, G. D. (2009). The national survey of student engagement: Conceptual and empirical foundations. New Directions for Institutional Research, 141, 5–20.
Kuh, G. D., Kinzie, J. L., Buckley, J. A., Bridges, B. K., & Hayek, J. C. (2006). What matters to student success: A review of the literature (Vol. 8). National Postsecondary Education Cooperative.
Levontin, L., & Bardi, A. (2018). Pro-social goals in achievement situations: Amity goal orientation enhances the positive effects of mastery goal orientation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 44(8), 1258–1269.
Li, H. (2005). Chinese cultural schema of education: Implications for communication between Chinese students and Australian educators. Issues in Educational Research, 15(1), 17–36.
Li, J. (2012). Cultural foundations of learning: East and West. Cambridge University Press.
Liem, G. A. D., Martin, A. J., Porter, A. L., & Colmar, S. (2012). Sociocultural antecedents of academic motivation and achievement: Role of values and achievement motives in achievement goals and academic performance. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 15(1), 1–13.
Luo, Y., Ross, H., & Cen, Y. (2009). Measurement of Higher Education in the Perspective of Cross-Nation Comparison: A report on cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of NSSE-China development. Fudan Education Forum (in Chinese), 7(5), 12–18.
Luo, Y., Xie, M., & Lian, Z. (2019). Emotional engagement and student satisfaction: A study of Chinese college students based on a nationally representative sample. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 28, 283–292.
Makarova, E., & Birman, D. (2015). Cultural transition and academic achievement of students from ethnic minority backgrounds: A content analysis of empirical research on acculturation. Educational Research, 57(3), 305–330.
Marginson, S. (2018). Higher education as self-formation. UCL IOE Press.
Marginson, S. (2020). The relentless price of high individualism in the pandemic. Higher Education Research & Development, 39(7), 1392–1395.
Marginson, S., & Yang, L. (2022). Individual and collective outcomes of higher education: A comparison of Anglo-American and Chinese approaches. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 20(1), 1–31.
Marton, F., & Säljö, R. (1976). On qualitative differences in learning I: Outcome and process. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 4–11.
Nelson Laird, T. F., Seifert, T. A., Pascarella, E. T., Mayhew, M. J., & Blaich, C. F. (2014). Deeply affecting first-year students’ thinking: Deep approaches to learning and three dimensions of cognitive development. Journal of Higher Education, 85(3), 402–432.
Nelson Laird, T. F., Shoup, R., Kuh, G. D., & Schwarz, M. J. (2008). The effects of discipline on deep approaches to student learning and college outcomes. Research in Higher Education, 49(6), 469–494.
Prosser, M., & Trigwell, K. (1999). Understanding learning and teaching: The experience in higher education. SRHE and Open University Press.
Rao, N., & Chan, C. K. (2010). Moving beyond paradoxes: Understanding Chinese learners and their Teachers. In C. Chan & N. Rao (Eds.), Revisiting the Chinese Learner (pp. 3–32). Springer.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54–67.
Sax, L. J., & Harper, C. E. (2007). Origins of the gender gap: Pre-college and college influences on differences between men and women. Research in Higher Education, 48(6), 669–694.
Shi, J., Wen, W., Li, Y., & Chu, J. (2014). China college student survey (CCSS): Breaking the black box of the process of learning. International Journals of Chinese Education, 3(1), 132–159.
Sirin, S. R. (2005). Socioeconomic status and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review of research. Review of Educational Research, 75(3), 417–453.
Tagg, J. (2003). The learning paradigm college. Anker.
Tao, V. Y. K., & Hong, Y. Y. (2014). When academic achievement is an obligation: Perspectives from social-oriented achievement motivation. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 45(1), 110–136.
Urdan, T. C., & Maehr, M. L. (1995). Beyond a two-goal theory of motivation and achievement: A case for social goals. Review of Educational Research, 65(3), 213–243.
