Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

On the complementarity between online and offline music consumption: the case of free streaming

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Cultural Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

From a representative survey of 2,000 individuals, we study whether consumption of music through streaming services, like Spotify or YouTube, is a substitute or a complement to physical music consumption modes, such as CDs and live music. Controlling for the taste for music, various socio-demographic characteristics and the usual determinants of music consumption either offline (radio, TV, friends/relatives) or online (online recommendations, social networks), our results show that free music streaming (where the consumer does not possess the music but only has access to it) has no significant effect on CD sales and affects positively live music attendance, but only for national or international artists who are more likely to be available on streaming services.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. http://www.musicweek.com/news/read/sweden-record-sales-rise-again-in-2012/053223 [accessed April 5, 2013].

  2. For an empirical approach, see Tu and Lu (2006).

  3. Studies by Oberholzer-Gee and Strumpf (2007), Andersen and Frenz (2010) and Hammond (2012) are the only ones to conclude that piracy has no impact on music sales. However, their conclusions have been called into question by Liebowitz (2010), Barker and Maloney (2012) and Smith and Telang (2012), respectively.

  4. Note that most of these studies relate to a period before the rise of the online market. Waldfogel (2010) is an exception. From a survey of university students, he shows that in the iTunes era—at the time of the survey, digital sales accounted for about a third of US music sales—each additional song illegally obtained reduces paid consumption by between a third and a sixth of a song. This result is close to the results obtained by the previous studies. He also found that consumers value the songs they have illegally obtained less than the songs they have purchased. Waldfogel concludes that “much of the music people consume without paying would otherwise not have been purchased”.

  5. Montoro-Pons and Cuadrado-Garcia (2011) empirically confirm the existence of a positive externality from recorded music consumption to concert attendance.

  6. Quotas have been determined based on the age, the socio-professional category, the gender and the size of the urbain area.

  7. The six sources used are national newspapers, local newspapers, Google news or Yahoo news, Websites of TV channels, blogs and pure players of news on the Internet. For each source, five answers are considered: every day, at least once a week, at least once a month, rarely, never.

  8. The use of an alternative instrument would have improved the robustness of our results; unfortunately, no additional variable in the survey supports both the inclusion and the exclusion conditions.

  9. The GHK algorithm is a simulated likelihood method.

  10. To ensure that the composition of our sample (1,008 Internet users representative of France and 999 representative of Brittany) has no impact on the results of the empirical analysis, we re-estimate the models in Table 4 while only considering the 1,008 Internet users representative of the French population. No qualitative change occurs in this case. Data are available from the authors upon request.

  11. Results of a representative survey of the whole French population on the online consumption of cultural goods (Hadopi 2011).

  12. http://www.snepmusique.com/fr/cpg1-396677-385752-Le-marche-de-la-musique-enregistree---les-resultats-du-1er-trimestre-de-l-annee-2011.html.

References

  • ABI Research (2011) Mobile cloud music services: On-demand, internet radio, discovery, and digital locker services. Research Report.

  • Adermon, A., & Liang, C. (2010) Piracy, music and movies: A natural experiment. IFN Working Paper No. 854.

  • Andersen, B., & Frenz, M. (2010). Don’t blame the P2P file-sharers: The impact of free music downloads on the purchase of music CDs in Canada. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 20(5), 715–740.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, C. (2006). The long tail. London: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bacache, M., Bourreau, M., & Moreau, F. (2012) Piracy and creation: The case of the music industry. European Journal of Law and Economics. doi:10.1007/s10657-012-9360-1.

  • Barker, G., & Maloney, T. (2012) The impact of free music downloads on the purchase of music CDs in Canada. Working Paper Number 4-2012. College of Law, Australian National University.

  • Bastard, I., Bourreau, M., Maillard, S., & Moreau, F. (2012). De la visibilité à l’audience: Le cas des musiciens. Réseaux, 175, 21–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bigot, R., & Croutte, P. (2011). La diffusion des TIC dans la société française. Paris: CREDOC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn, D. (2004) On-line piracy and recorded music sales. Unpublished Manuscript. Harvard University.

  • Bounie, D., Bourreau, M., & Waelbroeck, P. (2007). Pirates or explorers? Analysis of music consumption in French Graduate Schools. Brussels Economic Review, 50(2), 167–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chevalier, J., & Mayzlin, D. (2006). The effect of word of mouth on sales: Online book reviews. Journal of Marketing Research, 43(3), 345–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collopy, D. & Bahanovich, D. (2009) Music experience and music and behaviour in young people, mimeo. Hatfield: University of Hertfordshire.