Walpole, M. (2003). Socioeconomic status and college: How SES affects college experiences and outcomes. The Review of Higher Education, 27(1), 45–73.
Wang, J., King, R. B., & Rao, N. (2019). The role of social-academic goals in Chinese students’ self-regulated learning. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 34(3), 579–600.
Wentzel, K. R., Muenks, K., McNeish, D., & Russell, S. (2018). Emotional support, social goals, and classroom behavior: A multilevel, multisite study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 110(5), 611–627.
Yang, R., Xie, M., & Wen, W. (2019). Pilgrimage to the West: Modern transformations of Chinese intellectual formation in social sciences. Higher Education, 77(5), 815–829.
Yeager, D. S., & Bundick, M. J. (2009). The role of purposeful work goals in promoting meaning in life and in schoolwork during adolescence. Journal of Adolescent Research, 24(4), 423–452.
Yeager, D. S., Henderson, M. D., Paunesku, D., Walton, G. M., D’Mello, S., Spitzer, B. J., & Duckworth, A. L. (2014). Boring but important: A self-transcendent purpose for learning fosters academic self-regulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107(4), 559–580.
Yin, H. (2018). What motivates Chinese undergraduates to engage in learning? Insights from a psychological approach to student engagement research. Higher Education, 76(5), 827–847.
Yu, A. B., & Yang, K. S. (1987). Social-oriented and individual-oriented achievement motivation: A conceptual and empirical analysis (in Chinese). Bulletin of the Institute of Ethnology, Academia Sinica, 64, 51–98.
Zhu, Y., & Leung, F. K. (2011). Motivation and achievement: Is there an East Asian model? International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9(5), 1189–1212.
Zong, J. (2021). The transformation of classroom under the view of deep learning theory: Structure and path. Journal of Educational Studies, 17(1), 59–72.
Zusho, A., & Kumar, R. (2018). Critical reflections and future directions in the study of race, ethnicity, and motivation. Educational Psychologist, 53(2), 61–63.
Biggs, J. B. (1987). Student approaches to learning and studying. Hawthorn, Victoria: Australian Council for Educational Research.
Daumiller, M., Janke, S., Rinas, R., Dickhäuser, O., & Dresel, M. (2021). Need satisfaction and achievement goals of university faculty: An international study of their interplay and relevance. Higher Education, 1–24.
Entwistle, N. J. (1998). Approaches to learning and forms of understanding. In B. Dart and G. Boulton-Lewis (Eds.), Teaching and Learning in Higher Education (pp. 72–101). Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research.
Fryer, L. K., Bovee, H. N., & Nakao, K. (2021a). Self-efficacy latent growth trajectories’ longitudinal links with achievement and interest: Both baseline and growth rate are important for interest outcomes. British Journal of Educational Psychology, e12473.
Wang, J., & Rao, N. (2020). What do Chinese students say about their academic motivational goals—Reasons underlying academic strivings? Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 1–15.
Yu, A. B., & Yang, K. S. (1994). The nature of achievement motivation in collectivist societies. In U. Kim, H. C. Triandis, C. Kagitcibasi, S. C. Choi, & G. Yoon (Eds.), Individualism and collectivism: Theory, method, and applications (pp. 239–250). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE
Zeng, L. M., Fryer, L. K., & Zhao, Y. (2021). A comparison of three major instruments used for the assessment of university student experience: Toward a comprehensive and distributed approach. Higher Education Quarterly.
Acknowledgements
This research was inspired by the academic dialogue between Professor Gu Mingyuan and Professor Ruth Hayhoe held at Beijing Normal University in 2018 on the global significance of educational development in China. Their dialogue highlighted the collectivist orientation of Chinese Confucian society.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Xie, M., King, R.B. & Luo, Y. Social motivation and deep approaches to learning: a nationwide study among Chinese college students. High Educ 85, 669–687 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-022-00860-6
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-022-00860-6