  • Curien, N., & Moreau, F. (2009). The music industry in the digital era: Towards new contracts? Journal of Media Economics, 22(2), 102–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dewenter, R., Haucap, R., & Wenzel, T. (2012). On file-sharing with indirect network effects between concert ticket sales and music recordings. Journal of Media Economics, 25(3), 168–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gayer, A., & Shy, O. (2006). Publishers, artists, and copyright enforcement. Information Economics and Policy, 18(4), 374–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hadopi. (2011). Hadopi, biens culturels et usages d’internet: Pratiques et perceptions des internautes français. Paris: Hadopi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, R.G. (2012) Profit leak? Pre-release file-sharing and the music industry, mimeo. Raleigh, NC: North Carolina State University.

  • Handke, C. (2011). Economic effect of copyright: The empirical evidence so far. Rotterdam: Report for the National Academies of the Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • IFPI (2012) Recording industry in numbers 2012, international federation of the phonographic industry. (http://www.ifpi.org/).

  • Krueger, A. B. (2005). The economics of real superstars: The market for rock concerts in the material world. Journal of Labor Economics, 23(1), 1–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leung, T. C. (2009) Should the music industry sue its own customers? Impacts of music piracy and policy suggestions. Working Paper. Chinese University of Hong Kong.

  • Liebowitz, S. (2008). Testing file-sharing’s impact on music album sales in cities. Management Science, 54(4), 852–859.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liebowitz, S. (2010) The oberholzer-gee/strumpf file-sharing instrument fails the laugh test, mimeo. Richardson, TX: University of Texas at Dallas.

  • Michel, N. J. (2006) The impact of digital file-sharing on the music industry: An empirical analysis. Topics in Economic Analysis and Policy, 6(1). doi:10.2202/1538-0653.1549.

  • Montoro-Pons, J. D., & Cuadrado-Garcia, M. (2011). Live and prerecorded popular music consumption. Journal of Cultural Economics, 35(1), 19–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mortimer, J., Nosko, C., & Sorensen, A. (2012). Supply responses to digital distribution: Recorded music and live performances. Information Economics and Policy, 24(1), 3–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, P. (1970). Information and consumer behavior. Journal of Political Economy, 78(2), 311–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oberholzer-Gee, F., & Strumpf, K. (2007). The effect of file-sharing on record sales: An empirical analysis. Journal of Political Economy, 115(1), 1–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peitz, M., & Waelbroeck, P. (2004). The effect of internet piracy on CD sales—cross section evidence. Review of the Economic Research, 1, 71–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peitz, M., & Waelbroeck, P. (2005). An economist’s guide to digital music. CESifo Economic Studies, 51(2–3), 359–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peitz, M., & Waelbroeck, P. (2006). Why the music industry may gain from free downloading—The role of sampling. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 24, 907–914.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rob, R., & Waldfogel, J. (2006). Piracy on the high C’s: Music downloading, sales displacement and social welfare in a sample of college students. Journal of Law and Economics, 49(1), 29–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roodman, D. (2009) Estimating fully observed recursive mixed-process models with cmp. Working Paper. Center for Global Development.

  • Smith, M. D., & Telang, R. (2012) Assessing the academic literature regarding the impact of media piracy on sales, mimeo. Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon University.

  • SNEP (2013) Bilan de l’année 2012 du marché de la musique enregistrée. In: Conférence de Presse au MIDEM—28 janvier 2013 (http://proxy.siteo.com.s3.amazonaws.com/www.snepmusique.com/file/presentationdu28janvier2013midemdef.pdf).

  • Thomes, T. P. (2011) An economic analysis of online streaming: How the music industry can generate revenues from cloud computing. Zew Discussion Paper No. 11-039.

  • Tu, Y., & Lu, M. (2006). An experimental and analytical study of on-line digital music sampling strategies. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 10(3), 39–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waldfogel, J. (2010). Music file-sharing and sales displacement in the iTunes era. Information Economics and Policy, 22, 306–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wooldridge, J. M. (2009). Introductory econometrics: A modern approach. Cincinnati: South-Western Publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zentner, A. (2006). Measuring the effect of music downloads on music purchases. Journal of Law and Economics, 49, 63–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank two anonymous reviewers as well as the participants at the 2012 ACEI Conference and the 10th ZEW Conference on the Economics of Information and Communication Technologies for their comments and suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sylvain Dejean.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nguyen, G.D., Dejean, S. & Moreau, F. On the complementarity between online and offline music consumption: the case of free streaming. J Cult Econ 38, 315–330 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10824-013-9208-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10824-013-9208-8

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation